Correction to : Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-022-01008-x

The original version of this article contained some minor mistakes in layout and typesetting, which have been corrected in this erratum.

  • In the ‘Data-Analyses’ section, in the reference 3 footnote the word ‘closely’ should be removed so the sentence will be:

    3 This cutoff closely resembles the ROC derived cutoff score of 28 for the ICU youth self-report version recommended by Docherty et al., (2017).”

  • In the ‘Group Differences: Personality Traits and Internalizing Problems’ section, in the ‘Total sample’ the word ‘(YPI)’ in the last sentence should be removed so the sentence will be:

    “Table 3 also demonstrates that both scoring methods identified a group of detained girls with the highest level of CU traits as measured by the Youth Psychopathic traits Inventory.”

  • The layout-out, title, and/or notes to Tables 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 should also be slightly corrected. The following are corrected tables.

Table 1 Group Comparisons for Indices of Past Antisocial Behavior and Substance Use Disorders Using Normative, Empirical, and DSM-5 LPE Scoring Methods in the Total Sample of Detained Girls (N = 192)
Table 2 Group Comparisons for Indices of Past Antisocial Behavior and Substance Use Disorders Using Normative, Empirical, and DSM-5 LPE Scoring Methods in the Detained Girls with Conduct Disorder (N = 119)
Table 3 Group Difference Tests with Regard to Psychopathic Traits, Big Five Personality Traits, Internalizing Problems, and Future Antisocial Behavior Using Normative, Empirical, and DSM-5 LPE Scoring Methods in the Total Sample of Detained Girls (N = 192)
Table 4 Group Difference Tests with Regard to Psychopathic Traits, Big Five Personality Traits, Internalizing Problems, and Future Antisocial Behavior Using Normative, Empirical and DSM-5 LPE Scoring Methods in the Total Sample of Detained Girls with CD (N = 119)
Table 5 High Levels of Callous-Unemotional Traits as Predictor of Future Antisocial Behavior Independent of Conduct Disorder, Number of Total Conduct Disorder Symptoms, or Number of Aggressive Conduct Disorder Symptoms (N = 175)

The original article has been corrected.