Abstract
This paper explores how some older residents in B Town, a residential estate in northern Singapore, engage in community building through their ‘serious leisure’ and ‘devotee work’ participation in a resident landscaper program. Using data from ethnographic fieldwork conducted from February to November 2020 with participants aged from 60 to 81, I analyze how they built connections with each other, and the wider B Town community, through their participation. Particularly, I examine how the shared identity marker of being former farmers in now-evicted kampungs (villages) before the 1980s drew them together, and informed their continued involvement as resident landscapers. The ‘kampung spirit’ that they built up through the program enabled the construction of not only social connections, but also exclusionary mechanisms that prevented more older adults from engaging in the activities. These findings highlight participants’ agency, and complicate static and/or monolithic conceptualizations of ‘aging in place/the community’ and ‘active aging’.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Raw data from the fieldwork is not publicly available to preserve the research participants’ privacy and confidentiality, under the terms agreed by the NUS IRB (Reference Code S-19-274).
Notes
All informants’ names are pseudonyms for anonymity. Age and gender are indicated in brackets throughout this paper.
Crucial Chinese terms in this paper are highlighted in brackets in hanyu pinyin.
Interestingly, Kim’s acceptance of the administrative duties that came with the leadership role questions to what extent of paperwork serious leisure enthusiasts are amenable to engage in (Stebbins, 2020).
References
Agahi, N., Ahacic, K., & Parker, M. G. (2006). Continuity of leisure participation from middle to old age. The Journals of Gerontology Series b: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 61(6), 340–346.
Bhuyan, M. R., Lane, A. P., Moogoor, A., Močnik, Š, & Yuen, B. (2020). Meaning of age-friendly neighbourhood: An exploratory study with older adults and key informants in Singapore. Cities, 107, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102940
Blackshaw, T. (2010). Key concepts in community studies. SAGE Publications.
Centre for liveable cities and The Seoul Institute (2019). Age-friendly cities: Lessons from Seoul and Singapore. CLC Publications.
Cheng, E., & Pegg, S. (2016). “If I’m not gardening, I’m not at my happiest”: exploring the positive subjective experiences derived from serious leisure gardening by older adults. World Leisure Journal, 58(4), 285–297.
Cheng, E., Stebbins, R., & Packer, J. (2016). Serious leisure among older gardeners in Australia. Leisure Studies, 36(4), 505–518.
Chiesura, A. (2004). The role of urban parks for the sustainable City. Urban Studies, 25(6), 455–473.
Chua, B.H. (1997). Political legitimacy and housing: Stakeholding in Singapore. Routledge.
Feng, Q., & Straughan, P. T. (2017). What does successful aging mean? Lay perception of successful aging among elderly Singaporeans. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 72(2), 204–213.
Gonzaga, E. (2019). Precarious nostalgia in the Tropical Smart City: Transmedia memory, urban informatics, and the Singapore Golden Jubilee. Cultural Studies, 33(1), 147–169.
Holland, L. (2004). Diversity and connections in community gardens: A contribution to local sustainability. Local Environment, 9(3), 285–305.
Jones, R., & Shaw, B. J. (2006). Palimpsests of progress: Erasing the past and rewriting the future in developing societies — Case studies of Singapore and Jakarta. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 12(2), 122–138.
Kong, L., Yeoh, B., & Teo, P. (1996). Singapore and the experience of place in old age. Geographical Review, 86(4), 529–549.
Lee, K. Y. (2000). From third world to first: The Singapore story. Singapore Press Holdings/Times Editions.
Merdeka Generation Program (2019) Ministry of Health, Singapore. “Merdeka Generation Package”. https://www.moh.gov.sg/healthcare-schemessubsidies/merdeka-generation-package. Accessed 19 Jun 2021
Muyskens, K. (2020). Will confucian values help or hinder the crisis of elder care in modern Singapore? Asian Bioethics Review, 12, 117–134.
National Parks Board (2020). Community in bloom initiatives. https://www.nparks.gov.sg/gardening/community-in-bloom-initiative. Accessed 19 Jun 2021
Neale, J. (2016). Iterative Categorization (IC): A systematic technique for analyzing qualitative data. Addiction, 111, 1096–1106.
Ng, K. S. T., Sia, A., Ng, K. W. M., Tan, T. Y. C., Chan, H. Y., Tan, C. H., Rawater, I., Feng, L., Mahendran, R., Larbi, A., Kua, E. K., & Ho, C. M. R. (2018). Effects of horticultural therapy on Asian older adults: A randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15, 1705–1718.
Nora, P. (1989). Between memory and history: Les Lieux de Mémoire. Representations, 26, 7–24.
Pioneer Generation Program (2014) Ministry of Health, Singapore. “Pioneer Generation Package”. https://www.moh.gov.sg/healthcare-schemessubsidies/pioneer-generation-package. Accessed 19 Jun 2021
Singapore Department of Statistics (2020). Population Trends. Department of Statistics, Ministry of Trade & Industry.
Stebbins, R. (2014). Careers in serious leisure: From dabbler to devotee in search of fulfilment. Palgrave Macmillan.
Stebbins, R. (2020). The serious leisure perspective: A synthesis. Palgrave Macmillan.
Tan, H. H. L., & Neo, H. (2009). “Community in bloom”: Local participation of community gardens in urban Singapore. Local Environment, 14(6), 529–539.
Tan, S. (2019). Over half of older workers want to continue full time: Survey. The Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/manpower/over-half-of-older-workers-want-to-continue-full-time-survey. Accessed 19 Jun 2021
Thang, L. L. (2006). Experiencing leisure in later life: A study of retirees and activity in Singapore. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 20, 307–318.
Tong, K. F. B. (2020). Better singers together: How older Japanese women build and maintain social relations in karaoke classrooms. In T. D. Glover & E. K. Sharpe (Eds.), Leisure communities: Rethinking mutuality, collective identity and belonging in the new century (pp. 100–110). Routledge.
Acknowledgements
This study was conducted with the approval of the National University of Singapore Institutional Review Board (NUS IRB), and supported by the Asia Research Institute under the Research Fieldwork Grant. The findings and analysis presented in this paper do not reflect the views of NUS, the Ministry of Social and Family Development, or the National Parks Board (NParks), Singapore.
The author would like to thank NParks and the Town Gardeners for their hospitality and cooperation. The author also thanks organizers and participants at the International Conference on Leisure for Older Adults in Asia (January 19-20, 2021), as well as the journal reviewers for their insightful suggestions for this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Tong, B. Community Building Through Place-Making Activities: Older Landscapers in a Singaporean Residential Town. J Cross Cult Gerontol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-024-09499-5
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-024-09499-5