Skip to main content
Log in

P-stranding under sluicing and repair by ellipsis: why is Indonesian (not) special?

  • Published:
Journal of East Asian Linguistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents novel evidence that P-stranding in Indonesian contradicts Merchant’s (The syntax of silence: sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis, 2001) generalization that P-stranding under sluicing is possible only in those languages that allow this option under regular wh-movement. It is proposed that this apparently special pattern is accounted for by the recent idea of repair by ellipsis (Ross, in Binnick et al. (eds.) Papers from the 5th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 1969; Merchant, The syntax of silence: sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis; Lasnik, M: Kim and Strauss (eds.) Proceedings of NELS 31, 2001). Specifically, the failure of percolation of the wh-feature is repaired by PF deletion. P-stranding in French and German cannot be so repaired since the violation in question is a strictly computational violation caused by D-to-P incorporation. Our cross-linguistic examination of P-stranding suggests a bifurcated view of violations (Boeckx and Lasnik in Linguistic Inquiry 37: 150–155, 2006); violations pertaining to the syntax-phonology interface in principle can be repaired whereas violations incurred within the syntactic computation cannot. This contrast in “reparability” naturally falls out from a minimalist architecture of the syntax-phonology interface. A broader implication of the present analysis is that syntax is itself not a crash-proof system in the sense of Frampton and Gutmann (Syntax 2:1–27, 1999; Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program. Blackwell, Oxford, 2002); it could produce certain operational failures, but language-particular parameters afford a bit of leeway for PF to remedy them at the syntax-phonology interface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almeida Diogo, Masaya Yoshida (2007) A problem for the preposition stranding generalization. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 349–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker Mark (1988) Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeckx Cedric, Howard Lasnik (2006) Intervention and Repair. Linguistic Inquiry 37: 150–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobaljik, Jonathan. 1995. Morphosyntax: The syntax of verbal inflection. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Bolinger, Dwight. 1978. Asking more than one thing at a time. In Questions, ed. Henry Hiz, 107–150. Dordrecht: Reidel.

  • Chierchia Gennaro (1998) Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6: 339–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1972. Some empirical issues in the theory of transformational grammar. In Goals of linguistic theory, ed. Stanley Peters, 63–130. Englewood Cliffs: Winston.

  • Chomsky Noam (1986) Barriers. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky Noam (1995) The minimalist program. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in language, ed. Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Chomsky, Noam. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 3, ed. Adrianna Belletti, 104–131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Chung Sandra (2000) Reference to kinds in Indonesian. Natural Language Semantics 8: 157–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, Sandra. 2006. Sluicing and the lexicon: The point of no return. In Proceedings of the 31st Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. Rebecca T. Cover and Yuni Kim, 73–91. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.

  • Chung Sandra, William Ladusaw, James McCloskey (1995) Sluicing and logical form. Natural Language Semantics 3: 239–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortin, Catherine. 2007. Indonesian sluicing and verb phrase ellipsis: Description and explanation in a minimalist framework. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.

  • Fox Danny, Howard Lasnik (2003) Successive-cyclic movement and island repair: The difference between sluicing and VP-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 143–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frampton John, Sam Gutmann (1999) Cyclic computation, a computationally efficient minimalist syntax. Syntax 2: 1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frampton, John, and Sam Gutmann. 2002. Crash-proof syntax. In Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program, ed. Samuel D. Epstein and T. Daniel Seely, 90–105. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Groenendijk, Jeroen, and Martin Stokhof. 1997. Questions. In Handbook of logic and language, ed. Johan van Benthem and Alice ter Meulen, 1055–1124. Amsterdam/Cambridge, MA: Elsevier/MIT Press.

  • Halle, Morris, and Marantz, Alec. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In A view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvian Bromberger, ed. Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Hankamer Jorge, Ivan Sag (1976) Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 391–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayaseelan K.A. (1990) Incomplete VP-deletion and gapping. Linguistic Analysis 20: 64–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne Richard (1994) The antisymmetry of syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy Chris, Jason Merchant (2000) Attributive comparative deletion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 89–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiss Katalin (1998) Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74: 245–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik Howard (1999a) On feature strength: Three minimalist approaches to overt movement. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 197–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik Howard (1999b) Minimalist analysis. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik, Howard. 2001. When can you save a structure by destroying it? In Proceedings of NELS 31, ed. Min-Joo Kim and Uri Strauss, 301–320. University of Massachusetts, Amherst: GLSA Publications.

  • Lasnik, Howard. 2005. Speculations on P-stranding. Class lecture handout, Linguistic Society of America Summer Institute, MIT/Harvard University, June-August 2005. http://www.ling.umd.edu/~lasnik/LSA%20course/Lasnik%20LSA%20HO%20Sect%202%20Appendix%20P-stranding.pdf] Accessed February 2, 2011.

  • Lasnik, Howard. 2006. Multiple sluicing in English. ms., University of Maryland, College Park.

  • Law, Paul. 1998. A unified analysis of P-stranding in Romance and Germanic. In Proceedings of NELS 28, ed. Pius Tamanji and Kiyomi Kusumoto, 219–234. University of Massachusetts, Amherst: GLSA Publications.

  • Law, Paul. 2006. Preposition stranding. In The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol. 3, Blackwell, ed. Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk, 631–684. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

  • Levin, Nancy. 1979/1986. Main verb ellipsis in spoken English. Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University. [Published 1986 by Garland, New York].

  • Merchant, Jason. 1998. Pseudosluicing: Elliptical clefts in Japanese and English. In ZAS Papers in Linguistics 10, ed. Artemis Alexiadou, Nanna Fuhrop, Paul Law, and Ursula Kleinhenz, 88–112. Berlin: Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft.

  • Merchant Jason (2001) The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant Jason (2008) An asymmetry in voice mismatches in VP-ellipsis and pseudogapping. Linguistic Inquiry 39: 169–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishigauchi Taisuke (1998) ‘Multiple sluicing’ in Japanese and the functional nature of wh-phrases. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 7: 121–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, Jairo. 1995. The copy theory of movement and the linearization of chains in the minimalist program. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.

  • Nunes Jairo (2004) Linearization of chains and sideward movement. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Postal Paul (1972) On some rules that are not successive cyclic. Linguistic Inquiry 3: 211–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, Norvin. 1997. What moves where when in which language? Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.

  • Rodriguez, Cilene, Andrew Nevins, and Luis Vincent. 2009. Cleaving the Interactions between Sluicing and Preposition Stranding. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2006, ed. Leo Wetzels and Jeroen van der Weijer, 175–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Rosen, Carol. 1976. Guess what about? In Proceedings of NELS 6, ed. in Alan Ford, John Reighard, and Rajendra Singh, 205–211. University of Massachusetts, Amherst: GLSA Publications.

  • Ross, John. 1969. Guess Who? In Papers from the 5th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago Linguistic Society, ed. Robert I. Binnick, Alice Davison, Georgia Green, and Jerry Morgan, 252–286. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

  • Sato, Yosuke. 2010. Minimalist interfaces: Evidence from Indonesian and Javanese. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Sells, Peter. 1984. Syntax and semantics of resumptive pronouns. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Stjepanović, Sandra. 2003. Multiple wh-fronting in Serbo-Croatian matrix questions and the matrix sluicing construction. In Multiple wh-fronting, ed. Cedric Boeckx and Kleanthes K. Grohmann, 255–284. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Stjepanović Sandra (2008) P-stranding under sluicing in a non-P-stranding language?. Linguistic Inquiry 39: 179–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szczegielniak, Adam. 2006. All sluiced up, but no alleviation in sight. ms., Harvard University.

  • Szczegielniak, Adam. 2008. Islands in sluicing in Polish. In Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. Natasha Abner and Jason Bishop, 404–412. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.

  • Takahashi Daiko (1994) Sluicing in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 3: 263–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, Shoichi. 2004. Pseudogapping and cyclic linearization. In Proceedings of NELS 34, ed. Matthew Wolf and Keir Moulton, 571–585. University of Massachusetts, Amherst: GLSA Publications.

  • Tanaka, Hidekazu. 2007. Ellipsis under syntactic isomorphism. ms., University of York.

  • van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen. 2004. Ellipsis in Dutch dialects. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Leiden.

  • van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen. 2007. What lies beneath: On the hidden syntax of sluicing. Paper presented at Brown Bag Talk, New York University.

  • van Craenenbroeck Jeroen (2010a) The syntax of ellipsis: Evidence from Dutch dialects. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • van Craenenbroeck Jeroen (2010b) Invisible last resort: A note on clefts as the underlying source for sluicing. Lingua 120: 1714–1726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Riemsdijk Henk (1998) Head movement and adjacency. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16: 633–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicente, Luis. 2008. Syntactic isomorphism and non-isomorphism under ellipsis. ms., University of California, Santa Cruz.

  • Wang, Chyan-An. 2006. Sluicing and resumption. Paper presented at the 18th Conference of the Northeast Linguistic Society, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yosuke Sato.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sato, Y. P-stranding under sluicing and repair by ellipsis: why is Indonesian (not) special?. J East Asian Linguist 20, 339–382 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-011-9082-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-011-9082-3

Keywords

Navigation