Purpose : To compare the effectiveness of double IUI with single IUI in male factor and idiopathic infertility patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH).
Methods : A prospective randomized study of 1257 COH-IUI cycles was performed. Total 1270 patients with mild or moderate male factor infertility (n = 776) and idiopathic infertility (n = 494) were enrolled in this study, and 767 with male factor infertility and 490 with idiopathic infertility completed clomiphene citrate (CC)/human menopausal gonadotrophin (hMG) COH cycles and IUI. Categorized on the basis of the causes of infertility (male factor, M; idiopathic infertility, I), patients were randomized into one of the following groups: Single IUI group (M1/I1) received single insemination 34 h post hCG administration, and double IUI group (M2/I2) received two inseminations 18–24 and 36–48 h post hCG injection, respectively.
Results : The overall pregnancy rates were 15.43%. Pregnancy rate for single and double IUI group was 11.06 and 19.87% (p < 0.05), respectively. There was a significant statistical difference in cycle fecundity between M1 and M2 group (11.34% vs. 24.93%, p < 0.05), and between I2 and M2 group (11.93% vs. 24.93%, p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between I1 and I2 (10.53% vs. 11.93%, p > 0.05).
Conclusions : Double IUI increases the pregnancy rate significantly in patients with male factor infertility, and single IUI acts as efficient as double IUI in patients with idiopathic infertility.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Iberico G, Vioque J, Ariza N, Lozano JM, Roca M, Liacer J, Bernabeu R: Analysis of factors influencing pregnancy rates in homologous intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 2004;81:1308–1313
Silverberg KM, Johnson JV, Olive DL, Burns WN, Schenken RS: A prospective, randomized trial comparing two different intrauterine insemination regimens in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles. Fertil Steril 1992;57:357–361
Dodson WC, Haney FF: Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treatment of infertility. Fertil Steril 1995;55:457–467
Hughes EG: The effectiveness of ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of persistent infertility: A meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1865–1872
Guzick DS, Carson SA, Coutifaris C, Overstreet JW, Factor-Litvak P, Steinkampf MP, et al.: Efficacy of superovulation and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility. N Engl J Med 1999;340:177–183
Osuna C, Matorras R, Pijoan JI, Rodriguez-Escudero FJ: One versus two inseminations per cycle in intrauterine insemination with sperm from patients’ husbands: A systematic review of the literature. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:17–24
Ragni G, Somigliana E, Vegetti W: Timing of intrauterine insemination: Where are we? Fertil Steril 2004;82:25–26
Guzick DS: For now, one well-timed intrauterine insemination is the way to go. Fertil Steril 2004;82:30–31
Cantineau AEP, Heineman MJ, Cohlen BJ: Single versus double insemination in stimulated cycles for subfertile couples: Systematic review based on a Cochrane review. Hum Reprod 2003;18:941–946
Alborzi S, Motazedian S, Parsanezhad ME, Jannati S: Comparison of the effectiveness of single intrauterine insemination (IUI) versus double IUI per cycle in infertile patients. Fertil Steril 2003;80:595–599
Ragni G, Maggioni P, Guermandi E, Testa A, Baroni E, Colombo M, et al.: Efficacy of double intrauterine insemination in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles. Fertil Steril 1999;72:619–622
Madankumar R, Tsang J, Lesser ML, Kenigsberg D, Brenner S: Clomiphene citrate induced ovulation and intrauterine insemination: Effect of timing of human chorionic gonadotropin injection in relation to the spontaneous LH surge on pregnancy rates. J Assist Reprod Genet 2005;22:155–159
Claman P, Wilkie V, Collins D: Timing intrauterine insemination either 33 or 39 h after administration of human chorionic gonadotropin yields the same pregnancy rates after superovulation therapy. Fertil Steril 2004;82:13–16
World Health Organization: Collection and examination of human semen. In WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction, 4th edn., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999; pp. 4–5
World Health Organization: WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-cervical Mucus Interaction., 3rd edn., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Osuna C, Matorras R, Pijoan JI, Rodriguez-Escudero F: The heterogeneity of randomized, controlled trials of intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 2004;83:34–35
Sahakyan M, Harlow BL, Hornstein MD: Influence of age, diagnosis, and cycle number on pregnancy rates with ganadotrophin-induced controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 1999;72:500–504
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors thank Central South University for supporting the study by providing Wei Liu ‘The Grands for Young Promising Teachers.’
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, W., Gong, F., Luo, K. et al. Comparing the pregnancy rates of one versus two intrauterine inseminations (IUIs) in male factor and idiopathic infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet 23, 75–79 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-005-9017-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-005-9017-x