Abstract
What happens when educational ideas cross national and cultural borders? How do teachers respond to ideas originating in a different school system and a different national culture? This article reports on an empirical study investigating the transfer of ideas from Design & Technology as a subject in England and Wales into Norwegian schools. A sample of teachers participating in a specific project on technology teaching inspired by this subject has been studied by means of interviews and classroom observation. Results of the study show that while some elements of Design & Technology are adopted by the teachers, essential ideas of the subject are significantly transformed. Drawing on Barnes, (1992, Teachers and Teaching: From Classrooms to Reflection (pp. 9–32), The Falmer press, London) concept of teachers' professional frames for teaching, it is shown how specific aspects of the national and educational culture have had a considerable effect on␣the teachers' interpretation of the nature of technology as a subject of teaching and its place in the curriculum. The study illustrates the importance of the cultural context in how educational ideas are interpreted, reshaped and realized in schools.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D. Barnes (1992) ‘The Significance of Teachers’ Frames for Teaching’ T. R. H. Munby (Eds) Teachers and Teaching: From Classrooms to Reflection The Falmer Press London 9–32
J. L. Bencze (2001) ArticleTitle‘ “Technoscience” Education: Empowering Citizens Against the Tyranny of School Science’ International Journal of Technology and Design Education 11 IssueID1 273–298
P. Broadhead (2001) ArticleTitle‘Curriculum Change in Norway: Thematic Approaches, Active Learning and Pupil Cooperation – From Curriculum Design to Classroom Implementation’ Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 45 IssueID1 10–36 Occurrence Handle10.1080/00313830020023375
Bungum, B.: 2003, Perceptions of Technology Education. A Cross-case Study of Teachers Realising Technology as a New Subject of Teaching, Dissertation for the degree of dr.scient., Trondheim, Norwegian University of Science and Technology
J. Chidgey (1994) ‘A Critique of the Design Process’ F. Banks (Eds) Teaching Technology Routledge London 89–93
C. Clarcson J. March J. Palmer (2002) GCSE Textiles Technology for OCR Heinemann Educational Publishers Oxford
D. Davies M. Rogers (2000) ArticleTitle‘Pre-service Primary Teachers’ Planning for Science and Technology Activities: Influences and Constraints’ Research in Science and Technology Education 18 IssueID2 215–225 Occurrence Handle10.1080/713694980
InstitutionalAuthorNameDES/WO (Department for Education and Skills/Welsh Office) (1990) Technology in the National Curriculum Her Majesty’s Stationary Office London
InstitutionalAuthorNameDfE/WO (Department for Education/Welsh Office) (1995) Design and Technology in the National Curriculum Her Majesty’s Stationary Office London
InstitutionalAuthorNameDFEE/QCA (Department for Education and Employment/Qualifications and Curriculum Authority) (1999) Design and Technology. The National Curriculum for England Her Majesty’s Stationary Office London
InstitutionalAuthorNameDFES/QCA (Department for Education and Skills / Qualifications and Curriculum Authority) (2000) Design and Technology. The National Curriculum Her Majesty’s Stationary Office London
J. Donnelly E. Jenkins (1992) GCSE Technology: Some Precursors and Issues Education for Capability Research Group, University of Leeds Leeds
H. Eijkehof H. Franssen T. Houtveen (1998) ArticleTitle‘The Changing Relation Between Science and Technology in Dutch Secondary Education’ Journal of Curriculum Studies 30 IssueID6 677–690
O. Elgström U. Riis (1990) Läroplansprocesser och Förhandlingsdynamik. Exemplet Obligatorisk Teknik i Grundskolan Linkoping Studies in Arts and Science Linköping
Fores, M. L. & Rey, L.: 1979, ‘Technik: The Relevance of a Missing Concept’, Higher Education Review 11(2), 43–56. Reprinted in: A. Cross & B. McCormick (eds.), Technology in Schools (pp. 36–48), Open University Press, Milton Keynes
J. I. Goodlad (1979) Curriculum Inquiry. The Study of Curriculum Practice McGraw-Hill New York
B. B. Gundem (1993) Mot en ny skolevirkelighet? Læreplanen i et sentraliserings- og desentraliseringsperspektiv Ad Notam Gyldendal Oslo
A. Hargreaves M. G. Fullan (1992) Understanding Teacher Development Teacher College Press New York
W. Hörner (1985) ArticleTitle‘ “Technik” and “Technology”: Some Consequences of Terminological Differences for Educational Policy Making’ Oxford Review of Education 11 317–324
R. Johnsey (1995) ArticleTitle‘The Design Process – Does it Exist? A Critical Review of Published Models for the Design Process in England and Wales’ International Journal of Technology and Design Education 5 199–217 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00769904
A. Jones A. Harlow B. Cowie (2004) ArticleTitle‘New Zealand Teachers’ Experiences in Implementing the Technology Curriculum’ International Journal of Technology and Design Education 14 101–119
R. Kimbell (1997) Assessing Technology: International Trends in Curriculum and Assessment Open University Press Buckingham
J. Kramer (1984) ‘Norsk Identitet – et Produkt av Underutvikling og Stamme-tilhørighet’ A. M. Klausen (Eds) Den Norske Væremåten J. W. Cappelens forlag Trondhjem
InstitutionalAuthorNameKUF (Royal Ministry of Church, Education and Research) (1996) The Curriculum for the 10-year Compulsory School in Norway KUF/Nasjonalt læremiddelsenter Oslo
S. Kvale (1996) InterViews. An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing Sage Publications Thousand Oaks, California
D Layton (Eds) (1984) The Alternative Road. The Rehabilitation of the Practical University of Leeds CSSME, Leeds
D. Layton (1995) ArticleTitle‘Constructing and Reconstructing School Technology in England and Wales’ International Journal of Technology and Design Education 5 89–118
S. Lindblad (1990) ArticleTitle‘From Technology to Craft: On Teachers’ Experimental Adoption of Technology as a New Subject in the Swedish Primary School’ Journal of Curriculum Studies 22 IssueID2 165–175
D. Lortie (1975) Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study University of Chicago Press Chicago
B. Mawson (2003) ArticleTitle‘Beyond “The Design Process”: An Alternative Pedagogy for Technology Education’ International Journal of Technology and Design Education 13 117–128 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1024186814591
C. J. McRobbie I. S. Ginns S. J. Stein (2000) ArticleTitle‘Preservice Primary Teachers’ Thinking About Technology and Technology Education’ International Journal of Technology and Design Education 10 181–101 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008941520152
P. Medway (1992) ‘Constructions of Technology: Reflections on a New Subject’ J. Beynon H. Mackay (Eds) Technological Literacy and the Curriculum The Falmer Press London
I. Mittell A. Penny (1997) ArticleTitle‘Teacher Perceptions of Design and Technology: A Study of Disjunction Between Policy and Practice’ International Journal of Technology and Design Education 7 279–293 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008836605181
P. Murphy R. McCormick (1997) ArticleTitle‘Problem Solving in Science and Technology Education’ Research in Science Education 27 IssueID3 461–481
C. Robson (2002) Real World Research. A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers Blackwell Oxford
P. M. Rowell B. J. Gustafson S. M. Guilbert (1999) ArticleTitle‘Characterization of Technology Within an Elementary Science Program’ International Journal of Technology and Design Education 9 37–55 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008899911931
S. Sjøberg (1995) ArticleTitle‘Technology Education: Diversity or Chaos?’ Studies in Science Education 25 143–153
M. J. Wiener (1981) English Culture and the Decline of the Industrial Spirit 1850–1980 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
R. K. Yin (1994) Case Study Research. Design and Methods Sage Publications Thousand Oaks, California
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bungum, B. Transferring and Transforming Technology Education: A Study of Norwegian Teachers’ Perceptions of Ideas from Design & Technology. Int J Technol Des Educ 16, 31–52 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-005-2111-7
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-005-2111-7