Abstract
Social network intervention aimed at bolstering the informal supports of high risk families is recognized as a common element of community-based, family-focused practice models, such as intensive family preservation services (IFPS), multisystemic therapy (MST), and the wraparound process. The empirical research basis for these practice models is examined, with an eye toward discerning the extent to which network intervention is identified as a critical component of comprehensive service. Results reveal that few studies make clear the degree to which treatment adhered to a focus on natural network enhancement or the development of informal resources. Those that did, suggest that relatively few families received this form of ecologically-oriented intervention. Consequently, this body of practice research offers insufficient evidence of the benefits or limitations associated with network facilitation with multi-need families. Explanations for these findings are explored and directions for future research are recommended.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barrera, M., Sandler, I. N., & Ramsey, T. B. (1981). Preliminary development of a scale of social support: Studies on college students. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 435–447.
Biegel, D. E., Tracy, E. M., & Corvo, K. N. (1994). Strengthening social networks: Intervention strategies for mental health case managers. Health and Social Work, 19, 206–216.
Borduin, C. M., Blaske, D. M., Cone, L., Mann, B. J., & Hazelrigg, M. D. (1989). Development and validation of a measure of adolescent peer relations: The Missouri Peer Relations Inventory. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of Missouri—Columbia.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brunk, M., Henggeler, S. W., Whelan, J. P. (1987). A comparison of multisystemic therapy and parent training in brief treatment of child abuse and neglect. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 311–318.
Burns, B. J., Schoenwald, S. K., Burchard, J. D., Faw, L., & Santos, A. B. (2000). Comprehensive community-based interventions for youth with severe emotional disorders: Multisystemic therapy and the wraparound process. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 9, 283–314.
Clark, H. B. & Clarke, R. T. (1996). Research on the wraparound process and individualized services for children with multi-system needs. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 1–5.
Clark, H. B., Lee, B. L., Prange, M. E., & McDonald, M. A. (1996). Children lost within the foster care system: Can wraparound service strategies improve placement outcomes? Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 39–54.
Clark, R. T., Schaefer, M., Burchard, J. D., & Weikowitz, J. W. (1992). Wrapping community-based mental health services around children with a severe behavioral disorder: An evaluation of Project Wraparound. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 1, 241–261.
Cohen, S., & McKay, G. (1984). Social support, stress and the buffering hypothesis: A theoretical analysis. In A. Baum, S. E. Taylor, & J. E. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology and health (Vol. IV). Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Cohen, S., Mermelstein, R., Kamark, T., & Hoberman, H. M. (1985). Measuring the functional components of social support. In I. G. Sarason & B. R. Sarason (Eds.), Social support: Theory, research, and applications. Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Cohen, S., & Wills, S. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357.
Cutrona, C. E., & Cole, V. (2000). Optimizing support in the natural network. In S. Cohen, L. G. Underwood, & B. H. Gottlieb (Eds.). Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cutrona, C. E., & Russell, D. W. (1990). Type of social support and specific stress: Toward a theory of optimal matching. In B. R. Sarason, I. G. Sarason, & G. R. Pierce (Eds.), Social support: An interactional view. New York: Wiley.
Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., & Deal, A. G. (1988). Enabling and empowering families: Principles and guidelines for practice. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
Eber, L., Osuch, R., Redditt, C. A. (1996). School-based applications of the wraparound process: Early results on service provision and student outcomes. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 83–99.
Evans, M. E., Armstrong, M. I., Kuppinger, A. D., Huz, S., & McNulty, T. L. (1998). Preliminary outcomes of an experimental study comparing treatment foster care and family-centered case management. In M. H. Epstein, K. Kutash, & A. Duchnowski (Eds.), Outcomes for children and youth with emotional and behavioral disorders and their families: Programs and evaluation best practices (pp. 543–580). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Feldman, L. M. (1992). Assessing the effectiveness of family preservation services in New Jersey within an ecological context. New Jersey: Bureau of Research, Evaluation, and Quality Assurance, Division of Youth and Family Services.
Fraser, M. W., Nelson, K. E., & Rivard, J. C. (1997). Effectiveness of family preservation services. Social Work Research, 21, 138–152.
Fraser, M. W., Pecora, P. J., & Haapala, D. A. (1991). Families in crisis: The impact of intensive family preservation services. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
Froland, C., Pancoast, D. L., Chapman, N. J., Kimboko, P. J. (1981). Helping networks and human services. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Gottlieb, B. H. (1983). Social support strategies: Guidelines for mental health practice. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Heflinger, C. A., & Bickman, L. (1996). Family empowerment: A conceptual model for promoting parent-professional partnership. In C. A. Heflinger, & C. T. Nixon (Eds.), Families and the mental health system for children and adolescents: Policies, services, and research (pp. 96–116). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Henggeler, S. W., & Borduin, C. M. (1992). Multisystemic therapy adherence scales. Unpublished instrument. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina.
Henggeler, S. W., Melton, G. B., Brondino, M. J., Scherer, D. G., & Hanley, J. H. (1997). Multisystemic therapy with violent and chronic juvenile offenders and their families: The role of treatment fidelity in successful dissemination. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 821–833.
Henggeler, S. W., Melton, G. B., Smith, L. A. (1992). Family preservation using multisystemic therapy: An effective alternative to incarcerating serious juvenile offenders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 953–961.
Henggeler, S. W., Pikrel, S. G., & Brondino, M. J. (1999). Multisystemic treatment of substance abusing and dependent delinquents: Outcomes, treatment fidelity, and transportability. Mental Health Services Research, 1, 171–184.
Henggeler, S. W., Schoenwald, S. K., Borduin, C. M., Rowland, M. D., & Cunningham, P. B. (1998). Multisystemic treatment of antisocial behavior in children and adolescents. New York: The Guilford Press.
Huey, S. J., Henggeler, S. W., Brondino, M. J., & Pickrel, S. G. (2000). Mechanisms of change in multisystemic therapy: Reducing delinquent behavior through therapist adherence and improved family and peer functioning. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 451–467.
Hyde, K. L., Burchard, J. D., & Woodworth, K. (1996). Wrapping services in an urban setting. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 67–82.
Illback, R. J., Nelson, C. M., & Sanders, D. (1998). Community-based services in Kentucky: Description and 5-year evaluation of Kentucky IMPACT. In M. H. Epstein, K. Kritash, & A. Duchnowski (Eds.), Outcomes for children and youth with behavioral and emotional disorders and their families: Programs and evaluation best practices (pp. 141–172). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Kamradt, B., Kostan, M. J., & Pina, V. (1998). Wraparound Milwaukee: Two year follow-up on the twenty-five kid project. In C. Liberton, K. Kutash, & R. Friedman (Eds.), 10th annual research conference. A system of care for children’s mental health: Expanding the research base (pp. 225–228). Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Florida Mental Health Institute Research and Training Center for Children’s Mental Health.
Kemp, S. P., Whittaker, J. K., & Tracy, E. (1997). Person-environment practice: The social ecology of interpersonal helping. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
Lourie, I. S., Stroul, B. A., & Friedman, R. M. (1998). Community-based systems of care: From advocacy to outcomes. In M. H. Epstein, K. Kutash, & A. Duchnowski (Eds.), Outcomes for children and youth with behavioral and emotional disorders and their families: Programs and evaluation best practices (pp. 3–19). Austin TX: Pro-Ed.
Malysiak, R. (1998). Deciphering the Tower of Babel: Examining the theory base for wraparound fidelity. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 7, 11–25.
McCroskey, J., & Meezan, W. (1997). Family preservation and family functioning. Washington, DC: CWLA Press.
Milardo, R. M. (1983). Social networks and pair relationships: A review of substantive and measurement issues. Sociology and Social Research, 68, 1–18.
Mitchell, C., Tovar, P., & Knitzer, J. (1988). Evaluating the Bronx Homebuilders Program: The first 35 families. New York, NY: Bank Street College of Education.
Pecora, P. J., Whittaker, J. K., Maluccio, A. N., & Barth, R. P. (2000). The child welfare challenge: Policy, practice, and research. (2nd ed.). New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
Rappaport, J. (1981). In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 1–25.
Rosenblatt, A. (1996). Bows and ribbons, tape and twine: Wrapping the wraparound process for children with multi-system needs. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 101–117.
Saleebey, D. (1992). The strengths perspective in social work practice. New York: Longman Publishing Group.
Schuerman, J. R., Rzepnicki, T. L., & Little, J. H. (1994). Putting families first: An experiment family preservation. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
Simpson, D. D., & McBride, A. A. (1992). Family, friends, and self (FSS) assessment scales for Mexican-American Youth. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Science, 14, 327–340.
Specht, H. (1986). Social support, social networks, social exchange, and social work practice. Social Service Review, 60, 218–240.
Stroul, B. (1996). Children’s mental health: Creating systems of care in a changing society. Baltimore, MA: Paul H. Brook Publishing Co.
Tracy, E. M., & Whittaker, J. M. (1987). The evidence base for social support intervention in child and family practice: Emerging issues for research and practice. Children and Youth Services Review, 9, 249–270.
VanDenBerg, J. E., & Grealish, E. M. (1996). Individualized services and supports through the wraparound process: Philosophy and procedures. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 7–21.
Whittaker, J. K., & Tracy, E. M. (1991). Social network intervention in intensive family-based preventive services. Prevention in the Human Services, 9, 175–192.
Yuan, Y. T., McDonald, W. R., Wheeler, C. E., Struckman-Johnson, D., & Rivest, M. (1990). Evaluation of AB 1562 in-home care demonstration projects: Volume I—Final report. Sacramento, CA: Department of Social Services, Office of Child Abuse Prevention.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cox, K.F. Examining the Role of Social Network Intervention as an Integral Component of Community-Based, Family-Focused Practice. J Child Fam Stud 14, 443–454 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-005-6855-1
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-005-6855-1