Abstract
Studies have supported two different hypotheses of reduced eye gaze in people with ASD; gaze avoidance and gaze indifference, while less is known about the role of anxiety. We tested these hypotheses using an eye-tracking paradigm that cued the eyes or mouth of emotional faces. Autistic children (n = 12, mean age 7 years) looked faster away from both eyes and mouths than controls (n = 22). This effect was not explained by anxiety symptoms. No difference was found in latency towards either area. These results indicate that attentional avoidance of autistic children is not specific to eyes, and that they do not show attentional indifference to eyes compared to controls. Atypicalities in visual scanning in ASD are possibly unrelated to specific facial areas.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
One of the most prominent deficits of social functioning observed in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is atypical eye gaze behavior (American Psychiatric Association, 2013; Kliemann et al., 2010; Kleberg, Thorup, et al., 2017; Klin et al., 2002; Tanaka & Sung, 2016). The cognitive mechanisms underlying this impairment are still debated, with two opposing theoretical explanations being most supported and salient in the discourse. These are the avoidance hypothesis and the indifference hypothesis. Each of these hypotheses is grounded in different theories of cognition in ASD.
The eye gaze avoidance hypothesis states that diminished eye gaze in ASD stems from active avoidance of eyes, driven by discomfort or aversive hyper-arousal (Tanaka & Sung, 2016). In support of this hypothesis, studies have reported heightened arousal levels in school age children with ASD (Kylliäinen & Hietanen, 2006) and increased amygdala activation in adults with ASD (Dalton et al., 2005) in response to direct eye gaze, compared to their neurotypical peers. Eye gaze may be particularly diminished in response to threatening emotions, further supporting the avoidance theory (Wang et al., 2018).
The eye gaze indifference hypothesis states that autistic people do not perceive others’ eyes as engaging or adaptively informative to the same degree as typically developing individuals (Moriuchi et al., 2017). Such indifference might be a product of a general lack of social motivation in ASD (Chevallier et al., 2012) or by an impaired ability to infer mental states from information displayed in the eye region (Baron-Cohen et al., 1997). In support of this hypothesis, toddlers with ASD have been found to be less likely to orient to eyes spontaneously (Moriuchi et al., 2017), and a preference for non-social distractors (in competition with faces) has been found to be correlated with ASD severity in diagnosed toddlers (Kwon et al., 2019).
A currently unanswered question is the extent to which comorbid anxiety can explain reduced attention to eyes in ASD. Recent studies have suggested that 34–50% of individuals with ASD fulfill the criteria for an anxiety disorder, with higher numbers in adults and high-functioning individuals (Maddox & White, 2015; Simonoff et al., 2008; van Steensel et al., 2011). Anxiety disorders are associated with avoidant visual scanning of faces and eyes with direct gaze, likely reflecting that these stimuli are perceived as aversive (Schmidtendorf et al., 2018; Waters et al., 2014; Weeks et al., 2013). It is therefore possible that gaze avoidance in ASD is explained by anxiety rather than by core ASD symptomatology (Amaral et al., 2003; Kleberg, Högström, et al., 2017; Kleberg, Thorup, et al., 2017), whereas core ASD symptoms may be linked to gaze indifference.
Inconsistent results from previous studies may also relate to differences in age. Studies of toddlers and very young children have mostly supported the indifference hypothesis (Kwon et al., 2019; Moriuchi et al., 2017), while the avoidance hypothesis has support from studies of older children, adolescents and adults (Dalton et al., 2005; Kliemann et al., 2010, 2012; Kylliäinen & Hietanen, 2006). This indicates a possible developmental aspect; an initial lack of neurobiological reward in response to other’s eyes in infancy may develop into avoidance with increasing maturity and social pressures at later stages of development (Fletcher-Watson & Happé, 2019).
To sum up, previous studies have given some support to both the avoidance and the indifference hypotheses, but the literature is inconclusive regarding which theory is best supported. Discrepancies in the previous literature may be explained at least partly by comorbid anxiety and differences in the age groups studied. These inconsistencies may be resolved by validation of experimental paradigms which (1) can be used across age groups and (2) provide the means to study links between eye gaze and symptoms of ASD and anxiety across a range of severity.
The paradigm used in the current study is adapted from Kliemann et al.’s (2010 and 2012) studies of autistic adults. This paradigm makes it possible to quantify and study the presence of avoidance and indifference simultaneously, which provides evidence of the presence of either or both these behaviors at a specific age. In their studies using a similar paradigm, Kliemann et al., (2010, 2012), reported that adults with ASD were more likely to make quick gaze shifts away from the eye region than typically developing controls, supporting the avoidance hypothesis. The current study is, to our knowledge, the first to use this kind of paradigm in a group of young children. This is also, to our knowledge, the first study to examine the association between dimensional anxiety symptoms and orienting from human eyes in this age group.
The first aim of the current study was to test the gaze avoidance and gaze indifference hypotheses by comparing a group of young school age children with ASD and a group of typically developing peers, thereby contributing to a more complete picture of the effects of age on gaze behavior in ASD. Facial stimuli were presented, and participants were cued to first attend to either the eyes or the mouth. As there is some evidence for the effects of specifically threatening emotions on eye gaze (e.g. Wang et al., 2018) we varied the emotional expressions displayed by the faces to ensure generalizability of the effect of initially cueing eyes and mouths. We reasoned that the avoidance hypothesis would predict quicker orienting away from eyes in children with ASD as compared to controls, whereas the indifference hypothesis would predict slower orienting from the mouth to the eyes in children with ASD compared to controls (as measured by latency to first fixation). The second aim was to study the association between ASD and anxiety symptoms and orienting away from human eyes, using a dimensional approach. Based on previous results by Kleberg, Högström, et al. (2017), Kleberg, Thorup, et al. (2017), we reasoned that higher levels of anxiety would predict faster orienting away from eyes, while ASD symptom severity would predict slower orienting towards eyes.
Methods
Participants
A total of 38 children, (14 diagnosed with ASD and a control group of 24 typically developing children) participated in the study. The ASD group was recruited through adverts posted in a local school for children with special needs, a local habilitation center, as well as relevant social media groups and in general social media posts. The adverts were directed to parents of children from 6 to 10 years old, either typically developing or with a diagnosis of autism or Asperger syndrome. Parents of children with an ASD diagnosis that had participated in previous studies at Uppsala Child- and Babylab and KIND (Center of Neurodevelopmental Disorders at Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm) were contacted personally. Inclusion criteria for the ASD group were; confirmed diagnosis of ASD or Asperger syndrome, parent-reported ability to sit relatively still and perform a task, and absence of known uncorrected vision- or hearing problems. The typically developing control group was recruited from Uppsala Child- and Babylab’s registry of families who had previously expressed interest in participating in research, as well as from the adverts mentioned above. Inclusion criteria for the control group were; parent-reported absence of any diagnosed mental- or neurodevelopmental disorder, parent-reported ability to sit relatively still and perform a task, and absence of known uncorrected vision- or hearing problems. Informed consent was obtained from the legal guardians of all individual participants included in the study. Data were missing from two participants (one in the ASD group and one in the control group) due to excessive head movement and unwillingness to finish the experiment. Consent was withdrawn for one participant from the control group after testing, and no confirmation of diagnosis was provided for one child in the ASD group. Data from 34 children (12 with ASD and 22 controls) were therefore analyzed. The groups were matched for age, but the proportion of male participants was higher in the ASD group, and children with ASD had fewer valid trials in the analyses related to latency to orient to AOIs. Groups did not differ in the proportion of invalid gaze samples (see Table 1).
Diagnostic status of the ASD group was confirmed through medical records. Participants in the control group had no psychiatric disorder according to parental report and scored below the diagnostic cut-off of the Autism Quotient: Children’s version (no participant in the control group scored higher than 66 points) (Auyeung et al., 2008). IQ was estimated as the mean of the Vocabulary and Matrix Reasoning subtests from the Swedish version of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-IV; Wechsler et al., 2003). Valid results were obtained for 20 children in the control group and 11 children in the ASD group. As can be seen in Table 1, IQ was higher in the control group than the ASD group. The sample size was somewhat larger than in previous studies using a highly similar experimental paradigm, meaning that the study had enough power to detect large effect sizes, as reported in these studies (Kliemann et al., 2010, 2012).
Questionnaires
Symptoms of anxiety and autistic traits were measured using parent-report scales. The Spence Children’s Anxiety Scale for Parents (SCAS-P; Nauta et al., 2004) was used to assess symptoms of anxiety. SCAS-P scores were obtained from 33 participants (12 with ASD, 21 typically developing). Both groups had mean scores within one standard deviation of the mean of a European validation study (Essau et al., 2002), indicating no significant anxiety symptoms. Symptoms of autism were measured using the Autism Spectrum Quotient-Children’s Version (AQ-Child; Auyeung et al., 2008). AQ-Child scores were obtained from all 34 participants. Autistic traits were higher in the ASD group, as expected, while the groups did not differ on anxiety symptoms (see Table 1).
Experimental Task
A modified version of the experimental task used by Kliemann and colleagues (2010, 2012) was used. The paradigm is illustrated in Fig. 1. Each trial began with a fixation cross placed in the middle of a computer screen, directly followed by a face from the Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces set (Lundqvist et al., 1998), elliptically masked and in full color. Faces displaying expressions depicting anger, happiness, fear and neutrality were randomly presented to ensure generalizability of the results across emotional expressions. The faces were positioned on the screen so that the initial fixation would be either in the eye region or in the mouth region. In total, 48 trials were presented to each participant (32 with initial fixation at the eye area). This difference in number of trials cueing eyes and mouths was due to an exploratory manipulation, in which the initial fixation position within the eye condition was varied to be directed at the left eye, the right eye, or between the eyes. A third of the trials were directed at either eye, a third between the eyes, and a third at the mouth. Preliminary analyses showed that this manipulation did not affect the latency to orient away from an eye AOI created by merging the three eye areas cued in the experiment (p > 0.25). The fixation cross was presented for 1.5 s, 1.7 s or 2.5 s, and faces were subsequently presented for 2 s. Duration of fixation cross presentation was varied to prevent potential learning effects. Stimuli were presented on a 17″ computer screen. Facial stimuli displayed a happy, fearful, angry, or neutral expression (equally balanced between stimuli and conditions).
Participants were instructed to maintain gaze at the fixation cross until a face appeared. They were informed that different faces would appear between fixation crosses, and that they were free to view them any way they liked, but to return to the fixation cross when it appeared again.
Data Recording and Analysis
Gaze data were recorded with a Tobii T120 eye-tracker (Tobii inc, Danderyd, Sweden) with a sampling rate of 60 Hz. Fixations were identified in the raw data using a dispersion-based fixation filter (Tobii fixation filter) with dispersion and duration threshold set to 35 pixels. Gaze shifts away from cued AOIs that occurred earlier than 100 ms after stimulus onset were considered anticipatory and were therefore not analyzed (see Table 2 for each group's number of valid trials in the analyzed conditions). AOIs were defined around the eyes and mouth of the stimuli (both covering 8.33° horizontally and 3.89° vertically). Latency to look away was defined as the time from face stimulus onset to first fixation outside the initially cued AOI (eyes or mouth). Latency to look to an area of interest was defined as the time from face stimuli presentation to first fixation within the relevant area of interest, after disengaging from an initially cued AOI (eyes or mouth).
Statistical Analysis
Data were analyzed using linear mixed effects regression models. For group comparisons, models with outcome variables “Latency from AOI” and “Latency to AOI” were run, each with fixed factors “Group” (ASD or Control), “Emotion” (Angry, Happy, Fearful or Neutral) and “Region” (initial fixation at Eyes or Mouth). Models included random intercepts for participant (i.e. accounting for repeated measures) and random slope for trial (i.e. accounting for trial order). No results were changed when age was added as covariate. A group difference was found in IQ, and this variable was therefore not added as a covariate due to the known statistical problems associated with controlling for variables which differ between groups of interest (e.g. Miller & Chapman, 2001). In exploratory analyses, main effects of sex and IQ, and interaction terms between sex and group, IQ and group, (in group comparisons) and sex and AQ, and IQ and AQ (in dimensional analyses) were added to the models.
For the dimensional analysis of effects of anxiety and autistic traits on gaze behavior, fixed factors were “AQ scores”, “SCAS-P scores” and “Region”, with outcome variables “Latency from AOI” and “Latency to AOI” averaged at the level of the individual. Statistical significance was tested by χ2-tests comparing the model to a null model without the effect of interest (Baayen et al., 2008). Effect sizes for pairwise group comparisons are reported as Cohen’s d, and as Cohen’s f2 in the dimensional analyses.
Results
Results are shown in Tables 2 and 3 and described here.
Latency to Look Away
Children with ASD were quicker to orient away from both the eyes and mouth than TD children (main effect of group, p = 0.003) (Fig. 2). There was also a main effect of region, indicating that both groups oriented quicker from the mouth than from the eyes (p < 0.001). No significant two- or three-way interactions between group and region or emotion were found (all p > 0.30). As can be seen in Table 2, a significant main effect of emotion, and a significant interaction effect between region and emotion were found on latency to look away. Follow-up tests (see Supplementary materials) indicated that the difference in latency to orient from the eyes and mouth was significant for all emotions displayed by the faces, except happiness. Participants were also quicker to look away from any cued region of happy as compared to neutral faces. In an exploratory analysis, main effects of sex and IQ, and interaction effects between sex and group, and group and IQ were added to the model. This did not change any of the results, and no effects involving sex or IQ were significant (all p > 0.20).
Latency to Orient to Eyes and Mouth
The only significant effect was a main effect of region (p < 0.001), driven by quicker orienting to eyes than mouths in both groups (Fig. 2).
Dimensional Analyses
Results are shown in Table 3 and summarized here. Across groups, higher AQ scores predicted quicker orienting away (p = 0.029), independent of SCAS-P scores, an effect that was not explained by an AQ × Region interaction (p > 0.50). No main or interaction effects involving SCAS-P were found (all p > 0.13). These results did not change when main and interaction effects involving sex and IQ were included in the models. All effects involving sex and IQ were statistically non-significant (all p > 0.10).
Discussion
The results of this study indicate that children diagnosed with ASD orient away from eyes faster than children with no diagnosis of ASD, but are not slower to orient to eyes. These results, by themselves, would lend support to the eye gaze avoidance hypothesis, while not supporting the eye gaze indifference hypothesis. Unexpectedly, however, children with ASD were also quicker than typically developing children to orient away from mouths. This finding is not consistent with the eye gaze avoidance hypothesis, which predicts quicker orienting from eyes specifically, as their highly emotionally expressive nature should render them socially threatening to autistic people (Tanaka & Sung, 2016). It should be noted that the results were not modulated by the emotional expression of the facial stimuli. Taken together, these results might reflect a more general deviation in visual attention allocation in ASD, presenting here as shorter fixations on any cued stimulus. These results are consistent with previous research showing that school age children with ASD display shorter fixations in general during scene perception (Keehn et al., 2008), a phenomenon which may emerge already in infancy (Wass et al., 2015). Although increased scanning may enhance perception in children with ASD in certain ways, as indicated by enhanced performance on the Embedded Figures task (Keehn et al., 2008), it may also be a contributor to the social challenges accompanying the disorder.
Given previous findings of reduced gaze preference for social stimuli in children with ASD (e.g. Kwon et al., 2019; Shaffer et al., 2016), an interesting topic for future research would be to examine how autistic children in this age group attend to specific regions of the face, or the entire face, in the presence of non-social distractors.
As noted in the introduction, gaze avoidance has most consistently been reported in adults with ASD, and rarely in toddlers. In light of our results and previous research, it is possible that a developmental shift towards gaze avoidance takes place during adolescence or late childhood. This is an interesting topic for future studies.
A dimensional analysis supported the findings from the group comparisons, and demonstrated that the link between ASD symptoms and quicker orienting away from facial regions was independent of parent rated anxiety. This suggests that the pattern of quicker reorienting related to ASD symptomatology was not attributable to co-occurring anxiety symptoms. It should, however, be noted that neither group can be described as clinically anxious, based on the obtained SCAS-P scores [no participant scored over 1.25 standard deviations from the mean of a European validation study (Essau et al., 2002)]. An interesting future direction would be to examine the effects of high levels of anxiety on avoidance of and indifference to eye gaze in ASD. A recent study (Kleberg et al., 2021) using a similar task found that adolescents with social anxiety were slower than healthy controls to orient from eyes, but not from mouths.
Our results suggest that an experimental paradigm used previously in adult studies (Kliemann et al., 2010, 2012) is feasible for researching atypical social attention in young children with ASD, but also points to the need to incorporate nonsocial control stimuli in future research. Due to the small sample size, the results must be considered preliminary. The inability to match the groups on intelligence and sex is a limitation for this study. Matching groups on these variables is often a challenge in autism research (Chita-Tegmark, 2016). Low IQ-scores are common in ASD (O’Brien & Pearson, 2004) and such outcomes can be difficult to separate from ASD core symptoms without losing data from a large number of participants. There is redeeming evidence for a non-significant effect of matching of verbal and non-verbal IQ on effect sizes in eye tracking studies of social attention in ASD (Chita-Tegmark, 2016). Future studies should ideally include an IQ matched control group. With regards to sex differences, a growing body of evidence indicates that females with ASD (or female infants at risk) show a more normative pattern of social attention than males with ASD, presenting as a larger preference for social stimuli (Chawarska et al., 2016; Harrop et al., 2018, 2019). As the current study’s experimental group had more boys than girls, sex differences may have skewed the results toward a larger difference between the children with ASD and typically developing children. We did not find evidence for sex differences in the current study, but the small sample size precludes definite conclusions.
Despite these limitations, the results contribute to our understanding of atypical social attention in ASD.
References
Amaral, D. G., Bauman, M. D., & Mills Schumann, C. (2003). The amygdala and autism: Implications from non-human primate studies. Genes, Brain and Behavior, 2(5), 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1601-183X.2003.00043.x
Auyeung, B., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., & Allison, C. (2008). The Autism Spectrum Quotient: Children’s version (AQ-Child). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(7), 1230–1240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0504-z
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412.
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., & Jolliffe, T. (1997). Is there a “language of the eyes”? Evidence from normal adults, and adults with autism or Asperger Syndrome. Visual Cognition, 4(3), 311–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/713756761
Chawarska, K., Macari, S., Powell, K., DiNicola, L., & Shic, F. (2016). Enhanced social attention in female infant siblings at risk for autism. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 55(3), 188–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2015.11.016
Chevallier, C., Grèzes, J., Molesworth, C., Berthoz, S., & Happé, F. (2012). Brief report: Selective social anhedonia in high functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(7), 1504–1509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1364-0
Chita-Tegmark, M. (2016). Social attention in ASD: A review and meta-analysis of eye-tracking studies. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 48, 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2015.10.011
Dalton, K. M., Nacewicz, B. M., Johnstone, T., Schaefer, H. S., Gernsbacher, M. A., Goldsmith, H. H., Alexander, A. L., & Davidson, R. J. (2005). Gaze fixation and the neural circuitry of face processing in autism. Nature Neuroscience, 8(4), 519. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1421
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). American Psychiatric Publications.
Essau, C. A., Muris, P., & Ederer, E. M. (2002). Reliability and validity of the Spence Children’s Anxiety Scale and the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders in German children. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 33(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-7916(02)00005-8
Fletcher-Watson, S., & Happé, F. (2019). Autism: A new introduction to psychological theory and current debate. Routledge.
Harrop, C., Jones, D., Zheng, S., Nowell, S. W., Boyd, B. A., & Sasson, N. (2018). Sex differences in social attention in autism spectrum disorder. Autism Research, 11(9), 1264–1275. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1997
Harrop, C., Jones, D., Zheng, S., Nowell, S., Schultz, R., & Parish-Morris, J. (2019). Visual attention to faces in children with autism spectrum disorder: Are there sex differences? Molecular Autism, 10(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-019-0276-2
Keehn, B., Brenner, L. A., Ramos, A. I., Lincoln, A. J., Marshall, S. P., & Müller, R. A. (2008). Brief report: Eye-movement patterns during an embedded figures test in children with ASD. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(2), 383–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-008-0608-0
Kleberg, J. L., Högström, J., Nord, M., Bölte, S., Serlachius, E., & Falck-Ytter, T. (2017). Autistic traits and symptoms of social anxiety are differentially related to attention to others’ eyes in social anxiety disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47(12), 3814–3821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2978-z
Kleberg, J. L., Högström, J., Sundström, K., Frick, A., & Serlachius, E. (2021). Delayed gaze shifts away from others’ eyes in children and adolescents with social anxiety disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, 278, 280–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.022
Kleberg, J. L., Thorup, E., & Falck-Ytter, T. (2017). Visual orienting in children with autism: Hyper-responsiveness to human eyes presented after a brief alerting audio-signal, but hyporesponsiveness to eyes. Autism Research, 10(2), 246–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1668/full
Kliemann, D., Dziobek, I., Hatri, A., Baudewig, J., & Heekeren, H. R. (2012). The role of the amygdala in atypical gaze on emotional faces in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(28), 9469–9476. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5294-11.2012
Kliemann, D., Dziobek, I., Hatri, A., Steimke, R., & Heekeren, H. R. (2010). Atypical reflexive gaze patterns on emotional faces in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0688-10.2010
Klin, A., Jones, W., Schultz, R., Volkmar, F., & Cohen, D. (2002). Visual fixation patterns during viewing of naturalistic social situations as predictors of social competence in individuals with autism. Archives of General Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.59.9.809
Kwon, M., Moore, A., Barnes, C. C., Cha, D., & Pierce, K. (2019). Typical levels of eye-region fixation in toddlers with autism spectrum disorder across multiple contexts. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2018.12.011
Kylliäinen, A., & Hietanen, J. K. (2006). Skin conductance responses to another person’s gaze in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0091-4
Lundqvist, D., Flyckt, A., & Öhman, A. (1998). The Karolinska directed emotional faces (KDEF). Clinical Neuroscience, Psychology section, Karolinska Institutet.
Maddox, B. B., & White, S. W. (2015). Comorbid social anxiety disorder in adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(12), 3949–3960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2531-5
Miller, G. A., & Chapman, J. P. (2001). Misunderstanding analysis of covariance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843x.110.1.40
Moriuchi, J. M., Klin, A., & Jones, W. (2017). Mechanisms of diminished attention to eyes in autism. American Journal of Psychiatry, 174(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.15091222
Nauta, M. H., Scholing, A., Rapee, R. M., Abbott, M., Spence, S. H., & Waters, A. (2004). A parent-report measure of children’s anxiety: Psychometric properties and comparison with child-report in a clinic and normal sample. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42(7), 813–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00200-6
O’Brien, G., & Pearson, J. (2004). Autism and learning disability. Autism, 8(2), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361304042718
Schmidtendorf, S., Wiedau, S., Asbrand, J., Tuschen-caffier, B., & Heinrichs, N. (2018). Attentional bias in children with social anxiety disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 42(3), 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-017-9880-7
Shaffer, R. C., Pedapati, E. V., Shic, F., Gaietto, K., Bowers, K., Wink, L. K., & Erickson, C. A. (2016). Brief Report: Diminished gaze preference for dynamic social interaction scenes in youth with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47(2), 506–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2975-2
Simonoff, E., Pickles, A., Charman, T., Chandler, S., Loucas, T., & Baird, G. (2008). Psychiatric disorders in children with autism spectrum disorders: Prevalence, comorbidity, and associated factors in a population-derived sample. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 47(8), 921–929. https://doi.org/10.1097/CHI.0b013e318179964f
Tanaka, J. W., & Sung, A. (2016). The “Eye Avoidance” hypothesis of autism face processing. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(5), 1538–1552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1976-7
van Steensel, F. J. A., Bögels, S. M., & Perrin, S. (2011). Anxiety disorders in children and adolescents with Autistic Spectrum Disorders: A meta-analysis. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 14(3), 302–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-011-0097-0
Wang, Q., Lu, L., Zhang, Q., Fang, F., Zou, X., & Yi, L. (2018). Eye avoidance in young children with Autism Spectrum Disorder is modulated by emotional facial expressions. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 127(7), 722–732. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000372
Wass, S. V., Jones, E. J. H., Gliga, T., Smith, T. J., Charman, T., & Johnson, M. H. (2015). Shorter spontaneous fixation durations in infants with later emerging autism. Scientific Reports, 5(1), 8284. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08284
Waters, A. M., Bradley, B. P., & Mogg, K. (2014). Biased attention to threat in paediatric anxiety disorders (generalized anxiety disorder, social phobia, specific phobia, separation anxiety disorder) as a function of “distress” versus “fear” diagnostic categorization. Psychological Medicine, 44(3), 607–616. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291713000779
Wechsler, D., Kaplan, E., Fein, D., Kramer, J., Morris, R., Delis, D., & Maelender, A. (2003). Wechsler intelligence scale for children: Fourth edition (WISC-IV) [Assessment instrument]. Pearson.
Weeks, J. W., Howell, A. N., & Goldin, P. R. (2013). Gaze avoidance in social anxiety disorder. Depression and Anxiety, 30(8), 749–756. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22146
Funding
Open access funding provided by Uppsala University. This research was supported by grants to JLK from the Strategic Research Area Neuroscience (StratNEURO), Center for Psychiatry Research and Claes Groschinsky’s memorial fund. The work of TFY was supported by Vetenskapsrådet (Grant Agreement No. 2018-06232), Riksbankens Jubileumsfond in collaboration with the Swedish Collegium for Advanced Study, and the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The study was conceptualized and designed by JLK, TFY and LKJ. Data collection was conducted by LKJ, supervised and assisted by JLK and TFY. JLK and LKJ conducted data analysis with contributions from TFY and JN. LKJ and JLK wrote the manuscript. JN and TFY critically reviewed the manuscript, providing comments for revisions performed by LKJ and JLK. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethical Approval
This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Uppsala Ethical Review Board (2017/No. 483).
Consent to Participate and Publish
Informed consent to participate and for the publishing of their data was obtained from the legal guardians of all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Jónsdóttir, L.K., Neufeld, J., Falck-Ytter, T. et al. Autistic Children Quickly Orient Away from Both Eyes and Mouths During Face Observation. J Autism Dev Disord 53, 495–502 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05378-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05378-x