Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Testing Signals for Electronics: Criteria for Synthesis

  • Published:
Journal of Electronic Testing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Expressions for calculation of optimal criteria for highest information and sensitivity indices and lowest mean square error in test signals for radio-electronic systems (RES), working under influence of the additive Gaussian noise, are derived. In this framework, the technical state of a RES is determined via measurement of its dynamic characteristics. Because at negligible electromagnetic noise, all test signals are equivalently optimal, the test signal of the RES, which is optimal for a high-level noise, is considered to be optimal for the noise of lower level. It is proven, that at high levels of noise these three criteria (maximums of informative and sensitivity indices and minimum of mean square error) reduce into a single criterion. This universal criterion can be used to synthesize test signals with optimal parameters for determination of the technical state of any radio electronic device at any level of an additive Gaussian noise and can be applied in situ of RES operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D.K. Barton: Radar equations for modern radar. London, Artech house (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Binu D, Kariyappa BS (2017) A survey on fault diagnosis of analog circuits: taxonomy and state of the art. AEU - International Journal of Electronics and Communications. 73:68–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeue.2017.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boudreaux-Bartels GF (2000) Mixed time-frequency signal transformations. In: The transforms and applications handbook, , Ed. A. D. Poularikas, chapter 12, CRC press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2nd edition

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chang GW, & Chen C-I (2010) Measurement techniques for stationary and time-varying harmonics. Proc. IEEE PES General Meeting, pp. 1–5, July 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1109/PES.2010.5589611

  5. Chinkov VM, Gerasimov SV (2013) Research and substantiation of criteria of optimization of measuring signals for control of the technical state of automatic control systems. Ukrainian Metrological Journal 4:43–47 http://www.metrology.kharkov.ua/fileadmin/user_upload/data_gc/umj/2013/umj_2013_4/JRN/PDF/2.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clarke F (2013) Functional analysis, Calculus of variations and optimal control. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Cui J, Wang Y (2011) A novel approach of analog circuit fault diagnosis using support vector machines classifier. Measurement. 44(1):281–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2010.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Di Y, Jin C, Bagheri B, Shi Z, Lee J (2018) Fault prediction of power electronics modules and systems under complex working conditions. Comput Ind 97(1–9):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2018.01.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Friedman N (2006) The naval institute guide to world naval weapon system. Naval Institute Press

  10. Gerasimov S, Mozhayev А, Nakonechnyi A, Podorozhniak А (2015) Method of synthesis of the automatic control system adjustment circuit parameters. Nauka i studia, Przemysl 12(143):61–67

    Google Scholar 

  11. Helstrom CW (1995) Elements of signal detection and estimation, prentice hall, Englewood cliffs, NJ. In: USA

    Google Scholar 

  12. Herasimov SV, Timochko OI, Khmelevskiy SI (2017) Synthesis method of the optimum structure of the procedure for the control of technical status of complex systems and complexes. Proceedings of Kharkiv National university of Air Forces 4(53):148–152

    Google Scholar 

  13. Karimi-Ghartemani M, Iravani MR (2005) Measurement of harmonics/inter-harmonics of time-varying frequencies. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery 20(1):23–31. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2004.837674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Luo H, Lu W, Wang Y, Wang L, Zhao X (2016) A novel approach for analog fault diagnosis based on stochastic signal analysis and improved GHMM. Measurement 81:26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.11.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mohsen AAK, Abu El-Yazeed MF (2004) Selection of input stimulus for fault diagnosis of analog circuits using ARMA model. AEU - International Journal of Electronics and Communications 58:212–217. https://doi.org/10.1078/1434-8411-54100231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Neill CR, Arena ASJ (2005) Time-domain training signals comparison for computational fluid dynamics based aerodynamic identification. J Aircr 42(2):421–428. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.6424

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Pramila, Rajpal R, Hansalia CJ, Pathak SK, & Atrey PK (2012) Design and development of signal conditioning electronics for SST-1 microwave interferometer system. Fusion Engineering and Design 87(9):1558–1564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2012.04.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rybin Y (2012) Barkhausen criterion for pulses oscillators. Int J Electron 99(11):1547–1556. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207217.2012.673153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rybin Y (2014) Measuring signal generators. Theory and design. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Ryzhov Y, Sakovych L, Vankevych P, Yakovlev M, Nastishin Y (2018) Optimization of requirements for measuring instruments at metrological service of communication tools. Measurement 123:19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.03.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shi Y, Deng Y, Zhang W (2013) Diagnosis of incipient faults in weak nonlinear analog circuits. Circ Syst Signal Process 32(5):2151–2170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-013-9589-0

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Song P, He Y, Cui W (2016) Statistical property feature extraction based on FRFT for fault diagnosis of analog circuits. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 87(3):427–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10470-016-0721-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Valenzuela J, & Pontt J (2009) Real-time interharmonics detection and measurement based on FFT algorithm. Appl. Electronics, 259–264, (Sep. 9–10), https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5289260

  24. Verba VS, Neronsky LB, Osipov IG, Turuk VE (2010) Earth-boring space radar systems. Moskov, Radiotechnics

  25. Xu LJ, Huang JG, Wang HJ, Long B (2010) A novel method for the diagnosis of the incipient faults in analog circuits based on LDA and HMM. Circuits Syst Signal Process 29:577–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-010-9160-1

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Yuan L, He Y, Huang J, Sun Y (2010) A new neural-network-based fault diagnosis approach for analog circuits by using kurtosis and entropy as a preprocessor. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 59(3):586–595. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2009.2025068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhao G, Liu X, Zhang B, Liu Y, Niu G, Hu C (2018) A novel approach for analog circuit fault diagnosis based on deep belief network. Measurement. 121:170–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.02.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Hetman Petro Sahaidachnyi National Army Academy (Lviv, Ukraine).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ivan Kozhedub Kharkiv National Air Force University, 77/79, Sumska street, Kharkiv, 61023, Ukraine

    S. Herasimov, V. Pavlii & O. Tymoshchuk

  2. National Academy of the National Guard of Ukraine, 3, Defenders’ Square, Kharkiv, 61001, Ukraine

    M.Yu. Yakovlev

  3. Hetman Petro Sahaidachnyi National Army Academy, 32, Heroes of Maidan street, Lviv, 79012, Ukraine

    D.Ye. Khaustov, Ye. Ryzhov & Yu.A. Nastishin

  4. State Institution “Institute of Special Communication and Information Security”, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, 4, Verhnyoklyuchova street, Kyiv, 03056, Ukraine

    L. Sakovych

Authors
  1. S. Herasimov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. Pavlii
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. O. Tymoshchuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M.Yu. Yakovlev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. D.Ye. Khaustov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ye. Ryzhov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. L. Sakovych
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yu.A. Nastishin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu.A. Nastishin.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: T. Xia

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Herasimov, S., Pavlii, V., Tymoshchuk, O. et al. Testing Signals for Electronics: Criteria for Synthesis. J Electron Test 35, 349–357 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-019-05798-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-019-05798-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation