Abstract
Biodiversity-rich, resource-poor countries need to allocate scarce resources to the competing goals of identifying and monitoring their biodiversity and educating their populace about it. Often only relatively wealthy individuals participate in biodiversity-related volunteering, while the poor are left on the margins. We present a case study that shows how monitoring and education can be combined. South African high school scholars from mostly disadvantaged communities participated in ant monitoring in transformed sites and received lessons using their own data. The project provides baseline data on an important insect group in a region where invertebrate monitoring is rare. Participation in a real study enhances the scholars’ interest in science and direct interaction with scientists allows them to enquire about careers they might not otherwise consider. Here we outline how the project works, what participants learnt, and demonstrate that the data provide insights into ant diversity and the effects of landscape transformation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agosti D, Majer JD, Alonso LE, Schultz TR (eds) (2000) Ants: standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington
Andersen AN, Fischer A, Hoffmann BD, Read JL, Richards R (2004) Use of terrestrial invertebrates for biodiversity monitoring in Australian rangelands, with particular references to ants. Austral Ecol 29:87–92. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2004.01362.x
Anonymous (2004a) From laggard to world class. Reforming maths and science education in South Africa. Centre for Development and Enterprise Report No. 13, Johannesburg
Anonymous (2004b) National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act. Act 10 of 2004. South African Government Gazette 467, No. 26436, Cape Town
Anonymous (2007) SANBI Annual Review 2006–2007. Available via www.sanbi.org/anreport0607/index.html. Accessed 20 July 2008
Balmford A, Gaston KJ (1999) Why biodiversity surveys are good value. Nature 398:204–205. doi:10.1038/18339
Bolton B (1994) Identification Guide to the ant genera of the world. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Botes A, McGeoch MA, Robertson HG, van Niekerk A, Davids HP, Chown SL (2006) Ants, altitude and change in the northern Cape Floristic Region. J Biogeogr 33:71–90. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01336.x
Botes A, McGeoch MA, Chown SL (2007) Ground-dwelling beetle assemblages in the northern Cape Floristic Region: patterns, correlates and implications. Austral Ecol 32:210–224. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2007.01681.x
Braschler B (2009) Successfully implementing a citizen-scientist approach to insect monitoring in a resource-poor country. Bioscience 59:103–104. doi:10.1525/bio.2009.59.2.2
Cheesman OD, Key RS (2007) The extinction of experience: a threat to insect conservation? In: Stewart AJA, New TR, Lewis OT (eds) Insect conservation biology. CABI, Wallingford, pp 322–348
Christian CE (2001) Consequences of a biological invasion reveal the importance of mutualism for plant communities. Nature 413:635–639. doi:10.1038/35098093
Christie M, Hanley N, Warren J, Murphy K, Wright R, Hyde T (2006) Valuing the diversity of biodiversity. Ecol Econ 58:304–317. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.07.034
Clarke KR, Warwick RM (1994) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth
Colwell RK (2005) EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 7.5. User’s guide and application. Available via http://purl.oclc.org/estimates). Accessed 22 July 2008
Cowling RM, Lombard AT (2002) Heterogeneity, speciation/extinction history and climate: explaining regional plant diversity patterns in the Cape Floristic Region. Divers Distrib 8:163–179. doi:10.1046/j.1472-4642.2002.00143.x
Davis ALV, Scholtz CH, Chown SL (1999) Species turnover, community boundaries and biogeographical composition of dung beetle assemblages across an altitudinal gradient in South Africa. J Biogeogr 26:1039–1055. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.1999.00335.x
Driver A, Maze K, Rouget M, Lombard AT, Nel J, Turpie JK, Cowling RM, Desmet P, Goodman P, Harris J, Jonas Z, Reyers B, Sink K, Strauss T (2005) National spatial biodiversity assessment 2004: priorities for biodiversity conservation in South Africa. Strelitzia 17. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria
Fuller RA, Irvine KN, Devine-Wright P, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2007) Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biol Lett 3:390–394. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2007.0149
Gaston KJ (1992) Regional numbers of insect and plant species. Funct Ecol 6:243–247. doi:10.2307/2389513
Gaston KJ (2000) Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature 405:220–227. doi:10.1038/35012228
Gaston KJ, Jackson SF, Cantú-Salazar L, Cruz-Piñón G (2008) The ecological performance of protected areas. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39:93–113. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173529
Gore A (1992) Earth in the balance. Earthscan, London
Gore A (2007) The assault on reason. Penguin Press, New York
Hannah L, Midgley G, Hughes G, Bomhard B (2005) The view from the Cape. Extinction risk, protected areas, and climate change. Bioscience 55:231–242. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0231:TVFTCE]2.0.CO;2
Hawkins BA, Porter EE (2003) Does herbivore diversity depend on plant diversity? The case of California butterflies. Am Nat 161:40–49. doi:10.1086/345479
Hoffmann BD, Andersen AN (2003) Responses of ants to disturbance in Australia, with particular reference to functional groups. Austral Ecol 28:444–464. doi:10.1046/j.1442-9993.2003.01301.x
Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg
Infield M (1988) Attitudes of a rural community towards conservation and a local conservation area in Natal, South Africa. Biol Conserv 45:21–46. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(88)90050-X
Johnson SD (1992) Plant–animal relationships. In: Cowling RM (ed) The ecology of Fynbos: nutrients, fire and diversity. Oxford University Press, Cape Town, pp 175–205
Kaspari M, Alonso L, O’Donnell S (2000) Three energy variables predict ant abundance at a geographical scale. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 267:485–489. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1026
Koch SO, Chown SL, Davis ALV, Endrödy-Younga S, Van Jaarsveld AS (2000) Conservation strategies for poorly surveyed taxa: a dung beetle (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) case study form southern Africa. J Insect Conserv 4:45–56. doi:10.1023/A:1009634318926
Kothari A (2006) Community conserved areas. In: Lockwood M, Worboys GL, Kothari A (eds) Managing protected areas. A global guide. Earthscan, London, pp 549–573
Lindenmayer DB (1999) Future directions for biodiversity conservation in managed forests: indicator species, impact studies and monitoring programs. For Ecol Manag 115:277–287
Linder HP (2003) The radiation of the Cape flora, southern Africa. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 78:597–638. doi:10.1017/S1464793103006171
Lovett JC (2008) Urbanisation and over-population. Afr J Ecol 46:461–462. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2028.2008.01040.x
Mayr GL (1868) Formicidae novae americannae collectae a Prof P. de Strobel. Ann Soc Nat Modena 3:161–178
McNeely JA, Lockwood M, Chapman J (2006) Building support for protected areas. In: Lockwood M, Worboys GL, Kothari A (eds) Managing protected areas. A global guide. Earthscan, London, pp 656–676
Midgley GF, Millar HD, Rutherford MC, Powrie LW (2002) Assessing the vulnerability of species richness to anthropogenic climate change in a biodiversity hotspot. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 11:445–451. doi:10.1046/j.1466-822X.2002.00307.x
Midgley GF, Chown SL, Kgope BS (2007) Monitoring effects of anthropogenic climate change on ecosystems: A role for systematic ecological observation? S Afr J Sci 103:282
Miller JR (2005) Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. Trends Ecol Evol 20:430–434. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.013
Mittermeier RA, Robles Gil P, Hoffman M, Pilgrim J, Brooks T, Goettsch Mittermeier C, Lamoureux J, da Fonseca GAB (2004) Hotspots revisited: earth’s biologically richest and most endangered terrestrial ecoregions. Monterrey, Cemex, Conservation International and Agrupación Sierra Madre
Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Goettsch Mittermeier C, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858. doi:10.1038/35002501
Novotný V, Drozd P, Miller SE, Kulfan M, Janda M, Basset Y, Weiblen GD (2006) Why are there so many species of herbivorous insects in tropical rainforests? Science 313:1115–1118. doi:10.1126/science.1129237
Parr CL, Chown SL (2001) Inventory and bioindicator sampling: testing pitfall and Winkler methods with ants in a South African savanna. J Insect Conserv 5:27–36. doi:10.1023/A:1011311418962
Parr CL, Robertson HG, Biggs HC, Chown SL (2004) Response of African savanna ants to long-term fire regimes. J Appl Ecol 41:630–642. doi:10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00920.x
Pergams ORW, Zaradic PA (2008) Evidence for a fundamental and pervasive shift away from nature-based recreation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:2295–2300. doi:10.1073/pnas.0709893105
Procheş Ş, Cowling RM (2006) Insect diversity in Cape Fynbos and neighbouring South African vegetation. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15:445–451
Procheş Ş, Forest F, Veldtman R, Chown SL, Cowling RM, Johnson SD, Richardson DM, Savolainen V (2008) Dissecting the insect-plant relationship in the Cape. Mol Phylogenet Evol. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2008.05.040
Ricklefs RE (2004) A comprehensive framework for global patterns in biodiversity. Ecol Lett 7:1–15. doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00554.x
Samways MJ (2005) Insect diversity conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Samways MJ (2007) Rescuing the extinction of experience. Biodivers Conserv 16:1995–1997. doi:10.1007/s10531-006-9144-4
Santschi F (1923) Revue des fourmis du genre Brachymyrmex Mayr. An Mus Hist B Aires 31:650–678
Scholtz CH, Chown SL (1993) Insect conservation and extensive agriculture: the savanna of southern Africa. In: Gaston KJ, New TR, Samways MJ (eds) Perspectives on insect conservation. Intercept, Andover, pp 75–95
Stewart AJA, New TR (2007) Insect conservation in temperate biomes: issues, progress and prospects. In: Stewart AJA, New TR, Lewis OT (eds) Insect conservation biology. CABI, Wallingford, pp 1–33
Taylor B (2007) The Ants of (sub-Saharan) Africa (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Available via http://antbase.org/ants/africa/. Accessed 21 July 2008
Williams B, Campbell C, Williams R (1995) Broken houses: science and development in the African savannahs. Agric Human Values 12:29–38. doi:10.1007/BF02217294
Ziman J (2007) Science in civil society. Imprint-Academic, Exeter
Acknowledgments
We thank the Western Cape Education Department, T. Botha, the curriculum advisors and teachers, and the many scholars we have worked with for their support. South African National Parks, Cape Nature, S. Milton and W.R.J. Dean, M. van der Bank and various reserve managers provided access to land and permits. C. Boonzaaier, H. Davids, E. Nortje, S. Kritzinger-Klopper, T. Khoza, and several volunteers are thanked for their support over the past 4 years. H. G. Robertson verified some ant identifications. J.C. Roux explained how to spell Iimbovane phonetically. The referees are thanked for their constructive comments. SLC thanks G. Preston for continually asking difficult questions about research relevance. This project is funded by the Centre for Invasion Biology and the UK Darwin Initiative (Ref. 14-012/).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Appendix
Appendix
Box 1. Ant sampling
Ants are collected in 13 transformed sites associated with schools, in 13 natural sites close to the schools that serve as controls, and in a further 7 sites located in habitat types that were otherwise under-represented (Fig. 3). Two grids of 10 pitfall traps each are set in each site in a way that captures the local habitat diversity (Fig. 3). Traps within a grid are 10 m apart. The traps are plastic beakers of 7 cm diameter that are buried so that the rim is flush with the ground. Traps are partly filled with 50% propylene glycol solution. Propylene glycol is a low toxicity catching fluid which prevents ants from escaping and reduces evaporation. Traps are left open for 5 days at a time. Ant collections are done biannually in spring and autumn when ants are most active in this region. Collected samples were rinsed, sorted by trained staff and stored in 70% ethyl alcohol. By-catch with the exception of beetles—which will be processed at our own institution—has been made available to the Agricultural Research Council: South African National Survey of Arachnids (16 February 2009; www.arc.agric.za/home.asp?pid=3235) to avoid wasting specimens.
Box 2. Environmental data
Additional environmental data were collected to examine what factors affect ant diversity patterns:
Topographic data: Scholars used clinometers, global positioning system (GPS) handsets, and compasses to measure, slope, location, elevation, and aspect.
Soil structure and chemical composition: Soil samples were collected once in all sites by taking 20 subsamples randomly in the area of each grid. Soil samples were then analysed in the laboratory for structural factors like sand, clay and stone content as well as for their content of nitrogen, phosphorous and other key nutrients.
Soil surface temperature: Soil surface temperature was measured hourly in pristine sites using small loggers (Thermocron i-Buttons, Semiconductor Corporation, Dallas/Maxim, TX, USA).
Vegetation structure surveys: These formed a key element of the field work done together with the scholars and were conducted each time traps were collected. Measurements were taken every 1 m along transects over the traps, starting five meters before and ending five meters after the last trap. At each point a measurement pole was set and maximum height at which different groups (e.g., grasses or woody shrubs) touched the pole was recorded. Additionally, the total number of intersections of the pole with dead or live vegetation, respectively was recorded every 5 m. The presence of large stones or exposed bedrock was also noted. The data thus collected were used to calculate descriptors of vegetation structure; e.g., vegetation cover was calculated as percentage of measurements taken where at least one plant touched the pole, while maximum vegetation height was the highest point at which any plant touched the pole. While the surveys had to be simple and thus provided only relatively coarse information, the data agreed well with productivity data gained from remote sensing when used to explain ant diversity patterns (data not shown). Ants are in the main not direct users of primary productivity and when using plant materials the interactions tend not to be highly specific. Thus a species-specific vegetation survey seems unlikely to be necessary to explain ant diversity patterns.
Box 3. Effects of habitat transformation on ant species richness and density
In the first 2 years 87,762 individuals belonging to 160 species and morpho-species (from now on also called species) in 32 genera were collected in all sites of the project. Of these 70 species were found in the 13 transformed school sites combined and 149 species were found in the other 21 sites. Transformed sites associated with schools had reduced species and genus richness but similar density to their control sites (Fig. 4; paired t-tests: species richness: t 12 = 4.80, P < .001; density: t 12 = 0.80, P = .44).
The identification of the morpho-species is ongoing. However, it is already clear that new knowledge about the ranges of some South African species has been added. For example we found numerous Diplomorium workers in two sites in the Western Cape representing a Renosterveld site and an ecotonal site between Succulent Karoo and Fynbos. Diplomorium was previously only reported from the Eastern Cape Province at the eastern end of the Cape Floristic Region.
Box 4. Effects of habitat transformation on ant species composition
Species richness was decreased in most transformed sites when compared to natural sites in the same biome (Table 1). This reduced species richness was not due to random absences but rather to differences in how different genera coped with transformation. While some genera did very well in transformed areas others were completely absent from them (electronic supplementary Table S1). Large-bodied species from the genera Camponotus and Pachycondyla were absent or rare in transformed sites, while some small species of the genera Tetramorium and Monomorium reached high densities (Fig. 5). The alien invasive Argentine ant (Linepithema humile) was the most abundant species in many school sites but was only found in one nature reserve, where it had low abundance. Linepithema humile is known negatively to affect many though not all indigenous species (Christian 2001). Indeed, the most common species in transformed sites was the indigenous seed disperser Tetramorium quadrispinosum which has been previously shown to co-exist with L. humile (Christian 2001). This indicates that transformed sites retained some functionality, though it remains to be examined to what degree still present species can fulfil the roles of those that disappeared.
Changes in ant species composition depended on the degree of disturbance. Fig. 6 show the result of non-metric multidimensional scaling (MDS) using pooled data from the first 2 years. Primer 5 version 5.2.0 was used for analysis. In the MDS, sites are arranged in a way that reflects their ranked similarities, so that sites with a more similar species composition are closer together (Clarke and Warwick 1994). A finer division than for the preceding analyses was used. School sites were divided between fully transformed sites (novel habitats like lawns or thickets of alien invasive trees), partly transformed sites (novel habitats with remnants of disturbed but more natural vegetation), and heavily disturbed sites (original vegetation type but heavily impacted by a multitude of factors including trampling, refuse, alien plants, or livestock). Non-school sites were divided between pristine sites, slightly disturbed sites (low-level disturbance, or close to disturbed sites or roads), and moderately disturbed sites (previously heavily disturbed now restored sites or sites with some moderate disturbance). The non-school sites cluster together, indicating that low-level disturbance did not change ant species composition (Fig. 6). By contrast the school sites are clearly separated from the natural sites with the distance greatest for the worst transformation.
MDS also shows that sites within the Cape Floristic Region (Fynbos and Renosterveld) cluster separately from those in the more arid karoo biomes. The only exception was an ecotonal and extralimital site. In contrast the ant species composition of the two karoo biomes seems similar. These findings are interesting in the light of large shifts in biome boundaries predicted for the area as a consequence of climate change (e.g., Midgley et al. 2002; Hannah et al. 2005). Both these findings are also supported by cluster analysis (not shown).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Braschler, B., Mahood, K., Karenyi, N. et al. Realizing a synergy between research and education: how participation in ant monitoring helps raise biodiversity awareness in a resource-poor country. J Insect Conserv 14, 19–30 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-009-9221-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-009-9221-6