Skip to main content
Log in

Realizing a synergy between research and education: how participation in ant monitoring helps raise biodiversity awareness in a resource-poor country

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biodiversity-rich, resource-poor countries need to allocate scarce resources to the competing goals of identifying and monitoring their biodiversity and educating their populace about it. Often only relatively wealthy individuals participate in biodiversity-related volunteering, while the poor are left on the margins. We present a case study that shows how monitoring and education can be combined. South African high school scholars from mostly disadvantaged communities participated in ant monitoring in transformed sites and received lessons using their own data. The project provides baseline data on an important insect group in a region where invertebrate monitoring is rare. Participation in a real study enhances the scholars’ interest in science and direct interaction with scientists allows them to enquire about careers they might not otherwise consider. Here we outline how the project works, what participants learnt, and demonstrate that the data provide insights into ant diversity and the effects of landscape transformation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agosti D, Majer JD, Alonso LE, Schultz TR (eds) (2000) Ants: standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen AN, Fischer A, Hoffmann BD, Read JL, Richards R (2004) Use of terrestrial invertebrates for biodiversity monitoring in Australian rangelands, with particular references to ants. Austral Ecol 29:87–92. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2004.01362.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2004a) From laggard to world class. Reforming maths and science education in South Africa. Centre for Development and Enterprise Report No. 13, Johannesburg

  • Anonymous (2004b) National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act. Act 10 of 2004. South African Government Gazette 467, No. 26436, Cape Town

  • Anonymous (2007) SANBI Annual Review 2006–2007. Available via www.sanbi.org/anreport0607/index.html. Accessed 20 July 2008

  • Balmford A, Gaston KJ (1999) Why biodiversity surveys are good value. Nature 398:204–205. doi:10.1038/18339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton B (1994) Identification Guide to the ant genera of the world. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Botes A, McGeoch MA, Robertson HG, van Niekerk A, Davids HP, Chown SL (2006) Ants, altitude and change in the northern Cape Floristic Region. J Biogeogr 33:71–90. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01336.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botes A, McGeoch MA, Chown SL (2007) Ground-dwelling beetle assemblages in the northern Cape Floristic Region: patterns, correlates and implications. Austral Ecol 32:210–224. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2007.01681.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braschler B (2009) Successfully implementing a citizen-scientist approach to insect monitoring in a resource-poor country. Bioscience 59:103–104. doi:10.1525/bio.2009.59.2.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheesman OD, Key RS (2007) The extinction of experience: a threat to insect conservation? In: Stewart AJA, New TR, Lewis OT (eds) Insect conservation biology. CABI, Wallingford, pp 322–348

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Christian CE (2001) Consequences of a biological invasion reveal the importance of mutualism for plant communities. Nature 413:635–639. doi:10.1038/35098093

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christie M, Hanley N, Warren J, Murphy K, Wright R, Hyde T (2006) Valuing the diversity of biodiversity. Ecol Econ 58:304–317. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.07.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke KR, Warwick RM (1994) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell RK (2005) EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 7.5. User’s guide and application. Available via http://purl.oclc.org/estimates). Accessed 22 July 2008

  • Cowling RM, Lombard AT (2002) Heterogeneity, speciation/extinction history and climate: explaining regional plant diversity patterns in the Cape Floristic Region. Divers Distrib 8:163–179. doi:10.1046/j.1472-4642.2002.00143.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis ALV, Scholtz CH, Chown SL (1999) Species turnover, community boundaries and biogeographical composition of dung beetle assemblages across an altitudinal gradient in South Africa. J Biogeogr 26:1039–1055. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.1999.00335.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver A, Maze K, Rouget M, Lombard AT, Nel J, Turpie JK, Cowling RM, Desmet P, Goodman P, Harris J, Jonas Z, Reyers B, Sink K, Strauss T (2005) National spatial biodiversity assessment 2004: priorities for biodiversity conservation in South Africa. Strelitzia 17. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller RA, Irvine KN, Devine-Wright P, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2007) Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biol Lett 3:390–394. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2007.0149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ (1992) Regional numbers of insect and plant species. Funct Ecol 6:243–247. doi:10.2307/2389513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ (2000) Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature 405:220–227. doi:10.1038/35012228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Jackson SF, Cantú-Salazar L, Cruz-Piñón G (2008) The ecological performance of protected areas. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39:93–113. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gore A (1992) Earth in the balance. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore A (2007) The assault on reason. Penguin Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah L, Midgley G, Hughes G, Bomhard B (2005) The view from the Cape. Extinction risk, protected areas, and climate change. Bioscience 55:231–242. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0231:TVFTCE]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins BA, Porter EE (2003) Does herbivore diversity depend on plant diversity? The case of California butterflies. Am Nat 161:40–49. doi:10.1086/345479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann BD, Andersen AN (2003) Responses of ants to disturbance in Australia, with particular reference to functional groups. Austral Ecol 28:444–464. doi:10.1046/j.1442-9993.2003.01301.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Infield M (1988) Attitudes of a rural community towards conservation and a local conservation area in Natal, South Africa. Biol Conserv 45:21–46. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(88)90050-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson SD (1992) Plant–animal relationships. In: Cowling RM (ed) The ecology of Fynbos: nutrients, fire and diversity. Oxford University Press, Cape Town, pp 175–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaspari M, Alonso L, O’Donnell S (2000) Three energy variables predict ant abundance at a geographical scale. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 267:485–489. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koch SO, Chown SL, Davis ALV, Endrödy-Younga S, Van Jaarsveld AS (2000) Conservation strategies for poorly surveyed taxa: a dung beetle (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) case study form southern Africa. J Insect Conserv 4:45–56. doi:10.1023/A:1009634318926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kothari A (2006) Community conserved areas. In: Lockwood M, Worboys GL, Kothari A (eds) Managing protected areas. A global guide. Earthscan, London, pp 549–573

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB (1999) Future directions for biodiversity conservation in managed forests: indicator species, impact studies and monitoring programs. For Ecol Manag 115:277–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linder HP (2003) The radiation of the Cape flora, southern Africa. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 78:597–638. doi:10.1017/S1464793103006171

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lovett JC (2008) Urbanisation and over-population. Afr J Ecol 46:461–462. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2028.2008.01040.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr GL (1868) Formicidae novae americannae collectae a Prof P. de Strobel. Ann Soc Nat Modena 3:161–178

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeely JA, Lockwood M, Chapman J (2006) Building support for protected areas. In: Lockwood M, Worboys GL, Kothari A (eds) Managing protected areas. A global guide. Earthscan, London, pp 656–676

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley GF, Millar HD, Rutherford MC, Powrie LW (2002) Assessing the vulnerability of species richness to anthropogenic climate change in a biodiversity hotspot. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 11:445–451. doi:10.1046/j.1466-822X.2002.00307.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley GF, Chown SL, Kgope BS (2007) Monitoring effects of anthropogenic climate change on ecosystems: A role for systematic ecological observation? S Afr J Sci 103:282

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller JR (2005) Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. Trends Ecol Evol 20:430–434. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier RA, Robles Gil P, Hoffman M, Pilgrim J, Brooks T, Goettsch Mittermeier C, Lamoureux J, da Fonseca GAB (2004) Hotspots revisited: earth’s biologically richest and most endangered terrestrial ecoregions. Monterrey, Cemex, Conservation International and Agrupación Sierra Madre

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Goettsch Mittermeier C, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858. doi:10.1038/35002501

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Novotný V, Drozd P, Miller SE, Kulfan M, Janda M, Basset Y, Weiblen GD (2006) Why are there so many species of herbivorous insects in tropical rainforests? Science 313:1115–1118. doi:10.1126/science.1129237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parr CL, Chown SL (2001) Inventory and bioindicator sampling: testing pitfall and Winkler methods with ants in a South African savanna. J Insect Conserv 5:27–36. doi:10.1023/A:1011311418962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parr CL, Robertson HG, Biggs HC, Chown SL (2004) Response of African savanna ants to long-term fire regimes. J Appl Ecol 41:630–642. doi:10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00920.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pergams ORW, Zaradic PA (2008) Evidence for a fundamental and pervasive shift away from nature-based recreation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:2295–2300. doi:10.1073/pnas.0709893105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Procheş Ş, Cowling RM (2006) Insect diversity in Cape Fynbos and neighbouring South African vegetation. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15:445–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Procheş Ş, Forest F, Veldtman R, Chown SL, Cowling RM, Johnson SD, Richardson DM, Savolainen V (2008) Dissecting the insect-plant relationship in the Cape. Mol Phylogenet Evol. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2008.05.040

  • Ricklefs RE (2004) A comprehensive framework for global patterns in biodiversity. Ecol Lett 7:1–15. doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00554.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samways MJ (2005) Insect diversity conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Samways MJ (2007) Rescuing the extinction of experience. Biodivers Conserv 16:1995–1997. doi:10.1007/s10531-006-9144-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santschi F (1923) Revue des fourmis du genre Brachymyrmex Mayr. An Mus Hist B Aires 31:650–678

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholtz CH, Chown SL (1993) Insect conservation and extensive agriculture: the savanna of southern Africa. In: Gaston KJ, New TR, Samways MJ (eds) Perspectives on insect conservation. Intercept, Andover, pp 75–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart AJA, New TR (2007) Insect conservation in temperate biomes: issues, progress and prospects. In: Stewart AJA, New TR, Lewis OT (eds) Insect conservation biology. CABI, Wallingford, pp 1–33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor B (2007) The Ants of (sub-Saharan) Africa (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Available via http://antbase.org/ants/africa/. Accessed 21 July 2008

  • Williams B, Campbell C, Williams R (1995) Broken houses: science and development in the African savannahs. Agric Human Values 12:29–38. doi:10.1007/BF02217294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziman J (2007) Science in civil society. Imprint-Academic, Exeter

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Western Cape Education Department, T. Botha, the curriculum advisors and teachers, and the many scholars we have worked with for their support. South African National Parks, Cape Nature, S. Milton and W.R.J. Dean, M. van der Bank and various reserve managers provided access to land and permits. C. Boonzaaier, H. Davids, E. Nortje, S. Kritzinger-Klopper, T. Khoza, and several volunteers are thanked for their support over the past 4 years. H. G. Robertson verified some ant identifications. J.C. Roux explained how to spell Iimbovane phonetically. The referees are thanked for their constructive comments. SLC thanks G. Preston for continually asking difficult questions about research relevance. This project is funded by the Centre for Invasion Biology and the UK Darwin Initiative (Ref. 14-012/).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brigitte Braschler.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 26 kb)

Appendix

Appendix

Box 1. Ant sampling

Ants are collected in 13 transformed sites associated with schools, in 13 natural sites close to the schools that serve as controls, and in a further 7 sites located in habitat types that were otherwise under-represented (Fig. 3). Two grids of 10 pitfall traps each are set in each site in a way that captures the local habitat diversity (Fig. 3). Traps within a grid are 10 m apart. The traps are plastic beakers of 7 cm diameter that are buried so that the rim is flush with the ground. Traps are partly filled with 50% propylene glycol solution. Propylene glycol is a low toxicity catching fluid which prevents ants from escaping and reduces evaporation. Traps are left open for 5 days at a time. Ant collections are done biannually in spring and autumn when ants are most active in this region. Collected samples were rinsed, sorted by trained staff and stored in 70% ethyl alcohol. By-catch with the exception of beetles—which will be processed at our own institution—has been made available to the Agricultural Research Council: South African National Survey of Arachnids (16 February 2009; www.arc.agric.za/home.asp?pid=3235) to avoid wasting specimens.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Survey design. The map shows the locations of sites within the Western Cape Province of South Africa. School sites ranged from novel habitat types like lawns (shown left) to heavily trampled and otherwise impacted natural vegetation (right). Control sites were located in nearby nature reserves (middle) resulting in a matched-pair design. Some additional sites were selected to cover additional habitat types. Two grids with ten pitfall traps each are set in each site

Box 2. Environmental data

Additional environmental data were collected to examine what factors affect ant diversity patterns:

Topographic data: Scholars used clinometers, global positioning system (GPS) handsets, and compasses to measure, slope, location, elevation, and aspect.

Soil structure and chemical composition: Soil samples were collected once in all sites by taking 20 subsamples randomly in the area of each grid. Soil samples were then analysed in the laboratory for structural factors like sand, clay and stone content as well as for their content of nitrogen, phosphorous and other key nutrients.

Soil surface temperature: Soil surface temperature was measured hourly in pristine sites using small loggers (Thermocron i-Buttons, Semiconductor Corporation, Dallas/Maxim, TX, USA).

Vegetation structure surveys: These formed a key element of the field work done together with the scholars and were conducted each time traps were collected. Measurements were taken every 1 m along transects over the traps, starting five meters before and ending five meters after the last trap. At each point a measurement pole was set and maximum height at which different groups (e.g., grasses or woody shrubs) touched the pole was recorded. Additionally, the total number of intersections of the pole with dead or live vegetation, respectively was recorded every 5 m. The presence of large stones or exposed bedrock was also noted. The data thus collected were used to calculate descriptors of vegetation structure; e.g., vegetation cover was calculated as percentage of measurements taken where at least one plant touched the pole, while maximum vegetation height was the highest point at which any plant touched the pole. While the surveys had to be simple and thus provided only relatively coarse information, the data agreed well with productivity data gained from remote sensing when used to explain ant diversity patterns (data not shown). Ants are in the main not direct users of primary productivity and when using plant materials the interactions tend not to be highly specific. Thus a species-specific vegetation survey seems unlikely to be necessary to explain ant diversity patterns.

Box 3. Effects of habitat transformation on ant species richness and density

In the first 2 years 87,762 individuals belonging to 160 species and morpho-species (from now on also called species) in 32 genera were collected in all sites of the project. Of these 70 species were found in the 13 transformed school sites combined and 149 species were found in the other 21 sites. Transformed sites associated with schools had reduced species and genus richness but similar density to their control sites (Fig. 4; paired t-tests: species richness: t 12 = 4.80, P < .001; density: t 12 = 0.80, P = .44).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Ant species richness and density in thirteen transformed sites associated with schools and thirteen control sites. Bars show means and 95% confidence intervals from pooled data from the two collections in 2007 in which all sites were sampled

The identification of the morpho-species is ongoing. However, it is already clear that new knowledge about the ranges of some South African species has been added. For example we found numerous Diplomorium workers in two sites in the Western Cape representing a Renosterveld site and an ecotonal site between Succulent Karoo and Fynbos. Diplomorium was previously only reported from the Eastern Cape Province at the eastern end of the Cape Floristic Region.

Box 4. Effects of habitat transformation on ant species composition

Species richness was decreased in most transformed sites when compared to natural sites in the same biome (Table 1). This reduced species richness was not due to random absences but rather to differences in how different genera coped with transformation. While some genera did very well in transformed areas others were completely absent from them (electronic supplementary Table S1). Large-bodied species from the genera Camponotus and Pachycondyla were absent or rare in transformed sites, while some small species of the genera Tetramorium and Monomorium reached high densities (Fig. 5). The alien invasive Argentine ant (Linepithema humile) was the most abundant species in many school sites but was only found in one nature reserve, where it had low abundance. Linepithema humile is known negatively to affect many though not all indigenous species (Christian 2001). Indeed, the most common species in transformed sites was the indigenous seed disperser Tetramorium quadrispinosum which has been previously shown to co-exist with L. humile (Christian 2001). This indicates that transformed sites retained some functionality, though it remains to be examined to what degree still present species can fulfil the roles of those that disappeared.

Table 1 Species richness in sites included in the Iimbovane project
Fig. 5
figure 5

Abundance in transformed sites within the CFR pooled over the first 2 years and body size range for ant genera. Body size ranges were extracted from Brian Taylor’s “The ants of (sub-Saharan) Africa” (Taylor 2007) and taxonomic papers referenced therein for all species of each genus that were recorded from South Africa and Lesotho. For Brachymyrmex no sizes were reported for South African species and the size range given in Mayr (1868) and Santschi (1923) defining the genus was accepted instead. In polymorphic species all workers including majors were considered and the absolute minimum and maximum values for each genus are reported. The only worker caste excluded was repletes (a caste used as storage vessels) as they would not leave the nest. Bars for genera not represented in transformed sites are slightly offset for better visibility. Genus abbreviations are: Acr Acropyga, Ano1 Anochetus, Ano2 Anoplolepis, Bra Brachymyrmex, Cam Camponotus, Car Cardiocondyla, Cre Crematogaster, Dip Diplomorium, Dor Dorylus, Hyp Hypoponera, Lep1 Lepisiota, Lep2 Leptogenys, Lin Linepithema, Mer Meranoplus, Mes Messor, Mon Monomorium, Nes Nesomyrmex, Ocy Ocymyrmex, Oli Oligomyrmex, Pac Pachycondyla, Phe Pheidole, Pla Plagiolepis, Pol Polyrhachis, Pyr Pyramica, Sol Solenopsis, Tap1 Tapinolepis, Tap2 Tapinoma, Tec Technomyrmex, Tet1 Tetramorium, Tet2 Tetraponera

Changes in ant species composition depended on the degree of disturbance. Fig. 6 show the result of non-metric multidimensional scaling (MDS) using pooled data from the first 2 years. Primer 5 version 5.2.0 was used for analysis. In the MDS, sites are arranged in a way that reflects their ranked similarities, so that sites with a more similar species composition are closer together (Clarke and Warwick 1994). A finer division than for the preceding analyses was used. School sites were divided between fully transformed sites (novel habitats like lawns or thickets of alien invasive trees), partly transformed sites (novel habitats with remnants of disturbed but more natural vegetation), and heavily disturbed sites (original vegetation type but heavily impacted by a multitude of factors including trampling, refuse, alien plants, or livestock). Non-school sites were divided between pristine sites, slightly disturbed sites (low-level disturbance, or close to disturbed sites or roads), and moderately disturbed sites (previously heavily disturbed now restored sites or sites with some moderate disturbance). The non-school sites cluster together, indicating that low-level disturbance did not change ant species composition (Fig. 6). By contrast the school sites are clearly separated from the natural sites with the distance greatest for the worst transformation.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Non-metric multidimensional scaling analysis of all sites in the Iimbovane project based on Bray-Curtis similarity. The analysis is based on the pooled abundance data for each species for the first 2 years of the project. In a few sites which joined the project later the actual period sampled is shorter. Data were 4th root-transformed prior to analysis to decrease the effect of very abundant species. Black symbols denote sites within the Cape Floristic Region (Fynbos and Renosterveld area) while open symbols denote sites in the Succulent Karoo. Grey symbols denote sites located within the Nama-Karoo biome. Degree of disturbance: P Pristine, SD Slightly disturbed, MD Moderately disturbed, HD Heavily disturbed, PT Partly transformed else heavily disturbed, T Fully transformed (see Box 4 for explanation of categories)

MDS also shows that sites within the Cape Floristic Region (Fynbos and Renosterveld) cluster separately from those in the more arid karoo biomes. The only exception was an ecotonal and extralimital site. In contrast the ant species composition of the two karoo biomes seems similar. These findings are interesting in the light of large shifts in biome boundaries predicted for the area as a consequence of climate change (e.g., Midgley et al. 2002; Hannah et al. 2005). Both these findings are also supported by cluster analysis (not shown).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Braschler, B., Mahood, K., Karenyi, N. et al. Realizing a synergy between research and education: how participation in ant monitoring helps raise biodiversity awareness in a resource-poor country. J Insect Conserv 14, 19–30 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-009-9221-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-009-9221-6

Keywords

Navigation