Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Forgivingness, Pessimism, and Environmental Citizenship

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our attitudes toward human culpability for environmental problems have moral and emotional import, influencing our basic capacities for believing cooperative action and environmental repair are even possible. In this paper, I suggest that having the virtue of forgivingness as a response to environmental harm is generally good for moral character, preserving us from morally risky varieties of pessimism and despair. I define forgivingness as a forward-looking disposition based on Robin Dillon’s conception of preservative forgiveness, a preparation to be deeply and abidingly accepting yet expecting human error. As with other virtues, however, preservative forgiveness is available to some of us more than others; in the second half of this paper, I consider the deep challenge posed by rational pessimism, especially on the part of those who have been given many reasons not to hope for the very moral improvements for which they strive. I conclude that for those of us with the power roles and personal resources especially conducive to environmental activism, preservative forgiveness inclines us to remain engaged in environmental activism with fellow flawed human beings, recognizing our own mutual depredations while committing us to cooperatively respond.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aristotle. (1999). Nicomachean ethics. (trans: T. Irwin). 2nd ed., Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.

  • Badhwar, N. K. (1996). The limited unity of virtue. Noûs, 30(3), 306–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, M., & Brass, D. J. (2006). Relational correlates of interpersonal citizenship behavior: A social network perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 70–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brison, S. (2002). Aftermath: Violence and the remaking of a self. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denton, R. T., & Martin, M. W. (1998). Defining forgiveness: An empirical exploration of process and role. American Journal of Family Therapy, 26(4), 281–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, R. (2001). Self-forgiveness and self-respect. Ethics, 112, 53–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., & Mussen, P. H. (1989). The roots of prosocial behavior in children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, P. (1992). Responsibility matters. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griswold, C. (2007). Forgiveness: A philosophical exploration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, J. (1988). Forgiveness and mercy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, R. (2005). All about eve: A report on environmental virtue ethics today. Ethics and the Environment, 10(1), 89–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. (2008). Tap water’s popularity forces pepsi to cut jobs. New York Times, October 14; Accessed online 8 November 2008.

  • McFall, L. (1991). What’s wrong with bitterness? In C. Card (Ed.), Feminist ethics (pp. 146–160). Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melville, H. (2008). Moby Dick. In T. Tanner (Ed.), Loomings (Oxford World Classics edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Murphy, J. (2002). Forgiveness in counseling: A philosophical perspective. In S. Lamb & J. Murphy (Eds.), Before forgiving: Cautionary views of forgiveness in psychotherapy (pp. 41–53). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R. (Ed.). (2001). Coping with stress: Effective people and processes. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P. (1993). Freedom and resentment. In J. M. Fischer & M. Ravizza (Eds.), Perspectives on moral responsibility (pp. 45–66). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strelan, P., & Covic, T. (2006). A review of forgiveness process models and a coping framework to guide future research. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 25(10), 1059–1085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tessman, L. (2009). Expecting Bad Luck. Hypatia, 24(1), 9–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Human Development Report. (2007/2008). New York: United Nations Development Programme. First Published in 2007 by Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Walker, M. U. (2006). Moral repair: Reconstructing moral relations after wrongdoing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, E. L., Jr. (2006). Forgiveness and reconciliation: Theory and application. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ysseldyk, R., & Matheson, K. (2008). Forgiveness and coping. In W. Malcolm, N. DeCourville, & K. Belicki (Eds.), Women’s reflections on the complexities of forgiveness (pp. 143–164). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathryn J. Norlock.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Norlock, K.J. Forgivingness, Pessimism, and Environmental Citizenship. J Agric Environ Ethics 23, 29–42 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-009-9182-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-009-9182-5

Keywords

Navigation