Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Ablation procedures for cavo-tricuspid isthmus (CTI)–dependent typical atrial flutter (AFL) have classically been guided by fluoroscopy, but nowadays, increasing evidence suggests that electro-anatomic mapping systems (EAM) may be useful to diminish fluoroscopy and guide ablation, targeting high voltage areas [1,2,3]. Areas of slow conduction in the CTI are the primary substrate of the macroreentrant circuit [4, 5]. We have tested a strategy of CTI ablation targeting areas of slow conduction and high voltage, identified with the omnipolar vectors (OV: maximum voltage vector determined from a triangular set of three electrodes, automatically selected from all directions), which allow obtaining improved voltage maps and detecting wave speed.
We conducted a conceptual pilot study in patients undergoing CTI RF ablation for AFL. We prospectively evaluated a novel strategy where ablation was guided by OV delineating sites of slow wave speed and high voltage. All procedures were performed with Ensite EAM, HD-Grid multipolar diagnostic catheter, and Tacti-cath contact-force irrigated tip ablation catheter (Abbott). We identified the areas with the slowest wave speed (wave speed values < 30% of average value in the CTI); afterwards, we identified the areas with the highest voltage (voltage values > 70% of average voltage in the CTI). Finally, areas with overlap between slow wave speed and high voltage were identified (Fig. 1). Acute success was defined by the achievement of bidirectional block in the CTI. RF ablation was first attempted at the focal sites of confluence between slow wave speed and high voltage. If bidirectional conduction block was not achieved, the second step consisted of ablation of the remaining sites of slow wave speed. If unsuccessful, the third step was ablation of the remaining sites of high voltage. Finally, if bidirectional CTI block was not achieved with the aforementioned steps, a CTI line was performed until success.
LAO caudal view, showing the CTI. Panel A shows the areas of high voltage encircled in black. Panel B displays the prominent EGMs in those high voltage areas. Panel C shows the areas of slow wave speed encircled in white. Panel D displays the fractionated EGMs in those low wave speed areas. Paned E shows all the previous areas and highlights confluent sites encircled in green
A total of 26 patients were included (mean age 68 ± 12 years, 88% male). The procedure was performed during stimulation at 600 ms cycle length from the proximal coronary sinus in the 61% of patients and during AFL in the rest of the 39%. Mean procedure time was 83 ± 19 min. Median fluoroscopy time was 0 min (interquartile range 0–1), and median radiation dose was 0 mGray (interquartile range 0–13). Zero fluoroscopy was used in 62% of the procedures. Targeted areas of slow wave speed in the CTI had a velocity of 0.57 ± 0.25 mm/ms, compared to the average velocity of the whole RA (0.91 ± 0.27 mm/ms). Targeted high voltage areas in the CTI were also consistently higher (3 ± 0.95 mV) than the average voltage in the RA (2.2 ± 0.6 mV). Concerning ablation, a median of 13 RF lesions (interquartile range 9–16) was performed and mean RF time was 349 ± 149 s. Quality of lesions was assessed by LSI, which averaged 5 ± 0.5. Regarding procedure success, CTI block was obtained with ablation at the slow-wave speed/high voltage confluence areas in 16 patients (53.9%), 10 patients (38.5%) patients needed additional applications in areas of isolated slow wave speed, 1 patient needed ablation in areas of isolated high voltage, and only 1 patient (3.8%) needed the performance of a complete CTI line. Thus, in 24/26 patient (92%), ablation at areas of slow wave speed achieved complete CTI block. During a mean follow-up of 12 ± 6 months, 24-h Holter and symptomatic event recorder were performed in 11 and 1 patients, respectively, because of isolated palpitations, with 1 clinical recurrence (3.8%).
The availability of new EAM catheters and systems capable of identifying regions of local slow wave speed opens a new horizon. Traditionally, stable reentrant arrhythmias have been treated by targeting the weakest point, the isthmus of the circuit [6]. Our results indicate that these slow CTI conduction pathways should be considered as unique conduction corridors in the CTI and cornerstones for typical AFL maintenance. These areas are surrounded by large muscle fibers, which are often detected on omnipolar mapping as high voltage areas.
In conclusion, ablation in areas of slow conduction achieves CTI bidirectional block in more than 92% of patients and should be targeted preferentially. This approach may be able to diminish procedure, fluoroscopy, and RF burden. Although, these observations are made in basis of a non-controlled study and warrant confirmation in an ongoing, larger, prospective randomized study (clinicatrials.gov NCT05709795).
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Sato H, Yagi T, Namekawa A, Ishida A, Yamashina Y, Nakagawa T, Sakuramoto M, Sato E, Yambe T. Efficacy of bundle ablation for cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter: combination of the maximum voltage-guided ablation technique and high-density electro-anatomical mapping. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2010;28:39–44.
Regoli F, Faletra FF, Nucifora G, Pasotti E, Moccetti T, Klersy C, Auricchio A. Feasibility and acute efficacy of radiofrequency ablation of cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter guided by real-time 3D TEE. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:716–26.
Hsu JC, Darden D, Glover BM, et al. Performance and acute procedural outcomes of the EnSite Precision™ cardiac mapping system for electrophysiology mapping and ablation procedures: results from the EnSite Precision™ observational study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022;65:141–51.
Feld GK, Mollerus M, Birgersdotter-Green U, Fujimura O, Bahnson TD, Boyce K, Rahme M. Conduction velocity in the tricuspid valve-inferior vena cava isthmus is slower in patients with type I atrial flutter compared to those without a history of atrial flutter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1997;8:1338–48.
Hassankhani A, Yao B, Feld GK. Conduction velocity around the tricuspid valve annulus during type 1 atrial flutter: defining the location of areas of slow conduction by three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2003;8:121–7.
Okumura K, Henthorn RW, Epstein AE, Plumb VJ, Waldo AL. Further observations on transient entrainment: importance of pacing site and properties of the components of the reentry circuit. Circulation. 1985;72:1293–307.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
This study was approved by our institution’s ethical committee on human research.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Vallès, E., Jiménez, J., González, C. et al. First experience of wave speed guided point-by-point cavo-tricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 66, 1325–1327 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-023-01531-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-023-01531-x