Abstract
Background
Cryoballoon (CB)-guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an established treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). This observational study aimed to assess the role of individual anatomical characteristics to predict long-term freedom from arrhythmia recurrence after CB-guided PVI for paroxysmal AF (PAF).
Methods
Three hundred fifty three consecutive patients (58 ± 11 years, 56% males), undergoing PVI between 2012 and 2018 were analysed. Individual pulmonary vein (PV) anatomy was assessed using preprocedural cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). For each PV, the cross-sectional area (CSA) was calculated. The impact of PV characteristics and CSA on long-term AF-free survival was evaluated.
Results
Acute PVI was achieved in all patients. Two hundred twenty-three patients (63%) had a normal PV anatomy (2 left- and 2 right-sided PV). Variant PV anatomy was present in 130 patients (37%). During the observation period of 48 months, AF-recurrence was documented in 167 patients (47 %). Patients with AF-recurrence presented with significantly enlarged right-sided PVs and left superior PVs (LSPVs) (p < 0.001). The presence of left common PVs (LCPVs) (n = 75, Log-rank p < 0.001) as well as right variant PVs (n = 35, Log rank p < 0.001) was associated with a significantly impaired long-term AF-free survival rate as compared to patients with normal PV characteristics.
Conclusion
Variant PV anatomy is a good predictor for AF-recurrence. A correlation between an enlarged CSA of right-sided PVs as well as LSPVs and AF-recurrence was documented.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common rhythm disorder, which is often associated with an impaired quality of life, stroke, dementia, and heart failure [1, 2]. Interventional therapy has become a class IA-recommendation for symptomatic drug-refractory paroxysmal AF (PAF) [1]. The FIRE-ICE study identified cryoballoon-ablation (CBA) as non-inferior to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) regarding efficacy and safety aspects [2]. Compared to RFA, CBA is associated with a rapid learning curve [3] and shorter procedure duration [2]. CBA results in a favourable long-term outcome [4]. Meanwhile, novel balloon-guided single-shot devices have been introduced [5]. Nevertheless, PV-reconnection remains an issue [5, 6]. Since complete occlusion of the PV ostium is the cornerstone for PVI, individual anatomical characteristics and ostial dimensions of PVs may have an impact on AF-free survival. In this context, long-term follow-up data are lacking.
2 Methods
2.1 Patients
This observational single-centre study included 353 consecutive patients undergoing CB-guided catheter ablation for symptomatic and drug refractory PAF between 2012 and 2018. Patients with a left ventricular dysfunction, a relevant mitral valve disease and a previous AF ablation were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups: regular versus variant pulmonary vein anatomy. We compared clinical characteristics and effects of PV anatomy on freedom from arrhythmia recurrence. The diagnosis of PAF was made using the definition from the ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and the management of AF [1]. Arrhythmia recurrence was defined as documented episode of any atrial tachycardia (AT)/AF > 30 s. AF-recurrence within the first 12 months excluding the blanking period of 90 days is defined as “early AF-recurrence.”
2.2 Procedural management
All patients underwent preprocedural transoesophageal echocardiography to rule out left atrial thrombus formation. Antiarrhythmic agents (AADs) except for amiodarone were discontinued at least 48 h before ablation. Anticoagulation with phenprocoumon was continued aiming for an International Normalized Ratio (INR) between 2.0 and 3.0. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) were stopped one half-life before ablation. Pericardial effusion was ruled out immediately after ablation and the next day thereafter. Anticoagulation was continued within 4 h after the procedure with phenprocoumon or DOAC when there was no evidence for pericardial effusion. AADs were prescribed to the operators’ discretion for a period of 3 months following ablation.
2.3 Assessment of PV anatomy and size
All patients underwent MRI with (1.5 or 3 Tesla) prior to the ablation procedure. Cine imaging was performed in an end-expiration breath-hold using a standard multislice balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) technique (effective TR 2.7 ms, TE 1.3 ms, 1.4 × 1.4 mm2 in-plane, slice thickness 10 mm, 50 phases). Contrast was injected with a dose of 0.1–0.2 mmol/kg at a rate of 1–2 mL/s, followed by saline flash. CSA was determined according to the established method described by Kato et al. In detail, PV diameters were measured in superoinferior and anteroposterior directions. To determine the long axis of the PV, axial and coronal tomograms at the junction of the PV and LA were displayed, and then oblique coronal and oblique axial images were identified parallel to each PV. The PV ostium was defined as the point of inflection between the LA wall and the PV wall [7]. Along with conventional MRI scans, we additionally reconstructed a 3D model of each PV, which facilitated the distinction between ostium and antrum. The size of each PV was given in coronary (D1) and transversal (D2) diameter. The cross-sectional area (CSA) was calculated using the following equation, p × (1/2 × D1 × D2) allowing for an approximate determination of the PV ostium dimension (Fig. 1).
2.4 Ablation procedure
The procedure was performed under conscious sedation with propofol and sufentanil. Intravenous heparin was administered to maintain an activated clotting time (ACT) of 300 s throughout the procedure.
The 28-mm AFA cryoballoon (Arctic Front Advance, Medtronic) was applied in all procedures. Following transseptal puncture, the balloon device was advanced into the LA via a steerable sheath (15-F FlexCath advance Medtronic). A multipolar mapping catheter (Achieve Advance Mapping Catheter, Medtronic) was used for PV mapping.
Diaphragmatic excursion during ablation of the right-sided veins was confirmed via continuous stimulation of the phrenic nerve and compound motor action potential (CMAP) visualization. Complete PV-occlusion prior to each freezing cycle was confirmed by PV-angiography with contrast media injection with the balloon inflated and placed at the PV-ostia. If an antral LCPV occlusion could not be obtained, a sequential ablation approach was adapted. At first, the first superior branch of the LCPV was targeted, followed by ablation of the first inferior branch. To verify complete occlusion of the targeted LCPV branch, contrast medium was injected. To achieve complete occlusion of RMPVs, the ablation technique described above was applied. In addition, “hockey stick,” “loop,” and “pull-down” techniques were performed, if necessary. Ablation was performed adherent to a 2*180s freeze per vein protocol. Persistent PVI (entrance and exit block) was confirmed after a waiting period of 20 min. Bonus freezes were not applied during standard protocol ablation but could have been used at the discretion of the operator. If isolation was not achieved, touch-up ablation with a focal cryo-energy catheter (Freezor MAX; Medtronic) was performed.
2.5 Follow-up
After discharge, follow-up visits were scheduled at 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure, including 7-day-Holter-ECGs and interviews. Thereafter, 24-h-Holter ECGs were performed every 6 months during the whole observation period of 48 months. Additional unscheduled visits were performed in case of complaints. The total observation duration was 48 months. Most patients were followed up in our outpatient clinic. The other patients kindly provided their follow-up reports on our request.
2.6 Statistical analysis
All calculations were performed using the statistical package for the social sciences (IBM SPSS Statistics 27.0). The chi-squared test was used for categorical variables and Student’s t test for comparison of continuous variables. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or percentage value (%) unless stated otherwise. A two-tailed p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Multivariate analysis was conducted using multiple logistic regression. Data processing and analysis was performed using Excel 2010 (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA). Event-free survival was calculated by Kaplan–Meier analysis as time from initial PVI to first documented AF/AT episode > 30 s. AF-recurrence within the blanking period of 90 days was excluded from data analyses. The log-rank test was used to assess differences in event-free survival time between two groups: normal versus variant PV anatomy.
3 Results
3.1 Study population
The study population consisted of 353 consecutive patients (58 ± 11 years old, 56% males) who underwent an index CBA for symptomatic PAF. Baseline parameter is summarized in Table 1. No major, relevant differences were observed between the groups.
3.2 Procedural data
Acute PVI was achieved in all patients (n = 353, 100%). Procedural data of patients with a normal PV anatomy were compared to those patients with variant PV characteristics (Table 1). Although, procedural and fluoroscopy times were slightly longer in the variant PV-anatomy cohort of patients, this difference did not reach statistical relevance. Nadir temperatures and freezing times were similar between both groups (Table 2).
3.3 Clinical outcome depending on PV anatomy
Two hundred twenty-three patients (63%) presented with a regular PV anatomy (2 right- and 2 left-sided PVs). A variant PV anatomy was present in 130 patients (37%) and distributed as follows: 27% (n = 95) left common ostium (LCPV), 5% (n = 16) right middle PV (RMPV), 5% (n = 19) right common ostium (RCPV). Further details are summarized in Table 3.
3.3.1 12-months’ follow up
Patients with AF-recurrence within 12 months (n = 68, 19%) significantly more often presented with a variant PV anatomy in comparison to patients with AF-free survival within this observation period (n = 37, 54% vs. n = 31, 46%, p < 0.001). Among those patients with early AF-recurrence, significantly more right-sided variant PVs were observed (p < 0.001). Details are presented in Table 3. Kaplan-Meier plot analyses demonstrated a significantly impaired 12-month AF-free survival rate in patients with right-sided variant PV characteristics (Log-rank p = 0.008).
3.3.2 48-months’ follow up
One hundred sixty-seven patients (47%) have had AF-recurrence within the observation period of 48 months. Fifty-nine percent of them (n = 99) suffered from late AF-recurrence. Significantly more patients with variant PV characteristics (n = 59, 45%) presented with late AF-recurrence compared to those with a normal PV anatomy (n = 40, 18%) (p < 0.001) (Table 3).
No patient was lost to follow-up. Kaplan-Meier plot survival analyses demonstrate a significantly higher probability of AF-recurrence among patients with variant PV characteristics. Both, patients with a LCPV (Log-rank p < 0.001) and those with right variant PVs (Log-rank p < 0.001), present with a significantly worse long-term outcome following CBA. Details on patients’ AF-free survival are summarized in Figs. 2 and 3.
3.3.3 Clinical outcome depending on CSA
Concerning CSA dimensions, patients with AF-recurrence within the observation period of 48 months presented with significantly enlarged LSPVs and right-sided PVs as well as significantly greater dimensions of LCPVs. Details are gathered in Table 4.
3.3.4 Multivariate analysis
Multivariate Cox Regression model calculation revealed the presence of right-sided PVs and a LCPV as independent predictors for AF-recurrence (Table 5).
3.4 Complications
One patient (< 1%) developed a pericardial effusion after the procedure, and 3 patients (1%) had vascular groin complications (pseudoaneurysm of the femoral vein) not requiring intervention. No further postprocedural complications were observed.
4 Discussion
This study has two major findings: First, variant PV anatomy seems to be predictive for long-term AF-recurrence in PAF. LCPVs and right variant PVs were revealed as independent predictors for AF-recurrence following CB-guided PVI. Second, a correlation between AF-recurrence and an enlarged CSA was observed for LSPVs and right-sided PVs.
4.1 Variant pulmonary vein anatomy
In our previous study comparing two single-shot devices, patients with a variant PV anatomy presented with a significantly higher 12-month AF-recurrence rate (69%) compared to patients with a regular PV anatomy (44%) (p < 0.001) [8]. In our present study, we analysed patients’ 48-month long-term arrhythmia outcome. In line with the previously published study [8], variant PV characteristics were significantly more often observed in the AF-cohort compared to the No-AF group of patients (Table 3; Fig. 2). In detail, significantly more LCPVs, RCPVs and RMPVs were found in the AF-cohort of patients (p < 0.001) (Table 3; Fig. 2). The presence of variant PV characteristics, a right variant PV anatomy and a LCPV were revealed as independent predictors for AF-recurrence (Table 5).
Smaller CBA studies comparing AF-free survival rates depending on the presence of a LCPV reported on similar results [9, 10]. But compared to prior publications, our present study is the first to present 48 month long-term outcome data after single-shot guided CBA for PAF in a large cohort of patients depending on PV anatomy. Çöteli et al. compared AF-freedom after CBA and RFA depending on the presence of a LCPV in patients with PAF and PERS AF [11]. Mid-term AF/AT-recurrence-free survival between CBA and RFA did not differ significantly (p = 0.235). Similar results were presented by Khoueiry et al. comparing 15-month outcome data after CBA and RFA among patients with PAF and PERS AF depending on variant PV anatomy characteristics [12]. These results may be caused by the analysis of PAF and PERS AF as in our previous study, significant differences were observed between PAF and PERS AF. Especially in PAF, variant PV characteristics had a significant impact on AF-free survival whereas PV characteristics seem to play a minor role in PERS AF most likely due to advanced stages of atrial fibrosis and scar formation [8]. Moreover, different classifications and definitions for the left common ostium used in prior studies may in part explain discrepant results, too [11,12,13].
The incidence of a RMPV among AF-patients is being reported to be 20% [12]. In our study, 13% of all patients with AF-recurrence had a RMPV (Table 3). A meta-analysis of Cheruiyot et al., including 12 CBA and RFA studies, demonstrated a significant association between the presence of a RMPV and AF-recurrence (OR = 1.85, 95% CI 1.26–2.72, p = 0.002) [14]. The authors suggested that technical difficulties in reaching a small PV may be the reason for AF-recurrence in these patients. Additionally, they proposed that small PVs can be easily overseen during ablation [14].
These results match our findings, as patients with right-variant PVs presented with the poorest outcome (Fig. 2). The data given above suggests that a more complex understanding of PV characteristics is strongly required to improve patients’ outcome.
4.2 Cross-sectional area of the pulmonary vein
The crucial moment in achieving acute PVI is not just the complete vein occlusion but also a wide antral ablation. It is well-recognized that antral positioning is more efficient in terms of long-term results [15]. It could be explained by involving more arrhythmogenic aerials of PV-LA connection sometimes also including the posterior wall of the LA. A wide antral ablation became more feasible after introducing the 2nd-generation cryoballoon. It allows for a shorter procedure duration and enables proper positioning in challenging PV anatomy [16, 17]. Although complete occlusion was routinely confirmed angiographically for each PV, we revealed a significant correlation between enlarged right-sided PVs as well as LSPVs and 48-month AF-recurrence rates (Table 4). These results act in concert with our previous study, analysing patients’ 12-month outcome data [8]. Another study by Güler et al. revealed the size of the RSPV as independent predictor for AF-recurrence [18]. This supports the hypothesis that PV anatomy seems to be an important issue [19]. Dilated PV orifices may lead to structural and electrical remodeling processes of the PVs that trigger AF recurrence. However, Bose et al. showed that PV-dimensions do not have a statistically significant impact on AF freedom [20]. These differences may be caused by procedural differences.
Further studies are warranted, e.g., comparing the impact of different ablation strategies (CBA vs. RFCA) on the outcome following catheter ablation for PAF in patients with variant PV characteristics.
5 Limitations
Since the size of PVs is not constant and changing throughout the cardiac cycle and depending on hydration status and left atrial geometry, it may have an influence on the measurements done during preprocedural imaging. For each PV, The CSOA of the PVs was calculated using the following equation p × (1/2 × D1 × D2) allowing for an approximate, not an exact determination of the PV ostium dimension. The stable size of the 28-mm CB could have led to more distal ablation lesions in enlarged PVs. Thus, we cannot exclude an influence of rather distal ablation lesion in enlarged PVs on patients’ AF-free survival. The subgroup of patients with right variant PV characteristics is quite small. Further studies are warranted to confirm our initial observations.
6 Conclusion
Variant PV anatomy predicted 48-month long-term AF-recurrence following single-shot–guided CBA. Patients with right-variant PVs presented with the worst outcome in terms of arrhythmia recurrence. A correlation between the CSA of right-sided PVs as well as LSPVs and AF-recurrence was demonstrated.
References
Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, Arbelo E, Bax JJ, Blomström-Lundqvist C, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021;42:373–498.
Kuck KH, Brugada J, Fürnkranz A, Metzner A, Ouyang F, Chun KRJ, et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:2235–45.
Packer DL, Kowal RC, Wheelan KR, Irwin JM, Champagne J, Guerra PG, et al. Cryoballoon ablation of pulmonary veins for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1713–23.
Bergau L, Sciacca V, Nesapiragasan V, Rubarth K, Konietschke F, Fink T, El Hamriti M, Imnadze G, Dagher L, Braun M, Khalaph M, Guckel D, Heintze J, Noelker G, Vogt J, Sommer P, Sohns C. A frozen decade: ten years outcome of atrial fibrillation ablation using a single shot device for pulmonary vein isolation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022;33:1383–90.
Guckel D, Lucas P, Isgandarova K, El Hamriti M, Bergau L, Fink T, Sciacca V, Imnadze G, Braun M, Khalaph M, Nölker G, Sommer P, Sohns C. News from the cold chamber: clinical experiences of POLARx versus Arctic front advance for single-shot pulmonary vein isolation. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022;9:16.
Mugnai G, Cecchini F, Stroker E, Paparella G, Iacopino S, Sieira J, et al. Durability of pulmonary vein isolation following cryoballoon ablation: lessons from a large series of repeat ablation procedures. IJC Heart Vasc. 2022;40:101040.
Kato R, Lickfett L, Meininger G, Dickfeld T, Wu R, Juang G, et al. Pulmonary vein anatomy in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: lessons learned by use of magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2003;107:2004–10.
Guckel D, Lucas P, Isgandarova K, Hamriti ME, Bergau L, Fink T, et al. Impact of pulmonary vein variant anatomy and cross-sectional orifice area on freedom from atrial fibrillation recurrence after cryothermal single-shot guided pulmonary vein isolation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022;65:251–60.
Shigeta T, Okishige K, Yamauchi Y, Aoyagi H, Nakamura T, Yamashita M, et al. Clinical assessment of cryoballoon ablation in cases with atrial fibrillation and a left common pulmonary vein. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017;28:1021–7.
Beiert T, Lodde PC, Linneborn LPT, Werner J, Prinz L, Stöckigt F, et al. Outcome in patients with left common pulmonary vein after cryoablation with second-generation cryoballoon. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;41:22–7.
Çöteli C, Dural M, Şener YZ, Ateş AH, Okşul M, Gülşen MR, et al. Comparison of atrial fibrillation ablation using cryoballoon versus radiofrequency in patients with left common pulmonary veins: mid-term follow-up results. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022;64:597–605.
Khoueiry Z, Albenque JP, Providencia R, Combes S, Combes N, Jourda F, et al. Outcomes after cryoablation vs. radiofrequency in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: impact of pulmonary veins anatomy. Europace. 2016;18:1343–51.
Altinkaynak D, Koktener A. Evaluation of pulmonary venous variations in a large cohort: Multidetector computed tomography study with new variations. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2019;131:475–84.
Cheruiyot I, Munguti J, Olabu B, Gichangi P. A meta-analysis of the relationship between anatomical variations of pulmonary veins and atrial fibrillation. Acta Cardiol. 2020;75:1–9.
Steiner I, Hájková P, Kvasnička J, Kholová I. Myocardial sleeves of pulmonary veins and atrial fibrillation: a postmortem histopathological study of 100 subjects. Virchows Arch. 2006;449:88–95.
Proietti R, Santangeli P, Di Biase L, Joza J, Bernier ML, Wang Y, et al. Comparative effectiveness of wide antral versus ostial pulmonary vein isolation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ: Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7:39–45.
Straube F, Dorwarth U, Schmidt M, Wankerl M, Ebersberger U, Hoffmann E. Comparison of the first and second cryoballoon: high-volume single-center safety and efficacy analysis. Circ: Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7:293–9.
Güler E, Güler GB, Demir GG, Kizilirmak F, Güneş HM, Barutçu I, Kiliçaslan F. Effect of pulmonary vein anatomy and pulmonary vein diameters on outcome of cryoballoon catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015;38:989–96.
Larsen, J. M., Deyell, M. W., Macle, L., Champagne, J., Sarrazin, J., Leong-Sit et al. Impact of left common pulmonary veins in the contact force versus cryoballoon atrial fibrillation ablation (CIRCA-DOSE) study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 31, 9, pp. 2300–2307).
Bose A, Chevli PA, Berberian G, Januszkiewicz J, Ahmad G, Hashmath Z, et al. Presence of a left common pulmonary vein and pulmonary vein anatomical characteristics as predictors of outcome following cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021;62:409–17.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the local ethic committee (Reg. No. 2019-563).
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Isgandarova, K., Bergau, L., El Hamriti, M. et al. Impact of pulmonary vein anatomy and ostial dimensions on long-term outcome after single-shot device–guided cryoablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 66, 2125–2133 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-023-01554-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-023-01554-4