Abstract
There is increasing evidence supporting the effectiveness of the Early Start Denver Model (ESDM) for children on the autism spectrum. However, substantial variability in response to the ESDM has been reported across participants. We examined the plausible yet untested hypothesis that variations in the fidelity level of therapists delivering the intervention contribute to variability in children’s response to the ESDM. Videotaped sessions (n = 40) of toddlers on the autism spectrum who received the ESDM from trained therapists were coded to obtain measures of therapist fidelity and children’s learning in response to the therapists’ instruction. Variations in overall fidelity, along with variations in most items included in the ESDM fidelity checklist, contributed to the children’s learning response during the sessions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300.
Botha, M., Hanlon, J., & Williams, G. L. (2021). Does language matter? Identity-first versus person-first language use in autism research: A response to Vivanti. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04858-w
Bury, S. M., Jellett, R., Spoor, J. R., & Hedley, D. (2020). “It defines who I am” or “It’s something I have”: What language do [autistic] Australian adults [on the autism spectrum] prefer? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04425-3
Durlak, J. A., & Dupre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3–4), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0
Fuller, E. A., Oliver, K., Vejnoska, S. F., & Rogers, S. J. (2020). The effects of the Early Start Denver Model for children with autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analysis. Brain Sciences, 10(6), 368.
Howlin, P., Magiati, I., & Charman, T. (2009). Systematic review of early intensive behavioral interventions for children with autism. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 114(1), 23–41.
Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163.
Landa, R. J. (2018). Efficacy of early interventions for infants and young children with, and at risk for, autism spectrum disorders. International Review of Psychiatry, 30(1), 25–39.
Långh, U., Perry, A., Eikeseth, S., & Bölte, S. (2020). Quality of early intensive behavioral intervention as a predictor of children’s outcome. Behavior Modification. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445520923998
Lord, C., Rutter M., DiLavore P., Risi, S., Gotham, K., & Bishop, S. (2012). Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition (ADOS-2). Western Psychological Services.
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2014). The effectiveness and ineffectiveness of complex behavioral interventions: Impact of treatment fidelity. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 37(2), 234–241.
Mullen, E. M. (1995). Mullen scales of early learning (AGS ed.). American Guidance Service.
Pellecchia, M., Connell, J. E., Beidas, R. S., Xie, M., Marcus, S. C., & Mandell, D. S. (2015). Dismantling the active ingredients of an intervention for children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(9), 2917–2927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2455-0
Reed, F. D., & Codding, R. S. (2014). Advancements in procedural fidelity assessment and intervention: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Behavioral Education, 23(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-013-9191-3
Rogers, S. J., & Dawson, G. (2010). Early Start Denver Model for young children with autism. Promoting language, learning and engagement. Guilford Press.
Rogers, S. J., Estes, A., Vismara, L., Munson, J., Zierhut, C., Greenson, J., Dawson, G., Rocha, M., Sugar, C., Senturk, D., Whelan, F., & Talbott, M. (2018). Enhancing low-intensity coaching in parent implemented Early Start Denver Model intervention for early autism: A randomized comparison treatment trial. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49(2), 632–646.
Rogers, S. J., Vivanti, G., & Rocha, M. (2017). Helping young children with autism spectrum disorder develop social ability: The Early Start Denver Model approach. In Handbook of social skills and autism spectrum disorder (pp. 197–222). Springer, Cham.
Saville, D. J. (1990). Multiple comparison procedures. The American Statistician, 44(2), 174–180.
Schoenwald, S. K., Garland, A. F., Chapman, J. E., Frazier, S. L., Sheidow, A. J., & Southam-Gerow, M. A. (2011). Toward the effective and efficient measurement of implementation fidelity. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(1), 32–43.
Schreibman, L., Stahmer, A. C., Barlett, V. C., & Dufek, S. (2009). Brief Report: Toward refinement of a predictive behavioral profile for treatment outcome in children with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3(1), 163–172.
Shine, R., & Perry, A. (2010). Brief report: The relationship between parental stress and intervention outcome of children with autism. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 16(2), 64.
Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, D. V., & Saulnier, C. A. (2016). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, (Vineland-3). Psychological Corporation.
Stahmer, A. C., Suhrheinrich, J., Roesch, S., Zeedyk, S. M., Wang, T., Chan, N., & Lee, H. S. (2019). Examining relationships between child skills and potential key components of an evidence-based practice in ASD. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 90, 101–112.
Strain, P. S., & Bovey, E. H. (2011). Randomized, controlled trial of the leap model of early intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorders. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 31(3), 133–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121411408740
Suhrheinrich, J., Stahmer, A. C., Reed, S., Schreibman, L., Reisinger, E., & Mandell, D. (2013). Implementation challenges in translating pivotal response training into community settings. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(12), 2970–2976.
Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 5, pp. 481–498). Pearson.
Tucker, A. R., & Blythe, B. (2008). Attention to treatment fidelity in social work outcomes: A review of the literature from the 1990s. Social Work Research, 32(3), 185.
Vismara, L. A., McCormick, C., Young, G. S., Nadhan, A., & Monlux, K. (2013). Preliminary findings of a telehealth approach to parent training in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(12), 2953–2969.
Vivanti, G., Bottema-Beutel, K., & Turner-Brown, L. (2020). Clinical guide to early interventions for children with autism. Springer.
Vivanti, G., Dissanayake, C., Duncan, E., Feary, J., Capes, K., Upson, S., Bent, C. A., Rogers, S. J., & Hudry, K. (2019). Outcomes of children receiving Group-Early Start Denver Model in an inclusive versus autism-specific setting: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Autism, 23(5), 1165–1175.
Vivanti, G., Dissanayake, C., & Victorian ASELCC Team. (2016). Outcome for children receiving the Early Start Denver Model before and after 48 months. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(7), 2441–2449.
Vivanti, G., Prior, M., Williams, K., & Dissanayake, C. (2014). Predictors of outcomes in autism early intervention: Why don’t we know more? Frontiers in Pediatrics, 2, 58.
Vivanti, G., & Stahmer, A. (2018). Early intervention for autism: Are we prioritizing feasibility at the expenses of effectiveness? A cautionary note. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 22(7), 770–773.
Vivanti, G., & Stahmer, A. C. (2020). Can the Early Start Denver Model be considered aba practice? Behavior Analysis in Practice, 14(1), 230–9.
Waddington, H., van der Meer, L., & Sigafoos, J. (2016). Effectiveness of the Early Start Denver Model: A systematic review. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 3(2), 93–106.
Waddington, H., van der Meer, L., Sigafoos, J., & Whitehouse, A. (2020). Examining parent use of specific intervention techniques during a 12-week training program based on the Early Start Denver Model. Autism, 24(2), 484–498.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01MH115715; R21HD090344). We thank our grant sponsors along with the research participants and their families for their participation in the study. We also thank Adreeja Guha Ray for her contribution with data collection, and all the therapists involved in the intervention sessions used for the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
GV, HR, and AZ conceived and designed the research; AZ, HR, ZS completed behavioral coding; GV, AZ, and HR conducted statistical analyses and drafted the manuscript. All authors have read, edited and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No royalties were received for any of the data presented in the current study. Dr. Robins is a co-owner of the M-CHAT in electronic products and sits on the advisory board of Quadrant Biosciences Inc. All other authors have indicated they have no financial relationships or potential conflicts of interests relevant to this article to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zitter, A., Rinn, H., Szapuova, Z. et al. Does Treatment Fidelity of the Early Start Denver Model Impact Skill Acquisition in Young Children with Autism?. J Autism Dev Disord 53, 1618–1628 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05371-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05371-4