Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Financial Planning for College: Parental Preparation and Capital Conversion

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Family and Economic Issues Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study explores the conversion of cultural capital into economic capital, and specifically financial capital in the form of parental financial planning for children’s college education, including reported financial preparations and savings. Using data from the Education Longitudinal Study (ELS:2002), logistic regression-based analyses of aspects of cultural capital indicated that parental involvement exhibited the most prevalent relationship with financial planning and the amount saved, and that parents’ expectations, but not their aspirations, corresponded to engagement in financial planning. Findings support the conclusion that some parents convert part of their cultural capital to financial capital in preparation for paying for their child’s college education, perhaps representing a typically hidden facet of social class reproduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Such plans include Coverdell Education Savings Accounts (ESAs, previously called Education IRAs) and Qualified Tuition Programs (QTPs) authorized by Sect. 529 of the Internal Revenue Code. With these 529 plans, the US federal government allows individual states to create tax-advantaged programs to encourage parents to save money toward their child’s college education. These programs can either be general college savings plans intended for use wherever the child goes or prepaid tuition plans tied to specific institutions.

  2. There have been warnings against superficial quantitative operationalization of social and cultural capital (Smart 2005), which we acknowledge and seek to avoid.

  3. Although Martin and Spenner (2009) note: “Bourdieu considers the academic skills, values and abilities that we regard as dimensions of human capital as examples of embodied cultural capital” (p. 626), we chose to consider parental and grandparental education as human capital, including them as controls (Becker 1993; Coleman 1988). This allows us to argue clearly for a conversion of capital without appealing to these variables, which economists might consider differently than sociologists.

  4. Results of all analyses using multiple imputation when restricting the sample to cases where parents completed a survey (not presented) are substantively similar to those reported here for the entire 10th grade cohort. This reinforces the assumption that these missing parent data are either missing completely at random (MCAR) or missing at random (MAR) and can reasonably be imputed. For ease of interpretability, we present results for the full 10th grade cohort.

  5. Given that including income in a separate model block with the cultural capital variables but without the other controls (results not presented) rarely substantially changed the resulting relationship between a cultural capital variable and our outcomes of interest, we present income in our control block for all analyses.

  6. A comparison of results using multiple imputation and listwise deletion showed a reasonably good correspondence overall, although there were some differences. In particular, for the cultural capital variables, differences included parental expectations (for 3 out of 15 models) and parental home involvement (1 out of 15). The factors showing the most differences overall were private school (5 out of 15) and the number of kids (4 out of 15).

  7. We conducted several alternate analyses for the amount saved to test the sensitivity of our results to the analysis model chosen. Ordinary least squares models for a pseudo-continuous amount saved variable, which likely violate the assumption of normality of errors due to the large number of zero values, produced results very similar in nature to the multinomial models presented, with only a few exceptions (e.g., attending private school was significant and parent age was not; R2 = 0.30). Given that the amount saved was collected as a categorical response set, we also considered ordered logistic regression. However, this specification failed the parallel regression assumption (via a Brant test) on which ordinal models rely (Long 1997). Multinomial logistic regression on all eight original categories did produce slightly more nuanced findings (e.g., particularly for parents who do not work and high school type), but the added complexity would not add substantially to the interpretation of our primary findings, and so we present more concise three-category results.

  8. This may be an aberration though, as the sharp rise in home equity-based borrowing beginning in 2002 and lasting until 2006 that appears to be associated with the subsequent economic downturn may partially explain this result (Mian and Sufi 2009).

  9. The condensed information in Table 4 relevant for this study should be used in conjunction with the complete regression results to get a full understanding of the relationships between the variables. These results, as well as additional information about the variables themselves may be found in a supplemental file available from the authors upon request or from the website https://works.bepress.com/ryan_wells/36/.

References

  • Allison, P. D. (1999). Multiple regression: A primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, P. D. (2002). Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. B. (2000). Optimizing capital, social reproduction, and undergraduate persistence: A sociological perspective. In J. M. Braxton (Ed.), Reworking the student departure puzzle (pp. 95–124). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1971). Intellectual field and creative project. In M. F. D. Young (Ed.), Knowledge and control: New directions for the sociology of education (pp. 161–188). London: Collier-Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society, and culture (R. Nice, Trans.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bricker J., Dettling, L. J., Henriques, A., Hsu, J. W., Moore, K. B., Sabelhaus, J., Thompson, J. & Windle, R. A. (2014). Changes in U.S. family finances from 2010 to 2013: Evidence from the survey of consumer finances. Federal Reserve Bulletin. Retrieved from http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/bulletin/2014/pdf/scf14.pdf.

  • Calzada, E. J., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., & Yoshikawa, H. (2013). Familismo in Mexican and Dominican families from low-income, urban communities. Journal of Family Issues, 34(12), 1696–1724. doi:10.1177/0192513X12460218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheatham, G. A., & Elliott, W. (2013). The effects of family college savings on postsecondary school enrollment rates of students with disabilities. Economics of Education Review, 33, 95–111. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2012.09.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S121. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2780243.

  • Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVaney, S. A., Anong, S. T., & Whirl, S. E. (2007). Household savings motives. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 41(1), 174–186. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00073.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVaney, S. A., & Chien, Y. W. (2002). Children’s education as the most important savings goal. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 94(1), 64–70. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/218195833.

  • DiPrete, T. A., & Eirich, G. M. (2006). Cumulative advantage as a mechanism for inequality: A review of theoretical and empirical developments. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 271–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dynarski, S. (2004). Who benefits from the education saving incentives? Income, educational expectations and the value of the 529 and Coverdell. National Tax Journal, 57(2), 359–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, W., & Friedline, T. (2013). “You pay your share, we’ll pay our share:” The college cost burden and the role of race, income, and college assets. Economics of Education Review, 33, 134–153. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2012.10.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engberg, M. E., & Allen, D. J. (2011). Uncontrolled destinies: Improving opportunity for low-income students in American higher education. Research in Higher Education, 52(8), 786–807. doi:10.1007/s11162-011-9222-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, X. T., & Chen, M. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 1–22. doi:10.1023/A:1009048817385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedline, T. (2012). Predicting children’s savings: The role of parents’ savings for transferring financial advantage and opportunities for financial inclusion. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 144–154. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.09.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. W., Olchowski, A. E., & Gilreath, T. D. (2007). How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prevention Science, 8, 206–213. doi:10.1007/s11121-007-0070-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grolnick, W. S., Benjet, C., Kurowski, C. O., & Apostoleris, N. H. (1997). Predictors of parent involvement in children’s schooling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 538–548. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrold, K., & O’Donnell, K. (2008). Parent and family involvement in education, 2006-07 school year, from the National Household Education Surveys Program of 2007: First look (NCES No. 2008–050). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, T. (2008). Pay for college without sacrificing your retirement: A guide to your financial future. Point Richmond, CA: Bay Tree Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. M. (1997). Why do parents become involved in their children’s education? Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 3–42. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1170618.

  • Horn, L. J., Chen, X., & Chapman, C. (2003). Getting ready to pay for college: What students and their parents know about the cost of college tuition and what they are doing to find out (NCES Statistical Analysis Report No. 2003–030). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossler, D., & Vesper, N. (1993). An exploratory study of the factors associated with parental saving for postsecondary education. The Journal of Higher Education, 64(2), 140–165. doi:10.2307/2960027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ifill, R. M., & McPherson, M. S. (2004). When saving means losing: Weighing the benefits of college savings plans. Indianapolis, IN: Lumina Foundation for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Immerwahr, J. (2000). Great expectations: How the public and parents–White, African American and Hispanic–view higher education (No. R-00-2). San Jose, CA: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education and Public Agenda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingels, S. J., Pratt, D. J., Rogers, J. E., Siegel, P. H., Stutts, E. S., & Owings, J. A. (2004). Education longitudinal study of 2002: Base year data file user’s manual (NCES No. 2004–405). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, B. M., & Olivas, M. A. (2000). Prepaying and saving for college: Opportunities and issues (Policy Perspectives No. 3). Washington, DC: College Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, T., Adams, D., & Kim, J. S. (2010). Mapping the perspectives of low-income parents in a children’s college savings account program. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 129–136. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.08.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y., & Sherraden, M. (2011). Do parental assets matter for children’s educational attainment?: Evidence from mediation tests. Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 969–979. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.01.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lareau, A. (1987). Social class differences in family-school relationships. Sociology of Education, 60(2), 73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lareau, A. (2011). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N. (2001). Building a network theory of social capital. In N. Lin, K. S. Cook & R. S. Burt (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 3–29). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lippman, L., Guzman, L., Keith, J. D., Kinukawa, A., Shwalb, R., & Tice, P. (2008). Parent expectations and planning for college (NCES Statistical Analysis Report No. 2008–079). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, S. R. (2001). Effectively maintained inequality: Education transitions, track mobility, and social background effects. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1642–1690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, S. R. (2009). Stratification theory, socioeconomic background, and educational attainment. Rationality and Society, 21(4), 459–511. doi:10.1177/1043463109348987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luna de la Rosa, M. (2006). Is opportunity knocking?: Low-income students’ perceptions of college and financial aid. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(12), 1670–1686. doi:10.1177/0002764206289139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manly, C., & Wells, R. (2015). Reporting the use of multiple imputation for missing data in higher education research. Research in Higher Education, 56(4), 397–409. doi:10.1007/s11162-014-9344-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, N., & Spenner, K. (2009). Capital conversion and accumulation: A social portrait of legacies at an elite university. Research in Higher Education, 50(7), 623–648. doi:10.1007/s11162-009-9136-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, P. M. (1997). Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, P. M. (1998). Structuring college opportunities: A cross-case analysis of organizational cultures, climates, and habiti. In C. A. Torres & T. A. Mitchell (Eds.), Sociology of education: Emerging perspectives (pp. 181–210). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, P. M., Antonio, A. L., & Horvat, E. M. (1997). College choice as capital conversion and investment: A new model. Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Meeting Paper. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost ERIC database.

  • Mian, A. R., & Sufi, A. (2009). House prices, home equity-based borrowing, and the U.S. household leverage crisis (NBER Working Paper No. 15283). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nam, J., & Ansong, D. (2015). The effects of a dedicated education savings account on children’s college graduation. Economics of Education Review, 48, 198–207. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.07.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Napolitano, L. J., Pacholok, S., & Furstenberg, F. F. (2014). Educational aspirations, expectations, and realities for middle-income families. Journal of Family Issues, 35(9), 1200–1226. doi:10.1177/0192513X13479334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). Education longitudinal study of 2002: Parent questionnaire base year. Retrieved from U.S. Department of Education Web site: http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/els2002/pdf/ParentQ_baseyear.pdf.

  • Paulsen, M. B., & St. John, E. P. (2002). Social class and college costs: Examining the financial nexus between college choice and persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 73(2), 189–236. doi:10.1353/jhe.2002.0023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perna, L. W. (2000). Differences in the decision to attend college among African-Americans, Hispanics, and whites. Journal of Higher Education, 71(2), 117–141. doi:10.2307/2649245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perna, L. W. (2006). Understanding the relationship between information about college prices and financial aid and students’ college-related behaviors. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(12), 1620–1635. doi:10.1177/0002764206289144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perna, L. W., & Titus, M. A. (2005). The relationship between parental involvement as social capital and college enrollment: An examination of racial/ethnic group differences. Journal of Higher Education, 76(5), 485–518. doi:10.1353/jhe.2002.0036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1–24. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes, J. W. (2008). College financial aid rules and the allocation of savings. Education Economics, 16(2), 167–189. doi:10.1080/09645290701383605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, A. J., Temple, J. A., Robertson, D. L., & Mann, E. A. (2002). Age 21 cost-benefit analysis of the Title I Chicago Child-Parent Centers (Discussion Paper No. 1245–02). Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison. Insttute for Research on Poverty.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, J. R., & Burge, S. W. (2008). Educational expectations and the rise in women’s post-secondary attainments. Social Science Research, 37, 485–499. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowan-Kenyon, H., Bell, A. D., & Perna, L. W. (2008). Contextual influences on parental involvement in college going. Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 564–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sallie Mae (2015a). How America pays for college 2015: Sallie Mae’s national study of college students and parents. Retrieved from http://news.salliemae.com/files/doc_library/file/HowAmericaPaysforCollege2015FNL.pdf.

  • Sallie Mae (2015b). How America saves for college 2015: Sallie Mae’s national study of parents with children under age 18. Retrieved from https://salliemae.newshq.businesswire.com/files/doc_library/file/HowAmericaSaves2015_FINAL.pdf.

  • Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7(2), 147–177. doi:10.1037//1082-989X.7.2.147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. C. (2005). Attributes of exemplary research manuscripts employing quantitative analyses. Research in Higher Education, 46(4), 461–477. doi:10.1007/s11162-005-2970-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, H., & Elliott, W. (2012). The effects of parents’ college savings on college expectations and Hispanic youth’s four-year college attendance. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(9), 1845–1852. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.05.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swartz, D. (1997). Culture and power: The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, D. J. (2009). Quantitative data analysis: Doing social research to test ideas. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trent, W. T., Lee, H. S., & Owens-Nicholson, D. (2006). Perceptions of financial aid among students of color: Examining the role(s) of self-concept, locus of control, and expectations. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(12), 1739–1759. doi:10.1177/0002764206289146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Buuren, S. (2012). Flexible imputation of missing data. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walpole, M. (2007). Economically and educationally challenged students in higher education: Access to outcomes. ASHE Higher Education Report, 33(3).

  • Wells, R. S. (2008). Social and cultural capital, race and ethnicity, and college student retention. Journal of College Student Retention, 10(2), 103–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikoff, N., Huan, J., Kim, Y., & Sherraden, M. (2015). Material hardship and 529 college savings plan participation: The mitigating effects of child development accounts. Social Science Research, 50, 189–202. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.11.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams Shanks, T. R., Leyda Nicoll, K., & Johnson, T. (2014). Assets and African Americans: Attempting to capitalize on hopes for children through college savings accounts. Review of Black Political Economy, 41(3), 337–356. doi:10.1007/s12114-014-9185-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmazer, T. (2008). Saving for children’s college education: An empirical analysis of the trade-off between the quality and quantity of children. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29(2), 307–324. doi:10.1007/s10834-008-9105-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Robert Gable, Gary Malaney, Greg Wolniak, and Jessica Wolpaw for helpful comments on early drafts of this paper, although of course, any errors or omissions in the final paper are solely the responsibility of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine A. Manly.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Manly, C.A., Wells, R.S. & Bettencourt, G.M. Financial Planning for College: Parental Preparation and Capital Conversion. J Fam Econ Iss 38, 421–438 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-016-9517-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-016-9517-0

Keywords

Navigation