Abstract
Nickel-based hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) electrodes have been widely used in alkaline and anion exchange membrane water electrolysis. Therefore, understanding the activity dependence on the KOH concentration (pH) of alkaline electrolytes is essential for designing durable and active HER catalysts. In this work, the HER activity and kinetics of polycrystalline and nanostructured nickel-based catalysts are evaluated in various pH and KOH concentrations. The results for nanostructured NiMo catalyst indicate that both electrochemical active surface area and reaction order have a promoting region under various pH’s and KOH concentrations (0.01–1.0 M, pH 12–14) accompanied by better HER activity (a lower overpotential for achieving − 10 mA cm−2) and Tafel slope decreases from around 180 mV dec−1 to 60 mV dec−1 in the same pH and KOH concentration range. The change in the Tafel slope indicates that the HER rate-determining step for HER at NiMo/C changes with pH and KOH concentration. The polycrystalline Ni displays different behaviours where a promoting (0.01–0.10 M, pH 12–13), stabilizing (0.1–1.0 M, pH 13–14), and an inhibiting region (2 M, pH > 14) are present. However, Tafel slopes of around 120 mV/dec are obtained for polycrystalline Ni at all KOH concentrations. The HER characteristics are inhibited at 2.0 M KOH for both catalysts due to slower OH* transport kinetics. The results confirmed the importance of tuning catalyst-pH/KOH concentration for better HER activity and kinetics.
Graphical abstract
![](http://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10800-022-01749-z/MediaObjects/10800_2022_1749_Figa_HTML.png)
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) kinetics is sluggish in an alkaline environment being two orders of magnitude slower than that in an acidic environment [1, 2]. The large energy (Ea) of the Hads intermediate formation (Volmer reaction) and water dissociation process in alkaline HER induces an additional energy barrier and controls the overall reaction rate [3, 4].
Nickel (Ni) is a promising HER catalyst for cathode electrodes in alkaline and anion exchange membrane (AEM) water electrolysis [5,6,7]. Thus, understanding the electrolyte pH/KOH concentration dependence on the HER and electrochemical surface area (ECSA) of nickel-based electrodes has recently become one of the key issues in nickel electrocatalysis. The HER on nickel occurs at an applied negative potential (E < 0.00 V vs. RHE) where the water is reduced to hydrogen and the surface of the electrode is metallic nickel [8, 9]. When nickel is scanned in the positive potential direction (0 ≤ Eapp \(\le \) +0.50 V vs. RHE), the Ni surface is converted into α-Ni(OH)2 when reacted with OH− ions [9]. When the electrode is scanned in a reverse direction, α-Ni(OH)2 is easily reduced to Ni [8, 9]. The ECSA is an important parameter in defining catalyst intrinsic HER activity [10, 11] and the surface area of the catalyst in contact with the electrolyte [12, 13]. Machado and Avaca introduced a method for determining the ECSA of Ni by polarizing the Ni electrode cathodically to remove any traces of surface oxides/hydroxides and then recording a cyclic voltammogram for the Ni electrode or catalyst in the α-Ni(OH)2 potential region ([\(-\) 0.15 ≤ Eapp \(\le +\) 0.50 V]) [14].
In the case of platinum (Pt), fundamental HER studies have indicated that the catalyst-alkaline electrolyte interaction on single/polycrystal Pt depends upon the pH of the electrolyte. The HER kinetics in alkaline and high-pH conditions are sluggish and two orders of magnitude slower than in acidic due to pH-dependent H-adsorption energy and/or water dissociation energy barrier which suppress their practical applications [15,16,17,18,19]. However, these studies are limited to single/polycrystalline Pt and certain types of electrolytes and concentrations such as 0.1 M KOH (pH 12.8–13) and buffer solutions for pH (7–10) without going to higher pH/KOH concentrations.
Recently, Li et al. found that on polycrystalline Pt, the HER activity increased as the NaOH concentration increased from 0.01 (pH 12) to 1.0 M (pH 14) [20]. Wang et al. showed that Pt catalyst-electrolyte interaction is dependent upon catalyst morphology with the HER activity of nanostructured Pt-based electrocatalysts being better in high-pH (0.1–1.0 M KOH, pH 13–13.5) electrolytes than in less alkaline environments (0.01 M KOH to neutral buffer, pH 12–7.1). Polycrystalline Pt showed the opposite trend [19]. Kuznetsov et al. noted that the anodic charge (for α-Ni(OH)2 formation charge and electrochemical Had oxidation) and ECSA of NiCu/C CVs depend on the NaOH concentration and HER activity of partially oxidized Ni disc electrode increased with the pH/NaOH concentration below − 0.18 V vs. RHE [21]. Cossar et al. also mentioned that current densities in CVs can change with electrolyte concentration, meaning that the apparent active surface areas can change with the electrolyte concentration [22].
However, apart from the aforementioned studies on Pt, there are no detailed reports and information dealing with Ni-based catalyst-alkaline electrolyte interaction and how the ECSA or the HER activity of polycrystalline and nanostructured nickel-based catalyst change with pH/KOH concentration. Polycrystalline Ni and nanostructured NiMo are widely studied as HER catalysts in traditional alkaline and AEM water electrolysis, respectively [20].
In this work, the influence of pH/KOH concentration on HER performance, ECSA, Tafel slope, and reaction order for two model catalysts (polycrystalline Ni and nanostructured NiMo) are evaluated. The catalyst stability under various pH concentrations is beyond the focus of this communication. The results indicate that KOH electrolyte catalyst interaction relies on the composition and morphology of Ni-based catalysts.
2 Experimental methods
All electrochemical experiments were carried out using a potentiostat/galvanostat (BioLogic-SP 150) in a three-electrode configuration. The working electrodes (WE) were nickel-based catalysts (either polycrystalline nickel (Ni-poly) disc (Ø = 5 mm) or nanostructured NiMo) of a geometric surface area of Ag = 0.196 cm2. The nanostructured NiMo has been synthesized with a modified process of chemical reduction using sodium borohydride reported by Faid et al. [7]. The reference electrode (RE) was a homemade reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE). All potential values in this work are reported against the RHE. A Ni mesh (40 mesh woven from 0.13 mm diameter wire, 99.99% metal basis, Alfa Aesar, Germany) was cut out in a rectangle shape (20.67 × 10.76 mm2) and used as a counter electrode (CE). The loading of nanostructured NiMo was kept at 0.25 mg cm−2. The ohmic (IR) drop was compensated at 85% of the ohmic resistance measured by the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) technique at − 0.3 V vs. RHE. The EIS test was collected in a frequency range of 0.1–105 Hz with an amplitude of 10 mV alternative current (AC) perturbation.
The electrolytes were prepared by mixing KOH pellets (Sigma-Aldrich, 99.99% in purity) in ultra-high purity water (Millipore, 18.2 MΩ cm in resistivity). All KOH electrolytes (0.01, 0.10, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 M KOH) were outgassed using ultra-high purity N2(g) (99.999% in purity) before each experiment.
The HER experiments were investigated by a series of linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) in the potential region of 0.00 ≤ Eapp ≤ − 0.60 V vs. RHE at the potential scan rate of ν = 0.30 mV s−1. Cyclic voltammetry experiments were carried out at a potential scan rate of ν = 20, 50, and 100 mV s−1 in the potential region of the formation and reduction of α-Ni(OH)2 (− 0.15 ≤ Eapp ≤ + 0.50 V vs. RHE).
The structure and surface of Ni-poly disc electrode and nanostructured NiMo were studied using scanning electron microscopy Zeiss-Ultra/Supra 55-FEG-SEM.
3 Results and discussions
3.1 Effect of KOH concentration on the HER performance
Figure 1a and b show SEM images of polycrystalline Ni and nanostructured NiMo. The SEM image of polycrystalline Ni is a relatively smooth surface while the nanostructured NiMo has nanoparticle morphology.
Figure 1c and d show LSV curves of the HER activity of polycrystalline Ni and nanostructured NiMo in various KOH concentrations (0.01–2.0 M). The nanostructured NiMo resulted in higher HER performance than polycrystalline Ni. Both polycrystalline Ni and nanostructured NiMo have similar trends with HER activity increasing as the pH/KOH concentration increased from 0.01 (pH 12) to 1.0 M (pH 13.8) and then the HER performance slightly decreased in 2.0 M (pH 14.2) KOH. Figure 1e displays the overpotential required to achieve − 10 mA cm−2 for polycrystalline Ni and nanostructured NiMo in various KOH concentrations (0.01–2.0 M). Nanostructured NiMo achieves − 10 mA cm−2 at an overpotential of 160 mV compared to 360 mV for polycrystalline Ni. For all pH/KOH concentrations, nanostructured NiMo achieves the − 10 mA cm−2 at approximately 200 mV lower overpotential than that of polycrystalline Ni.
3.2 Effect of KOH concentration on ECSA
Figure 2a and b show the CV transients of α-Ni(OH)2 formation and reduction at various KOH concentrations (0.01–2.0 M) of polycrystalline Ni and nanostructured NiMo. The anodic and cathodic features correspond to the formation and reduction of a surface layer of α-Ni(OH)2. The shape of the oxidation and reduction peaks is characteristic of the formation of α-Ni(OH)2 and its reduction to metallic Ni, respectively.
Cyclic voltammetry transients at different KOH concentrations (0.01–2.0 M) of a polycrystalline Ni, b nanostructured NiMo, c ECSA vs. KOH concentration for polycrystalline Ni and nanostructured NiMo, and cyclic voltammetry (CV) transients of d polycrystalline Ni, e nanostructured NiMo and f ECSA vs. scan rate at various potential scan rate (ν = 20, 50 and 100 mV s−1) in 1.0 and 0.1 M KOH concentrations at T = 298 K (Ageo = 0.196 cm2)
The CVs of polycrystalline Ni and nanostructured NiMo at the same scan rate displays a higher peak current for the formation of α-Ni(OH)2 formation as KOH concentration increases from 0.01 to 1.0 M then decreases at 2.0 M. The increase of the α-Ni(OH)2 formation current is in the order of 0.01 < 0.1 < 0.5 < 2.0 < 1.0 M.
The ECSA is calculated using the following equation: [23]
where Q is the experimentally determined charge of α-Ni(OH)2 formation in µC. The theoretical charge value (514 µC cm−2) is the charge required to form one monolayer of α-Ni(OH)2 [23].
When considering ECSA based upon α-Ni(OH)2 charge, for polycrystalline Ni, the ECSA increased by 50% from 0.01 to 1.0 M KOH while for nanostructured NiMo, the ECSA increased more than 8 times from 0.01 to 1.0 M KOH as shown in Fig. 2c.
3.3 Effect of scan rate on the CV behaviour and ECSA
Figure 2d and e show the CV transients obtained in the potential region of the α-Ni(OH)2 formation and reduction in 0.10 M and 1.0 M aqueous KOH on nanostructured NiMo and polycrystalline Ni and were acquired at different potential scan rates ν = 20, 50, and 100 mV s−1.
The oxidation (anodic) peak potential (Ep,ox), the reduction (cathodic) peak potential (Ep,red), the oxidation and reduction peak current (Ip,ox and Ip,red) change with scan rate. For polycrystalline Ni and nanostructured NiMo, in both concentrations, Ep,ox shifted towards higher potentials upon increasing the value of ν, while potential Ep,red shifted towards negative values. Furthermore, Ip,ox and Ip,red values increased upon increasing the value of ν. The results illustrate that there is a linear relationship between Ip,ox and ν. On the other hand, while there appears to be a linear relationship between Ip,red and v, a careful analysis of this relationship is more complicated due to overlapping contributions from the reduction of α-Ni(OH)2 and HER.
As can be seen in Fig. 2, by decreasing the potential scan rate, the Ip,ox in 0.10 M and 1.0 M aqueous KOH solution decreased. As described earlier, this peak corresponds to the formation of α-Ni(OH)2 and is used to determine the electrochemical surface area of Ni electrodes.
The ECSA values at different scan rates in 0.10 M and 1.0 M aqueous solutions obtained from CVs are shown in Fig. 2f. The figure displays a very minor dependence on potential scan rate for polycrystalline Ni and nanostructured NiMo in 0.1 and 1.0 M KOH. For polycrystalline Ni, at the same pH/KOH concentration, the ECSA-scan rate dependence displays that ECSA will vary only 3 ± 1% when the scan rate increases from 20 to 100 mV s−1 in 0.1 and 1 M KOH as in Fig. 2f. At the same scan rate v = 100 mV s−1, the ECSA of polycrystalline Ni in 1.0 M aqueous KOH solution is only 2.6% greater than in 0.10 M aqueous KOH solution.
The nanostructured NiMo showed a higher degree of ECSA dependence on potential scan rate at 0.1 M KOH than 1.0 M KOH. The ECSA-scan rate dependence displays that ECSA varies 20 ± 2 and 5 ± 1% when the scan rate increases from 20 to 100 mV s−1 in 0.1 and 1.0 M KOH, respectively as in Fig. 2f.
3.4 Effect of KOH concentration on the HER kinetics
Figure 3a and b display Tafel slopes of polycrystalline Ni and nanostructured NiMo in (0.01–2.0) M KOH concentrations. Tafel slopes of around 120 mV dec−1 are obtained for polycrystalline Ni at all studied KOH concentrations, indicating that HER is controlled by the first electron transfer step (Volmer step), which is governed by the barrier of the electrochemical water dissociation.
Nanostructured NiMo displays Tafel slopes dependence on KOH concentration with Tafel slope of around 180, 145, 110, 62, and 70 mV dec−1 in 0.01, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 M KOH, respectively. Tafel slope of 120 mV dec−1 indicates a Volmer step as a rate-determining step (rds) at lower concentration (0.01–0.5 M KOH) while a Tafel slope of around 60 mV dec−1 corresponds to a rds of second electron transfer Heyrovsky step implying that the HER mechanism for nanostructured NiMo changes with KOH concentration to Volmer-Heyrovsky mechanism. This change in the reaction mechanism suggests that the cation concentration plays an important role in how accessible the surface is for hydrogen adsorption.
Tafel slopes of 120, 40, and 30 mV dec−1 observed for the Volmer, Heyrovsky, and Tafel determining rate steps, respectively, are widely accepted for kinetic models. However, for Heyrovsky as a rate-determining step, at higher coverage region (θH > 0.6), a Tafel slope of 120 mV dec−1 was observed. Therefore, a Tafel slope of 120 mV dec.−1 may originate from either the Volmer or the Heyrovsky rate-determining step with high adsorbed hydrogen atom coverage [24].
It is proposed that massive H3O+ intermediates generated at high-pH/KOH concentration electrolytes (1.0 M KOH) would create a unique acid-like local environment on the surface of nanostructured catalysts, which facilitates the overall HER kinetics. In low-pH/KOH concentration electrolyte or bulk materials surface, such an anomalous enriched H3O.+ layer is absent, so a poorer HER activity is observed [19].
The increase in Tafel slope and overpotential to achieve − 10 mA cm−2 when moving from 1.0 to 2.0 M KOH suggested a detrimental effect on HER when using 2.0 M KOH concentration due to high local alkalinity, high viscosity, and low OH− transport.
Figure 3c and d display reaction order plots of polycrystalline Ni and nanostructured NiMo. The current is reported for 50 mV potential steps (vs. RHE) plotted as a function of the logarithm of the current density on the y-axis and the logarithm of the cation concentration on the x-axis. The slopes extracted from the linear fit of the current response (reaction orders) are shown next to the plots. The figure shows positive reaction orders for both polycrystalline Ni and nanostructured NiMo.
For polycrystalline Ni, positive reaction order increase with applied HER potential, however, at higher KOH concentration (2.0 M), the reaction order trend reversed, indicating an inhibiting effect on HER due to higher local alkalinity and the concentration of weakly hydrated cations at the reaction interface.
For nanostructured NiMo, the positive reaction order is almost constant at around 0.33 ± 0.02 and stabilizes at higher KOH concentrations up to 2.0 M KOH. It should be noted that we do not see here the inhibition effect of higher KOH concentration (2.0 M) as in polycrystalline Ni suggesting KOH concentration (cation effect) dependence on the catalyst (polycrystalline Ni vs. nanostructured NiMo).
Based upon our results above, we show that the KOH concentration (pH) effect in HER in alkaline media depends upon the catalyst composition and morphology (polycrystalline Ni vs. nanostructured NiMo). For polycrystalline Ni, the catalyst has three regions depending upon the local KOH concentration: a promotion (0.01–0.1 M, pH 12–13), stabilization (0.1–1.0 M, pH 13–14), and an inhibition region (2.0 M, pH > 14). In the promotion region, KOH through pH and cation effect accelerates HER kinetics. In stabilization region, the promotion region stabilizes, and HER properties do not change so much in this region. At the inhibition region, it is proposed that at higher KOH concertation (2.0 M), OH* transport kinetics are slower than water dissociation rate [19], and hence HER may have a negative reaction order dependence on KOH concentration in this region.
For nanostructured NiMo, there is typically a promotion region under various pH/KOH concentrations (0.01–1.0 M, pH 12–14) and then it turns to inhibition region at 2.0 M (pH > 14). The pH/KOH concentration has an essential role for nanostructured NiMo HER activity and kinetics (as we can see from the overpotential values achieved at − 10 mA cm−2 and Tafel slope changes).
The difference in KOH electrolyte-activity and kinetics trends are strongly dependent upon the catalyst morphology, composition, and “strength” of the catalyst-water-cation (K+) interactions. Our findings have important application for HER cathodes in alkaline and AEM electrolysers where using weak KOH electrolyte concentrations is essential. Tuning the cathode composition/morphology with KOH concentration can therefore enhance the performance and stability.
4 Conclusions
The influence of pH/KOH concentration on Ni-based catalyst HER activity depends upon the catalyst composition and morphology. For polycrystalline Ni, the catalyst performance and kinetics have three regions depending upon the KOH concentration: (1) a promoting (0.01–0.10 M, pH 12–13), (2) stabilizing (0.1–1.0 M, pH 13–14), and (3) an inhibiting region (2.0 M, pH > 14). While for nanostructured NiMo, there is typically a promoting region under various pH/KOH concentrations (0.01–1.0 M, pH 12–14), and then it turns into inhibiting region at 2.0 M (pH > 14). The pH/KOH concentration has an essential role for nanostructured NiMo HER activity and kinetics, as observed from the overpotential values to achieve − 10 mA cm−2 and Tafel slope changes. The difference in pH/KOH concentration trend with polycrystalline Ni and nanostructured NiMo confirmed the importance of optimizing the electrode–electrolyte interface for optimum HER performance and kinetics.
References
Vetter KJ (2013) Electrochemical kinetics: theoretical aspects. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Durst J, Siebel A, Simon C, Hasché F, Herranz J, Gasteiger HA (2014) New insights into the electrochemical hydrogen oxidation and evolution reaction mechanism. Energy Environ Sci 7:2255–2260. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ee00440j
Zhao G, Rui K, Dou SX, Sun W (2018) Heterostructures for electrochemical hydrogen evolution reaction: a review. Adv Funct Mater 28:1–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201803291
Strmcnik D, Lopes PP, Genorio B, Stamenkovic VR, Markovic NM (2016) Design principles for hydrogen evolution reaction catalyst materials. Nano Energy 29:29–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.04.017
Faid AY, Barnett AO, Seland F, Sunde S (2020) Ni/NiO nanosheets for alkaline hydrogen evolution reaction: in situ electrochemical-Raman study. Electrochim Acta 361:137040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2020.137040
Faid AY, Barnett AO, Seland F, Sunde S (2021) NiCu mixed metal oxide catalyst for alkaline hydrogen evolution in anion exchange membrane water electrolysis. Electrochim Acta. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2021.137837
Faid A, Oyarce Barnett A, Seland F, Sunde S, Faid AY, Oyarce Barnett A, Seland F, Sunde S (2018) Highly active nickel-based catalyst for hydrogen evolution in anion exchange membrane electrolysis. Catalysts 8:614. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8120614
Alsabet M, Grden M, Jerkiewicz G (2011) Electrochemical growth of surface oxides on nickel. Part 1: formation of $α$-Ni(OH)2in relation to the polarization potential, polarization time, and temperature. Electrocatalysis 2:317–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12678-011-0067-9
Hall DS, Bock C, MacDougall BR (2013) The electrochemistry of metallic nickel: oxides, hydroxides, hydrides and alkaline hydrogen evolution. J Electrochem Soc 160:F235–F243. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.026303jes
Wei C, Sun S, Mandler D, Wang X, Qiao SZ, Xu ZJ (2019) Approaches for measuring the surface areas of metal oxide electrocatalysts for determining their intrinsic electrocatalytic activity. Chem Soc Rev 48:2518–2534. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cs00848e
Anantharaj S, Ede SR, Sakthikumar K, Karthick K, Mishra S, Kundu S (2016) Recent trends and perspectives in electrochemical water splitting with an emphasis on sulphide, selenide, and phosphide catalysts of Fe Co, and Ni: a review. ACS Catal 6:8069–8097. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.6b02479
McCrory CCL, Jung S, Peters JC, Jaramillo TF (2013) Benchmarking heterogeneous electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction. J Am Chem Soc 135:16977–16987. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja407115p
Jung S, McCrory CCL, Ferrer IM, Peters JC, Jaramillo TF (2016) Benchmarking nanoparticulate metal oxide electrocatalysts for the alkaline water oxidation reaction. J Mater Chem A 4:3068–3076. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ta07586f
Machado SA, Avaca LA (1994) The hydrogen evolution reaction on nickel surfaces stabilized by H-absorption. Electrochim Acta 39:1385–1391. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4686(94)E0003-I
Strmcnik D, Uchimura M, Wang C, Subbaraman R, Danilovic N, Van Der Vliet D, Paulikas AP, Stamenkovic VR, Markovic NM (2013) Improving the hydrogen oxidation reaction rate by promotion of hydroxyl adsorption. Nat Chem 5:300–306. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1574
Subbaraman R, Tripkovic D, Strmcnik D, Chang KC, Uchimura M, Paulikas AP, Stamenkovic V, Markovic NM (2011) Enhancing hydrogen evolution activity in water splitting by tailoring Li+-Ni(OH)2-Pt interfaces. Science 334:1256–1260. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1211934
Sheng W, Zhuang Z, Gao M, Zheng J, Chen JG, Yan Y (2015) Correlating hydrogen oxidation and evolution activity on platinum at different pH with measured hydrogen binding energy. Nat Commun 6:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6848
Ledezma-Yanez I, Wallace WDZ, Sebastián-Pascual P, Climent V, Feliu JM, Koper MTM (2017) Interfacial water reorganization as a pH-dependent descriptor of the hydrogen evolution rate on platinum electrodes. Nat Energy 2:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.31
Wang X, Xu C, Jaroniec M, Zheng Y, Qiao SZ (2019) Anomalous hydrogen evolution behavior in high-pH environment induced by locally generated hydronium ions. Nat Commun 10:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12773-7
Li D, Park EJ, Zhu W, Shi Q, Zhou Y, Tian H, Lin Y, Serov A, Zulevi B, Baca ED, Fujimoto C, Chung HT, Kim YS (2020) Highly quaternized polystyrene ionomers for high performance anion exchange membrane water electrolysers. Nat Energy 5:378–385. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-0577-x
Kuznetsov AN, Oshchepkov AG, Cherstiouk OV, Simonov PA, Nazmutdinov RR, Savinova ER, Bonnefont A (2020) Influence of the NaOH concentration on the hydrogen electrode reaction kinetics of Ni and NiCu electrodes. ChemElectroChem 7:1438–1447. https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.202000319
Cossar E, Houache MSE, Zhang Z, Baranova EA (2020) Comparison of electrochemical active surface area methods for various nickel nanostructures. J Electroanal Chem 870:114246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114246
Houache MSE, Cossar E, Ntais S, Baranova EA (2018) Electrochemical modification of nickel surfaces for efficient glycerol electrooxidation. J Power Sources 375:310–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPOWSOUR.2017.08.089
Shinagawa T, Garcia-Esparza AT, Takanabe K (2015) Insight on Tafel slopes from a microkinetic analysis of aqueous electrocatalysis for energy conversion. Sci Rep 5(August):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13801
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank NTNU, ENERSENSE for the 3-year financial support towards FF’s doctoral studies.
Funding
Open access funding provided by NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology (incl St. Olavs Hospital - Trondheim University Hospital). Funding was provided by Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet, and Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking (Grant No. 875088).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Faid, A.Y., Foroughi, F., Sunde, S. et al. Unveiling hydrogen evolution dependence on KOH concentration for polycrystalline and nanostructured nickel-based catalysts. J Appl Electrochem 52, 1819–1826 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-022-01749-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-022-01749-z