Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Enriching educational accountabilities through collaborative public conversations: Conceptual and methodological insights from the Learning Commission approach

  • Published:
Journal of Educational Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article describes the use of a Learning Commission to experiment with conceptualising and implementing richer modes of educational accountability. A Learning Commission is a form for collaborative thinking that brings different kinds of knowledge and expertise to bear in relation to a common matter of concern: the role of schools in relation to the communities they serve. As part of a broader research project, we used a Learning Commission to co-produce knowledge about community expectations of schools in a regional area of Queensland, Australia. We analysed data generated through this process using a narrative approach and synthesised the findings in a conceptualisation of rich accountabilities that offers an alternative to top-down, test-based modes of accountability. Rich accountabilities raise anew the questions of who should be accountable, what counts and whose practices should be changed by accountability systems. The article thus describes (a) an alternative model of accountability in education and (b) an alternative theorisation of accountability informed by the implementation of this model as a method for co-producing research about schools and communities. The article provides significant conceptual and methodological resources for further experiments in enriching educational accountability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The PETRA project was funded by the Australian Research Council Linkage scheme (100200841). The research team included Professor Bob Lingard, Professor Peter Renshaw, Professor Martin Mills, Dr Sam Sellar, Dr Aspa Baroutsis, Dr Sue Monk, Dr Richard Waters (The University of Queensland), Professor Marie Brennan, Dr Lew Zipin (Victoria University), Dr John Dungan and other members of the Strategic Policy and Research Division (Queensland Department of Education, Training and Employment).

  2. For further details about the community in which the schools were located and about the PETRA project, see Baroutsis (2016) and Brennan et al. (2016).

  3. The My School (myschool.edu.au) website makes public a range of school-level data about every school in Australia, including the aggregated school results of the National Assessment Program.

  4. The Alice Springs Education Declaration articulates goals for all Australian schools as agreed to by all education systems and the federal government. It builds from earlier such Declarations, the most recent of which was the Melbourne Declaration of 2008.

  5. The study was conducted in a rural/regional part of Queensland; therefore, we note that perceptions of these social skills might be articulated in different ways across the nation. We were surprised at the emphasis given to handwriting in this digital age.

  6. Centrelink is an Australian Government agency responsible for the delivery social, health and child support services and payments for a variety of groups including the unemployed.

References

  • Ball, S. J. (2006). Education policy and social class: The selected works of Stephen Ball. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baroutsis, A. (2016). Media accounts of school performance: Reinforcing dominant practices of accountability. Journal of Education Policy, 31(5), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2016.1145253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2004). Education, accountability, and the ethical demand: Can the democratic potential of accountability be regained? Educational Theory, 54(3), 233–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, M., Zipin, L., & Sellar, S. (2016). Negotiating with the neighbours: Balancing different accountabilities across a cluster of regional schools. In B. Lingard, G. Thompson, & S. Sellar (Eds.), National testing in schools: An Australian assessment (pp. 199–211). New York: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin, D. J., Murphy, M. S., Huber, J., & Orr, M. (2009). Negotiating narrative inquiries: Living in a tension-filled midst. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(2), 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couldry, N. (2010). Why voice matters: Culture and politics after neoliberalism. Los Angeles: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Council. (2019). Alice Springs (Mparntwe) Education Declaration. Retrieved 29 September 2020, from: https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/final_-_alice_springs_declaration_-_17_february_2020_security_removed.pdf

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., Ancess, J., & Falk, B. (1995). Authentic assessment in action: Studies of schools and students at work. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., Wilhoit, G., & Pittenger, L. (2014). Accountability for college and career readiness: Developing a new paradigm. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(86), 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. L., & Sheldon, S. B. (2016). Necessary but not sufficient: The role of policy for advancing programs of school, family, and community partnerships. The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 2(5), 202–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, J. (2011). Reading the popular (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A., Earl, L., & Schmidt, M. (2002). Perspectives on alternative assessment reform. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 69–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D., Mills, M., Christie, P., & Lingard, B. (2006). Teachers and schooling: Making a difference. Crows Nest, AU: Allen Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschmann, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations and states. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, N. L., Kingsley, B. C., Tink, L. N., & Scherer, J. (2011). Benefits and challenges associated with sport participation by children and parents from low-income families. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12(5), 490–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lareau, A. (2011). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lawn, M. (2013). A systemless system: Designing the disarticulation of English state education. European Educational Research Journal, 12(2), 231–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B. (2014). Reviewing education policy to develop a shared vision of excellence and innovation. Keynote Address, the Maynooth Education Forum, Ireland, 27 June

  • Lingard, B., & Lewis, S. (2016). Globalization of the Anglo-American approach to top-down, test-based educational accountability. In G. Brown & L. Harris (Eds.) Handbook of Human and Social Factors in Assessment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., Sellar, S., & Lewis, S. (2017). Accountabilities in schools and school systems. In G. Noblit (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll, L. C. (2014). L S Vygotsky and education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualititive approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, S., & Berliner, D. C. (2007). Collateral damage: How high stakes testing corrupts America’s schools. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (2003). Is teaching a practice? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 37(2), 241–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 results: Ready to learn: Students’ engagement, drive and self-beliefs (Vol. III). Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ozga, J. (2009). Governing education through data in England: From regulation to self-regulation. Journal of Education Policy., 24, 149–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozga, J. (2012). Governing knowledge: Data, inspection and education policy in Europe. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 10(4), 439–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinnegar, S., & Daynes, J. G. (2007). Locating narrative inquiry historically: Thematics in the turn to narrative. In D. J. Clandinin (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. 3–35). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ranson, S. (2003). Public accountability in the age of neo-liberal governance. Journal of Education Policy, 18(5), 459–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranson, S. (2012). Schools and civil society: Corporate or community governance. Critical Studies in Education, 53(1), 29–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranson, S. (2018). Education, Democratic Participation: The Making of Learning Communities. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlberg, P. (2007). Education policies for raising student learning: The Finnish approach. Journal of Education Policy, 22(2), 147–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlberg, P. (2010). Rethinking accountability in a knowledge society. Journal of Educational Change, 11(1), 45–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellar, S. (2015). Transparency and opacity: Levinasian reflections on accountability in Australian schooling. Educational Philosophy and Theory: Incorporating ACCESS, 47(2), 118–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stengers, I. (2010). Cosmopolitics 1. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stengers, I. (2011). Comparison as a matter of concern. Common Knowledge, 17(1), 48–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tate, W. (2012). Research on schools, neighbourhoods, and communities. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). Educational Psychology. Boco Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whatmore, S. J. (2009). Mapping knowledge controversies: Science, democracy and the redistribution of expertise. Progress in Human Geography, 33(5), 587–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whatmore, S. J., & Landström, C. (2011). Flood apprentices: An exercise in making things public. Economy and Society, 40(4), 582–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bob Lingard.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lingard, B., Baroutsis, A. & Sellar, S. Enriching educational accountabilities through collaborative public conversations: Conceptual and methodological insights from the Learning Commission approach. J Educ Change 22, 565–587 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-020-09407-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-020-09407-x

Keywords

Navigation