Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Genetic engineering and the Moral Status of Non-Human Species

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Genetic modification leads to several important moral issues. Up until now they have mainly been discussed from the viewpoint that only individual living beings, above all animals, are morally considerable. The standpoint that also collective entities such as species belong to the moral sphere have seldom been taken into account in a more thorough way, although it is advocated by several important environmental ethicists. The main purpose of this article is to analyze in more detail than often has been done what the practical consequences of this ethical position would be for the use of genetic engineering on animals and plants. The practical consequences of the holistic standpoint (focused on collective entities) of Holmes Rolston, III, is compared with the practical consequences of the individualistic standpoints (focused on individual living beings) of Bernard E. Rollin and Philipp Balzer, Klaus Peter Rippe, and Peter Schaber, respectively. The article also discusses whether the claim that species are morally considerable is tenable as a foundation for policy decisions on genetic engineering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • R. Attfield (1998) “Intrinsic Value and Transgenic Animals” A. Holland A. Johnson (Eds) Animal Biotechnology and Ethics Chapman and Hall London 172–189

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Balzer K. P. Rippe P. Schaber (2000) ArticleTitle“Two Concepts of Dignity for Humans and Non-human Organisms in the Context of Genetic Engineering” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 7–27

    Google Scholar 

  • F. W. A. Brom (2000) ArticleTitle“The Good Life of Creatures with Dignity – Some Comments on the Swiss Expert Opinion” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 53–63

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Dobson (1995) ArticleTitle“Biocentrism and Genetic Engineering” Environmental Values 4 227–239

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Dobson (1997) ArticleTitle“Genetic Engineering and Environmental Ethics” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6 205–221

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Heeger (2000) ArticleTitle“Genetic Engineering and the Dignity of Creatures” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 43–51

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Holland A. Johnson (Eds) (1998) Animal Biotechnology and Ethics Chapman and Hall London

    Google Scholar 

  • D.L. Hull (1998) “Introduction to part V” The Philosophy of Biology Oxford University Press Oxford 295–299

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Jaber (2000) ArticleTitle“Human Dignity and the Dignity of Creatures” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 29–42

    Google Scholar 

  • L. E. Johnson (1993) A Morally Deep World. An Essay on Moral Significance and Environmental Ethics Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • P. F. Lurquin (2001) The Green Phoenix. A History of Genetically Modified Plants Columbia University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • W. M. Muir H. A. Hostetler (2001) “Transgenic Fish: Production, Testing, and Risk Assessment” R. Renaville A. Burny (Eds) Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht 261–282

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Partridge (1990) “On the Rights of Future Generations” D. Scherer (Eds) Upstream/Downstream. Issues in Environmental Ethics Temple University Press Philadelphia 40–66

    Google Scholar 

  • G.M.C. Poirer D. B. Morton (2000) “An Ethical Framework for the Use of Transgenic Mice in Basic Research” M. Balls A.-M. Zeller Particle van M. E. Halder (Eds) Progress in the Reduction, Refinement and Replacement of Animal Experimentation Elsevier Amsterdam 1465–1473

    Google Scholar 

  • M. J. Reiss R. Straughan (1996) Improving Nature? The Science and Ethics of Genetic Engineering Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • B. E. Rollin (1995) The Frankenstein Syndrome. Ethical and Social Issues in the Genetic Engineering of Animals Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • B.E. Rollin (1998) “On telos and genetic engineering” A. Holland A. Johnson (Eds) Animal Biotechnology and Ethics Chapman and Hall London 156–171

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Rolston SuffixIII (1988) Environmental Ethics. Duties to and Values in the Natural World Temple University Press Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolston, III, H., “What do we mean by the intrinsic value and integrity of plants and animals?” in D. Heaf and J. Wirtz (eds.), Genetic Engineering and the Intrinsic Value and Integrity of Animals and Plants. Proceedings of a Workshop at the Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh, UK (Ifgene, Hafan, UK, 2002), pp. 5–10.

  • E. Sober (1993) Philosophy of Biology Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Verhoog (1992) ArticleTitle“The Concept of Intrinsic Value and Transgenic Animals” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 5 147–160

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Theology and Religious Studies, Lund University, Sweden

    Anders Melin

Authors
  1. Anders Melin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anders Melin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Melin, A. Genetic engineering and the Moral Status of Non-Human Species. J Agric Environ Ethics 17, 479–495 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-004-1467-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-004-1467-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation