Skip to main content
Log in

Case Report: Autism Risk Within the Context of Two Chromosome 15 Syndromes

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Abel, E. A., & Tonnsen, B. L. (2017). Sleep phenotypes in infants and toddlers with neurogenetic syndromes. Sleep Medicine, 38(1), 130–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2017.07.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Achenbach. (1999). The child behavior checklist and related instruments (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2000). Manual for the ASEBA preschool forms & profiles. University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families

  • Ajayi, O. J., Smith, E. J., Viangteeravat, T., Huang, E. Y., Nagisetty, N. S. V. R., Urraca, N., Lusk, L., Finucane, B., Arkilo, D., Young, J., Jeste, S., Thibert, R., & Reiter, L. T. (2017). Multisite semiautomated clinical data repository for duplication 15q syndrome: Study protocol and early uses. JMIR Research Protocols, 6(10), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.7989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arkilo, D., Devinsky, O., Mudigoudar, B., Boronat, S., Jennesson, M., Sassower, K., Vaou, O. E., Lerner, J. T., Jeste, S. S., Luchsinger, K., & Thibert, R. (2016). Electroencephalographic patterns during sleep in children with chromosome 15q11.2–13.1 duplications (Dup15q). Epilepsy & Behavior, 57(Pt A), 133–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.02.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berument, S., Rutter, M., Lord, C., Pickles, A., & Bailey, A. (1999). Autism screening questionnaire: Diagnostic validity. The British Journal of Psychiatry: THe Journal of Mental Science, 175, 444–451. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.175.5.444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betancur, C., & Coleman, M. (2013). Etiological heterogeneity in autism spectrum disorders: Role of rare variants. In J. D. Buxbaum & P. R. Hoff (Eds.), The neuroscience of autism spectrum disorder (1st ed., pp. 113–144). Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, L. M. (2014). Angelman syndrome: Review of clinical and molecular aspects. The Application of Clinical Genetics, 7, 93–104. https://doi.org/10.2147/TACG.S57386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, S. E., Zwaigenbaum, L., McDermott, C., Rombough, V., & Brian, J. (2008). The autism observation scale for infants: Scale development and reliability data. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(4), 731–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0440-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, S. J., & Lalande, M. (2010). Angelman syndrome, a genomic imprinting disorder of the brain. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(30), 9958–9963. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1728-10.2010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constantino, J. N., Abbacchi, A. M., Lavesser, P. D., Reed, H., Givens, L., Chiang, L., Gray, T., Gross, M., Zhang, Y., & Todd, R. D. (2009). Developmental course of autistic social impairment in males. Development and Psychopathology, 21(1), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095457940900008X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constantino, J. N., Davis, S. A., Todd, R. D., Schindler, M. K., Gross, M. M., Brophy, S. L., Metzger, L. M., Shoushtari, C. S., Splinter, R., & Reich, W. (2003). Validation of a brief quantitative measure of autistic traits: Comparison of the social responsiveness scale with the autism diagnostic interview-revised. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33(4), 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025014929212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constantino, J. N., & Gruber, C. P. (2012). Social responsiveness scale–second edition (SRS-2). Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantino, J. N., Przybeck, T., Friesen, D., & Todd, R. D. (2000). Reciprocal social behavior in children with and without pervasive developmental disorders. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 21(1), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004703-200002000-00002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constantino, J. N., & Todd, R. D. (2005). Intergenerational transmission of subthreshold autistic traits in the general population. Biological Psychiatry, 57(6), 655–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.12.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagli, A., Buiting, K., & Williams, C. A. (2011). Molecular and clinical aspects of Angelman syndrome. Molecular Syndromology. https://doi.org/10.1159/000328837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiStefano, C., Gulsrud, A., Huberty, S., Kasari, C., Cook, E., Reiter, L. T., Thibert, R., & Jeste, S. (2016). Identification of a distinct developmental and behavioral profile in children with Dup15q syndrome. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 8(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11689-016-9152-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esler, A. N., Bal, V. H., Guthrie, W., Wetherby, A., Weismer, S. E., & Lord, C. (2015). The Autism diagnostic observation schedule, toddler module: Standardized severity scores. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(9), 2704–2720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2432-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenson, L., Marchman, V. A., Thal, D. J., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., & Bates, E. (2007). MacArthur-Bates communicative development inventories (2nd ed.). Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotham, K., Pickles, A., & Lord, C. (2009). Standardizing ADOS scores for a measure of severity in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 693–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-008-0674-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick, L. R., & Tonnsen, B. L. (2019). Validating and applying the CSBS-ITC in neurogenetic syndromes. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 124(3), 263–285. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-124.3.263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leader, G., Forde, J., Naughton, K., Maher, L., Arndt, S., & Mannion, A. (2021). Relationships among gastrointestinal symptoms, sleep problems, challenging behaviour, comorbid psychopathology and autism spectrum disorder symptoms in children and adolescents with 15q duplication syndrome. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 65(1), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, C., Risi, S., Lambrecht, L., Cook, E. H., Jr., Leventhal, B. L., & DiLavore, P. C. (2002). Autism diagnostic observation schedule. Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, S. S., Sell, G. L., Zbinden, M. A., & Bird, L. M. (2015). Angelman syndrome. Neurotherapeutics, 12(3), 641–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-015-0361-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messinger, D., Young, G. S., Ozonoff, S., Dobkins, K., Carter, A., Zwaigenbaum, L., Landa, R. J., Charman, T., Stone, W. L., Constantino, J. N., Hutman, T., Carver, L. J., Bryson, S., Iverson, J. M., Strauss, M. S., Rogers, S. J., & Sigman, M. (2013). Beyond autism: A baby siblings research consortium study of high-risk children at three years of age. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 52(3), 300–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2012.12.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, E. M. (1995). Mullen scales of early learning. American Guidance Service Inc

  • Mundy, P., Delgado, C., Block, J., Venezia, M., Hogan, A., & Seibert, J. (2003). Early social communication scales (ESCS). University of Miami

  • Mundy, P., & Newell, L. (2007). Attention, joint attention, and social cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(5), 269–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00518.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naigles, L. R., Johnson, R., Mastergeorge, A., Ozonoff, S., Rogers, S. J., Amaral, D. G., & Nordahl, C. W. (2017). Neural correlates of language variability in preschool-aged boys with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Research, 10(6), 1107–1119. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozonoff, S., Heung, K., Byrd, R., Hansen, R., & Hertz-Picciotto, I. (2008). The onset of autism: Patterns of symptom emergence in the first years of life. Autism Research, 1(6), 320–328. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozonoff, S., Iosif, A.-M., Baguio, F., Cook, I. C., Hill, M. M., Hutman, T., Rogers, S. J., Rozga, A., Sangha, S., Sigman, M., Steinfeld, M. B., & Young, G. S. (2010). A prospective study of the emergence of early behavioral signs of autism. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 49(3), 256–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozonoff, S., Young, G. S., Belding, A., Hill, M., Hill, A., Hutman, T., Johnson, S., Miller, M., Rogers, S. J., Schwichtenberg, A. J., Steinfeld, M., & Iosif, A.-M. (2014). The broader autism phenotype in infancy: When does it emerge? Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 53(4), 398–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2013.12.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paruthi, S., Brooks, L. J., D’Ambrosio, C., Hall, W. A., Kotagal, S., Lloyd, R. M., Malow, B. A., Maski, K., Nichols, C., Quan, S. F., Rosen, C. L., Troester, M. M., & Wise, M. S. (2016). Recommended amount of sleep for pediatric populations: A consensus statement of the American Academy of sleep medicine. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 12(06), 785–786. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.5866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, S. P., Gartstein, M. A., & Rothbart, M. K. (2006). Measurement of fine-grained aspects of toddler temperament: The early childhood behavior questionnaire. Infant Behavior and Development, 29(3), 386–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2006.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiersen, A. M., Constantino, J. N., Volk, H. E., & Todd, R. D. (2007). Autistic traits in a population-based ADHD twin sample. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(5), 464–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01720.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. E., Tonnsen, B. L., McCary, L. M., Caravella, K. E., & Shinkareva, S. V. (2016). Brief report: Autism symptoms in infants with fragile x syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(12), 3830–3837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2903-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, D. L., Fein, D., Barton, M. L., & Green, J. A. (2001). The modified checklist for autism in toddlers: An initial study investigating the early detection of autism and pervasive developmental disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010738829569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadhwani, A., Wheeler, A., Gwaltney, A., Peters, S. U., Barbieri-Welge, R. L., Horowitz, L. T., Noll, L. M., Hundley, R. J., Bird, L. M., & Tan, W. H. (2021). Developmental skills of individuals with Angelman syndrome assessed using the Bayley-III. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04861-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaaya, E. A., Pollack, S. F., Boronat, S., Davis-Cooper, S., Zella, G. C., & Thibert, R. L. (2015). Gastrointestinal problems in 15q duplication syndrome. European Journal of Medical Genetics, 58(3), 191–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmg.2014.12.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siebert, J. M., Hogan, A. E., & Mundy, P. C. (1982). Assessing interactional competencies: The early social-communication scales. Infant Mental Health Journal, 3(4), 244–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, S. S., Bella, D. A., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1984). Vineland adaptive behavior scales. American Guidance Service Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, W.-H., Bacino, C. A., Skinner, S. A., Anselm, I., Barbieri-Welge, R., Bauer-Carlin, A., Beaudet, A. L., Bichell, T. J., Gentile, J. K., Glaze, D. G., Horowitz, L. T., Kothare, S. V., Lee, H.-S., Nespeca, M. P., Peters, S. U., Sahoo, T., Sarco, D., Waisbren, S. E., & Bird, L. M. (2011). Angelman syndrome: Mutations influence features in early childhood. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 155(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.33775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urraca, N., Cleary, J., Brewer, V., Pivnick, E. K., McVicar, K., Thibert, R. L., Schanen, N. C., Esmer, C., Lamport, D., & Reiter, L. T. (2013). The interstitial duplication 15q11.2–q13 syndrome includes autism, mild facial anomalies and a characteristic EEG signature. Autism Research, 6(4), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegiel, J., Schanen, N. C., Cook, E. H., Sigman, M., Brown, W. T., Kuchna, I., Nowicki, K., Wegiel, J., Imaki, H., Ma, S. Y., Marchi, E., Wierzba-Bobrowicz, T., Chauhan, A., Chauhan, V., Cohen, I. L., London, E., Flory, M., Lach, B., & Wisniewski, T. (2012). Differences between the pattern of developmental abnormalities in autism associated with duplications 15q11.2–q13 and idiopathic autism. Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, 71(5), 382–397. https://doi.org/10.1097/NEN.0b013e318251f537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherby, A., & Prizant, B. (2002). The Infant toddler checklist from the communication and symbolic behavior scales. Brookes Publishing. Retrieved May 3, 2021, from https://www.carautismroadmap.org/infant-toddler-checklist-itc/

  • Williams, C. A., Driscoll, D. J., & Dagli, A. I. (2010). Clinical and genetic aspects of Angelman syndrome. Genetics in Medicine, 12(7), 385–395. https://doi.org/10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181def138

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would first like to thank the truly exceptional family of ‘Alan, Bryson, and Corbin.’ The years of openly sharing their family dynamics with us made this project possible. The knowledge gained in this study can inform future Dup15q syndrome, Angelman syndrome, autism, and global developmental delay trajectories—thank you. The authors would also like to thank Anastasia Krutulis and the students of the Sleep and Developmental Studies Laboratory (especially Anne Nanninga and Collen Sheehy) who took special care and attention to capture Bryson and Corbin’s development. We would also like to thank Bridgette Kelleher for her initial input and reflections on this case study series. And finally, we thank Bob and Joyce Miles for their generous donation to the Purdue Center for Families—their donation supported the extended follow-up of Bryon and Corbin.

Funding

This work received support from National Institute of Mental Health Grant No. R00MH092431 and Center for Families at Purdue University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Kellerman and Schwichtenberg primarily led the manuscript effort. Kellerman led the content development of each section, along with data visualization efforts. Hassan contributed text across the ASD characteristics and behavioral profiles sections, as well as to sections of the discussion. Abel primarily contributed text to the genetic syndrome reviews and details from Bryson and Corbin’s genetic reports. Reilly contributed to the organization and text generation for the included measures. McNally Keehn contributed to the ASD characteristics subsection and overall clinical insights/impressions. Schwichtenberg primarily contributed to the sleep characteristics section and take-home of the discussion, as well as provided feedback and revision support. All authors read the penultimate draft of the manuscript and provided edits as needed throughout the review process.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. J. Schwichtenberg.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 94 KB)

Appendices

Appendix

Summary of Measures

Actigraphy

Infant movement during sleep at each visit will be tracked using a miniature actigraphy device, specifically a micromini-motionlogger® by Ambulatory Monitoring, Incorporated (AMI). The micomini-motionlogger is placed inside a neoprene ankle band and is attached to the toddler’s ankle. An actigraphy motion sensor provides a minute by minute reading of motion. Motion data are then scored as awake or asleep using an algorithm designed by Dr. Avi Sadeh. Data from the actigraphy device will be used to calculate several indices of infant sleep.

Autism Observation Scale for Infants (AOSI; Bryson et al., 2008)

This is a brief clinical assessment in which an infant’s visual tracking, attention disengagement, response to human faces, imitation, and motor skills are assessed. It is appropriate for infants aged 6–18 months. In previous studies, scores on this test are useful in predicting which infants are at highest risk for developing autism.

Autism Diagnostic Observation Scales (ADOS)

The ADOS-2 is a semi-structured standardized diagnostic tool to measure symptoms of autism in the social communication and restricted and repetitive behavior domains (Lord et al., 2002). The ADOS-2 allows numerous opportunities for social interaction, intentional communication, and pretend play between the child and the examiner. All participants included in analyses received this assessment at their outcome visit, which occurred between 24 and 36 months of age. Depending on age at outcome visit and expressive language level, children received either the Toddler Module, Module 1, or Module 2. To compare symptom severity across modules, total scores on the administered ADOS modules will be converted into severity scores following guidelines established in Gotham et al. (2009) and Esler et al. (2015).

Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL; Achenbach, 1999; Achenbach & Rescorla, 2000)

The 1½–5 year-old version of the CBCL was used to assess children’s attention, behavior and emotional reactivity problems at 24 and 36 months. The CBCL is a parental report measure which assesses 99 problem behaviors in infants and small children. It is commonly used in identifying children with behavior problems and has high reliability and validity (Achenbach, 1999).

Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales Infant–Toddler Checklist (CSBS-ITC; Wetherby & Prizant, 2002)

The checklist is a 24 multiple choice parent report screener for communication delays. It is currently a validated measure for detecting early signs of communication delays in children aged 9–24 months.

Early Childhood Behavior Questionnaire (ECBQ; Putnam et al., 2006)

The ECBQ was designed to assess 18 fine-grained subdimensions of temperament in children ages 18–36 months. For the present study the attentional focusing, frustration, and fear subscales will be used. For each item, the likert-type scale ranges from 1 “never” to 7 “always”.

Early Social Communication Scales (ESCS; Mundy et al., 2003; Mundy & Newell, 2007; Siebert et al., 1982)

ESCS is a widely used measure of early communicative functions of joint attention, behavior regulation, and social interaction. The experimenter-administered play measure assesses nonverbal communication skills in children between 8 and 30 months of age.

In the ESCS, joint attention skills are divided into initiating and responding skills (IJA and RJA, respectively). The ESCS’s IJA procedure mixes a series of trials (e.g., the child’s response to a mechanical wind-up toy) and spontaneous observations. The child’s IJA score on the ESCS is the number of acts both during the specific IJA tasks and acts that “spontaneously occur during testing.”

Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (M-CHAT; Robins et al., 2001)

M-CHAT is a 20 yes/no question parent report screening tool designed to identify children who should receive a more thorough assessment for possible early signs of ASD or developmental delay. It is currently a validated measure for identifying children at higher risk of developing autism for children aged 16 to 30 months, across three categorical cut-offs (i.e., low-risk 0–2, medium-risk 3–6, high-risk 7–23). For total scores of 7 or above, it is recommended for the child to be referred immediately for a diagnostic evaluation.

MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (CDI; Fenson et al., 2007)

The CDI is a series of parent-report measures of child word/gesture use and comprehension from 8 to 37 months of age. For the present study, the child vocabulary checklist will be used to provide an estimate of child word use and understanding. The CDI is a well-established measure with adequate internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and content/construct validity.

Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL; Mullen, 1995)

The Mullen measures cognitive ability in children aged birth to 68 months across five scales: gross motor, fine motor, visual reception, receptive language, and expressive language (Mullen, 1995). This measure was included at each laboratory visit. This measure was also included in determining outcome group membership.

Object Exploration (OE; Ozonoff et al., 2008)

Four objects (a round metal lid, round plastic ring, rattle, small toy cars) are presented, one at a time for 30 s each. Nine uses of the object are coded: shaking, banging, mouthing, throwing, spinning, rotating, lining up, and unusual visual exploration.

Parent–child Play (PCP)

The caregiver will be asked to play with the baby for 5 min as she or he usually does. Toys such as a rattle, toy phone, plastic key ring, blanket, ball, shape sorter, toy car, doll, bottle and scarves will be provided for use during the task. Variables to be rated from the video consist of vocalizations, eye contact, social initiations and responses, and smiling by both infant and caregiver.

Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ; Berument et al., 1999)

This brief instrument helps evaluate communication skills and social functioning in children who may have autism or autism spectrum disorders. This questionnaire will be completed at the first visit on siblings of the enrolled infant.

Social Responsiveness Scale- Preschool Form (SRS- Preschool; Constantino & Gruber, 2012; Constantino & Todd, 2005;)

The SRS is a 65-item informant-report questionnaire which assesses social interactions, relationships, and communication skills. Items are rated on a 4-point scale of (1) not true, (2) sometimes true, (3) often true, and (4) almost always true. Studies using the SRS report high reliability (Constantino & Todd, 2005; Constantino et al., 2009) and discriminant validity, differentiating well between typically developing, at-risk, and ASD populations (Constantino et al., 2003; Constantino et al., 2000; Reiersen et al., 2007). SRS total T scores may fall within the normal (T score ≤ 59), mild to moderate (T scores 60–75), or severe range (T score ≥ 76).

Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS; Sparrow et al., 1984)

The VABS is a parent report measure that assesses children’s skills on three main domains: communication (receptive; expressive; written), daily living skills (personal; domestic; community), and socialization (interpersonal relationships; play and leisure; coping skills). Questions are tailored to individuals with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities, such as ASD. Mothers completed this measure at each laboratory visit.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kellerman, A.M., Hassan, M.Z., Abel, E.A. et al. Case Report: Autism Risk Within the Context of Two Chromosome 15 Syndromes. J Autism Dev Disord 53, 503–513 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05422-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05422-w

Navigation