Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Technology Education: The Promise of Cultural-Historical Theory for Advancing the Field

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pedagogy for Technology Education in Secondary Schools

Part of the book series: Contemporary Issues in Technology Education ((CITE))

  • 1394 Accesses

Abstract

Although technology education has a long history in practice (i.e. apprenticeship model, guilds), the theorisation of learning technology and design is relatively recent when compared with other disciplines, such as science education. Consequently, this chapter examines how scholars of technology education in contemporary times have theorised their work in their quest for better understanding how teachers teach and young people learn in technology education. To achieve this goal, this chapter conceptualises the outcomes of this focused theoretical review by examining the essence of what constitutes constructivism, social-constructivism, sociocultural theory and cultural-historical theory. In drawing upon primary sources, the questions posed for critique are: How does each inform design and technology education? What is unique to each? What is the same? What might be the gaps? A critique of the grey zone between social constructivism and cultural-historical theory will be made in the context of theories placed on a continuum, which moves from ‘in the head’ and ‘in the hand’, to a dialectical relation between cultural and societal contexts and the cultural development of the person through technology education. It is argued that through examining the alignment, contradictions and movement of thought practice, a theoretically informed discussion of learning the practice and knowledge of technology and design is possible. The chapter concludes by returning to the theoretical review to present a discussion on the place of theory for informing a dialectical understanding of how young people learn and teachers teach in technology and design education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AP images. (2018). http://www.apimages.com/metadata/Index/Self-Driving-Vehicle-Fatality/d7a9837e1275452d84aed6ea70a7f9ec/2/0). Accessed 12th July 2018.

  • Barlex, D. (2012). Curriculum development. In P. J. Williams (Ed.), Technology education for teachers. International Technology Education Studies. (pp. 196–230). Sense Publishers, Rotterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlex, D. (2017). Disruptive technologies. In P. J. Williams & K. Stables (Eds.), Critique in design and technology education. Contemporary issues in technology education. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, J. R. (2014). Technological knowledge and artifacts: An analytical view, In De Vries, J.R. (eds). Defining technological literacy. Towards an epistemological framework. Palgrave MacMillan, New York, US, (pp. 23–40).

    Google Scholar 

  • Djordjevic, B., Spirtovic, O., & Acimovic, D. (2016). Social constructivism and technology. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 7(11), 178–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eames, C. (2016). Exploring teacher pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) development using CoRes (content representations). In D. S. P. Gedera & P. J. Williams (Eds.), Activity theory in education. Research and practice (pp. 169–182). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Education Council. (2018). Optimising STEM industry-school partnerships: Inspiring Australia’s next generation, final report, STEM Partnership Forum, Carlton South, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engestrom, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engestrom, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fox-Turnbull, W. H. (2015). Conversations to support learning in technology education. In P. J. Williams, A. Jones, & C. Buntting (Eds.), The future of technology education (pp. 99–120). Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firat, M. (2017). Growing misconception of technology: Investigation of elementary students’ recondition of and reasoning about technological artifacts. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27, 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9351-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleury, S., & Garrison, J. (2014). Toward a new philosophical anthropology of education: Fuller considerations of social constructivism. Interchange, 45, 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-014-9216-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (2005). Funds of knowledge. In Theorizing practices in households, communities and classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumbo, M. T. (2015). Indigenous technology in technology education curricula and teaching. In P. J. Williams, A. Jones, & C. Buntting (Eds.), The future of technology education (pp. 57–76). Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. M., & Caro, R. (2017). Building TPACK in preservice teachers through explicit course design. Technology Trends, 61, 106–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/w11528-016-0120-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head, G., & Dakers, J. (2005). Verillon’s trio and Wenger’s community: Learning in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14, 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedegaard, M. (2012). Analyzing children’s learning and development in everyday settings from a cultural-historical wholeness approach. Mind Culture and Activity, 19(2), 127–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Himmelreich, J. (2018). The everyday ethical challenges of self-driving cars Posted March 27, 2018 9.42pm AEDT, The Conversation, http://theconversation.com/the-everyday-ethical-challenges-of-self-driving-cars-92710. Accessed 12th July 2018.

  • Jones, A., Buntting, C., & de Vries, M. J. (2013). The developing field of technology education: A review to look forward. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23, 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9174-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotezee, B. (2010). Seven posers in the constructivist classroom. London Review of Education, 8(2), 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460.2010.487340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koycu, U., & de Vries, M. J. (2016). What preconceptions and attitudes about engineering are prevalent amongst upper secondary school pupils? An international study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26, 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9306-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krahenbuhl, K. S. (2016). Student-centered education and constructivism: Challenges, concerns and clarity for teachers. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 89(3), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2016.1191311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leontiev, A. N., & Luria, A. R. (2005). The problem of the development of the intellect and learning in human psychology. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 43(4), 34–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C. H., & Matthews, R. (2005). Vygotsky’s philosophy: Constructivism and its criticisms examined. International Education Journal, 6(3), 386–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockley, J. (2016). Teachers designing classroom cultural through the lens of cultural-historical theory. In D. S. P. Gedera & P. J. Williams (Eds.), Activity theory in education. Research and practice (pp. 183–198). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mapotse, T. A. (2017). Development of a technology education cascading theory through community engagement site-based support. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9411-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Situating constructionism. In S. Papert & I. Harel (Eds.), Constructionism. New York: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlova. (2015). Design and technology education for sustainable futures: In preparation for global citizenship. In K. Stables & S. Keirl (Eds.), Environment, ethics and cultures. Design and technology education’s contribution to sustainable global futures (pp. 87–100). Rotterdam Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrina, S. (2000). The political ecology of design and technology education: An inquiry into methods. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10, 207–237. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008955016067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharff, R. C., & Dusek, V. (Eds.). (2003). Philosophy of technology. The technological condition. An anthology. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeman, K. (2015). Designing for cultural groups and humanization: Two ideas from design anthropology. In K. Stables & S. Keirl (Eds.), Environment, ethics and cultures. Design and technology education’s contribution to sustainable global futures (pp. 101–118). Rotterdam Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slatter, W., & France, B. (2011a). Taking part in the dance: Technology teachers interacting with communities of practice. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21, 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-010-9115-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slatter, W., & France, B. (2011b). The teacher-community of practice-student interaction in the New Zealand technology classroom. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21, 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-000-9111-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Problems of general psychology. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), Trans by N. Minick. The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky (Vol. 1). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1994). The problem of the environment. In J. Valsiner & R. vander Veer (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 347–348). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42(1), 7–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wajcman, J. (2004). TechnoFeminism. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wajcman, J. (2010). Feminist theories of technology. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/ben057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. P. (2016). Research in technology education: Looking back to move forward … again. International Journal Technological and Design Education, 26, 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9316-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J., Eames, C., Hume, A., & Lockley, J. (2012). Promoting pedagogical content knowledge development for early career secondary teachers in science and technology using content representations. Research in Science and Technological Education, 30(3), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/-2635143.2012.740005

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Marilyn Fleer

Authors
  1. Marilyn Fleer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marilyn Fleer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia

    P. John Williams

  2. University of Exeter Associate, Brighton, UK

    David Barlex

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fleer, M. (2020). Technology Education: The Promise of Cultural-Historical Theory for Advancing the Field. In: Williams, P.J., Barlex, D. (eds) Pedagogy for Technology Education in Secondary Schools. Contemporary Issues in Technology Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41548-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41548-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41547-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41548-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation