Skip to main content
Log in

The Cognitive Interview for Eyewitnesses with Autism Spectrum Disorder

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The cognitive interview (CI) is one of the most widely accepted forms of interviewing techniques for eliciting the most detailed, yet accurate reports from witnesses. No research, however, has examined its effectiveness with witnesses with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Twenty-six adults with ASD and 26 matched typical adults viewed a video of an enacted crime, and were then interviewed with either a CI, or a structured interview (SI) without the CI mnemonics. Groups did not differ on the quantity or quality of their reports when interviewed with a SI, however, when interviewed with a CI the ASD group was significantly less accurate. Findings indicate that investigative professionals should be cautious in relying on the CI to interview witnesses with ASD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Although previous studies (e.g. Wright and Holliday 2007a, b) have used interview duration as a covariate in analyses, it was deemed that this would have provided a somewhat circular argument for findings in the present study; if witnesses spent more time talking they would naturally come up with more detail.

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, (DSM-IV) (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashwin, C., Ricciardelli, P., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2009). Positive and negative gaze perception in autism spectrum conditions. Social Neuroscience, 4, 153–164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bachevalier, J., & Loveland, K. A. (2006). The orbitofrontal-amygdala circuit and self-regulation of social-emotional behavior in autism. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 97–117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baird, G., Simonoff, E., Pickles, A., Chandler, S., Loucas, T., Meldrum, D., et al. (2006). Prevalence of disorders of the autism spectrum in a population cohort of children in South Thames: the Special Needs and Autism Project (SNAP). Lancet, 368, 210–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a ‘theory of mind’? Cognition, 21, 37–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bennetto, L., Pennington, B. F., & Rogers, S. J. (1996). Intact and impaired memory function in autism. Child Development, 67, 1816–1835.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, R. J. R., Frith, U., Smith, N., Abell, F., & Cipolotti, L. (2002). Fractionation of visual memory: agency detection and its impairment in autism. Neuropsychologia, 40, 108–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boucher, J. (2001). ‘Lost in a sea of time’: Time parsing and autism. In C. Hoel & T. McCormack (Eds.), Time and memory: Issues in philosophy and psychology (pp. 111–135). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boucher, J., Mayes, A., & Bigham, S. (2008). Memory, language and intellectual ability in low-functioning autism. In J. Boucher & D. M. Bowler (Eds.), Memory in autism (pp. 330–349). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, D. M. (2007). Autism spectrum disorders: Psychological theory and research. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, D. M., & Gaigg, S. B. (2008). Memory in ASD: Enduring themes and future prospects. In J. Boucher & D. M. Bowler (Eds.), Memory in autism (pp. 330–349). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, D. M., Gaigg, S. B., & Gardiner, J. M. (2008). Effects of related and unrelated context on recall and recognition by adults with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder. Neuropsychologia, 46, 993–999.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, D. M., Gardiner, J. M., & Berthollier, N. (2004). Source memory in adolescents and adults with Asperger’s syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 533–542.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, D. M., Gardiner, J. M., & Grice, S. J. (2000a). Episodic memory and remembering in adults with Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 295–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, D. M., Gardiner, J. M., Grice, S., & Saavalainen, P. (2000b). Memory illusions: False recall and recognition in adults with Asperger’s syndrome. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 663–672.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, D. M., Matthews, N. J., & Gardiner, J. M. (1997). Asperger’s syndrome and memory: Similarity to autism but not amnesia. Neuropsychologia, 35, 65–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, J., Brown, C. C., Boucher, J., & Rippon, G. (2002). The temporal binding deficit hypothesis of autism. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 209–224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruck, M., London, K., Landa, R., & Goodman, J. (2007). Autobiographical memory and suggestibility in children with autism spectrum disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 73–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dando, C. J., & Milne, R. (2009). The cognitive interview. In R. N. Kocsis (Ed.), Applied criminal psychology, a guide to forensic behavioural sciences. Springfield, IL: Charles. C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. R., McMahon, M., & Greenwood, K. M. (2005). The efficacy of mnemonic components of the cognitive interview: Towards a shortened variant for time-critical investigations. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 75–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dornburg, C. C., & McDaniel, M. A. (2006). The cognitive interview enhances long-term free recall of older adults. Psychology and Aging, 21, 196–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaigg, S. B., & Bowler, D. M. (2008). Free recall and forgetting of emotionally arousing words in autism spectrum disorder. Neuropsychologia, 46, 2336–2343.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaigg, S. B., Gardiner, J. M., & Bowler, D. M. (2008). Free recall in autism spectrum disorder: The role of relational and item-specific encoding. Neuropsychologia, 46, 983–992.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, J. M., Bowler, D. M., & Grice, S. J. (2003). Further evidence of preserved priming and impaired recall in adults with Asperger’s syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33, 259–269.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geiselman, R. E. (1984). Enhancement of eyewitness memory: An empirical evaluation of the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 12, 74–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R. P., Mackinnon, D. P., & Holland, H. L. (1986). Enhancement of eyewitness memory with the cognitive interview. American Journal of Psychology, 99, 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiselman, R. E., & Padilla, J. (1988). Cognitive interviewing with child witnesses. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 16, 236–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office, UK. (2002). Achieving the best evidence in criminal proceedings: Guidance for vulnerable and intimidated witnesses, including children. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huff, C. R., Rattner, A., & Sagarin, E. (1996). Convicted but innocent: Wrongful convictions and public policy. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kebbell, M. R., & Milne, R. (1998). Police officers’ perceptions of eyewitness performance in forensic investigations. The Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 323–330.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kohnken, G., Milne, R., Memon, A., & Bull, R. (1999). The cognitive interview: A meta-analysis. Psychology, Crime and Law, 5, 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopelman, M. D., Guinan, E. M., & Lewis, P. D. R. (1995). Delusional memory, confabulation and frontal lobe dysfunction: A case study in De Clérambault’s syndrome. Neurocase, 1, 71–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, A. M. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of ‘theory of mind’. Psychological Review, 94, 412–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P., & Risi, S. (1999). Autism diagnostic observation schedule—Generic. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Memon, A., Wark, L., Bull, R., & Koehnken, G. (1997). Isolating the effects of the cognitive interview techniques. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 179–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercadante, M. T., Macedo, E. C., Baptista, P. C. M., Paula, C. S., & Schwartzman, J. S. (2006). Saccadic movements using eye-tracking technology in individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, 64, 559–562.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milne, R., Clare, I. C. H., & Bull, R. (1999). Using the cognitive interview with adults with mild learning disabilities. Psychology, Crime and Law, 5, 81–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice, UK. (2008). Criminal statistics: England and Wales 2007 Statistics Bulletin.

  • Minshew, N. J., & Goldstein, G. (1993). Is autism an amnesic disorder? Evidence from the California verbal learning test. Neuropsychology, 7, 209–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minshew, N. J., Luna, B., & Sweeney, J. A. (1999). Oculomotor evidence for neocortical systems but not cerebellar dysfunction in autism. Neurology, 52, 917–922.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, R. G., Rowe, A., Fox, N., Feigenbaum, J. D., Miotto, E. C., & Howlin, P. (1999). Spatial working memory in Asperger’s syndrome and in patients with focal frontal and temporal lobe lesions. Brain and Cognition, 41, 9–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moscovitch, M., & Melo, B. (1997). Strategic retrieval and the frontal lobes: Evidence from confabulation and amnesia. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1017–1034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parkin, A. J. (1997). The neuropsychology of false memory. Learning and Individual Differences, 9, 341–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renner, P., Klinger, L. G., & Klinger, M. R. (2000). Implicit and explicit memory in autism: Is autism an amnesic disorder? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 3–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riby, D. M., & Hancock, P. J. B. (2008). Viewing it differently: Social scene perception in Williams syndrome and autism. Neuropsychologia, 46, 2855–28600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riby, D., & Hancock, P. J. B. (2009). Looking at movies and cartoons: Eye-tracking evidence from Williams syndrome and autism. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 53, 169–181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., III, Weldon, M. S., Challis, B. H., & Craik, F. I. M. (1989). Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: A processing account. In H. L. Roediger III & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 3–41). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D. L., Kagan, J., & Leichtman, M. D. (1995). True and false memories in children and adults: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 411–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Oxford: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuss, D. T., Alexander, M. P., Lieberman, A., & Levine, H. (1978). An extraordinary form of confabulation. Neurology, 28, 1166–1172.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tager-Flusberg, H. (1991). Semantic processing in the free-recall of autistic children—further evidence for a cognitive deficit. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 417–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. (1974). Cue-dependent forgetting. American Scientist, 62, 74–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. S., Cipolotti, L., Yousry, T. A., & Shallice, T. (2008). Confabulation: Damage to a specific inferior medial prefrontal system. Cortex, 44, 637–648.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1997). Manual for the Wechsler adult intelligence scale (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. L., Goldstein, G., Carpenter, P. A., & Minshew, N. J. (2005). Verbal and spatial working memory in Autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35, 747–756.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. L., Goldstein, G., & Minshew, N. J. (2006). The profile of memory function in children with autism. Neuropsychology, 20, 21–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. (1971). Manual for the embedded figures test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (1993). The international statistical classification of diseases and related mental health problems, tenth revision (ICD-10). Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, A. M., & Holliday, R. E. (2007a). Enhancing the recall of young, young-old and old-old adults with cognitive interviews. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 19–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, A. M., & Holliday, R. E. (2007b). Interviewing cognitively impaired older adults: How useful is a cognitive interview? Memory, 15, 17–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work reported in this paper was undertaken as part of ongoing research in fulfilment of a City University-funded PhD by the first author. Special thanks to Sebastian Gaigg (City University London) for his generous time and helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katie L. Maras.

Appendix

Appendix

A. Structured and Cognitive Interview Protocols

Italics = Cognitive Interviews Only

Rapport and explain aims

  • Reiterate that interviewer blind to contents of video

  • Explain that participant will be asked to go over events a few times; motivate to repeatedly recall

  • Don’t guess; ok to say “don’t know”

  • ‘Report all’ (no matter how trivial)

  • Concentrate hard

  • Transfer control

  • Any questions

Stage 1:

  • Context reinstatement:

  • Free recall

‘Remember more’ prompt

Stage 2: Questioning

  • Activate and probe an image

  • Open questions based on what participant said in free recall

  • Witness-compatible wording (e.g. if they use the term ‘guy’ then interviewer asks about the ‘guy’ rather than the man

  • Minimal closed questions for follow-up details

  • No leading questions

  • Don’t guess; ok to say “don’t know”

Stage 3: Second retrieval attempt/reverse order

Stage 4: Third retrieval attempt/change perspective

Closure

B: Context Reinstatement Protocol

What we are going to do is called context reinstatement, where you remember other things that you saw and felt just before you watched the video clip. This will help you to remember better.

In a few minutes I am going to ask you to tell me everything that you can remember.

In order for you to recall to the best of your memory I would like to you contextually remember the environment just before you saw the events unfold—what you could see, hear, sense, how you felt—and use this information to guide your recall.

I will go through this very slowly, so that you can relax and take it all in, inorder to build up a clear picture in your mind. This will take several minutes before you speak to build up a really clear picture of the clip in your mind. Please try to relax, concentrate and focus really hard with each instruction that I give. Although this might seem like a series of questions I don’t want you to answer them, they are just there so that you can build up a clear picture in your mind. At the end I will ask you to tell me what happened, not now, so in the meantime try to relax and take it all in.

If you close your eyes it will help you to focus, I will just look down here.

I would like you to clear your head of all other thoughts. Try to blank everything else from your mind, and focus only this task [5 s].

Think about how you were feeling when you came in here today [10 s].

Now picture yourself as you went into in the room where you watched the video [10 s].

Focus on that room [10 s].

Remember where you were sitting [5 s] and how the chair felt [5 s].

Think about the lights [5 s] and noises [10 s] in the room just before the video started [10 s].

Remember your mood when you started watching the video [5 s]. How were you feeling? [5 s].

How was your physical state? [5 s].

Now picture the screen ahead of you [10 s].

Build up a clear mental picture of that moment and visualise it [10 s].

Remember what the colours in the video were like [5 s].

Think about the noises you heard in the video [10 s].

Visualise where the event is taking place and what the scene or environment around looks like. Take in these surroundings and mentally note everything that you see [10 s].

Visualise what people are involved, what they look like, what they are wearing, what they are doing and how they are behaving [10 s].

Think about everything that you saw, noting every single detail, no matter how small or irrelevant it may seem, even if it seems trivial [10 s].

Back in this context you should be able to see the videotape in your mind. Picture the events you saw in the video as if they were happening right now before your eyes [10 s].

I’d like you to keep picturing and remembering what you saw. When you are ready please explain to me, in every detail, what you saw from the beginning of the videotape to the end—as you tell me keep your eyes closed and concentrate and focus on that image in your mind. Don’t leave anything out, even if it seems only partial or not significant. Take your time.

As you run through what happened, try to replay the event in your head, as if it were a video that is replaying before you, which you are watching right now.

When you are ready, please tell me everything you saw.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maras, K.L., Bowler, D.M. The Cognitive Interview for Eyewitnesses with Autism Spectrum Disorder. J Autism Dev Disord 40, 1350–1360 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-0997-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-0997-8

Keywords

Navigation