Skip to main content
Log in

The relationship of clinical response, oocyte number, and success in oocyte donor cycles

  • Assisted Reproduction
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to determine if there is a threshold of clinical response to ovarian stimulation below which pregnancy rates diminish in oocyte donation cycles.

Methods: Two hundred and seventy-six oocyte donor cycles were reviewed. Data were stratified by number of oocytes retrieved and divided into pregnant versus non-pregnant outcomes.

Results: There were no differences in fertilization rates or clinical pregnancy rates regardless of the number of oocytes retrieved ranging from 3 to > 25. There was no difference in the mean age of the donors in pregnant versus non-pregnant cycles.

Conclusions: These data suggest that a lower threshold below which cycle cancellation should be considered donation cycles is different than standard IVF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pados G, Camus M, Van Steirteghem A, Bonduelle M, Devroey P: The evolution and outcome of pregnancies from oocyte donation. Hum Reprod 1994;9:538–542

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahuja KK, Simons EG, Edwards RG: Money, morals and medical risks: Conflicting notions underlying the recruitment of egg donors. Hum Reprod 1999;14:279–284

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahuja KK, Simons EG, Fiamanya W, Dalton M, Armar NA, Kirkpatrick P, Sharp S, Arian-Schad M, Seaton A, Watters WJ: Egg-sharing in assisted conception: Ethical and practical considerations. Hum Reprod 1996;11:1126–1131

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Faber BM, Mercan B, Hamacher P, Muasher SJ, Toner JP: The impact of an egg donor’s age and her prior fertility on recipient pregnancy outcome. Fertil Steril 1997;68:370–372.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Toner JP, Grainger DA, Frazier LM: Clinical outcomes among recipients of donated eggs: An analysis of the U.S. national experience, 1996–1998. Fertil Steril 2002;78:1038–1045

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Marina S, Exposito R, Marina E, Nadal J, Masramon M, Verges A: Oocyte donor selection for 554 candidates. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2770–2776

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Abdalla HI, Billett A, Kan AK, Baig S, Wren M, Korea L, Studd JW: Obstetric outcome in 232 ovum donation pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;105:332–337

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kolibianakis EM, Tournaye H, Osmanagaoglu K, Camus M, Van Waesberghe L, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P: Outcome for donors and recipients in two egg-sharing policies. Fertil Steril 2003;79:69–73

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerard Letterie.

Additional information

Presented at the 59th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine 2003, San Antonio, Texas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Letterie, G., Marshall, L. & Angle, M. The relationship of clinical response, oocyte number, and success in oocyte donor cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 22, 115–117 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-005-4875-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-005-4875-9

Keywords

Navigation