Correction to: Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design (2023) 37:519–535 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-023-00524-2


In the original publication, the Fig. 3 was cropped during production and published incorrectly. The corrected Fig. 3 should have appeared as shown below.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Scheme for exploiting a macrocycle conformational preference to predict a bound pose, either using docking (protein structure shown in slate carbons at bottom left) or ligand similarity (exemplar conformer target shown in magenta carbons at bottom right). For the ligand-based score, a constant value of − 24.0 kcal/mol was added to the estimated strain energy in order to put the scores from the two protocols on the same rough scale

The original article has been corrected.