Respecting The Autonomy of European and American Consumers: Defending Positive Labels on Gm Foods
- 238 Downloads
In her recent article, “Does autonomy count in favor of labeling genetically modified food?,” Kirsten Hansen argues that in Europe, voluntary negative labeling of non-GM foods respects consumer autonomy just as well as mandatory positive labeling of foods with GM content. She also argues that because negative labeling places labeling costs upon those consumers that want to know whether food is GM, negative labeling is better policy than positive labeling. In this paper, we argue that Hansen’s arguments are mistaken in several respects. Most importantly, she underestimates the demands of respecting autonomy and overestimates the cost of positive labeling. Moreover, she mistakenly implies that only a small minority of people desire information about GM content. We also explore the extent to which her arguments would apply to the US context, and argue that any discussion of the relationship between autonomy and labeling should include not just considerations of consumer autonomy but also considerations of what we call citizen autonomy.
Keywordsautonomy genetically modified foods GM foods labeling
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- The Center for Food Safety, “Compilation and Analysis of Public Opinion Polls on Genetically Engineered Foods,” available on World Wide Web: http://centerforfoodsafety.org/facts&issues/polls.html (September 30, 2003)
- Gaskell, G., N. Allum, M. Bauer, J. Durant, A. Allansdottir, H. Bonfadelli, D. Boy, S. deCheveigné, B. Fjaestad, J. Gutteling, J. Hampel, E. Jelsøe, J. Jesuino, M. Kohring, N. Kronberger, C. Midden, T. Nielsen, A. Przestalski, T. Rusanen, G. Sakellaris, H. Torgersen, T. Twardowski, and W. Wagner, “Biotechnology and the European Public,” Nature Biotechnology 18(September) (2000), 935–938Google Scholar
- Kalaitzandonakes, N. and J. Bijman, “Who Is Driving Biotechnology Acceptance?” Nature Biotechnology 21(April) (2003), 366–369Google Scholar
- Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology, “GM Food Safety: Are Government Regulations Adequate?” Available on World Wide Web: http://pewagbiotech.org/buzz/display.php3?StoryID=42 (September 2003)
- Program on International Policy Attitudes, “US Public Opinion on Biotechnology,” available on the World Wide Web: http://www.americans-world.org/digest/global_issues/biotechnology/biotech3.cfm (2003)
- Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice, revised edn. (Belknap Press, Cambridge, 1999)Google Scholar
- Streiffer, R., Rubel, A. 2004Democratic Principles and Mandatory Labeling of Genetically Engineered FoodPublic Affairs Quarterly18223248Google Scholar
- Streiffer, R., Rubel, A. 2003Choice Versus Autonomy In The GM Food Labeling DebateAgBioForum6141142Google Scholar
- Thompson, P. 1997Food Biotechnology in Ethical PerspectiveBlackie, Academic and ProfessionalLondonGoogle Scholar
- United States Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (USFDA), “Report on Consumer Focus Groups on Biotechnology,” available on World Wide Web: http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~comm/biorpt.html (October 20, 2000).