Abstract
In her recent article, “Does autonomy count in favor of labeling genetically modified food?,” Kirsten Hansen argues that in Europe, voluntary negative labeling of non-GM foods respects consumer autonomy just as well as mandatory positive labeling of foods with GM content. She also argues that because negative labeling places labeling costs upon those consumers that want to know whether food is GM, negative labeling is better policy than positive labeling. In this paper, we argue that Hansen’s arguments are mistaken in several respects. Most importantly, she underestimates the demands of respecting autonomy and overestimates the cost of positive labeling. Moreover, she mistakenly implies that only a small minority of people desire information about GM content. We also explore the extent to which her arguments would apply to the US context, and argue that any discussion of the relationship between autonomy and labeling should include not just considerations of consumer autonomy but also considerations of what we call citizen autonomy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D. Brock (1999) ArticleTitleA Critique of Three Objections to Physician-Assisted Suicide Ethics 109 IssueID3 519–547 Occurrence Handle10.1086/233920
The Center for Food Safety, “Compilation and Analysis of Public Opinion Polls on Genetically Engineered Foods,” available on World Wide Web: http://centerforfoodsafety.org/facts&issues/polls.html (September 30, 2003)
Gaskell, G., N. Allum, M. Bauer, J. Durant, A. Allansdottir, H. Bonfadelli, D. Boy, S. deCheveigné, B. Fjaestad, J. Gutteling, J. Hampel, E. Jelsøe, J. Jesuino, M. Kohring, N. Kronberger, C. Midden, T. Nielsen, A. Przestalski, T. Rusanen, G. Sakellaris, H. Torgersen, T. Twardowski, and W. Wagner, “Biotechnology and the European Public,” Nature Biotechnology 18(September) (2000), 935–938
K. Hansen (2004) ArticleTitleDoes Autonomy Count In Favor of Labeling Genetically Modified Food? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 IssueID1 67–76 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:JAGE.0000010845.31368.2f
Kalaitzandonakes, N. and J. Bijman, “Who Is Driving Biotechnology Acceptance?” Nature Biotechnology 21(April) (2003), 366–369
Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology, “GM Food Safety: Are Government Regulations Adequate?” Available on World Wide Web: http://pewagbiotech.org/buzz/display.php3?StoryID=42 (September 2003)
Program on International Policy Attitudes, “US Public Opinion on Biotechnology,” available on the World Wide Web: http://www.americans-world.org/digest/global_issues/biotechnology/biotech3.cfm (2003)
Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice, revised edn. (Belknap Press, Cambridge, 1999)
S. Shiffrin (2000) ArticleTitlePaternalism, Unconscionability Doctrine, and Accommodation Philosophy and Public Affairs 29 IssueID3 205–250 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1088-4963.2000.00205.x
R. Streiffer A. Rubel (2004) ArticleTitleDemocratic Principles and Mandatory Labeling of Genetically Engineered Food Public Affairs Quarterly 18 IssueID3 223–248
R. Streiffer A. Rubel (2003) ArticleTitleChoice Versus Autonomy In The GM Food Labeling Debate AgBioForum 6 IssueID3 141–142
P. Thompson (1997) Food Biotechnology in Ethical Perspective Blackie, Academic and Professional London
United States Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (USFDA), “Report on Consumer Focus Groups on Biotechnology,” available on World Wide Web: http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~comm/biorpt.html (October 20, 2000).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rubel, A., Streiffer, R. Respecting The Autonomy of European and American Consumers: Defending Positive Labels on Gm Foods. J Agric Environ Ethics 18, 75–84 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-004-3079-0
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-004-3079-0