Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mouse embryo assay for human in vitro fertilization quality control: a fresh look

  • Assisted Reproduction Technologies
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mouse embryo assay (MEA) has been used in the field of human in vitro fertilization (IVF) for multiple purposes such as developing embryo culture media, quality control within the laboratory, and procedural training and proficiency testing for embryology staff. In addition, manufacturing companies use the MEA as a means of quality control for the development of embryo culture media and medical devices and to meet the standards of testing for FDA approval of new products. It has long been considered by embryologists and laboratory scientists whether the MEA is an accurate or sensitive test in the quality assessment of culture media and medical devices or if use of this testing is more an obligation. There is no uniformly accepted gold standard method for IVF lab quality control or FDA approval. This review aims to revisit the role of the use of mouse embryos in the formulation of IVF media for clinical use and the different methods of employing the mouse embryo assay for quality control. In addition, we will review the use of the MEA as an important adjunct in the training for embryology staff and fellows in training in reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI), as well as alternatives to the use of the MEA for these purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hammond J. Recovery and culture of tubal mouse ova. Nature. 1949;163(4131):28–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Whitten WK. Culture of tubal mouse ova. Nature. 1956;177(4498):96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McLaren A, Biggers JD. Successful development and birth of mice cultivated in vitro as early embryos. Nature. 1958;182(4639):877–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Biggers JD, Gwatkin RB, Brinster RL. Development of mouse embryos in organ cultures of fallopian tubes on a chemically defined medium. Nature. 1962;194(4830):747–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chronopoulou E, Harper JC. IVF culture media: past, present and future. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;21(1):39–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Whitten WK, Biggers JD. Complete development in vitro of the pre-implantation stages of the mouse in a simple chemically defined medium. Reproduction. 1968;17(2):399–401.

  7. Whittingham DG. Fertilization of mouse eggs in vitro. Nature. 1968;220(5167):592–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brinster RL. Studies on the development of mouse embryos in vitro. Reproduction. 1965;10(2):227–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gruber I, Klein M. Embryo culture media for human IVF: which possibilities exist? J Turk German Gynecol Assoc. 2011;12(2):110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Simopoulou M, Asimakopoulos B, Bakas P, Boyadjiev N, Tzanakaki D, Creatsas G. Oocyte and embryo vitrification in the IVF laboratory: a comprehensive review. Folia Med. 2014;56(3):161–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Whittingham DG, Leibo SP, Mazur P. Survival of mouse embryos frozen to-196 and-269 C. Science. 1972;178(4059):411–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rall WF, Fahy GM. Ice-free cryopreservation of mouse embryos at – 196 C by vitrification. Nature. 1985;313(6003):573.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Arav A. Cryopreservation of oocytes and embryos. Theriogenology. 2014;81(1):96–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. http://elss.cap.org/elss/ShowProperty?nodePath=/UCMCON/Contribution%20Folders/DctmContent/education/OnlineCourseContent/2017/LAP-TLTM/checklists/cl-com.pdf

  15. Ménézo YJ, Hérubel F. Mouse and bovine models for human IVF. Reprod BioMed Online. 2002;4(2):170–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/what-we-do

  17. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/mouse-embryo-assay-assisted-reproduction-technology-devices

  18. Delaroche L, Oger P, Genauzeau E, Meicler P, Lamazou F, Dupont C, et al. Embryotoxicity testing of IVF disposables: how do manufacturers test? Hum Reprod. 2020;35(2):283–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Li M, Drury KC, Williams RS. Suitability of mouse embryos for human IVF QC: zygotes vs. 2-cell embryos. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(3):S230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Davidson A, Vermesh M, Lobo RA, Paulson RJ. Mouse embryo culture as quality control for human in vitro fertilization: the one-cell versus the two-cell model. Fertil Steril. 1988;49(3):516–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Khan Z, Wolff HS, Fredrickson JR, Walker DL, Daftary GS, Morbeck DE. Mouse strain and quality control testing: improved sensitivity of the mouse embryo assay with embryos from outbred mice. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(3):847–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gardner DK, Reed L, Linck D, Sheehan C, Lane M. Quality control in human in vitro fertilization. In Seminars in reproductive medicine 2005 Nov (Vol. 23, No. 04, pp. 319-324). Copyright© 2005 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., New York

  23. Flood LP, Shirley B. Reduction of embryotoxicity by protein in embryo culture media. Mol Reprod Dev. 1991;30(3):226–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ainsworth AJ, Fredrickson JR, Morbeck DE. Improved detection of mineral oil toxicity using an extended mouse embryo assay. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34(3):391–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Scott LF, Sundaram SG, Smith S. The relevance and use of mouse embryo bioassays for quality control in an assisted reproductive technology program. Fertil Steril. 1993;60(3):559–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gilbert RS, Nunez B, Sakurai K, Fielder T, Ni HT. Genetic mouse embryo assay: improving performance and quality testing for assisted reproductive technology (ART) with a functional bioassay. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2016;14:13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Wolff HS, Fredrickson JR, Walker DL, Morbeck DE. Advances in quality control: mouse embryo morphokinetics are sensitive markers of in vitro stress. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(7):1776–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Hossain A, Aryal S, Osuampke C, Phelps J. Human sperm bioassay for reprotoxicity testing in embryo culture media: some practical considerations in reducing the assay time. Adv Urol. 2010;2010.

  29. Claassens OE, Wehr JB, Harrison KL. Optimizing sensitivity of the human sperm motility assay for embryo toxicity testing. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(7):1586–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hughes PM, Morbeck DE, Hudson SB, Fredrickson JR, Walker DL, Coddington CC. Peroxides in mineral oil used for in vitro fertilization: defining limits of standard quality control assays. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;27(2–3):87–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Betteridge KJ, Rieger D. Embryo transfer and related techniques in domestic animals, and their implications for human medicine. Hum Reprod. 1993;8(1):147–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Misty Blanchette-Porter for proofreading of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IVF and Andrology Laboratories, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT, 05401, USA

    Navid Esfandiari & Ashley Gubista

Authors
  1. Navid Esfandiari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ashley Gubista
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Navid Esfandiari.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Esfandiari, N., Gubista, A. Mouse embryo assay for human in vitro fertilization quality control: a fresh look. J Assist Reprod Genet 37, 1123–1127 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01768-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01768-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation