Skip to main content
Log in

Contactless Testing of Circuit Interconnects

  • Published:
Journal of Electronic Testing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

State-of-the-art printed circuit boards (PCBs) have become extremely dense and are not fully accessible for applying physical testing solutions. Extra steps are required in the design and manufacturing process for testing advanced printed wiring boards (PWBs) with embedded passive components. This processing is further complicated by upcoming sequential build-up (SBU) technologies that provide feature sizes smaller than 10 μm and that do not allow physical access for testing the interconnect between two pads. In this paper, we propose a new contactless technique for overcoming the SBU challenge for testing interconnects between embedded components. A test trace is employed as a sensor, which senses the terminations of the trace being tested. The simulation and analysis results of this study demonstrate the feasibility of this concept for application to SBU and conventional PCB/PWB interconnect testing to overcome the barriers to physical access. Robustness of the approach has been studied against packaging deviations and possible testing process variations. To ensure defect detection with feasible margins, design for testability (DfT) rules have been established for practical PCB dimensions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33
Fig. 34
Fig. 35
Fig. 36
Fig. 37
Fig. 38
Fig. 39
Fig. 40
Fig. 41
Fig. 42
Fig. 43
Fig. 44
Fig. 45
Fig. 46
Fig. 47
Fig. 48
Fig. 49
Fig. 50
Fig. 51
Fig. 52
Fig. 53
Fig. 54

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Antonini G, Delsing J, Ekman J, Orlandi A, Ruehli A (2007) PEEC development road map 2007. Tech Rep 5. Lulea University of Technology

  2. Davis B (1994) Economic modeling of board test strategies. J Electron Test 5(2–3):157–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dunsmore JP (2012) Handbook of microwave component measurements: with advanced VNA techniques, 1st. Wiley, chap 2–5

  4. Fjelstad J (2009) An alternative process for assembling electronic products without solder. Advancing Microelectronics 36(4):18–21

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fjelstad J (2009) Solderless assembly of electronic products — a more reliable and more cost effective approach to electronics manufacturing? In: IEEE Vehicle power and propulsion conference, 2009 VPPC,09. IEEE, pp 11–16

  6. Fjelstad J (2011) Benefits of reversing the circuit manufacturing and assembly processes for electronic products. In: IEEE international symposium on Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC), 2011. IEEE, pp 624–628

  7. Hall SH, Heck HL (2009) Advanced signal integrity for high-speed digital designs. Network analysis for digital engineers, 1st edn. Wiley, pp 347–415

  8. Hannu J, Häkkinen J, Voutilainen JV, Jantunen H, Moilanen M (2012) Current state of the mixed-signal test bus 1149.4. J Electron Test 28(6):857–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Holden H (2009) The HDI Handbook. Embedded Components, 1st edn. BR Publishing, Inc., pp 504–506

  10. Johler W (2003) RF performance of ultra-miniature high frequency relays. In: Proceedings of the forty-ninth IEEE holm conference on electrical contacts, 2003. pp 179–189

  11. Jones E (1956) Coupled-strip-transmission-line filters and directional couplers. IRE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 4(2):75–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim B, Choi HH (2001) A new test method for embedded passives in high density package substrates. In: Proceedings of the 51st IEEE electronic components and technology conference, 2001. pp 1362–1366

  13. Kim GS, Takamiya M, Sakurai T (2009) A capacitive coupling interface with high sensitivity for wireless wafer testing.. In: IEEE international conference on 3D system integration, 3DIC, 2009. pp 1–5

  14. Kim J, Kim H, Kim S, Bae B, Jung D, Kong S, Kim J, Lee J, Park K (2013) Non-contact wafer-level tsv connectivity test methodology using magnetic coupling. In: IEEE international 3D systems integration conference, (3DIC), 2013. pp 1–4

  15. Kujala A, Tuominen R, Kivilahti J (1999) Solderless interconnection and packaging technique for embedded active components. In: Proceedings of the 49th IEEE electronic components and technology conference, 1999. pp 155 –159

  16. Larsson K, Pettersson A, Hedlund S, Forsling W, Gunneriusson L, Lindberg M (2001) Method of applying metal layers in distinct patterns. US Patent 6,303,278. https://www.google.com/patents/US6303278

  17. Ley A (2012) Solving the problem of diminishing test coverage from in-circuit test (ICT). Tech. Rep. 17, ASSET InterTech

  18. Marinissen E, Lee DY, Hayes J, Sellathamby C, Moore B, Slupsky S, Pujol L (2009) Contactless testing: possibility or pipe-dream?. In: Design, automation test in europe conference exhibition, 2009. Date ’09., IEEE, pp 676–681

  19. Moore B, Sellathamby C, Cauvet P, Fleury H, Paulson M, Reja M, Fu L, Bai B, Reid E, Filanovsky I, Slupsky S (2007) High throughput non-contact SiP testing. In: IEEE international test conference, ITC, 2007. pp 1–10

  20. Noguchi M, Tsunoda O, Tomita H, Saito Y (2012) Study for a defect detection system with capacitance on the printed wiring board. In: IEEE 13th internatinal workshop on mechatronics (MECATRONICS), 9th France-Japan 7th Europe-Asia Congress on and research and education in mechatronics (REM), 2012. pp 182–187

  21. Norrgard D, Parker KP (2008) Augmenting boundary-scan tests for enhanced defect coverage. In: IEEE international test conference, ITC, 2008. pp 1–8

  22. Parker KP (2003) The Boundary-Scan Handbook, 3rd edn. Springer US, chap IEEE 1149.4: Analog Boundary-Scan

  23. Parker KP (2012) Capacitive sensing testability in complex memory devices. In: IEEE international test conference (ITC), 2012. pp 1–6

  24. Ruehli A, Antonini G, Esch J, Ekman J, Mayo A, Orlandi A (2003) Nonorthogonal PEEC formulation for time- and frequency-domain EM and circuit modeling. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 45(2):167–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Scheiber SF (2001) Building a successful board-test strategy, Newnes, chap What is a test strategy?, 2nd edn., pp 1–4

  26. Simpson G (1981) A generalized n-port cascade connection. In: Microwave symposium digest 1981 IEEE MTT-S international, IEEE, pp 507–509

  27. Stroud C E. A designers guide to Built-in Self-Test. An overview of BIST, Springer, pp 1–14

  28. Sunter S (2004) Circuit and method for determining the location of defect in a circuit. US Patent 6,717,415. https://www.google.com/patents/US6717415

  29. Sunter S, Parker K (2009) Testing bridges to nowhere - combining boundary scan and capacitive sensing. In: IEEE international test conference, ITC, 2009. pp 1–10

  30. Sunter S, Filliter K, Woo J, McHugh P (2001) A general purpose 1149.4 IC with HF analog test capabilities. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international test conference, 2001. pp 38–45

  31. Yao Z, Pan H (2012) Fault diagnosis using magnetic image of PCB. In: IEEE international conference on control (CONTROL), 2012, UKACC. pp 702–707

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdelghani Renbi.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: H. Manhaeve

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Renbi, A., Delsing, J. Contactless Testing of Circuit Interconnects. J Electron Test 31, 229–253 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-015-5524-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-015-5524-6

Keywords

Navigation