Skip to main content
Log in

Niche differentiation and preferences of Elaphrus cupreus Duftschmid, 1812 and Elaphrus uliginosus (Fabricius, 1792) (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as reason for their different endangerment in Central Europe

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ecological demands were studied in Elaphrus cupreus, a frequent species, and E. uliginosus, one of the most endangered carabids in Europe. Ecological experiments were performed in the laboratory and the field in northern Germany. Abundance was measured using the mark-and-recatch method. Both species prefer sites with water content changes lower than 25%. E. uliginosus prefers higher temperatures than E. cupreus and niche breadth was on average wider in E. cupreus than in E. uliginosus. E. uliginosus is restricted to grassland sites with a low fraction (>0 and 25%) of bare soil. E. cupreus was mainly found on sites having >75–100% bare soil. This preference of E. uliginosus can be referred to its high temperature demands using open regions for warming up and its predatory behaviour using hideouts for a rapid predatory push. The wider niche structure and lower temperature demand of E. cupreus allows the inhabitation of cooler alder woods. It prefers large fractions of bare soil because its predatory behaviour is to run randomly on the soil. Thus, E. uliginosus demands wet extensively grazed grassland where cattle produces low fractions of bare soil, while E. cupreus prefers intensively grazed sites in grassland or alder woods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams P (1980) Some comments on measuring niche overlap. Ecology 61:44–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen J (1985) Ecomorphological adaptations of riparian Bembidiini species (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Entomol Generalis 11:41–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer T (1974) Ethologische, autökologische und ökophysiologische und ökophysiologische Untersuchungen an Elaphrus cupreus Dft. und Elaphrus riparius L. (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Oecologia 14:139–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer T, Bath M (1976) Zur etho-ökologischen Differenzierung und Nischenbildung der Raschkäfer-Arten Elaphrus riparius, aureus und ulrichi (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Entomol German 2:209–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Burmeister F (1939) Biologie, Ökologie und Verbreitung der europäischen Käfer auf systematischer Grundlage. I. Band: Adephaga Hans Goecke, Krefeld

  • Desender K, Turin H (1989) Loss of habitats and changes in the composition of the ground and tiger beetle fauna in four West European countries since 1950 (Coleoptera: Carabidae, Cicindelidae). Biol Conserv 48:277–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ (1994) Rarity. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulet H (1983) The genera of holarctic Elaphrini and species of Elaphrus Fabricius (Coleoptera: Carabidae): classification, phylogeny and zoogeography. Quaestion Entomol 19:219–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoernes U, Irmler U (2004) Räumliche Verteilung epigäischer Carabiden in einer halboffenen Weidelandschaft in Abhängigkeit von Nutzung und Standortparametern. Faunistisch-Ökolog Mitt Suppl 31:57–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Irmler U, Gürlich S (2004) Die ökologische Einordnung der Laufkäfer (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in Schleswig-Holstein. Faunistisch-Ökolog Mitt Suppl 32:1–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch D (1985) Morphologische und öko-physiologische Differenzierung, Speziation und Verbreitung der Arten des Pterostichus nigrita-Komplexes (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Dissertation, University Cologne

  • Krebs C (1998) Ecological methodology. Addison Wesley Longman, Menlo Park

  • Krebs C (2002) Ecological methodology 6.1. Dept. of Zoology, University of British, Columbia

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindroth CH (1992) The Carabidae (Coleoptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. A Zoogeographic study Part I. The National Science Foundation, Washington

  • Mikami OK, Kawata M (2004) Does interspecific territoriality reflect the intensity of eclogical interactions? A theoretical model for interspecific territoriality. Evol Ecol Res 6:765–775

    Google Scholar 

  • Perttune V (1951) The humidity preferences of various carabid species (Col., Carabidae) of wet and dry habitats. Suom Hyönteistieteell Aikakausk 17:72–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Reck H, Mörsdorf S, Trautner J, Kaule G (1999) Die Entwicklung neuer Lebensräume auf landwirtschaftlich genutzten Flächen. Angew Landschaftsökol 21:1–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribera I, Doédec S, Downie IS, Foster GN (2001) Effect of land disturbance and stress on species traits of ground beetles assemblages. Ecology 82:1112–1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrautzer J, Rinker A, Jensen K, Müller F, Schwartze P, Dierssen K (2007) Succession and restoration of drained fens: perspectives from Northwestern Europe. In: Walker L, Walker J, Hobbs R (eds) Linking restoration and ecological succession. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiner R (2007) Elaphrus uliginosus und Elaphrus cupreus. Ein ökologischer Vergleich zwischen einer seltenen und einer häufigen Laufkäferart (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Faunistisch-Ökolog Mitt Suppl 34:5–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz B, Reck H (2004) Großflächige extensive Beweidung und die Habitate von Elaphrus uliginosus im Vergleich zu denen der anderen Elaphrinae Schleswig-Holsteins. Angew Carabidol 6:43–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Statsoft (1996) Statistica für windows (Computer-Programm-Handbuch). StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, USA

  • Theiss S, Heimbach U (1994) Präimaginale Larvalentwicklung der Laufkäfer-Art Poecilus cupreus in Abhängigkeit von Bodenfeuchte und Temperatur (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Entomol Generalis 19:57–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiele H (1977) Carabid beetles in their environments. Springer, Berlin

  • Turin H, Alders K, den Boer PJ, van Essen S, Heijerman T, Laane W, Penterman E (1991) Ecological characterization of carabid species (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in the Netherlands from thirty years of pitfall sampling. Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 134:278–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanntorp HE, Sjödin G (2003) Beetles of the Stockholm area – new records and rediscoveries. Entomol Tidskrit 124:65–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber F (1965) Vergleichende Untersuchungen über das Verhalten von Carabus-Arten in Luftfeuchtigkeitsgefällen. Zeitsch Morphol Ökol Tiere 55:233–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrich Irmler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schreiner, R., Irmler, U. Niche differentiation and preferences of Elaphrus cupreus Duftschmid, 1812 and Elaphrus uliginosus (Fabricius, 1792) (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as reason for their different endangerment in Central Europe. J Insect Conserv 13, 193–202 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-008-9142-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-008-9142-9

Keywords

Navigation