Skip to main content
Log in

Examining the Role of Social Network Intervention as an Integral Component of Community-Based, Family-Focused Practice

  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social network intervention aimed at bolstering the informal supports of high risk families is recognized as a common element of community-based, family-focused practice models, such as intensive family preservation services (IFPS), multisystemic therapy (MST), and the wraparound process. The empirical research basis for these practice models is examined, with an eye toward discerning the extent to which network intervention is identified as a critical component of comprehensive service. Results reveal that few studies make clear the degree to which treatment adhered to a focus on natural network enhancement or the development of informal resources. Those that did, suggest that relatively few families received this form of ecologically-oriented intervention. Consequently, this body of practice research offers insufficient evidence of the benefits or limitations associated with network facilitation with multi-need families. Explanations for these findings are explored and directions for future research are recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrera, M., Sandler, I. N., & Ramsey, T. B. (1981). Preliminary development of a scale of social support: Studies on college students. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 435–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biegel, D. E., Tracy, E. M., & Corvo, K. N. (1994). Strengthening social networks: Intervention strategies for mental health case managers. Health and Social Work, 19, 206–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borduin, C. M., Blaske, D. M., Cone, L., Mann, B. J., & Hazelrigg, M. D. (1989). Development and validation of a measure of adolescent peer relations: The Missouri Peer Relations Inventory. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of Missouri—Columbia.

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunk, M., Henggeler, S. W., Whelan, J. P. (1987). A comparison of multisystemic therapy and parent training in brief treatment of child abuse and neglect. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 311–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, B. J., Schoenwald, S. K., Burchard, J. D., Faw, L., & Santos, A. B. (2000). Comprehensive community-based interventions for youth with severe emotional disorders: Multisystemic therapy and the wraparound process. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 9, 283–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. B. & Clarke, R. T. (1996). Research on the wraparound process and individualized services for children with multi-system needs. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. B., Lee, B. L., Prange, M. E., & McDonald, M. A. (1996). Children lost within the foster care system: Can wraparound service strategies improve placement outcomes? Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. T., Schaefer, M., Burchard, J. D., & Weikowitz, J. W. (1992). Wrapping community-based mental health services around children with a severe behavioral disorder: An evaluation of Project Wraparound. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 1, 241–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., & McKay, G. (1984). Social support, stress and the buffering hypothesis: A theoretical analysis. In A. Baum, S. E. Taylor, & J. E. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology and health (Vol. IV). Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., Mermelstein, R., Kamark, T., & Hoberman, H. M. (1985). Measuring the functional components of social support. In I. G. Sarason & B. R. Sarason (Eds.), Social support: Theory, research, and applications. Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., & Wills, S. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cutrona, C. E., & Cole, V. (2000). Optimizing support in the natural network. In S. Cohen, L. G. Underwood, & B. H. Gottlieb (Eds.). Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutrona, C. E., & Russell, D. W. (1990). Type of social support and specific stress: Toward a theory of optimal matching. In B. R. Sarason, I. G. Sarason, & G. R. Pierce (Eds.), Social support: An interactional view. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., & Deal, A. G. (1988). Enabling and empowering families: Principles and guidelines for practice. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eber, L., Osuch, R., Redditt, C. A. (1996). School-based applications of the wraparound process: Early results on service provision and student outcomes. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 83–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. E., Armstrong, M. I., Kuppinger, A. D., Huz, S., & McNulty, T. L. (1998). Preliminary outcomes of an experimental study comparing treatment foster care and family-centered case management. In M. H. Epstein, K. Kutash, & A. Duchnowski (Eds.), Outcomes for children and youth with emotional and behavioral disorders and their families: Programs and evaluation best practices (pp. 543–580). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, L. M. (1992). Assessing the effectiveness of family preservation services in New Jersey within an ecological context. New Jersey: Bureau of Research, Evaluation, and Quality Assurance, Division of Youth and Family Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, M. W., Nelson, K. E., & Rivard, J. C. (1997). Effectiveness of family preservation services. Social Work Research, 21, 138–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, M. W., Pecora, P. J., & Haapala, D. A. (1991). Families in crisis: The impact of intensive family preservation services. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froland, C., Pancoast, D. L., Chapman, N. J., Kimboko, P. J. (1981). Helping networks and human services. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, B. H. (1983). Social support strategies: Guidelines for mental health practice. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heflinger, C. A., & Bickman, L. (1996). Family empowerment: A conceptual model for promoting parent-professional partnership. In C. A. Heflinger, & C. T. Nixon (Eds.), Families and the mental health system for children and adolescents: Policies, services, and research (pp. 96–116). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henggeler, S. W., & Borduin, C. M. (1992). Multisystemic therapy adherence scales. Unpublished instrument. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina.

  • Henggeler, S. W., Melton, G. B., Brondino, M. J., Scherer, D. G., & Hanley, J. H. (1997). Multisystemic therapy with violent and chronic juvenile offenders and their families: The role of treatment fidelity in successful dissemination. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 821–833.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henggeler, S. W., Melton, G. B., Smith, L. A. (1992). Family preservation using multisystemic therapy: An effective alternative to incarcerating serious juvenile offenders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 953–961.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henggeler, S. W., Pikrel, S. G., & Brondino, M. J. (1999). Multisystemic treatment of substance abusing and dependent delinquents: Outcomes, treatment fidelity, and transportability. Mental Health Services Research, 1, 171–184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henggeler, S. W., Schoenwald, S. K., Borduin, C. M., Rowland, M. D., & Cunningham, P. B. (1998). Multisystemic treatment of antisocial behavior in children and adolescents. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huey, S. J., Henggeler, S. W., Brondino, M. J., & Pickrel, S. G. (2000). Mechanisms of change in multisystemic therapy: Reducing delinquent behavior through therapist adherence and improved family and peer functioning. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 451–467.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, K. L., Burchard, J. D., & Woodworth, K. (1996). Wrapping services in an urban setting. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 67–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illback, R. J., Nelson, C. M., & Sanders, D. (1998). Community-based services in Kentucky: Description and 5-year evaluation of Kentucky IMPACT. In M. H. Epstein, K. Kritash, & A. Duchnowski (Eds.), Outcomes for children and youth with behavioral and emotional disorders and their families: Programs and evaluation best practices (pp. 141–172). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamradt, B., Kostan, M. J., & Pina, V. (1998). Wraparound Milwaukee: Two year follow-up on the twenty-five kid project. In C. Liberton, K. Kutash, & R. Friedman (Eds.), 10th annual research conference. A system of care for children’s mental health: Expanding the research base (pp. 225–228). Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Florida Mental Health Institute Research and Training Center for Children’s Mental Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, S. P., Whittaker, J. K., & Tracy, E. (1997). Person-environment practice: The social ecology of interpersonal helping. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lourie, I. S., Stroul, B. A., & Friedman, R. M. (1998). Community-based systems of care: From advocacy to outcomes. In M. H. Epstein, K. Kutash, & A. Duchnowski (Eds.), Outcomes for children and youth with behavioral and emotional disorders and their families: Programs and evaluation best practices (pp. 3–19). Austin TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malysiak, R. (1998). Deciphering the Tower of Babel: Examining the theory base for wraparound fidelity. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 7, 11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCroskey, J., & Meezan, W. (1997). Family preservation and family functioning. Washington, DC: CWLA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milardo, R. M. (1983). Social networks and pair relationships: A review of substantive and measurement issues. Sociology and Social Research, 68, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, C., Tovar, P., & Knitzer, J. (1988). Evaluating the Bronx Homebuilders Program: The first 35 families. New York, NY: Bank Street College of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pecora, P. J., Whittaker, J. K., Maluccio, A. N., & Barth, R. P. (2000). The child welfare challenge: Policy, practice, and research. (2nd ed.). New York: Aldine De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J. (1981). In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 1–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, A. (1996). Bows and ribbons, tape and twine: Wrapping the wraparound process for children with multi-system needs. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 101–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saleebey, D. (1992). The strengths perspective in social work practice. New York: Longman Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuerman, J. R., Rzepnicki, T. L., & Little, J. H. (1994). Putting families first: An experiment family preservation. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, D. D., & McBride, A. A. (1992). Family, friends, and self (FSS) assessment scales for Mexican-American Youth. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Science, 14, 327–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Specht, H. (1986). Social support, social networks, social exchange, and social work practice. Social Service Review, 60, 218–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroul, B. (1996). Children’s mental health: Creating systems of care in a changing society. Baltimore, MA: Paul H. Brook Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, E. M., & Whittaker, J. M. (1987). The evidence base for social support intervention in child and family practice: Emerging issues for research and practice. Children and Youth Services Review, 9, 249–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanDenBerg, J. E., & Grealish, E. M. (1996). Individualized services and supports through the wraparound process: Philosophy and procedures. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 7–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, J. K., & Tracy, E. M. (1991). Social network intervention in intensive family-based preventive services. Prevention in the Human Services, 9, 175–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, Y. T., McDonald, W. R., Wheeler, C. E., Struckman-Johnson, D., & Rivest, M. (1990). Evaluation of AB 1562 in-home care demonstration projects: Volume I—Final report. Sacramento, CA: Department of Social Services, Office of Child Abuse Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathleen F. Cox Ph.D., L.C.S.W..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cox, K.F. Examining the Role of Social Network Intervention as an Integral Component of Community-Based, Family-Focused Practice. J Child Fam Stud 14, 443–454 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-005-6855-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-005-6855-1

Keywords

Navigation