Abstract
This article is concerned both with the substantive policy issue of the implications of the European welfare state in a global setting and with the way in which economists analyse the welfare state. Economics has made a major contribution to our understanding of the welfare state through the provision of formal models. These have allowed us to see the implications of social protection for countries increasingly open to international competition. These models, however, leave out essential elements, and the standard Heckscher–Ohlin 2-good, 2-factor, 2-country assumptions impose too tight a straitjacket. We do not observe full factor price equalisation. The paper considers how we might relax this straitjacket to incorporate elements that are important in the public debate, while preserving tractability. The resulting 3×3×3 model is used to investigate the impact of globalisation on the welfare state, contrasting Europe and the US.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkinson, A. B. (1999). The economic consequences of rolling back the welfare state. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Atkinson, A. B. (2000). Is rising inequality inevitable? A critique of the transatlantic consensus. WIDER Annual Lecture 3, WIDER, Helsinki.
Corden, W. M., & Neary, J. P. (1982). Booming sector and de-industrialisation in a small open economt. Economic Journal, 92, 825–848.
Davis, D. R. (1998a). Does European unemployment prop up American wages? National labor markets and global trade. American Economic Review, 88, 478–494.
Davis, D. R. (1998b). Technology, unemployment and relative wages in a global economy. European Economic Review, 42, 1613–1633.
Dixit, A. K., & Norman, V. (1980). Theory of international trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Freeman, R., & Schettkat, R. (2001). Marketisation of production and the US–Europe employment gap. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 63, 647–660.
Freeman, R., & Schettkat, R. (2005). Marketisation of household production and the Europe–US gap in work. Economic Policy, 20(41), 6–50.
Haskel, J., & Slaughter, M. E. (2002). Does the sector bias of skill-biased technical change explain changing wage inequality? European Economic Review, 40, 1757–1783.
Krugman, P. (1994). Past and prospective causes of high unemployment. In Reducing unemployment: current issues and policy options. Kansas City: Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
Krugman, P. (1995). Growing world trade: causes and consequences. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1995(1), 327–362.
Manning, A., & Goos, M. (2003). Lousy and lovely jobs: the rising polarisation of work in Britain (CEP Discussion Paper 604).
Meade, J. E. (1964). Efficiency, equality and the ownership of property. London: Allen and Unwin.
Neary, J. P. (2001). Competition, trade and wages (Research Paper 2001/03). Globalisation and Labour Markets Programme, University of Nottingham.
Sinn, H.-W. (2005). Migration and social replacement incomes. International Tax and Public Finance, 12, 375–393.
Sinn, H.-W. (2006). The pathological export boom and the bazaar effect: how to solve the German puzzle (CESifo Working Paper No. 1708). University of Munich.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The first version of this paper was written while I was visiting the Economic Research Department of the Bank of Italy. I am most grateful to the Research Department for their hospitality, but make clear that the contents of the paper are solely my responsibility. The paper was presented at the April 2006 Netspar Conference in the Hague. I thank the discussants, André de Jong and Cees Oudshoorn, and the conference participants, for their helpful comments. The revision has benefited from the valuable suggestions of the referees and editors, and the final version has been greatly improved as a result of a conversation with Peter Neary. None of the above are to be held responsible for the remaining shortcomings of the paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Atkinson, A.B. The economics of the welfare state in today’s world. Int Tax Public Finance 15, 5–17 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-007-9052-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-007-9052-x