Skip to main content
Log in

Validated Eco-Friendly Spectrophotometric Methods for the Determination of Acefylline Piperazine and Bromhexine Hydrochloride in the Presence of Dosage Form Additives

  • Published:
Journal of Applied Spectroscopy Aims and scope

Four simple, precise, accurate, and eco-friendly spectrophotometric methods manipulating ratio spectra were used for the determination of acefylline piperazine (AC) and bromhexine hydrochloride (BR) in the presence of two dosage form additives — methylparaben (MP) and propylparaben (PP). The dual wavelength in ratio spectra (DWRS) and derivative of double divisor of ratio spectra (DD-RS) methods were used for the simultaneous determination of AC and BR. The first derivative ratio zero crossing method (1DD) was used for the determination of BR. AC can be determined using sequential spectrophotometry, where the ratio subtraction method was applied to remove the extended spectrum of BR followed by applying the dual wave length method. The linearity of the proposed methods was investigated in the ranges 5.00–60.00 and 4.00–60.00 μg/mL for AC and BR, respectively. The selectivity of the developed methods was investigated by analyzing laboratory-prepared mixtures containing different ratios of the cited drugs and additives in addition to the analysis of their pharmaceutical dosage form. The validity of the proposed methods was further assessed using the standard addition technique. The obtained results were statistically compared with those obtained by the reported method, showing no significant difference with respect to their accuracy and precision at p = 0.05.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clarke's Analysis of Drugs and Poisons, 4th edn., Pharmaceutical Press, London (2011).

  2. The British Pharmacopoeia, Her Majesty's Stationary Offi ce, London (2013).

  3. A. El-Gindy, S. Emara, and G. M. Hadad, Farmaco, 58, 377–390 (2003).

  4. M. Korany, A. Wahbi, S. Mandour, and M. Elsayed, Anal. Lett., 18, 21–34 (1985).

  5. N. A. Zakhari, M. I. Walash, and S. M. Ahmed, Farmaco, 46, 601–613 (1991).

  6. G. Ragab, H. Saleh, M. El-Henawee, and O. F. Elsayed, Eurasian J. Anal. Chem., 11, 197–210 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  7. I. H. Habib, M. E. Hassouna, and G. A. Zaki, Farmaco, 60, 249–254 (2005).

  8. D. M. Vishal, G. V. Tukaram, and J. P. Pramod, Int. Res. J. Pharm., 3, 197–201 (2011).

  9. G. Bazylaka and L. J. Nagels, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 32, 887–903 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Javanbakht, M. H. Namjumanesh, and B. Akbari-Adergani, Talanta, 80, 133–138 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. L. Shujuan, L. Zhao, X. Liu, F. Zhou, and S. Jiang, J. Food Drug Anal., 12, 306–310 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. E. Vignaduzzo and T. S. Kaufman, J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol., 36, 2829–2843 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Tyagi, N. Sharma, K. Mittal, R. Mashru, T. Bhardwaj, J. Malik, and A. Thakkar, Pharm. Anal. Acta, 6, 1–9 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. N. Dave, R. C. Mashru, and A. K. Patel, J. Pharm. Sci. Res., 2, 143–148 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. V. Dhoka, V. T. Gawande, and P. P. Joshi, J. Pharm. Sci. Res., 2, 477–483 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. Sumarlik and G. Indrayanto, J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol., 27, 2047–2056 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Pospısilova, M. Polasek, and V. Jokl, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 24, 421–428 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. A. El-Gindy, S. Emara, and H. Shaaban, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 43, 973–982 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Kenkel, Analytical Chemistry for Technicians, 3rd ed., CRC Press, London (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. S. Saad, Spectrochim. Acta A: Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc., 147, 257–261 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. S. Shibata, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 15, 673–679 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. S. Bindaiya, S. Bankey, and D. Jain, Int. J. Chem. Technol. Res., 2, 11–15 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  23. E. S. Elzanfaly, A. S. Saad, and A. A. B. Abd-Elaleem, Saudi Pharm. J., 20, 249-253 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. H. W. Darwish, S. A. Hassan, M. Y. Salem, and B. A. El-Zeany, Spectrochim. Acta A: Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc., 104, 70–76 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. H. W. Darwish, S. A. Hassan, M. Y. Salem, and B. A. El-Zeany, Int. J. Spectrosc., 2013, 1-8 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. M. R. El-Ghobashy, and N. F. Abo-Talib. J. Adv. Res., 1, 323–329 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. M. G. El-Bardicy, H. M. Lotfy, M. A. El-Sayed, and M. F. El-Tarras, JAOAC Int., 91, 299–310 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. F. Salinas, J. B. Nevado, and A. E. Mansilla, Talanta, 37, 347–351 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. H. A. Merey, S. S. El-Mosallamy, N. Y. Hassan, and B. A. El-Zeany, Spectrochim. Acta A: Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc., 160, 50–57 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. H. A. Merey, N. K. Ramadan, S. S. Diab, and A. A. Moustafa, Spectrochim. Acta A: Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc., 125, 138–146 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. E. Dinc, F. Onur, Anal. Chim. Acta, 359, 93–106 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. E. Dinç, Talanta, 48, 1145–1157 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. H. A. Merey, S. S. El-Mosallamy, N. Y. Hassan, and B. A. El-Zeany, Anal. Chem. Lett., 6, 70–85 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. I CH Q2 (R1) Validation of Analytical Procedures, in: Proceeding of the International Conference on Harmonization, Geneva (2005).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. S. El-Mosallamy.

Additional information

Abstract of article is published in Zhurnal Prikladnoi Spektroskopii, Vol. 87, No. 1, p. 171, January–February, 2020.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Merey, H.A., El-Mosallamy, S.S., Hassan, N.Y. et al. Validated Eco-Friendly Spectrophotometric Methods for the Determination of Acefylline Piperazine and Bromhexine Hydrochloride in the Presence of Dosage Form Additives. J Appl Spectrosc 87, 159–168 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10812-020-00977-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10812-020-00977-5

Keywords

Navigation