Abstract
De-extinction is the process through which extinct species can be brought back into existence. Although these projects have the potential to cause great harm to animal welfare, discussion on issues surrounding de-extinction have focussed primarily on other issues. In this paper, I examine the potential types of welfare harm that can arise through de-extinction programs, including problems with cloning, captive rearing and re-introduction. I argue that welfare harm should be an important consideration when making decisions on de-extinction projects. Though most of the proposed benefits of these projects are insufficient to outweigh the current potential welfare harm, these problems may be overcome with further development of the technology and careful selection of appropriate species as de-extinction candidates.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Or something closely resembling the species—see discussion on this point and its implications in the “Potential Issues with De-extinction” and “Restorative Benefits” sections. For the welfare concerns discussed in this paper, the distinction does not play a strong role, though may change weighting of potential benefits, as will be addressed in the “Restorative Benefits” section.
Though the use of the term ‘reintroduction’ here and throughout the paper implies the released animals would be of the same species as the extinct ones, this is not meant necessarily as an endorsement of this view, but is rather following the common usage in the literature. The welfare issues discussed are the same regardless of whether or not the releases can be classified as reintroductions.
Not all de-extinction projects aim at releasing animals back to the wild (Sandler 2014), and those which simply aim to create animals to hold in captivity for research or exhibition will not face this set of welfare problems, though the others, particularly those in the “Welfare Issues with Captive Rearing” section, will still apply.
References
Adams, W. M. (2017). Geographies of conservation I: De-extinction and precision conservation. Progress in Human Geography, 41(4), 534–545.
Beck, B. (1995). Reintroduction, zoos, conservation, and animal welfare. In B. G. Norton, M. Hutchins, E. Stevens, & T. L. Maple (Eds.), Ethics on the ark (pp. 155–163). Washington and London: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Beever, J. (2017). The ontology of species: Commentary on Kasperbauer’s ‘Should We Bring Back the Passenger Pigeon? The Ethics of De-Extinction’. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 20(1), 18–20.
Bennett, J. R., Maloney, R. F., Steeves, T. E., Brazill-Boast, J., Possingham, H. P., & Seddon, P. J. (2017). Spending limited resources on de-extinction could lead to net biodiversity loss. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 1(4), 0053.
Blockstein, D. E. (2017). We can’t bring back the passenger Pigeon: The ethics of deception around de-extinction. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 20(1), 33–37.
Camacho, A. E. (2015). Going the way of the dodo: De-extinction, dualisms, and reframing conservation. Washington University Law Review, 92(4), 849–906.
Campagna, C., Guevara, D., & Le Boeuf, B. (2017). De-scenting extinction: The promise of de-extinction may hasten continuing extinctions. Hastings Center Report, 47, S48–S53.
Cohen, S. (2014). The ethics of de-extinction. NanoEthics, 8(2), 165–178.
Davis, M. A. (2000). “Restoration”—A misnomer? Science, 287(5456), 1203. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5456.1203b.
Davis, C. N., & Moran, M. D. (2016). An argument supporting de-extinction and a call for field research. Frontiers of Biogeography, 8(3), e28431.
Diehm, C. (2017). De-extinction and deep questions about species conservation. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 20(1), 25–28.
Fiester, A. (2005). Ethical issues in animal cloning. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 48(3), 328–343.
Friese, C., & Marris, C. (2014). Making de-extinction mundane? PLoS Biology, 12(3), e1001825.
Gamborg, C. (2014). What’s so special about reconstructing a mammoth? Ethics of breeding and biotechnology in re-creating extinct species. In M. Oksanen & H. Siipi (Eds.), The ethics of animal re-creation and modification (pp. 60–76). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gamborg, C., Gremmen, B., Christiansen, S. B., & Sandoe, P. (2010). De-domestication: Ethics at the intersection of landscape restoration and animal welfare. Environmental Values, 19(1), 57–78.
Greely, H. T. (2017). Is de-extinction special? Hastings Center Report, 47, S30–S36.
Harrington, L. A., Moehrenschlager, A., Gelling, M., Atkinson, R. P. D., Hughes, J., & Macdonald, D. W. (2013). Conflicting and complementary ethics of animal welfare considerations in reintroductions: Welfare in reintroductions. Conservation Biology, 27(3), 486–500.
IUCN. (1998). Guidelines for re-introductions. IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group. https://portals.iucn.org/library/efiles/documents/2013-009.pdf
Jones, K. E. (2014). From dinosaurs to dodos: Who could and should we de-extinct? Frontiers of Biogeography, 6(1), 20–24.
Jørgensen, D. (2013). Reintroduction and de-extinction. BioScience, 63(9), 719–720.
Kasperbauer, T. J. (2017). Should we bring back the passenger Pigeon? The ethics of de-extinction. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 20(1), 1–14.
Mason, C. (2017). The unnaturalness objection to de-extinction: A critical evaluation. Animal Studies Journal, 6(1), 40–60.
McCauley, D. J., Hardesty-Moore, M., Halpern, B. S., & Young, H. S. (2017). A mammoth undertaking: Harnessing insight from functional ecology to shape de-extinction priority setting. Functional Ecology, 31(5), 1003–1011.
McMahan, J. (2002). The ethics of killing: Problems at the margins of life. New York: Oxford University Press.
Narveson, J. (1973). Moral problems of population. The Monist, 57(1), 62–86.
Norton, B. G. (1995). Caring for nature: A broader look at animal stewardship. In B. G. Norton, M. Hutchins, E. Stevens, & T. L. Maple (Eds.), Ethics on the Ark (pp. 102–121). Washington and London: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Robert, A., Thévenin, C., Princé, K., Sarrazin, F., & Clavel, J. (2017). De-extinction and evolution. Functional Ecology, 31(5), 1021–1031.
Rohwer, Y., & Marris, E. (2018). An analysis of potential ethical justifications for mammoth de-extinction and a call for empirical research. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 21, 1–16.
Sandler, R. (2014). The ethics of reviving long extinct species: Reviving long extinct species. Conservation Biology, 28(2), 354–360.
Sandler, R. (2017). De-extinction: Costs, benefits and ethics. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 1(4), 0105.
Seddon, P. J., Moehrenschlager, A., & Ewen, J. (2014). Reintroducing resurrected species: Selecting de-extinction candidates. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 29(3), 140–147.
Shapiro, B. (2015). How to clone a mammoth: The science of de-extinction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Shapiro, B. (2017). Pathways to de-extinction: How close can we get to resurrection of an extinct species? Functional Ecology, 31(5), 996–1002.
Steen, E. (1968). Some aspects of the nutrition of semi-domestic reindeer. Symposium of the Zoological Society, London, 21, 117–128.
Turner, D. D. (2017). Biases in the selection of candidate species for de-extinction. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 20(1), 21–24.
Williams, N. (2003). Death of Dolly marks cloning milestone. Current Biology, 13(6), R209–R210.
Zimmer, C. (2013). Bringing them back to life. National Geographic, 223(4), 28–41.
Acknowledgements
This research is supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship. Thanks to Seth Lazar for assistance and comments on drafts of this article. Thanks also to two anonymous reviewers for their feedback, which helped improve and clarify this manuscript. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2016 Australasian Association of Philosophy conference, and benefitted greatly from the surrounding discussion there.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Browning, H. Won’t Somebody Please Think of the Mammoths? De-extinction and Animal Welfare. J Agric Environ Ethics 31, 785–803 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-018-9755-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-018-9755-2