Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

In pursuit of learning in an informal space: a case study in the Singapore context

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the dimensions of how interest can be sustained in learners, using a case study of a makerspace in a Singapore context. We suggest a framework that synthesises both individual psychological aspects of interest development together with the impact of the socio-cultural environment which include five dimensions: community, culture, confidence, conflict resolution, recreating process. Based on a biblio-narrativical approach, we obtained data via interviews and field observations of students in the makerspace. The data obtained was able to substantiate our hypothesis of the impact the dimensions have on interest sustainability, emphasising the importance of a positive socio-cultural environment in interest development and sustainability. This has implications on the role stakeholders such as school management, teachers, peers and parents, have on an individual’s interest development. The unification of psychological and socio-cultural aspects of interest development would provide a more comprehensive perspective on interest development and sustainability which would benefit both practitioners and researchers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

(Adapted from Renninger and Hidi 2016)

Fig. 3

[Adapted from Renninger and Hidi (2016)]

Fig.. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 545–561. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajam, G., & Lee, E. (2016). A Singapore school’s journey towards maker education. Paper presented at the Regional Industry Networking Conference, Singapore.

  • Azevedo, F. S. (2011). Lines of practice: A practice-centered theory of interest relationships. Cognition and Instruction, 29(2), 147–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, B. (2006). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human Development, 49(4), 193–224. https://doi.org/10.1159/000094368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin, D. (2006). Narrative inquiry: A methodology for studying lived experience. Research Studies in Music Education, 27(1), 44–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleaves, A. (2005). The formation of science choices in secondary school. International Journal of Science Education, 27(4), 471–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000323746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., et al. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48(2), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.2.90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. A., Lopez, M., Maddox, D., Drape, T., & Duke, R. (2014). Interest-driven learning among middle school youth in an out-of-school STEM studio. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(5), 624–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9490-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, R., Faulkner, D., Whitelock, D., & Sheehy, K. (2015). Pre-teens’ informal learning with ICT and Web 2.0. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(2), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2013.870596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhow, C., & Lewin, C. (2016). Social media and education: Reconceptualising the boundaries of formal and informal learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(1), 6–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1064954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhow, C., & Robelia, B. (2009). Informal learning and identity formation in online social networks. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880902923580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15–46). New York, NY: McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halverson, E. R., & Sheridan, K. (2014). The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 495–504. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.4.34j1g68140382063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulleman, C. S., Godes, O., Hendricks, B. L., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 880–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, D., Lim, S. H., & Jamaludin, A. (2011). Social constructivism, projective identity, and learning: Case study of nathan. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12, 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamaludin, A. (2017). Innovations in education for a future-ready nation. In Keynote address at the 14th international conference on research in science and technology. Singapore: Nanyang Executive Centre.

  • Joeffe, H. (2012). Thematic analysis. In D. Harper & A. R. Thompson (Eds.), Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy (pp. 209–223). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., Jiang, Y., & Song, J. (2015). The effect of interest and utility on mathematics engagement and achievement. In K. A. Renninger, M. Nieswandt, & S. Hidi (Eds.), Interest in mathematics and science learning (pp. 63–78). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kolodner, J. L. (2004). The learning sciences: Past, present, and future. Educational Technology: The Magazine for Managers of Changes in Education, 44(3), 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krapp, A. (2003). Interest and human development: An educational-psychological perspective. British Journal of Educational Psychology (Monograph Series II, Part 2), 2, 57–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. L. (2014). Review time spent on CCAs. The Straits Times, Forum (p. A21).

  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipstein, R., & Renninger, K. A. (2007). “Putting things into words”: 12–15-year-old students’ interest for writing. In P. Boscolo & S. Hidi (Eds.), Motivation and writing: Research and school practice (pp. 113–140). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcu, G., Tassini, K., Carlson, Q., Goodwyn, J., Rivkin, G., Schaefer, K.J., & Kiesler, S. (2013). Why do they still use paper? Understanding data collection and use in Autism education. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 3177–3186). ACM.

  • Ministry of Education Singapore. (2015). 21st Century Competencies. Retrieved June 10, 2019, from https://www.moe.gov.sg/education/education-system/21st-century-competencies.

  • Ministry of Education Singapore. (2019). Courses and subjects for secondary schools. Retrieved September 9, 2019, from https://beta.moe.gov.sg/secondary/courses/.

  • Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 424–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, K. (2016). ‘Makerspaces’ allow students to get messy—and creative. Today. Retrieved May 8, 2019, from http://www.todayonline.com/singapore/makerspaces-allow-students-get-messy-and-creative.

  • Nolen, S. B. (2007). The role of literate communities in the development of children’s interest in writing. In P. Boscolo & S. Hidi (Eds.), Motivation and writing: Research and school practice (pp. 241–255). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressick-Kilborn, K., & Walker, R. (2002). The social construction of interest in a learning community. In D. McInerney & S. van Etten (Eds.), Sociocultural influences on motivation and learning (pp. 153–182). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. E. (2016). The power of interest for motivation and engagement. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, R., & Chiu, M. M. (2013). Formal and informal context factors as contributors to student engagement in a guided discovery-based program of game design learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 38(4), 429–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.779585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahin, A., Ayar, M. C., & Adiguzel, T. (2014). STEM related after-school program activities and associated outcomes on student learning. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(1), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.1.1876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sansone, C. C., Fraughton, T., Zachary, J., Butner, J., & Heiner, C. (2011). Self-regulation of motivation when learning online: The importance of who, why and how. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9193-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C. (1979). Interestingness: Controlling inferences. Artificial Intelligence, 12, 273–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiefele, U. (1999). Interest and learning from text. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 257–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, E. (2013). Informal Learning on YouTube: Exploring digital literacy in independent online learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 38(4), 463–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, A. L., Hung, D., & Jamaludin, A. (2019). Exploring the dimensions of interest sustainability (5Cs Framework): Case study of Nathan. In D. Hung, S. S. Lee, Y. Toh, A. Jamaludin, & L. Wu (Eds.), Innovations in educational change. Education Innovation Series (pp. 253–276). Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Teng, A., & Yang, C. (2016). Going beyond grades: Evolving the Singapore education system. The Straits Times. Retrieved March 12, 2019, from http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/education/going-beyond-grades-evolving-the-singapore-education-system.

  • United Nations Organization for Education, Science and Culture. (2012). UNESCO guidelines for the recognition, validation and accreditation of the outcomes of non-formal and informal learning. Hamburg: UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning. Retrieved March 1, 2019, from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002163/216360e.pdf.

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by National Institute of Education (SG).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Office of Education Research, Centre for Research in Pedagogy and Practice, National Institute of Education, Singapore, Singapore

    Aik Lim Tan

  2. Office of Education Research, National Institute of Education, Singapore, Singapore

    Azilawati Jamaludin & David Hung

Authors
  1. Aik Lim Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Azilawati Jamaludin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David Hung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aik Lim Tan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tan, A.L., Jamaludin, A. & Hung, D. In pursuit of learning in an informal space: a case study in the Singapore context. Int J Technol Des Educ 31, 281–303 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09553-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09553-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation