Skip to main content
Log in

Yori-comparatives: A reply to Beck et al. (2004)

  • Published:
Journal of East Asian Linguistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the syntax and semantics of the Japanese comparative construction that utilizes yori ‘than’, which functionally corresponds to the English more-comparative. While endorsing Beck et al.’s (J East Asian Linguist 13: 289–344, 2004) general claim that yori-comparatives cannot be analyzed on a par with the English comparative, the paper points out the problems associated with their analysis. Among the points the paper maintains in contrast with Beck et al. (J East Asian Linguist 13: 289–344, 2004) are (i) the denotation of the complement of yori is a degree, an individual, or a proposition, and (ii) yori-phrases take a gradable predicate as their argument; thus yori-phrases participate in the semantic composition of the matrix clause. In describing the difference between English and Japanese regarding the phenomena involving gradable predicates, the paper advocates Snyder et al.’s (Proceedings of the Thirteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 1994) hypothesis that AdjPs in Japanese lack the specifier position that hosts a degree variable or constant (cf. Fukui, A theory of category projection and its applications. Doctoral dissertation, 1986), dispensing with Beck et al.’s Degree Abstraction Parameter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartsch R., Vennemann T. (1973) Semantic structures: A study in the relation between syntax and semantics. Athenäum Verlag, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Basilico D. (1996) Head position and internally headed relative clauses. Language 72: 498–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck S., Oda T., Sugisaki K. (2004) Parametric variation in the semantics of comparison: Japanese vs. English. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 13: 289–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierwisch, M. 1989. The semantics of gradation. In Dimensional adjectives, ed. M. Bierwisch and E. Lang, 71–261, Berlin: Springer.

  • Bresnan J. (1973) Syntax of the comparative clause construction in English. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 275–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. 1977. On wh-movement. In Formal syntax, ed. P. Culicover, T. Wasow, and A. Akmajian. New York: Academic Press.

  • Chomsky N. (1981) Lectures on government and binding, the Pisa lectures. Foris, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, M.J. 1976. The semantics of degree. In Montague grammar, ed. B. Partee. New York: Academic Press.

  • Deguchi, M., and Y. Kitagawa. 2002. Prosody and wh-questions. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 32, 73–92. Amherst, Massachusetts: GLSA Publications.

  • Fukui, N. 1986. A theory of category projection and its applications. Doctoral dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Grice P. (1989) Studies in the way of words. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosu A., Landman F. (1998) Strange relatives of the third kind. Natural Language Semantics 6: 125–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamblin C.L. (1971) Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language 10: 41–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankamer, Jorge, Ivan Sag. (1976) Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 391–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayashishita, J.-R. 2003a. Restriction on covert movement—Evidence from comparative ellipsis in Japanese. In Japanese/Korean Linguistics, vol.12, 243–254. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

  • Hayashishita, J.-R. 2003b. What counts as IP-ellipsis? Unpublished manuscript. Kyoto University/University of Southern California. (Paper presented at the 2003 annual meeting of Linguistic Society of America, Boston, Massachusetts).

  • Hayashishita J.-R. (2007) Izyoo(ni)- and gurai-comparatives: Comparisons of deviation in Japanese. Gengo Kenkyu 132: 77–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayashishita, J.-R. 2009. Yori-comparative. In Proceedings of the V ASIAN GLOW: Delhi, 5-8 October 2005, ed. N. Khuong et al., 42–71. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages and New Delhi: FOSSSIL.

  • Heim, I. 1985. Notes on comparatives and related matters. Unpublished manuscript. University of Texas, Austin.

  • Hellan L. (1981) Towards an integrated analysis of comparatives. Tu¨bingen, Narr

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoji, H. 1990. Theories of anaphora and aspects of Japanese syntax. Unpublished manuscript. University of Southern California.

  • Hoji H. (1998) Null object and sloppy identity in Japanese. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 127–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoji, H. 2002. Surface and deep anaphora, sloppy identity, and experiments in syntax. In Anaphora: A reference guide, ed. A. Barss, 172–236. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell.

  • Ishii, Y. 1991. Operators and empty categories in Japanese. Doctoral dissertation. University of Connecticut.

  • Jacobson, P. 1995. On the quantificational force of English free relatives. In Quantification in natural languages, ed. E. Bach, E. Jelinck, A. Kratzer, and B. Bartee. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Karttunen L. (1977) Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 3–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy C. (1999) Projecting the adjective: The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. Garland, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy C. (2001) Polar opposition and the ontology of ‘degrees’. Linguistics and Philosophy 24: 33–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C. 2005. Parameters of comparison. Unpublished manuscript. University of Chicago. (Paper presented at Cornell University on November 10, 2005.)

  • Kennedy C. (2007) Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 1–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kikuchi, A. 1989. Comparative deletion in Japanese. Unpublished manuscript. Yamagata University.

  • Kuroda, S.-Y. 1965. Generative grammatical studies in the Japanese language. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Kuroda, S.-Y. 1999. Syuyoobu naizaigata kankeisetu [Internally-headed relative clauses]. In Kotoba no kaku to syuuen: Nihongo to Eego no aida [Core and outer domain of natural language: Between Japanese and English], ed. S.-Y. Kuroda and M. Nakamura. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.

  • Merchant J. (2001) The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihara, K. 1994. Nihongo no Toogo Koozo [Syntactic structures of Japanese sentences]. Tokyo: Shoohakusya.

  • Mukai, E. 2005. Comparatives in English and Japanese. Unpublished manuscript. University of Southern California.

  • Murasugi, K. 1991. Noun phrases in Japanese and English: A case study in syntax, learnability and acquisition. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.

  • Oshima, S. 1979. Conditions on rules: Anaphora in Japanese. In Exploration in linguistics: Papers in honor of Kazuko Inoue, ed. G. Bedell, E. Kobayashi, and M. Muraki, 423–448. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.

  • Otani K., Whitman J. (1991) V-raising and VP-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 345–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkal, M. 1989. On the logical structure of comparatives. In Lecture notes in artificial intelligence, ed. R. Studer, 146–167. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

  • Rullmann, H. 1995. Maximality in the semantics of wh-constructions. Doctoral dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Saito, M. 1985. Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Schwarzschild R., Wilkinson K. (2002) Quantifiers in comparatives: A semantics of degree based on intervals. Natural Language Semantics 10: 1–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimoyama, J. 2001. Wh-constructions in Japanese. Doctoral dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Snyder, W., K. Wexler, and D. Das. 1994. The syntactic representation of degree and quantity: Perspectives from Japanese and child English. In Proceedings of the thirteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 581–596. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

  • Tomioka, S. 2003. The semantics of null arguments in Japanese and its cross-linguistic implications. In Interface, ed. K. Schwabe and S. Winkler, 321–339. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin.

  • Ueyama, A. 1998. Are clausal comparatives in Japanese really ‘clausal’? Unpublished manuscript. Kyoto University of Foreign Studies. (Paper presented at Comparative workshop on Japanese, Chinese, Korean, and English, Kyushu University.)

  • Ueyama, A. 2004. Nihongo no hikakukoubun ni tuite [Notes on the syntactic/semantic properties of comparative constructions in Japanese]. Bungaku Kenkyu [Studies in Literature] no. 101, 45–47, Faculty of Humanities, Kyushu University.

  • von Stechow A. (1984) Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics 3: 1–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe A. (1992) Subjacency and S-structure movement of wh-in-situ. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1: 255–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. -R. Hayashishita.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hayashishita, J.R. Yori-comparatives: A reply to Beck et al. (2004). J East Asian Linguist 18, 65–100 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-009-9040-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-009-9040-5

Keywords

Navigation