Abstract
While much research has been done on Critical Thinking (CT) skills, the disposition toward CT has not been adequately investigated. The paucity of literature regarding technology teachers’ disposition toward CT is particularly problematic as these teachers have to assist learners with the designing and making of solutions (artefacts) to problems that are often ill structured. Solving these problems is complicated and involves critical thinking. Helping learners to find solutions to these problems, therefore, requires teachers to be willing to think critically and encourage critical thinking in the classroom. Profiling these teachers’ dispositions could reveal their inclination to employ critical thinking, and give an indication of the likelihood that they may foster CT skills and the disposition toward CT in the classroom. In addition, such profiling could provide a descriptive baseline for further investigation into the relationship that seems to exist between CT dispositions and professions. This study, therefore, aimed to investigate technology teachers’ disposition to think critically in terms of their habits of mind. Quantitative research, using an online survey, was employed in this study. A Likert Scale instrument comprising 42 statements, derived from Facione’s (Informal Log 20(1): 61–84, 2000) seven habits of mind, was administered to South African technology teachers. The participants had to rate their level of agreement with each statement on a six-point scale. The research findings revealed that this sample had a positive disposition toward CT. The habits of mind that ranked the strongest were CT Self-confidence and Inquisitiveness, while Mature Judgment ranked the weakest (although still in a positive direction). Further research is needed to establish which dispositions should be emphasised in order to address the dispositional needs in technology education.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Philosophical Association. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. Recommendations prepared for the committee on pre-college philosophy. California State University, Fullerton. ERIC Doc. No. ED 315-423.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education. Belmont: Wadsworth.
Beyer, B. (1990). What philosophy offers to the teaching of thinking. Educational Leadership, 47(5), 55–60.
Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., et al. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Dordrecht: Springer.
Department of Basic Education. (2011). National curriculum statement: Curriculum and assessment policy statement (CAPS). Technology Grades 7–9. Pretoria: Government Printing Works.
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston: D.C. Heath & Co.
Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., Harney, O. M., & Kavanagh, C. (2017). Facilitating a student-educator conceptual model of dispositions towards critical thinking through interactive management. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65, 47–73.
Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2015). The effects of argument mapping-infused critical thinking instruction on reflective judgement. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 16, 11–26.
Ennis, R. (1996). Critical thinking dispositions: Their nature and assessability. Informal Logic, 18(2), 165–182.
Ennis, R. (2018). Critical thinking across the curriculum: A vision. Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy, 37(1), 165–184.
Facione, P. A. (1990). The delphi report: Executive summary; critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. California: California Academic Press.
Facione, P. A. (2000). The disposition toward critical thinking: Its character, measurement, and relationship to critical chinking skill. Informal Logic, 20(1), 61–84.
Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts (pp. 1–30). Insight Assessment.
Facione, P. A., Sánchez, C. A., Facione, N. C., & Gainen, J. (1995). The disposition toward critical thinking. The Journal of General Education, 44(1), 1–25.
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Halpern, D. F. (2014). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (5th ed.). New York: Psychology Press.
Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and iII-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65–94.
Jonsson, A., & Lindén, S. (2009). The quest for the best consumer confidence indicator. European economy - economic papers (Vol. 372). Brussels: European Commission Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs.
Mcbride, R. E., Xiang, P., & Wittenburg, D. (2002). Dispositions toward critical thinking: the preservice teacher’s perspective. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(1), 29–40.
Paul, R. W. (1995). Critical thinking: How to prepare students for a rapidly changing world. Santa Rosa, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Paul, R. W. (2012). Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world (4th ed.). Tomales, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Perkins, D., Jay, E., & Tishman, S. (1993). Beyond abilities: A dispositional theory of thinking. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39(1), 1–21.
Schooner, P., Nordlöf, C., Klasander, C., & Hallström, J. (2017). Design, system, value: The role of problem-solving and critical thinking capabilities in technology education, as perceived by teachers. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 22, 60–75.
Siegel, H. (1999). What (good) are thinking dispositions? Educational Theory, 49(2), 207–221.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Van Niekerk, E., Ankiewicz, P., & De Swart, E. (2010). A process-based assessment framework for technology education: A case study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(2), 191–215.
Watson, L. (2015). What is inquisitiveness. American Philosophical Quarterly, 52(3), 273–287.
Wright, K. B. (2005). Researching Internet-based populations: Advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00259.x.
Funding
This publication was produced with support from the Teaching and Learning Development Capacity Improvement Programme, a partnership programme between the Department of Higher Education and Training and the European Union. Its contents are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department or the European Union.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rauscher, W., Badenhorst, H. Thinking critically about critical thinking dispositions in technology education. Int J Technol Des Educ 31, 465–488 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09564-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09564-3