Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Representations in simulated workplaces

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In vocational education students are to be prepared to participate in communities of practice. Hence they need technical skills as well as content knowledge e.g. science and mathematics. Research has shown that the instructional strategy of guided co-construction may lead to deeper understandings within a practice. The research questions in this article aim at finding out whether guided co-construction is an effective strategy in joining experience and general knowledge with representations as tools for communication and orientation. The present study is a qualitative analysis of a design-based research project. Our goal was to establish how the use of representations developed within a process of tandem tricycle construction. We looked for video data that could potentially explain how representations were used in practice and how such use was related to vocational and academic disciplines. Interesting differences could be revealed which were clearly related to differences in the way representations were designed and used in the whole cycle of problem solving (the construction of a technical object). At two of the four schools the representations remained visible and continued to be used until the end of the process. Designing and using representations as a core activity in vocational education could be the key to integrate theory in designing and constructing in the workshop.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. VMBO in the Netherlands is preparatory secondary education with a vocational perspective. See Cedefop (2009), Maes (2004) and Van de Velde (1991). In this article vocational education refers to VMBO.

  2. In vocational education (especially pre-vocational education) generally students are educated for a vocation while also being taught more general knowledge.

  3. For more discussion on design based research see Engeström (2009), Engeström and Sannino (2010).

  4. As in other countries mostly boys choose to follow a technical vocational programme.

  5. The names are not the real names of the schools, but pseudonyms

References

  • Akkerman, S., & Bakker, A. (2011a). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akkerman, S., & Bakker, A. (2011b). Crossing boundaries between school and work during apprenticeships. Vocations and Learning, 1–21.

  • Bell, P. (2004). On the theoretical breadth of design-based research in education. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 243–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229–270). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cedefop. (2009). Future skill supply in Europe. Medium-term forecast up to 2020, Luxembourg: Office for Official publications of the European Communities. http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/etv/Upload/Information_resources/Bookshop/546/4086_en.pdf (visited July 7, 2009).

  • Cobb, P., et al. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doorman, L. M. (2005). Modelling motion: From trace graphs to instantaneous change. Utrecht: CD-B press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (2009). The future of activity theory: A rough draft. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. D. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 303–328). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Engestrom, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F. (2006). Definition and analysis of data from videotape: Some research procedures and their rationales. In J. L. Green, G. Camilli, & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 177–192). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum associates, Inc. Publishers American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guile, D., & Young, M. (2003). Transfer and transition in vocational education: Some theoretical considerations. In T. Tuomi-Gröhn & Y. Engestrom (Eds.), Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary crossing (pp. 63–84). Amsterdam: Pergamon an Imprint of Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardman, F. (2008). The guided co-construction of knowledge. In M. Martin-Jones, A. de Meija, & N. Hornberger (Eds.), Discours and education (Vol. 3, pp. 253–264). New York: Springer.

  • Johri, A., & Olds, B. M. (2011). Bridging engineering education research and the learning sciences. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 151–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent, P., Hoyles, C., et al. (2007a). Introduction: Learning and technology at work. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 14(1–2), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent, P., Noss, R., et al. (2007b). Characterizing the use of mathematical knowledge in boundary-crossing situations at work. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 14(1–2), 64–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilbrink, N., & Bjurulf, V. (2012). Transfer of knowledge in technical vocational education: A narrative study in Swedish upper secondary school. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1–17. doi:10.1007/s10798-012-9201-0.

  • Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An Analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (2005). Practice, person, social world. In H. Daniels (Ed.), An introduction to Vygotsky (pp. 149–156). East Sussex: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. L. (2000). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litzinger, T., et al. (2011). Egineering education and the development of expertise. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 123–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, D., & Gustafson, B. (2004). The role of design drawing among children engaged in parachute building activity. Journal of technology education, 16, 55–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes, M. (2004). Vocational education and training in the Netherlands. Revised Edition., Luxembourg: CEDEFOP (European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training). http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/EN/Files/5142_en.pdf (visited February 10, 2009).

  • Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (2006). On some necessary conditions of learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 193–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Clevedon: Multilingual matters.

  • Mercer, N. (2002). Developing dialogues. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in de 21st century. Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education (pp. 141–153). Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Noldus. (2009). The observer XT. http://www.noldus.com/human-behavior-research/products/the-observer-xt (visited April 7, 2009).

  • Reisslein, M., Moreno, R., & Ozogul, G. (2010). Pre-college electrical engineering instruction: The impact of abstract vs. contextualized representations an practice on learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(3), 225–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. (1996). Art and artifact of children’s designing: A situated cognition perspective. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(2), 129–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M., & Lee, Y.-J. (2006). Contradictions in theorizing and implementing communities in education. Educational Research Review, 1(1), 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaap, H., Van Schaik, M., & De Bruijn, E. (2014). De rol van docenten bij het gebruik van authentieke instrumenten in beroepsopleidingen [The teachers’ role using authentic instruments in vocational education]. Pedagogische studiën.

  • Stevens, R., & Hall, R. (1998). Disciplined perception: learning to see in technoscience. In M. Lampert & M. L. Blunk, (eds), Talking mathematics in school. Studies of teaching and learning (pp. 107–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University press. http://faculty.washington.edu/reedstev/StevensandHall_disciplined_perception.pdf.

  • Stevens, R., et al. (2008). Becoming an engineer: Toward a three-dimensional view of engineering learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 355–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terwel, J., Rodrigues, R., & Van de Koot-Dees, D. (2011). Tussen afkomst en toekomst. Casestudies naar de schoolloopbanen van leerlingen van 10-21 jaar [Between origin and future. Casestudies in educational carreers from students 10–12 years], Antwerpen/Apeldoorn: Garant.

  • Terwel, J., Van Oers, B., Van Dijk, I., & Van Eeden, P. (2009). The learner as a designer: Effects on transfer of an experimental curriculum in modelling. Educational Research and Evaluation 15(1), 25–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomi-Gröhm, T., & Engeström, Y. (2003). Conceptualizing transfer: form standard notions to developmental perspectives. In T. Tuomi-Gröhn & Y. Engeström, (eds). Between school and work new perspectives on transfer and boundary crossing (pp. 19–38). Advances in learning and instruction series. Bingley: Emerald Group publishing Limited.

  • Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2011). Patterns of contingent teaching in teacher-student interaction. Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 46–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Velde, J. (1991). National report. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2(1), 48–59. doi:10.1007/BF00275231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, I., Van Oers, B., & Terwel, J. (2003). Providing or designing? Constructing models in primary maths education. Learning and Instruction, 13(1), 53–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oers, B. (1988). Modellen en de ontwikkeling van het (natuur-) wetenschappelijk denken van leerlingen. [Models and the development of (natural) scientific thinking of students]. Tijdschrift voor Didactiek de Beta-wetenschappen [Journal of didactics for the beta-sciences], 6(2), 115–143.

  • Van Oers, B., & Wardekker, W. (2000). De cultuurhistorische school in de pedagogiek [The cultural historical school in pedagogy]. In S. Miedema, (ed), Pedagogiek in meervoud [Pedagogy in plural]. Houten/Diegem: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum, pp. 171–213.

  • Van Schaik, M. (2009). Looking at learning in practice—Classroom observation with Noldus Observer XT. Noldus. Retrieved from http://www.noldus.com/documentation/looking-learning-practice-classroom-observation-noldus-observer-xt (visited July, 2009).

  • Van Schaik, M., Terwel, J., & Van Oers, B. (2010a). Tools for learning in simulated workplaces: Results of an intervention in vocational education. In Co-constructing models as tools in vocational practice. Learning in a knowledge-rich environment (pp. 86–106). Zoetermeer: Free Musketeers.

  • Van Schaik, M., Van Oers, B., & Terwel, J. (2010b). Learning in the school workplace: Knowledge acquisition and modelling in preparatory vocational secondary education. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 62(2), 163–181. doi:10.1080/13636820.2010.484629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Schaik, M., Van Oers, B., & Terwel, J. (2011). Towards a knowledge-rich learning environment in preparatory secondary education. British Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 61–81. doi:10.1080/01411920903420008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vries, M. J. de (1992). Dutch technology education developments: A comment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2(3), 58–60. doi:10.1007/BF00183781.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. NCOI Research Centre, Van Abbestraat 58, 1064 WV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Martijn van Schaik

  2. Department Theory and Research in Education, Faculty of Psychology and Education, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Jan Terwel & Bert van Oers

Authors
  1. Martijn van Schaik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jan Terwel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bert van Oers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martijn van Schaik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Schaik, M., Terwel, J. & van Oers, B. Representations in simulated workplaces. Int J Technol Des Educ 24, 391–417 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9261-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9261-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation