Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The efficacy of add-ons: selected IVF “add-on” procedures and future directions

  • Opinion
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the advent of ART, technology has continuously evolved to improve embryology and pregnancy outcomes. However, not all technologies that are integrated into practice have convincing evidence of clinical effectiveness, and they often increase the financial burden of fertility care. We discuss here a selection of commonly utilized IVF “add-ons” and discuss the existing evidence for their utility. The procedures included in this review are time-lapse imaging of embryos, assisted hatching, EmbryoGlue, sperm DNA testing, egg activation with calcium ionophore, endometrial receptivity array, and physiological intracytoplasmic sperm injection (PICSI). While there is rather limited supporting evidence for nearly all IVF add-ons that we reviewed, there is strong demand from patients, physicians, and the biotechnology industry to continue further research and development in this arena. We propose that all add-on procedures should provide true efficacy for the patient, and reproductive endocrinologists should inform patients of the costs and benefits of utilizing various technologies before they undergo treatment. In the future, add-ons that show clear evidence of efficacy and justifiable cost should be incorporated into routine practice, while others that do not meet these criteria should be phased out entirely.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Armstrong S, Atkinson M, MacKenzie J, Pacey A, Farquhar C. Add-ons in the laboratory: hopeful, but not always helpful. Fertil Steril. 2019;112:994–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Armstrong S, P Bhide, V Jordan, A Pacey, J Marjoribanks, and C Farquhar Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2019 5: CD011320.

  3. Atkinson B, and E Woodland EmbryoGlue: the use of hyaluronan in embryo transfer media, Semin Reprod Med. 2021.

  4. Bassil R, Casper R, Samara N, Hsieh TB, Barzilay E, Orvieto R, Haas J. Does the endometrial receptivity array really provide personalized embryo transfer? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35:1301–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Boueilh T, Reignier A, Barriere P, Freour T. Time-lapse imaging systems in IVF laboratories: a French national survey. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35:2181–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Centre Hewitt Fertility. Artificial oocyte activation (AOA). In, edited by Liverpool Women’s NHS Foundation Trust. 2020.

  7. Cissen M, Wely MV, Scholten I, Mansell S, Bruin JP, Mol BW, Braat D, Repping S, Hamer G. Measuring sperm DNA fragmentation and clinical outcomes of medically assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0165125.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen AM, Ye XY, Colgan TJ, Greenblatt EM, Chan C. Comparing endometrial receptivity array to histologic dating of the endometrium in women with a history of implantation failure. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2020;66:347–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen J, Malter H, Fehilly C, Wright G, Elsner C, Kort H, Massey J. Implantation of embryos after partial opening of oocyte zona pellucida to facilitate sperm penetration. Lancet. 1988;2:162.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Diaz-Gimeno, PJA Horcajadas, JA Martinez-Conejero, FJ Esteban, P Alama, A Pellicer, and C. Simon. A genomic diagnostic tool for human endometrial receptivity based on the transcriptomic signature, Fertil Steril 2011, 95: 50–60, 60 e1–15.

  11. Edwards RG, Van Steirteghem AC. Intracytoplasmic sperm injections (ICSI) and human fertilization: does calcium hold the key to success? Hum Reprod. 1993;8:988–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Esteves SC, Roque M, Garrido N. Use of testicular sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in men with high sperm DNA fragmentation: a SWOT analysis. Asian J Androl. 2018;20:1–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Esteves SC, Zini A, Coward RM, Evenson DP, Gosalvez J, Lewis SEM, Sharma R, Humaidan P. Sperm DNA fragmentation testing: summary evidence and clinical practice recommendations. Andrologia. 2021;53:e13874.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Evenson DP, Darzynkiewicz Z, Melamed MR. Relation of mammalian sperm chromatin heterogeneity to fertility. Sci. 1980;210:1131–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fauser BC. Towards the global coverage of a unified registry of IVF outcomes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;38:133–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fawzy M, Emad M, Mahran A, Sabry M, Fetih AN, Abdelghafar H, Rasheed S. Artificial oocyte activation with SrCl2 or calcimycin after ICSI improves clinical and embryological outcomes compared with ICSI alone: results of a randomized clinical trial. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:1636–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fertility, CNY. 2020. IVF cost: analyzing the true cost of in vitro fertilization, CNY Fertility, Accessed August 16, 2021.

  18. Fulton BP, Whittingham DG. Activation of mammalian oocytes by intracellular injection of calcium. Nature. 1978;273:149–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gallego RD, Remohi J, Meseguer M. Time-lapse imaging: the state of the artdagger. Biol Reprod. 2019;101:1146–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gardner DK, Rodriegez-Martinez H, Lane M. Fetal development after transfer is increased by replacing protein with the glycosaminoglycan hyaluronan for mouse embryo culture and transfer. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:2575–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hazlett WD, Meyer LR, Nasta TE, Mangan PA, Karande VC. Impact of EmbryoGlue as the embryo transfer medium. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:214–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hershlag A, Paine T, Cooper GW, Scholl GM, Rawlinson K, Kvapil G. Monozygotic twinning associated with mechanical assisted hatching. Fertil Steril. 1999;71:144–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Heymann D, L Vidal, Y Or, and Z Shoham. Hyaluronic acid in embryo transfer media for assisted reproductive technologies, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2020. 9: CD007421.

  24. Igenomix. 2019. What to know about endometrial receptivity analysis, Accessed August 16, 2021.

  25. Jwa J, Jwa SC, Kuwahara A, Yoshida A, Saito H. Risk of major congenital anomalies after assisted hatching: analysis of three-year data from the national assisted reproduction registry in Japan. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:71–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kirkegaard K, Ahlstrom A, Ingerslev HJ, Hardarson T. Choosing the best embryo by time lapse versus standard morphology. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:323–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lacey L, Hassan S, Franik S, Seif MW, Akhtar MA. Assisted hatching on assisted conception (in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;3:CD001894.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lemmen JG, Agerholm I, Ziebe S. Kinetic markers of human embryo quality using time-lapse recordings of IVF/ICSI-fertilized oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17:385–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lensen S, Shreeve N, Barnhart KT, Gibreel A, Ng EHY, Moffett A. In vitro fertilization add-ons for the endometrium: it doesn’t add-up. Fertil Steril. 2019;112:987–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lepine S, McDowell S, Searle LM, Kroon B, Glujovsky D, Yazdani A. Advanced sperm selection techniques for assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;7:CD010461.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lessey BA, Young SL. What exactly is endometrial receptivity? Fertil Steril. 2019;111:611–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Long R, Wang M, Yang QY, Hu SQ, Zhu LX, Jin L. Risk of birth defects in children conceived by artificial oocyte activation and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2020;18:123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Lopes S, Sun JG, Jurisicova A, Meriano J, Casper RF. Sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation is increased in poor-quality semen samples and correlates with failed fertilization in intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:528–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mahajan N. Endometrial receptivity array: clinical application. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2015;8:121–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Majzoub A, Agarwal A, Cho CL, Esteves SC. Sperm DNA fragmentation testing: a cross sectional survey on current practices of fertility specialists. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6:S710–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Miller D, Pavitt S, Sharma V, Forbes G, Hooper R, Bhattacharya S, Kirkman-Brown J, Coomarasamy A, Lewis S, Cutting R, Brison D, Pacey A, West R, Brian K, Griffin D, Khalaf Y. Physiological, hyaluronan-selected intracytoplasmic sperm injection for infertility treatment (HABSelect): a parallel, two-group, randomised trial. Lancet. 2019;393:416–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Miller N, Biron-Shental T, Sukenik-Halevy R, Klement AH, Sharony R, Berkovitz A. Oocyte activation by calcium ionophore and congenital birth defects: a retrospective cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:590–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Montag M, Koster M, van der Ven K, Bohlen U, van der Ven H. The benefit of artificial oocyte activation is dependent on the fertilization rate in a previous treatment cycle. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;24:521–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Murugesu S, Saso S, Jones BP, Bracewell-Milnes T, Athanasiou T, Mania A, Serhal P, Ben-Nagi J. Does the use of calcium ionophore during artificial oocyte activation demonstrate an effect on pregnancy rate? A meta-analysis, Fertil Steril. 2017;108:468–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Nicopoullos J, Vicens-Morton A, Lewis SEM, Lee K, Larsen P, Ramsay J, Yap T, Minhas S. Novel use of COMET parameters of sperm DNA damage may increase its utility to diagnose male infertility and predict live births following both IVF and ICSI. Hum Reprod. 2019;34:1915–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Parmegiani L, Cognigni GE, Bernardi S, Troilo E, Ciampaglia W, Filicori M. “Physiologic ICSI”: hyaluronic acid (HA) favors selection of spermatozoa without DNA fragmentation and with normal nucleus, resulting in improvement of embryo quality. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:598–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Paulson RJ. Time-lapse imaging. Fertil Steril. 2018;109:583.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Paulson RJ, Reichman DE, Zaninovic N, Goodman LR, Racowsky C. Time-lapse imaging: clearly useful to both laboratory personnel and patient outcomes versus just because we can doesn’t mean we should. Fertil Steril. 2018;109:584–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Payne D, Flaherty SP, Barry MF, Matthews CD. Preliminary observations on polar body extrusion and pronuclear formation in human oocytes using time-lapse video cinematography. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:532–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Racowsky C, Martins WP. Effectiveness and safety of time-lapse imaging for embryo culture and selection: it is still too early for any conclusions? Fertil Steril. 2017;108:450–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Rubio I, Galan A, Larreategui Z, Ayerdi F, Bellver J, Herrero J, Meseguer M. Clinical validation of embryo culture and selection by morphokinetic analysis: a randomized, controlled trial of the EmbryoScope. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:1287–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ruiz-Alonso M, Blesa D, Diaz-Gimeno P, Gomez E, Fernandez-Sanchez M, Carranza F, Carrera J, Vilella F, Pellicer A, Simon C. The endometrial receptivity array for diagnosis and personalized embryo transfer as a treatment for patients with repeated implantation failure. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:818–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Safari S, Razi MH, Safari S, Razi Y. Routine use of EmbryoGlue((R)) as embryo transfer medium does not improve the ART outcomes. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;291:433–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sailer BL, Jost LK, Evenson DP. Mammalian sperm DNA susceptibility to in situ denaturation associated with the presence of DNA strand breaks as measured by the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase assay. J Androl. 1995;16:80–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Salonia A, Bettocchi C, Carvalho J, Corona G, Jones TH, Kadioglu A, Martinez-Salamanca I, Minhas S, Serefoglu EC, Verze P. 2020 European Association of Urology Sexual and Reproductive Health Guidelines. 2020.

  51. Samplaski MK, Dimitromanolakis A, Lo KC, Grober ED, Mullen B, Garbens A, Jarvi KA. The relationship between sperm viability and DNA fragmentation rates. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015;13:42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Sanders KD, Silvestri G, Gordon T, Griffin DK. Analysis of IVF live birth outcomes with and without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): UK Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority data collection 2016–2018. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38:3277–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Schoolcraft W, Lane M, Stevens J, Gardner D. Increased hyaluronan concentration in the embryo transfer medium results in a significant increase in human embryo implantation rate. In American Society for Reproductive Medicine. 2002 Fertility and Sterility.

  54. Sfontouris IA, Nastri CO, Lima ML, Tahmasbpourmarzouni E, Raine-Fenning N, Martins WP. Artificial oocyte activation to improve reproductive outcomes in women with previous fertilization failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:1831–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Steinhardt RA, Epel D. Activation of sea-urchin eggs by a calcium ionophore. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974;71:1915–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Sugihara A, Van Avermaete F, Roelant E, Punjabi U, De Neubourg D. The role of sperm DNA fragmentation testing in predicting intra-uterine insemination outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;244:8–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Tan J, Kan A, Hitkari J, Taylor B, Tallon N, Warraich G, Yuzpe A, Nakhuda G. The role of the endometrial receptivity array (ERA) in patients who have failed euploid embryo transfers. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35:683–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Tesarik J, Sousa M. More than 90% fertilization rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and artificial induction of oocyte activation with calcium ionophore. Fertil Steril. 1995;63:343–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Urman B, Yakin K, Ata B, Isiklar A, Balaban B. Effect of hyaluronan-enriched transfer medium on implantation and pregnancy rates after day 3 and day 5 embryo transfers: a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:604–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Valojerdi MR, Karimian L, Yazdi PE, Gilani MA, Madani T, Baghestani AR. Efficacy of a human embryo transfer medium: a prospective, randomized clinical trial study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2006;23:207–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Wilcox AJ, Baird DD, Weinberg CR. Time of implantation of the conceptus and loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1796–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Winston N, Johnson M, Pickering S, Braude P. Parthenogenetic activation and development of fresh and aged human oocytes. Fertil Steril. 1991;56:904–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Witt KD, Beresford L, Bhattacharya S, Brian K, Coomarasamy A, Cutting R, Hooper R, Kirkman-Brown J, Khalaf Y, Lewis SE, Pacey A, Pavitt S, West R, Miller D, Cutting R. Hyaluronic acid binding sperm selection for assisted reproduction treatment (HABSelect): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e012609.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Yan J, Qin Y, Zhao H, Sun Y, Gong F, Li R, Sun X, Ling X, Li H, Hao C, Tan J, Yang J, Zhu Y, Liu F, Chen D, Wei D, Lu J, Ni T, Zhou W, Wu K, Gao Y, Shi Y, Lu Y, Zhang T, Wu W, Ma X, Ma H, Fu J, Zhang J, Meng Q, Zhang H, Legro RS, Chen ZJ. Live birth with or without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:2047–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Zborilova B, I Oborna, E Tkadlec, M Prochazka, J Brezinova, A Sobek Jr, and A Sobek. Does EmbryoGlue transfer medium affect embryo transfer success rate?, Ceska Gynekol, 83: 177–81.

  66. Zeng M, Su S, Li L. The effect of laser-assisted hatching on pregnancy outcomes of cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Lasers Med Sci. 2018;33:655–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Zhao J, Zhang Q, Wang Y, Li Y. Whether sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation has an effect on pregnancy and miscarriage after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:998–1005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 125 Paterson Street, Room 2133, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA

    Haley N. Glatthorn

  2. Program in Reproductive Endocrinology and Gynecology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Hatfield Clinical Research Center, 10 Center Drive, Room 5-5570, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA

    Alan Decherney

Authors
  1. Haley N. Glatthorn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alan Decherney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haley N. Glatthorn.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Glatthorn, H.N., Decherney, A. The efficacy of add-ons: selected IVF “add-on” procedures and future directions. J Assist Reprod Genet 39, 581–589 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02410-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02410-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation