Journal of Academic Ethics

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 1–18 | Cite as

Can Educators be Motivated by Management by Objective Systems in Academia?



The Management by Objective (MBO) system was widely discredited by the 1980s as not delivering on its promises of efficiency, worker motivation, etc. Now some universities around the world seek to employ such a system for faculty evaluation. This paper comments on the reasons the MBO was largely abandoned in the business world, provides the use of the MBO in Korean education as a case study of current use, and gives suggestions of the conditions under which the MBO or similar evaluation systems would likely be disastrous in an academic environment. This is followed by a series of criteria that a fair and equitable faculty evaluation system should have.


Faculty evaluation Management by objective Ethics of the MBO MBO in a university Korean MBO 


  1. Beaumont, E. F. (1974). A pivotal point for the merit concept. Public Administration Review, 34(5), 426–430.Google Scholar
  2. Blustein, P. (1989). Administration by Bush; Management by Objective; President asks OMB to oversee MBO. The Washington Post. April 14, 1989.Google Scholar
  3. Case, F. E. (1968). Management principles are what? A case study of the application of the concept of management by objective. The Academy of Management Journal, 11(1), 119–121.Google Scholar
  4. Coens, T., & Jenkins, M. (2000). Abolishing performance appraisals. Why they backfire and what to do instead. Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  5. Farson, R. Management by design. Commentary.
  6. Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32(1), 115–130.Google Scholar
  7. Hong, D.-R. (2009). A critical study on the university and academic assessment system in Korea. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 10(2), 292–302.Google Scholar
  8. Kondrasuk, J. N. (1981). Studies in MBO effectiveness. The Academy of Management Review, 6, 419–430.Google Scholar
  9. Lee, S.-H. (2001). Ethical practices in the Korean Academic profession. International Higher Education.Google Scholar
  10. Milkovich, G., & Newman, J. (2008). Compensation. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  11. Neave, H. R. (1987). Deming’s 14 points for management: framework for success. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 36, 561–570.Google Scholar
  12. OECD. (2005). Performance related pay in Korea. Performance-Related Pay Policies for Government Employees. OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Pearson, J. R. (1991). Management by Objective(MBO) used as an effective clinical education methodology. Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, 7(4), 217–220.Google Scholar
  14. Perlman, D. H. (1975). Implementing “management by objectives” in a university: a progress report. Speech given before the Working Conference of ACE-AAIP Alumni. New Orleans, Louisiana. February 5–7.Google Scholar
  15. Romani, P. N. (1997). An MBO by any other name is still an MBO. High Beam Research.Google Scholar
  16. Schulze, J. F. W. (1975). Situation delineation. Letter to the Editor. Public Administration Review.Google Scholar
  17. Schwartz, A. (1976). Commentary on productivity in local government. Public Productivity Review, 1(3), 69–71.Google Scholar
  18. Terpstra, D. E., & Honoree, A. L. (2003). The relative importance of external, internal, individual and procedural equity to pay satisfaction. Compensation and Benefits Review, 35, 67–74.Google Scholar
  19. Terpstra, D. E., & Honoree, A. L. (2008). Faculty perceptions of problems with merit pay plans in institutions of higher education. Journal of Business Management.Google Scholar
  20. Tipton, F. B. (2007). Asian firms: History, institutions, and management. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Wall, H. J. (2009). Don’t get skewed over by journal rankings. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 9(1), Article 34.Google Scholar
  22. Wallis, W. A., & Simon, L. S. (1972). Interview with: W. Allen Wallis, Chancellor, University of Rochester. Interfaces.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SolBridge International School of BusinessDaejeonSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations