Skip to main content
Log in

Characteristics and distribution of complex fractionated atrial electrograms and the dominant frequency during atrial fibrillation: relationship to the response and outcome of circumferential pulmonary vein isolation

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although sites of complex fractionated electrograms (CFAEs) and dominant frequency (DF) are known to be critical for the maintenance of atrial fibrillation (AF), spatial distribution of CFAEs and DF and their impact on the outcome of AF ablation remain unclear.

Methods

We created CFAE and DF maps of the left atrium (LA), right atrium, and pulmonary veins (PVs) with a NavX mapping system and simultaneously calculated the DF values with a Bard LabSystem Pro in 40 patients with AF (nonparoxysmal, n = 16).

Results

In 19 patients in whom circumferential PV isolation (CPVI) terminated AF, there was a high DF in the PVs (Bard-based DF value, 6.70 ± 1.01 Hz), low DF in the LA body (5.94 ± 0.75 Hz), and a significant PV-to-LA body DF gradient (0.76 ± 0.65 Hz), and the CFAEs were located mainly in the PV antrum. In the 21 patients not responding to CPVI, a high DF was located in both the PVs (7.04 ± 0.81 Hz) and LA body (6.75 ± 0.81 Hz), and therefore, the PV-to-LA body DF gradient was smaller than that in the CPVI responders (0.29 ± 0.52 Hz, P = 0.0160), and the CFAEs extended to the LA body. The higher DF in the LA body, nonparoxysmal AF, and longer AF duration remained as independent predictors of a post-ablation AF recurrence by using a multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

A higher LA-DF value, smaller PV-to-LA DF gradient, and wider LA-CFAE distribution were noted more often in the nonresponders to CPVI than in the responders. This suggested the presence of an arrhythmogenic substrate in the LA beyond the PVs in patients whose AF persisted after CPVI, which was further associated with post-ablation AF recurrence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nademanee, K., McKenzie, J., Kosar, E., Schwab, M., Sunsaneewitayakul, B., Vasavakul, T., et al. (2004). A new approach for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: mapping of the electrophysiologic substrate. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 43, 2044–2053.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Oral, H., Chugh, A., Good, E., Sankaran, S., Reich, S. S., Igic, P., et al. (2006). A tailored approach to catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Circulation, 113, 1824–1831.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Haïssaguerre, M., Sanders, P., Hocini, M., Hsu, L. F., Shah, D. C., Scavée, C., et al. (2004). Changes in atrial fibrillation cycle length and inducibility during catheter ablation and their relation to outcome. Circulation, 109, 3007–3013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Konings, K. T., Smeets, J. L., Penn, O. C., Wellens, H. J., & Allessie, M. (1997). A configuration of unipolar atrial electrograms during electrically induced atrial fibrillation in humans. Circulation, 95, 1231–1241.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Umapathy, K., Masse, S., Kolodziejska, K., Veenhuyzen, G. D., Chauhan, V. S., Husain, M., et al. (2008). Electrogram fractionation in murine HL-1 atrial monolayer model. Heart Rhythm, 5, 1029–1035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lin, J., Scherlag, B. J., Zhou, J., Lu, Z., Patterson, E., Jackman, W. M., et al. (2006). Autonomic mechanism to explain complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE). Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 18, 1197–1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kalifa, J., Tanaka, K., Zaitsev, A. V., Warren, M., Vaidyanathan, R., Auerbach, D., et al. (2006). Mechanisms of wave fractionation at boundaries of high-frequency excitation in the posterior left atrium of the isolated sheep heart during atrial fibrillation. Circulation, 113, 626–633.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mandapati, R., Skanes, A., Chen, J., Berenfeld, O., & Jalife, J. (2000). Stable microreentrant sources as a mechanism of atrial fibrillation in the isolated sheep heart. Circulation, 101, 194–199.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Park, J. H., Park, S. W., Kim, J. Y., Kim, S. K., Jeoung, B., Lee, M. H., et al. (2010). Characteristics of complex fractionated atrial electrogram in the electroanatomically remodeled left atrium of patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation Journal, 74, 1557–1563.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin, Y. J., Tai, C. T., Kao, T., Chang, S. L., Lo, L. W., Tuan, T. C., et al. (2009). Spatiotemporal organization of the left atrial substrate after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 2, 233–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lin, Y. J., Tsao, H. M., Chang, S. L., Lo, L. W., Hu, Y. F., Chang, C. J., et al. (2010). Role of high dominant frequency sites in nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation patients: insights from high-density frequency and fractionation mapping. Heart Rhythm, 7, 1255–1262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lazar, S., Dixit, S., Marchlinski, F. E., Callans, D. J., & Gerstenfeld, E. P. (2004). Presence of left-to-right atrial frequency gradient in paroxysmal but not persistent atrial fibrillation in humans. Circulation, 110, 3181–3186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Atienza, F., Almendral, J., Jalife, J., Zlochiver, S., Ploutz-Snyder, R., Torrecilla, E. G., et al. (2009). Real-time dominant frequency mapping and ablation of dominant frequency sites in atrial fibrillation with left-to-right frequency gradients predicts long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm. Heart Rhythm, 6, 33–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sanders, P., Nalliah, C. J., Dubois, R., Takahashi, Y., Hocini, M., Rotter, M., et al. (2006). Frequency mapping of the pulmonary veins in paroxysmal versus permanent atrial fibrillation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 17, 965–972.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yokoyama, E., Osaka, T., Takemoto, Y., Suzuki, T., Ito, A., Kamiya, K., et al. (2009). Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation maintained by nonpulmonary vein sources can be predicted by dominant frequency analysis of atriopulmonary electrograms. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 20, 630–636.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin, Y. J. (2006). Frequency analysis in different types of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 47, 1401–1407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hocini, M., Nault, I., Wright, M., Veenhuyzen, G., Narayan, S. M., Jaïs, P., et al. (2010). Disparate evolution of right and left atrial rate during ablation of long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 55, 1007–1016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Habel, N., Znojkiewicz, P., Thompson, N., Müller, J. G., Mason, B., Calame, J., et al. (2010). The temporal variability of dominant frequency and complex fractionated atrial electrograms constrains the validity of sequential mapping in human atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm, 7, 586–593.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasuo Okumura.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Okumura, Y., Watanabe, I., Kofune, M. et al. Characteristics and distribution of complex fractionated atrial electrograms and the dominant frequency during atrial fibrillation: relationship to the response and outcome of circumferential pulmonary vein isolation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 34, 267–275 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-011-9637-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-011-9637-2

Keywords

Navigation