Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

G-CSF and stem cell therapy for the treatment of refractory thin lining in assisted reproductive technology

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The study aims to describe two promising therapeutic options for resistant “thin” endometrium in fertility treatment: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and stem cell therapy.

Methods

A review of the scientific literature related to patients with thin endometrium undergoing fertility treatment.

Results

Sufficient endometrial growth is fundamental for embryo implantation. Whether idiopathic or resulting from an underlying pathology, a thin endometrium of <7 mm is associated with lower probability of pregnancy; however, no specific thickness excludes the occurrence of pregnancy. We specifically reviewed two relatively new treatment options for resistant thin lining: intrauterine G-CSF and stem cell therapy. The majority of the reviewed trials showed a significant benefit for intrauterine G-CSF infusion in improving endometrial thickness and pregnancy rates. Early results of stem cell therapy trials seem promising.

Conclusions

EMT <7 mm is linked to lower probability of pregnancy in assisted reproductive technology. Intrauterine G-CSF infusion appears to be a potentially successful treatment option for resistant cases, while stem cell therapy seems to be a promising new treatment modality in severely refractory cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Simón C, Moreno C, Remohí J, Pellicer A. Molecular interactions between embryo and uterus in the adhesion phase of human implantation. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(Suppl 3):219–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Simón C, Martín JC, Galan A, Valbuena D, Pellicer A. Embryonic regulation in implantation. Semin Reprod Endocrinol. 1999;17:267–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Simón C, Martin JC, Pellicer A. Paracrine regulators of implantation. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2000;14:815–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Paria BC, Lim H, Das SK, Reese J, Dey SK. Molecular signaling in uterine receptivity for implantation. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2000;11:67–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Paiva P, Hannan NJ, Hincks C, Meehan KL, Pruysers E, Dimitriadis E, et al. Human chorionic gonadotrophin regulates FGF2 and other cytokines produced by human endometrial epithelial cells, providing a mechanism for enhancing endometrial receptivity. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1153–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Salamonsen LA, Nie G, Hannan NJ, Dimitriadis E. Society for reproductive biolosy founders’ lecture 2009 preparing fertile soil: the importance of endometrial receptivity. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2009;21:923–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shapiro H, Cowell C, Casper R. The use of vaginal ultrasound for monitoring endometrial preparation in a donor oocyte program. Fertil Steril. 1993;59(5):1055–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sundström P. Establishment of a successful pregnancy following in-vitro fertilization with an endometrial thickness of no more than 4 mm. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(6):1550–2.

  9. Check JH, Dietterich C, Check ML, Katz Y. Successful delivery despite conception with a maximal endometrial thickness of 4 mm. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2003;30(2–3):93–4.

  10. Dix E, Check JH. Successful pregnancies following embryo transfer despite very thin late proliferative endometrium. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2010;37:15–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yaman C, Ebner T, Sommergruber M, Pölz W, Tews G. Role of three-dimensional ultrasonographic measurement of endometrium volume as a predictor of pregnancy outcome in an IVF-ET program: a preliminary study. Fertil Steril. 2000;74(4):797–801.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rashidi BH, Sadeghi M, Jafarabadi M, Tehrani Nejad ES. Relationships between pregnancy rates following in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection and endometrial thickness and pattern. Eur J Obs Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;120(2):179–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Al-Ghamdi A, Coskun S, Al-Hassan S, Al-Rejjal R, Awartani K. The correlation between endometrial thickness and outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) outcome. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2008;6:37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Basir GS, O W-S, So WWK, Ng EHY, Ho PC. Evaluation of cycle-to-cycle variation of endometrial responsiveness using transvaginal sonography in women undergoing assisted reproduction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19(5):484–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McWilliams GD, Frattarelli JL. Changes in measured endometrial thickness predict in vitro fertilization success. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(1):74–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kasius A, Smit JG, Torrance HL, Eijkemans MJC, Mol BW, Opmeer BC, et al. Endometrial thickness and pregnancy rates after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(4):530–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Senturk LM, Erel CT. Thin endometrium in assisted reproductive technology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008;3:221–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lebovitz O, Orvieto R. Treating patients with “thin” endometrium—an ongoing challenge. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014;30(6):409–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mouhayar Y, Sharara F. Modern management of thin lining. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2017;22:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gleicher N, Vidali A, Barad DH. Successful treatment of unresponsive thin endometrium. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(6):2123.e13–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gleicher N, Kim A, Michaeli T, Lee H-J, Shohat-Tal A, Lazzaroni E, et al. A pilot cohort study of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in the treatment of unresponsive thin endometrium resistant to standard therapies. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(1):172–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lucena E, Moreno-Ortiz H. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF): a mediator in endometrial receptivity for a patient with polycystic ovary (PCO) undergoing in vitro maturation (IVM). BMJ Case Rep. 2013; doi:10.1136/bcr-2012-008115.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Check JH, Cohen R, Choe JK. Failure to improve a thin endometrium in the late proliferative phase with uterine infusion of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2014;41(4):473–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Li Y, Pan P, Chen X, Li L, Li Y, Yang D. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration for infertile women with thin endometrium in frozen embryo transfer program. Reprod Sci. 2014;21(3):381–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kunicki M, Łukaszuk K, Woclawek-Potocka I, Liss J, Kulwikowska P, Szczyptańska J. Evaluation of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor effects on treatment-resistant thin endometrium in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:913235.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Barad DH, Yu Y, Kushnir VA, Shohat-Tal A, Lazzaroni E, Lee HJ, et al. A randomized clinical trial of endometrial perfusion with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in in vitro fertilization cycles: impact on endometrial thickness and clinical pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(3):710–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shah J, Gangadharan A, Shah V. Effect of intrauterine instillation of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on endometrial thickness and clinical pregnancy rate in women undergoing in vitro fertilization cycles: an observational cohort study. Int J Infertil Fetal Med. 2014;5(3):100–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Eftekhar M, Sayadi M, Arabjahvani F. Transvaginal perfusion of G-CSF for infertile women with thin endometrium in frozen ET program: a non-randomized clinical trial. Iran J Reprod Med. 2014;12(10):661–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Xu B, Zhang Q, Hao J, Xu D, Li Y. Two protocols to treat thin endometrium with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor during frozen embryo transfer cycles. Reprod BioMed Online. 2015;30(4):349–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tehraninejad E, Tanha F, Asadi E, Kamali K, Aziminikoo E, et al. G-CSF intrauterine for thin endometrium, and pregnancy outcome. J Family Reprod Health. 2015;9(3):107–12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee D, Jo JD, Kim SK, Jee BC, Kim SH. The efficacy of intrauterine instillation of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in infertile women with thin endometrium: a pilot study. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2012;43(4):240–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nagori CB, Panchal SY, Patel H. Endometrial regeneration using autologous adult stem cells followed by conception by in vitro fertilization in a patient of severe Asherman’s syndrome. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2011;4(1):43–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Singh N, Mohanty S, Seth T, Shankar M, Bhaskaran S, Dharmendra S. Autologous stem cell transplantation in refractory Asherman’s syndrome: a novel cell based therapy. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2014;7(2):93–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Santamaria X, Cabanillas S, Cervello I, Arbona C, Raga F, Ferro J, et al. Autologous cell therapy with CD133+ bone marrow-derived stem cells from refractory Asherman’s syndrome and endometrial atrophy: a pilot cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(5):1087–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Jensen JR, Witz CA, Schenken RS, Tekmal RR. A potential role for colony-stimulating factor 1 in the genesis of the early endometriotic lesion. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(1):251–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Padykula HA, Coles LG, McCracken JA, King Jr NW, Loncope C, et al. A zonal pattern of cell proliferation and differentiation in the rhesus endometrium during the estrogen surge. Biol Reprod. 1984;31:1103–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Padykula HA, Coles LG, Okulicz WC, Rapaport SI, McCracken JA, et al. The basalis of the primate endometrium: a bifunctional germinal compartment. Biol Reprod. 1989;40:681–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gargett CE. Uterine stem cells: what is the evidence? Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13(1):87–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gargett CE, Nguyen HPT, Ye L. Endometrial regeneration and endometrial stem/progenitor cells. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2012;13(4):235–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Cervello I, Mas A, Gil Sanchis C, Peris L, Saunders PT, et al. Reconstruction of endometrium from human endometrial side population cell lines. PLoS One. 2011;6:e21221.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Taylor HS. Endometrial cells derived from donor stem cells in bone marrow transplant recipients. JAMA. 2004;292(1):81–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bratincsák A, Brownstein MJ, Cassiani-Ingoni R, Pastorino S, Szalayova I, Tóth ZE, et al. CD45-positive blood cells give rise to uterine epithelial cells in mice. Stem Cells. 2007;25(11):2820–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Du H, Taylor HS. Contribution of bone marrow-derived stem cells to endometrium and endometriosis. Stem Cells. 2007;25(8):2082–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Cervello I, Gil Sanchis C, Mas A, Faus A, Sanz J, Moscardó, et al. Bone marrow-derived cells from male donors do not contribute to the endometrial side population of the recipient. PLoS One 7(1):e30260.

  45. Du H, Naqvi H, Taylor HS. Ischemia/reperfusion injury promotes and pranulocyte-colony stimulating factor inhibits migration of bone marrow-derived stem cells to endometrium. Stem Cells Dev. 2012;21(18):3324–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Morelli SS, Rameshwar P, Goldsmith LT. Experimental evidence for bone marrow as a source of nonhematopoietic endometrial stromal and epithelial compartment cells in a murine model. Biol Reprod. 2013;89(1):7–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Mints M, Jansson M, Sadeghi B, Westgren M, Uzunel M, Hassan M, et al. Endometrial endothelial cells are derived from donor stem cells in a bone marrow transplant. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:139–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ikoma T, Kyo S, Maida Y, Ozaki S, Takakura M, Nakao S, et al. Bone marrow-derived cells from male donors can compose endometrial glands in female transplant recipients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201:608.e1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Alawadhi F, Du H, Cakmak H, Taylor H. Bone marrow-derived stem cell (BMDSC) transplantation improves fertility in a murine model of Asherman’s syndrome. PLoS One. 9(5):e96662.

  50. Kilic S, Yuksel B, Pinarli F, Albayrak A, Boztok B, Delibasi T. Effect of stem cell application on Asherman syndrome, an experimental rat model. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;31:975–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhao J, Zhang Q, Wang Y, Li Y. Rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells improve regeneration of thin endometrium in rat. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(2):587–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Zhao J, Zhang Q, Wang Y, Li Y. Uterine infusion with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells improves endometrium thickness in a rat model of thin endometrium. Reprod Sci. 2015;22(2):181–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Gil-Sanchis C, Cervelló I, Khurana S, Faus A, Verfaillie C, Simón C. Contribution of different bone marrow-derived cell types in endometrial regeneration using an irradiated murine model. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(6):1596–605.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Cervello I, Gil-SanchisC SX, Cabanillas S, Diaz A, Faus A, et al. Human CD133+ bone marrow-derived stem cells promote endometrial proliferation in a murine model of Asherman syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:1552–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Casper RF. It’s time to pay attention to the endometrium. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(3):519–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Gingold JA, Lee JA, Rodriguez-Purata J, Whitehouse MC, Sandler B, Grunfeld L, et al. Endometrial pattern, but not endometrial thickness, affects implantation rates in euploid embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(3):620–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Mahajan N. Endometrial receptivity array: clinical application. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2015;8(3):121–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of OB/GYN, University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL, USA

    Youssef Mouhayar

  2. Virginia Center for Reproductive Medicine, 11150 Sunset Hills Rd, Suite, Reston, VA, 100, USA

    Fady I. Sharara

  3. Depatment of OB/GYN, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA

    Fady I. Sharara

Authors
  1. Youssef Mouhayar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fady I. Sharara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fady I. Sharara.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mouhayar, Y., Sharara, F.I. G-CSF and stem cell therapy for the treatment of refractory thin lining in assisted reproductive technology. J Assist Reprod Genet 34, 831–837 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-0922-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-0922-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation