Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Commentary to the article Acute and long-term results with the 3rd generation visually guided laser balloon ablation system for PV isolation
Cardiac catheter ablation procedures especially pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), as the currently most effective treatment option for atrial fibrillation (AF), are complex procedures with a relatively long learning curve. To reduce complexity and to improve safety, efficacy and efficiency single-shot devices have been introduced and shown promising acute and long-term success rates in numerous registries, studies, and randomized controlled clinical trials.1 Various catheter designs and energy sources have been evaluated in latest years, with the cryoballoon (CB) as the most common single-shot device with high level of clinical evidence [1]. Nevertheless, single-shot devices with a fixed size like the cryoballoon and the radiofrequency balloon have several limitations because the pulmonary vein anatomy strongly varies across patients [2, 3]. The visually guided laser balloon ablation system (HeartLight, CardioFocus, Marlborough, MA, USA) is a balloon-based ablation system which is utilizing laser light energy for lesion formation. Its design has been modified and optimized to its current version (X3, CardioFocus) and has been shown high PVI durability and similar clinical success compared to radiofrequency- and CB-based PVI [4, 5]. The X3 system offers a continuous sizeable balloon diameter and an automated continuous lesion formation [5].
In this issue of the Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Funasako et al. demonstrated safety, efficacy, and promising long-term follow-up utilizing the X3 for paroxysmal (PAF) and persistent AF (PersAF) patients. A total of 110 AF patients have been included and treated by the X3 laserballoon. The continuous ablation mode “RAPID mode” was applied to 99.5% of pulmonary veins, and 32.8% pulmonary veins were treated by the RAPID mode only. 91.1% of pulmonary veins were isolated on the first circumferential lesion and did not require any radiofrequency current touch up ablation. During the index procedure, 100% of pulmonary veins were successfully isolated. These observations connote that the X3 has been used as a real single-short device in about 1/3 of PVs with relative high rate of continuous lesion applications utilizing the RAPID mode. The mean procedure time was 77.0±22.7 min with a LA dwelling time of 61.9 ± 22.0 min. Periprocedural complications were limited to three transient phrenic nerve injuries. The 1-year AF free survival rate was 93.7% in PAF patients and 81.1% in PersAF patients.
Although these findings are promising there are several limitations utilizing the X3 system. Although a sizable balloon might lead to individualized PVI, this effect has not lead to improve outcome which was recently shown by Chun et al. comparing CB vs laser balloon-based PVI in AF patients [4]. Additionally the procedure time for X3 is longer in comparison to recent studies focusing on CB systems [4, 6]. As also observed in the studies by Funasako et al., Schmidt et al., and Heeger et al., a relatively high pinhole rate of 7–14%, leading to the necessity of a catheter exchange, has been reported for the X3 system [5, 7]. Due to these observations, the X3 balloon material has been recently modified to be more robust; however, there is no data available for this modification until today.
Contrary to thermal ablation energy sources like radiofrequency, laser light and cryotherapy pulsed field ablation (PFA) offers a unique non-thermal ablation modality with promising safety and efficacy advantages [8]. Cardiac tissue ablation is therefore not performed by thermal injury but by exposition to repetitive and rapid high-voltage electrical fields. Despite the fact that cardiac cells are destabilized within milliseconds, PFA offers the unique opportunity of selectivity to myocardial tissue while sparing non-myocardial cells. The combination of these two features (speed and selectivity) of PFA implies this novel ablation modality to be an ideal technology for safe, simple, fast, and effective single-shot devices which has been recently shown with the introduction of the FARAPULSE system. With this system, safe and effective PVI has been performed within a mean procedure time of 38±13 min in the 5S study and after further simplification and limitation to a single-sheath approach within 27.4±6.6 min [9, 10].
In summary, PVI by the X3 laser balloon system was safe, feasible, and effective in this single-center study. However, due to the fact that PFA offers fast, simple, safe, and selective cardiac tissue ablation, this novel modality might be the optimal energy source for single-shot devices.
Additionally, the current available PFA systems are only first generation, and further optimized PFA systems, catheter designs, and single-tip PFA catheter are approaching. Therefore, thermal energy modalities like laser light ablation procedures in its current form and catheter designs will have a hard times asserting themselves. However, as usual, only randomized clinical trials will offer powered data to draw final conclusions.
References
Kuck K-H, Brugada J, Fürnkranz A, et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:2235–45.
Heeger C-H, Tscholl V, Wissner E, et al. Acute efficacy, safety, and long-term clinical outcomes using the second-generation cryoballoon for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with a left common pulmonary vein: a multicenter study. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:1111–8.
Bordignon S, My I, Tohoku S, et al. Efficacy and safety in patients treated with a novel radiofrequency balloon: a two centres experience from the AURORA collaboration. Europace. 2023;25:euad106.
Chun JKR, Bordignon S, Last J, et al. Cryoballoon versus laserballoon: insights from the first prospective randomized balloon trial in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2021;14:e009294.
Heeger C-H, Tiemeyer CM, Phan H-L, et al. Rapid pulmonary vein isolation utilizing the third-generation laserballoon – the PhoeniX registry. Int J Cardiol Hear Vasc. 2020;29:100576.
Tilz RR, Meyer-Saraei R, Eitel C, et al. Novel cryoballoon ablation system for single shot pulmonary vein isolation — the prospective ICE-AGE-X study —. Circ J. 2021;85:1296–304.
Schmidt B, Petru J, Chun KRJ, et al. Pivotal study of a novel motor-driven endoscopic ablation system. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2021;14:e009544.
Heeger C-H, Tilz RR. Pulsed-field ablation—are we ready for fast and furious atrial tachycardia ablation? J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023:1–2.
Schmidt B, Bordignon S, Tohoku S, et al. 5S study: safe and simple single shot pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field ablation using sedation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2022;15:e010817.
Tilz RR, Vogler J, Kirstein B, et al. Pulsed field ablation-based pulmonary vein isolation using a simplified single-access single-catheter approach — the fast and furious PFA study —. Circ J. 2023:CJ-23-0389.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
CHH received travel grants and research grants from Boston Scientific, Lifetech, Biosense Webster, and Cardiofocus and speaker honoraria from Boston Scientific, Biosense Webster, Cardiofocus, and C.T.I. GmbH and Doctrina Med. RRT is a consultant for Boston Scientific, Biotronik, and Biosense Webster and received speaker honoraria from Biosense Webster, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Abbot Medical.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This comment refers to the article available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-023-01499-8
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Heeger, CH., Tilz, R.R. Laser light in the era of pulsed field ablation — still a competitor?. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 67, 29–30 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-023-01664-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-023-01664-z