Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Sustainability awareness in engineering curriculum through a proposed teaching and assessment framework

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Engineers play a vital role in enabling the sustainable development of their societies. Thus, it is necessary to teach sustainability in universities, especially for engineering students, for a more sustainable future. The present work aims to measure and enhance engineering students’ awareness of sustainability by monitoring and evaluating learning and student outcomes during the last stages of an engineering curriculum and its culminating major design experience. A questionnaire to assess students’ awareness of sustainability and its tools is implemented. From this empirical study, obstacles to the awareness of sustainability through engineering education are discussed. The analysis of the results of the questionnaire implies the modification of the structure of senior projects and other capstone design courses in order to include a proposed teaching and assessment framework. This framework emphasizes students’ ability to understand and use effective sustainability tools, within the environment of their major design experience. The framework is composed of two paths. The first path concerns course design through which sustainability concepts and methods are included in several course elements. The second path addresses the assessment of the attainment of sustainability objectives by the students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Adapted from (Soliman and Al-Bahi 2018))

Fig. 4

Adapted from (Huang and Badurdeen 2017))

Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Adapted from (Amrina and Yusof 2011))

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd-Elwahed, M. S., & El-Baz, M. A. (2018). Impact of implementation of total quality management: An assessment of the Saudi industry. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 29(1), 97–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdulwahed, M., & Hasna, M. (2017). The role of engineering design in technological and 21st century competencies capacity building: Comparative case study in the Middle East, Asia, and Europe. Sustainability, 9(4), 520.

    Google Scholar 

  • ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission. (2012). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, effective for evaluations during the 2011–2012 Accreditation Cycle. USA: ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission.

  • ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission. (2018). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, effective for reviews during the 2019–2020 accreditation cycle. USA: ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission.

  • Al-Bahi, A. M., Taha, M. A., & Turkmen, N. (2014). Capstone design projects in the environment of weak industry-academia interaction. In IEEE global engineering education conference (EDUCON). IEEE Xplore®, Istanbul, Turkey.

  • Amrina, E., & Vilsi, A. L. (2015). Key performance indicators for sustainable manufacturing evaluation in cement industry. Procedia CIRP, 26, 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amrina, E., & Yusof, S. M. (2011). Key performance indicators for sustainable manufacturing evaluation in automotive companies. In IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management. IEEE.

  • Badurdeen, F., et al. (2014) Sustainable value creation in manufacturing at product and process levels: A metrics-based evaluation. In Handbook of manufacturing engineering and technology (pp 1–28).

  • Badurdeen, F., & Jawahir, I. S. (2017). Strategies for value creation through sustainable manufacturing. Procedia Manufacturing, 8, 20–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blottnitz, H. V., Case, J. M., & Fraser, D. M. (2015). Sustainable development at the core of undergraduate engineering curriculum reform: A new introductory course in chemical engineering. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 300–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruntland, G. H. (1987). Our common future. In G. H. Bruntland (Ed.), The World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford.

  • Cheng, Y. (2017). Reliability prediction in early design stages. In Mechanical engineering. Missouri University of Science and Technology.

  • Chiu, M.-C., & Okudan, G. L. E. (2010). Evolution of design for X tools applicable to design stages: A literature review. In 15th design for manufacturing and the lifecycle conference; 7th symposium on international design and design education (Vol. 6, pp. 171–182).

  • Christie, B. A., et al. (2014). Environmental sustainability in higher education: What do academics think? Environmental Education Research, 21(5), 655–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee, A. I. M. L.-C. A. (1997). Life-cycle engineering and design. In G. E. Dieter (Ed.), ASM handbook: Materials selection and design (pp. 96–103). Cleveland: ASM International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coral, J. S. (2009). Engineering education for a sustainable future. Barcelona: Delft University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosme, N., et al. (2018). Learning-by-doing: Experience from 20 years of teaching LCA to future engineers. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 24(3), 553–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davim, J. P. (2017). Curricula for sustainability in higher education. In J. Paulo Davim (Ed.), Management and industrial engineering. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • De, D., et al. (2020). Impact of lean and sustainability oriented innovation on sustainability performance of small and medium sized enterprises: A data envelopment analysis-based framework. International Journal of Production Economics, 219, 416–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrick, S. (2013). Time and sustainability metrics in higher education. In S. Caeiro, et al. (Eds.), Sustainability assessment tools in higher education institutions. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desha, C. J., Hargroves, K. C., & Smith, M. H. (2009). Addressing the time lag dilemma in curriculum renewal towards engineering education for sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 10, 184–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of the 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing Limited Oxford Centre for Innovation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fergus, J. W. (2013). Materials engineering as a catalyst for sustainability education. In ASEE annual conference & exposition 2013, Atlanta.

  • Flowers, J., Rauch, C., & Wierzbicki, A. (2018). Teaching upcycling to impact environmental attitudes. Journal of Technology Education, 30(1), 30–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fürst, C., et al. (2014). Evaluating the role of ecosystem services in participatory land use planning: Proposing a balanced score card. Landscape Ecology, 29(8), 1435–1446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galankashi, M. R., Helmi, S. A., & Hashemzahi, P. (2016). Supplier selection in automobile industry: A mixed balanced scorecard-fuzzy AHP approach. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 55(1), 93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guinée, J. B., et al. (2011). Life cycle assessment: Past, present, and future. Environmental Science and Technology, 45(1), 90–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanning, A., et al. (2012). Are we educating engineers for sustainability? International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 13(3), 305–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hans-Carl-von-Carlowitz-Gesellschaft, S. (2013). Die Erfindung der Nachhaltigkeit. Leben, Werk und Wirkung des Hans Carl von Carlowitz. Muenchen: Oekom Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashmi, M. A., Abdulghaffar, N., & Edinat, I. (2015). Sustainability commitment in Saudi Arabia and need. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 14(1), 47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, A., & Badurdeen, F. (2017). Sustainable manufacturing performance evaluation: Integrating product and process metrics for systems level assessment. Procedia Manufacturing, 8, 563–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, A., & Badurdeen, F. (2018). Metrics-based approach to evaluate sustainable manufacturing performance at the production line and plant levels. Journal of Cleaner Production, 192, 462–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jawahir, I. S., & Bradley, R. (2016). Technological elements of circular economy and the principles of 6R-based closed-loop material flow in sustainable manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 40, 103–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovane, F., et al. (2008). The incoming global technological and industrial revolution towards competitive sustainable manufacturing. CIRP Annals, 57(2), 641–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketchman, K., et al. (2017). Sustainable engineering cognitive outcomes: Examining different approaches for curriculum integration. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 143(3), 04017002.

  • Kuei, C.-H., & Lu, M. H. (2013). Integrating quality management principles into sustainability management. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 24(1–2), 62–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, F. J., & Lozano, R. (2014). Developing the curriculum for a new Bachelor’s degree in engineering for sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 136–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D. H., et al. (1972). The limits to growth: A report for the club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. New York: Universe Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mojarad, A. A. S., Atashbari, V., & Tantau, A. (2018). Challenges for sustainable development strategies in oil and gas industries. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 12(1), 626–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, M., Phan, A., & Matsui, Y. (2018). Contribution of quality management practices to sustainability performance of Vietnamese firms. Sustainability, 10(2), 375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onat, N., et al. (2017). Systems thinking for life cycle sustainability assessment: A review of recent developments, applications, and future perspectives. Sustainability, 9(5), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesce, M., et al. (2018). SWOT analysis of the application of international standard ISO 14001 in the Chinese context. A case study of Guangdong Province. Sustainability, 10(9), 3196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pochampally, K. K., & Gupta, S. M. (2014). Six sigma case studies with Minitab®. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popoff, A., & Millet, D. (2017). Sustainable life cycle design using constraint satisfaction problems and quality function deployment. Procedia CIRP, 61, 75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rio de Janerio. (1992). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development. In Agenda 21, Ch. 36: Promoting education and public awareness and training. UN: Rio de Janerio.

  • Sivapalan, S., Clifford, M. J., & Speight, S. (2017). Engineering education for sustainable development: Using online learning to support the new paradigms. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 21(2), 61–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soliman, A. Y., & Al-Bahi, A. M. (2018). A win-win strategy to integrate sustainability objectives in product design—An educational approach. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 8(5), 29–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinhilper, R. (1998). Remanufacturing: The ultimate form of recycling (pp. 1–24). Stuttgart: Fraunhofer IRB Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoycheva, S., et al. (2018). Multi-criteria decision analysis framework for sustainable manufacturing in automotive industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 257–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sujova, A., Simanova, L., & Marcinekova, K. (2016). Sustainable process performance by application of six sigma concepts: The research study of two industrial cases. Sustainability, 8(3), 260.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2002). Education for sustainability-From Rio to Johannesburg: Lessons learnt from a decade of commitment. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinodh, S., Jayakrishna, K., & Vimal, K. E. K. (2014a). Modern mechanical engineering_ research, development and education. In J. P. Davim (Ed.), Materials forming, machining and tribology. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinodh, S., Kamala, V., & Jayakrishna, K. (2014b). Integration of ECQFD, TRIZ, and AHP for innovative and sustainable product development. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38(11–12), 2758–2770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinodh, S., & Rathod, G. (2010). Integration of ECQFD and LCA for sustainable product design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(8), 833–842.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., et al. (2012) A metrics-based methodology for establishing product sustainability index (ProdSI) for manufactured products. In 19th CIRP international conference on life cycle engineering. 2012. Berkeley.

  • Zhang, J., Schmidt, K., & Li, H. (2016a). BIM and sustainability education: Incorporating instructional needs into curriculum planning in CEM programs accredited by ACCE. Sustainability, 8(6), 525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q., et al. (2016b). More than target 6.3: A systems approach to rethinking sustainable development goals in a resource-scarce world. Engineering, 2(4), 481–489.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, under grant no. (D1440–036–135). The authors acknowledge with thanks the DSR’s technical and financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mechanical Engineering Department, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

    M. S. Abd-Elwahed

  2. Aerospace Engineering Department, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

    A. M. Al-Bahi

Authors
  1. M. S. Abd-Elwahed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. M. Al-Bahi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. S. Abd-Elwahed.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abd-Elwahed, M.S., Al-Bahi, A.M. Sustainability awareness in engineering curriculum through a proposed teaching and assessment framework. Int J Technol Des Educ 31, 633–651 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09567-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09567-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation