Can Educators be Motivated by Management by Objective Systems in Academia? Article First Online: 03 March 2011 DOI:
Cite this article as: Johnson, R. J Acad Ethics (2011) 9: 1. doi:10.1007/s10805-011-9127-2 Abstract
The Management by Objective (MBO) system was widely discredited by the 1980s as not delivering on its promises of efficiency, worker motivation, etc. Now some universities around the world seek to employ such a system for faculty evaluation. This paper comments on the reasons the MBO was largely abandoned in the business world, provides the use of the MBO in Korean education as a case study of current use, and gives suggestions of the conditions under which the MBO or similar evaluation systems would likely be disastrous in an academic environment. This is followed by a series of criteria that a fair and equitable faculty evaluation system should have.
Keywords Faculty evaluation Management by objective Ethics of the MBO MBO in a university Korean MBO References
Beaumont, E. F. (1974). A pivotal point for the merit concept.
Public Administration Review, 34
Blustein, P. (1989). Administration by Bush; Management by Objective; President asks OMB to oversee MBO.
The Washington Post. April 14, 1989.
Case, F. E. (1968). Management principles are what? A case study of the application of the concept of management by objective.
The Academy of Management Journal, 11(1), 119–121.
Coens, T., & Jenkins, M. (2000).
Abolishing performance appraisals. Why they backfire and what to do instead. Berrett-Koehler.
Farson, R. Management by design. Commentary.
Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions.
Academy of Management Journal, 32
Hong, D.-R. (2009). A critical study on the university and academic assessment system in Korea.
Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 10
Kondrasuk, J. N. (1981). Studies in MBO effectiveness.
The Academy of Management Review, 6
Lee, S.-H. (2001). Ethical practices in the Korean Academic profession.
International Higher Education.
Milkovich, G., & Newman, J. (2008).
Neave, H. R. (1987). Deming’s 14 points for management: framework for success.
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 36
OECD. (2005). Performance related pay in Korea.
Performance-Related Pay Policies for Government Employees. OECD Publishing.
Pearson, J. R. (1991). Management by Objective(MBO) used as an effective clinical education methodology.
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, 7
Perlman, D. H. (1975). Implementing “management by objectives” in a university: a progress report.
Speech given before the Working Conference of ACE-AAIP Alumni. New Orleans, Louisiana. February 5–7.
Romani, P. N. (1997). An MBO by any other name is still an MBO. High Beam Research.
Schulze, J. F. W. (1975). Situation delineation. Letter to the Editor.
Public Administration Review.
Schwartz, A. (1976). Commentary on productivity in local government.
Public Productivity Review, 1
Terpstra, D. E., & Honoree, A. L. (2003). The relative importance of external, internal, individual and procedural equity to pay satisfaction.
Compensation and Benefits Review, 35
Terpstra, D. E., & Honoree, A. L. (2008). Faculty perceptions of problems with merit pay plans in institutions of higher education.
Journal of Business Management.
Tipton, F. B. (2007).
Asian firms: History, institutions, and management. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Wall, H. J. (2009). Don’t get skewed over by journal rankings.
The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 9(1), Article 34.
Wallis, W. A., & Simon, L. S. (1972). Interview with: W. Allen Wallis, Chancellor, University of Rochester.
Interfaces. Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011