Skip to main content
Log in

Johannes von Kries’s Principien: A Brief Guide for the Perplexed

  • Special Section Article: Kries and Objective Probability
  • Published:
Journal for General Philosophy of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper has the aim of making Johannes von Kries’s masterpiece, Die Principien der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung of 1886, a little more accessible to the modern reader in three modest ways: first, it discusses the historical background to the book (in particular, what Keynes later termed the “principle of indifference”); next, it summarizes the basic elements of von Kries’s approach (in particular, his “Principle of the Spielraum”); and finally, it examines the so-called “principle of cogent reason” with which von Kries’s name is often identified in the English literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnett, V. (2009). Comparative statistical inference (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayes, T. (1764). An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 53, 370–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernoulli, J. (1713). Ars conjectandi. Thurnisiorum. Basel; English translation: The art of conjecture; (by E. D. Sylla, trans.). Johns Hopkins Press 2006. (Page references are to this translation.)

  • Bertrand, J. (1907). Calcul des probabilités (2nd ed.). Paris: Gauthier-Villars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boole, G. (1862). On the theory of probabilities. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 152, 225–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boring, E. G. (1920). The logic of the normal law of error in mental measurement. American Journal of Psychology, 31, 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czuber, E. (1908). Die Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung und ihre Anwendungen auf Fehlerausgleichung. Statistik und Lebensversicherung (2nd ed.). Leipzig: Teubner.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Alembert, J. (1784). Croix ou pile. In D. Diderot & J. D’Alembert (Eds.), Encyclopédie Méthodique. Mathématique (Vol. 1, pp. 471–472). Paris: Panckoucke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, L. (1988). Classical probability in the enlightenment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Morgan, A. (1847). Formal logic: Or the calculus of inference necessary and probable. London: Taylor and Walton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaconis, P., Holmes, S., & Montgomery, R. (2007). Dynamical bias in the coin toss. SIAM, 49, 211–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dühring, E. K. (1865). Natürliche Dialektik. Berlin: Mittler and Son.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, E. M. R. A. (1992). A road to randomness in physical systems. New York: Springer.

  • Fieller, E. C., & Piaggio, H. T. H. (1937). Review of elements of probability by H. Levy, & L. Roth. The Mathematical Gazette, 21, 438–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fioretti, G. (1998). John Maynard Keynes and Johannes von Kries. History of Economic Ideas, 6, 51–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fioretti, G. (2001). Von Kries and the other “German logicians”: Non-numerical probabilities before Keynes. Economics and Philosophy, 17, 245–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, A. (1915). The mathematical theory of probabilities and its application to frequency curves and statistical methods (2nd ed., 1922). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. (1922). On the mathematical foundations of theoretical statistics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (A), 222, 309–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. (1973). Statistical methods and scientific inference, (third edition, first edition 1956, second edition 1959), New York: Hafner Press.

  • Good, I. J. (1950). Probability and the weighing of evidence. New York: Hafner Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1971). Equipossibility theories of probability. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 22, 339–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1990). The taming of chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hald, A. (1998). A history of mathematical statistics from 1750 to 1930. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidelberger, M. (2001). Origins of the logical theory of probability: von Kries, Wittgenstein, Waismann. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 15, 177–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidelberger, M. (2004). Nature from within: Gustav Theodor Fechner and his psychophysical worldview. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburg Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jevons, W.S. (1874). The principles of science: A treatise on logic and scientific method, (second edition 1877; reprinted 1958). London: Macmillan.

  • Kamlah, A. (1983). Probability as a quasi-theoretical concept: J. V. Kries’ sophisticated account after a century. Erkenntnis, 19, 239–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamlah, A. (1987). The decline of the Laplacean theory of probability: A study of Stumpf, von Kries, and Meinong. In L. Krüger, L. Daston, & M. Heidelberger (Eds.), The probabilistic revolution, volume 1: Ideas in history (pp. 91–110). Boston: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. (1913). Theorie und Methoden der Statistik. Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J. (1986). The probability of heads. American Mathematical Monthly, 93, 191–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1907). The principles of probability. Fellowship dissertation. London: Kings College.

  • Keynes, J. M. (1921). A treatise on probability. London: Macmillan, reprinted in: The collected writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. 8. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1973. (Page references are to this edition.)

  • Keynes, J. M. (1923). A tract on monetary reform. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laplace, P. S. M. (1812). Théorie analytique sur les probabilités, (second edition 1814, third edition 1820). Paris: Courcier. (Page references are to Oeuvres complètes de Laplace, Vol. 7. Paris: Gauthier-Villars 1886.)

  • Laplace, P. S. M. (1814). Essai philosophique sur les probabilités. Paris: Courcier, English translation by Andrew I. Dale. Sources in the history of mathematics and physical sciences, Vol. 13. New York: Springer 1995.

  • Lexis, W. (1886). Über die Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung and deren Anwendung auf die Statistik. Jahrbuch für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 13, 433–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinong, A. (1890). Review of von Kries 1886. Göttingische gelehrte Anzeigen, 2, 56–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molina, E. C. (1944). Arne Fisher, 1887–1944. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 39, 251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niall, K. K. (1995). Conventions of measurement in psychophysics: von Kries on the so-called psychophysical law. Spatial Vision, 9, 275–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, H. (1896). Calcul des Probabilités, (second edition 1912). Paris: Gauthier-Villars.

  • Poincaré, H. (1902). La science et l’hypothèse. Paris: Flammarion, translated 1907 as Science and hypothesis by J. W. Greenstreet. London: Scott, reprinted 1952, New York: Dover.

  • Poisson, S. D. (1837). Recherches sur la probabilité des jugements en matières criminelles et matière civile. Paris: Bachelier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, T. (1986). The rise of statistical thinking. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H. (1916). The concept of probability in the mathematical representation of reality. Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Barth, translated and edited, with the German original, by Frederick Eberhardt and Clark Glymour. Chicago: Open Court 2008.

  • Reichenbach, H. (1949). Theory of probability (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, J. (2010). The natural-range conception of probability. In G. Ernst & A. Hüttemann (Eds.), Time, chance, and reduction: Philosophical aspects of statistical mechanics (pp. 71–91). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1948). Human knowledge: Its scope and limits. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, I. (1987). Laplace and thereafter: the status of probability calculus in the nineteenth century. In L. Krüger, L. Daston, & M. Heidelberger (Eds.), The probabilistic revolution, Volume 1: Ideas in history (Vol. 1, pp. 191–214). Boston: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, G., & Vovk, V. (2006). The sources of Kolmogorov’s Grundbegriffe. Statistical Science, 21, 70–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, S. M. (1986). The history of statistics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stölzner, M. (2003). Causality, realism and the two strands of Boltzmann’s legacy (1896–1936). Dissertation, Bielefeld.

  • Strevens, M. (2011). Probability out of determinism. In C. Beisbart & S. Hartmann (Eds.), Probabilities in physics (pp. 339–364). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stumpf, C. (1892). Über den Begriff der mathematischen Wahrscheinlichkeit. Sitzungsberichte der philosophisch-philologischen und historischen Classe der Königlich Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 20, 681–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venn, J. (1866). The logic of chance. London: Macmillan, second edition 1876, third edition 1888, reprinted 1962, New York: Chelsea.

  • von Kries, J. (1882). Ueber die Messung intensiver Grössen und über das sogenannte psychophysische Gesetz. Vierteljahrsschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie, 6, 257–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Kries, J. (1886). Die Principien der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung, (second edition 1927). Tübingen: Mohr.

  • von Kries, J. (1916). Logik: Grundzüge einer kritischen und formalen Urteilslehre. Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Mises, R. (1928). Wahrscheinlichkeit, Statistik, und Wahrheit, (second edition 1936, third edition 1951). Wien: Julius Springer, the second and third edition translated into English as Probability, statistics, and truth, 1939 and 1957, respectively.

  • von Mises, R. (1957). Probability, statistics, and truth. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Plato, J. (1983). The method of arbitrary functions. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 34, 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zabell, S. L. (2011). The subjective and the objective. In D. M. Gabbay & J. Woods (Eds.), Handbook of the philosophy of science: Philosophy of statistics (pp. 1149–1174). San Diego: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper had its origins in a conference on von Kries and his Principien held in Bonn in September 2012. I thank Jacob Rosenthal for his initial invitation to attend it, his subsequent and generous discussion of a number of difficult passages in von Kries, and his assistance with some of the translations. I also thank Michael Heidelberger who at an early stage was very helpful in providing me with a searchable copy of the Principien and answering some questions. Thanks also to Guido Fioretti and Reinhard Siegmund-Schultze, who both provided copies of material not readily available, and Andre Carus for helpful discussions and translations. Finally two anonymous referees made a number of very helpful suggestions regarding the first draft of the paper. Needless to say, I remain solely responsible for whatever errors or infelicities remain.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandy Zabell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zabell, S. Johannes von Kries’s Principien: A Brief Guide for the Perplexed. J Gen Philos Sci 47, 131–150 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-015-9320-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-015-9320-x

Keywords

Navigation