Skip to main content
Log in

On the argument structure of Zi-verbs in Japanese: reply to Tsujimura and Aikawa (1999)

  • Published:
Journal of East Asian Linguistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tsujimura and Aikawa (J Assoc Teach Jpn 33: 26–43, 1999) argue that objectless zi-verbs in Japanese uniformly have the unaccusative argument structure based on two tests for unaccusativity (resultative predication and quantifier floating). In this paper, we provide new evidence against their uniform unaccusative analysis. Applying several other diagnostics for external/internal argumenthood in Japanese, we demonstrate that objectless zi-verbs instantiate a full range of argument structure configurations: (a) transitive (e.g., zi-satu-suru ‘kill oneself’), (b) unaccusative (e.g., zi-kai-suru ‘collapse by itself’), and (c) unergative (e.g., zi-sui-suru ‘cook for oneself’). We further show that our new analysis framed in terms of the Lexical Conceptual Structure not only derives the various properties of the three types of objectless zi-verbs but also derives the different argument structural functions and meanings that the zi-morpheme is associated with in each type.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burzio Luigi. (1986) Italian syntax: A government-binding approach. Reidel, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter Richard (1976) Some constraints on possible words. Semantikos 1: 27–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty David. (1991) Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67: 547–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, Stanley. 1985. Japanese union constructions: A unified analysis of -sase and -rare. Ph. D. diss., Cornell University.

  • Grimshaw Jane., Alrmin Mester. (1988) Light verbs and -ma rking. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 205–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale Kenneth., Samuel Jay Keyser. (1986) Some transitivity alternation in English. In Lexicon project working papers 7. Center for Cognitive Science. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Inoue Kazuko. (1976) Henkei bunpoo to nihongo [Transformational grammar and Japanese]. Taishukan, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff Ray. (1972) Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff Ray. (1990) Semantic structures. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeggli Osvaldo. (1986) Passive. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 582–622

    Google Scholar 

  • Kageyama, Taro. 1993. Bunpoo to gokeisei [ Grammar and word formation] . Tokyo: Hituzi Shobo.

  • Kageyama, Taro. 1996. Dousi imiron [Semantics of verbs]. Tokyo: Kurosio Syuppan.

  • Kishimoto Hideki. (1996) Split intransitivity in Japanese and the unaccusative hypothesis. Language 72: 248–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kishimoto Hideki. (2005) Toogo koozoo to bunpoo kankei [Syntactic structures and grammatical relations]. Kurosio Publishers, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Koizumi, Masatoshi. 1999. Phrase structure in Minimalist syntax. Tokyo: Hituzi syobo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin Beth., Malka Rappaport Hovav. (1995) Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyagawa Shigeru. (1989a) Structure and case marking in Japanese. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyagawa Shigeru. (1989b) Light verbs and the ergative hypothesis. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 659–668

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishigauchi, Taisuke. 1993. Long distance passive. In Japanese syntax in comparative grammar, ed. Nobuko Hasegawa, 79–114. Tokyo: Kuroshio.

  • Perlmutter, David. 1978. Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. In Proceedings of the fourth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. J. Jaeger et al., 157–189. Berkeley: University of California.

  • Pinker Steven. (1989) Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi Luigi. (1986) Null subjects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–557

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, Jane. 1983. Resultatives. In Papers in lexical-functional grammar, ed. Lori Levin et al., 143–157. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.

  • Smith, Carlota. 1970. Jespersen’s ‘move and change’ class and causative verbs in English. In Linguistic and literary studies in honor of Archibald A. Hill. Vol 2: Descriptive linguistics, ed. M.A. Jazayery et al., 101–109. The Hague: Mouton.

  • Takezawa, Koichi. 1991. Zyudoobun, nookakubun, bunrihukanoosyoyuukoobun to teiru no kaisyaku [Passives, ergatives, inalienable possession constructions, and the interpretation of -teiru]. In Nihongo no boisu to tadoosei [Voice and transitivity in Japanese], ed. Nitta Yoshio, 59–81. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.

  • Tsujimura Natsuko. (1990) Ergativity of nouns and case assignment. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 277–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsujimura Natsuko., Takako Aikawa. (1999) Two types of zi-verbs in Japanese. Journal of the Association of Teachers of Japanese 33: 26–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maki Kishida.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kishida, M., Sato, Y. On the argument structure of Zi-verbs in Japanese: reply to Tsujimura and Aikawa (1999). J East Asian Linguist 21, 197–218 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-011-9088-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-011-9088-x

Keywords

Navigation