Abstract
Theoretical arguments suggest that a higher socioeconomic status can improve health and as a consequence reduce the need for sick leave. The purpose of this study is to empirically investigate causal effects between spousal income and absence from the workplace due to sickness. To control for unobserved heterogeneity a Swedish sample of female twins and a semiparametric censored fixed-effects model was used. Results for dizygotic (fraternal) twins indicated that male spousal income, i.e., a non-shared environmental influence, reduced the share of income that was government-paid sickness benefits. Data on monozygotic twins, who have identical genes, provide a more complete control for unobserved heterogeneity. No causal effect was found in this case.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Despite these complications, own income was tested in this study as an exercise of diagnostic character. Results from this exercise are mentioned in the results section.
The Swedish Social Insurance Agency has no official translation of the concept.
No qualitative difference was found if θ = 2, θ = 4, θ = 10 or θ = 100. If θ is set as low as θ = 0.5 the standard errors are, in general, very high and the coefficients are seldom significantly different from zero. For the dizygotic sample, the covariance matrix of the objective function’s second derivative was not of full rank when θ = 10 or θ = 100 for the model with the disposable income in 1998 for the spouse. These results are available on request from the author. Numerical derivatives are used with a bandwidth set to 0.2. Changing the bandwidth does not affect the estimated coefficient, but its standard error. Estimates are also performed with the bandwidth set to 0.1 and 0.3. If the coefficient is significantly different from zero at another significance level when the bandwidth is set to 0.1 or 0.3 the difference is noted in the tables. (See the instructions for Pantob, written by Campbell and Honoré 1991, for more details concerning the options).
Pearson χ2 (1) = 5.3722 (p = 0.020), estimated from a two-way table of frequency counts.
References
Adler, N. E., Boyce, T., Chesney, M. A., Cohen, S., Folkman, S., Kahn, R. L., et al. (1994). Socioeconomic status and health: The challenge of the gradient. American Psychologist, 49, 15–24.
Ashenfelter, O., & Rouse, C. (1998). Income, schooling, and ability: Evidence from a new sample of identical twins. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 253–284.
Auld, C. M., & Sidhu, N. (2005). Schooling, cognitive ability and health. Health Economics, 14, 1019–1034.
Backhans, M. (2004). Varför är kvinnor mer sjukskrivna än män?—En kunskapsöversikt. In C. Hogstedt, M. Bjurvald, S. Marklund, E. Palmer, & T. Theorell (Eds.), Den höga sjukfrånvaron—sanning och konsekvens (pp. 175–205). Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish National Institute of Public Health.
Buckley, N. J., Denton, F. T., Robb, A. L., & Spencer, B. G. (2004). The transition from good to poor health: An econometric study of the older population. Journal of Health Economics, 23, 1013–1034.
Campbell, J. R., & Honoré, B. E. (1991). Pantob instructions. (Unpublished manuscript). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
Case, A., Lubotsky, D., & Paxson, C. (2002). Economic status and health in childhood: The origins of the gradient. American Economic Review, 92, 1308–1334.
Case, A., Fertig, A., & Paxson, C. (2005). The lasting impact of childhood health and circumstances. Journal of Health Economics, 24, 365–389.
Chen, Z., Yen, S. T., & Eastwood, D. B. (2007). Does smoking have a causal effect on weight reduction? Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28, 49–67.
Deaton, A. (2002). Policy implications of the gradient of health and wealth. Health Affairs, 21(2), 13–30.
Finke, M. S., & Huston, S. J. (2003). Factors affecting the probability of choosing a risky diet. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 24, 291–303.
Frijters, P., Haisken-DeNew, J. P., & Shields, M. A. (2005). The causal effect of income on health: Evidence from German reunification. Journal of Health Economics, 24, 997–1017.
Fuchs, V. R. (2004). Reflections on the socio-economic correlates of health. Journal of Health Economics, 23, 653–661.
Godfrey, K. M., & Barker, D. J. P. (2000). Fetal nutrition and adult disease. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 71, 1344–1352.
Grafova, I. B. (2007). Your money or your life: Managing health, managing money. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28, 285–303.
Honoré, B. E. (1992). Trimmed lad and least squares estimation of truncated and censored regression models with fixed effects. Econometrica, 60, 533–565.
Isacsson, G. (1999). Estimates of the return to schooling in Sweden from a large sample of twins. Labour Economics, 6, 471–489.
Kim, J., Sorhaindo, B., & Garman, T. E. (2006). Relationship between financial stress and workplace absenteeism of credit counseling clients. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 27, 458–478.
Lindahl, M. (2005). Estimating the effect of income on health and mortality using lottery prizes as exogenous source of variation in income. Journal of Human Resources, 40, 144–168.
Lykken, D. T., & Tellegen, A. (1993). Is human mating adventitious or the result of lawful choice? A twin study of mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 56–68.
McKinnish, T. (2007). Panel data models and transitory fluctuations in the explanatory variable. In D. Millimet, J. Smith, & EJ Vytlacil (Eds.), Advances in Econometrics, Vol. 21. Oxford, England: Elsevier.
Michaud, P.–C., & van Soest, A. (2004). Health and wealth of elderly couples: Causality tests using dynamic panel data models. (CentER Discussion Paper, No. 2004–81). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
Neumark, D. (1999). Biases in twin estimates of the return to schooling. Economics of Education Review, 18, 143–148.
Nilsson, W. (2008). Unemployment, splitting up and spousal income replacement. Labour, 22, 73–106.
O’Hara, B. (2004). Do mothers work to support ailing husbands? Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 25, 197–198.
Singh-Manoux, A., Ferrie, J. E., Lynch, J. W., & Marmot, M. (2005). The role of cognitive ability (intelligence) in explaining the association between socioeconomic position and health: Evidence for the Whitehall II Prospective Cohort Study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 161, 831–839.
Sloan, R. P., Huang, M.-H., Sidney, S., Liu, K., Williams, O. D., & Seeman, T. (2005). Socioeconomic status and health: is parasympathetic nervous system activity an intervening mechanism? International Journal of Epidemiology, 34, 309–315.
Smith, J. P. (1999). Healthy bodies and thick wallets: The dual relation between health and economic status. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(2), 145–166.
Spotts, E. L., Neiderhiser, J. M., Caniban, J., Reiss, D., Lichtenstein, P., Hansson, K., et al. (2004). Accounting for depressive symptoms in women: A twin study of associations with interpersonal relationships. Journal of Affective Disorders, 82, 101–111.
Tiffin, P. A., Pearce, M., Kaplan, C., Fundudis, T., & Parker, L. (2007). The impact of socio-economic status and mobility on perceived family functioning. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28, 653–667.
Wilkinson, R. G. (1996). Unhealty societies: The affliction of inequality. London: Routledge.
Zimmerman, F. J., & Katon, W. (2005). Socioeconomic status, depression disparities, and financial strain: What lies behind the income-depression relationship? Health Economics, 14, 1197–1215.
Acknowledgments
I wish to thank two anonymous referees, seminar participants at Amsterdam Free University, in particular, Maarten Lindeboom and Bas van der Klaauw, and seminar participants at Centre for Research in Welfare Economics (CREB), Universitat de Barcelona. I wish also to thank Niklas Rudholm for valuable comments on a draft of the paper. Financial support from Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research is gratefully acknowledged. All data, except for the identification of the twin sample, come from Statistics Sweden (SCB). The twin information comes from the Swedish Twin Registry (STR). The Swedish Twin Registry is supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nilsson, W. Spousal Income and Sick Leave: What do Twins Tell us About Causality?. J Fam Econ Iss 29, 407–426 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-008-9108-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-008-9108-9