Allen, D. K., Brown, A., Karanasios, S., & Norman, A. (2013). How should technology-mediated organizational change be explained? A comparison of the contributions of critical realism and activity theory. MIS Quarterly 37, pp. 835-854. 10.25300/misq/2013/37.3.08
Allen, D. K., Karanasios, S., & Norman, A. (2014). Information sharing and interoperability: the case of major incident management. European Journal of Information Systems, 23, 418–432. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2013.8
Allen, D. K., Karanasios, S., & Slavova, M. (2011). Working with activity theory: Context, technology, and information behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(4), 776–788. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21441
Bag, S., Gupta, S., Kumar, A., & Sivarajah, U. (2021). An integrated artificial intelligence framework for knowledge creation and B2B marketing rational decision making for improving firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 92, 178–189.
Balakrishnan, J., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021). Role of cognitive absorption in building user trust and experience. Psychology & Marketing, 38(4), 643–668.
Behera, R. K., Bala, P. K., & Ray, A. (2021). Cognitive Chatbot for personalised contextual customer service: Behind the scene and beyond the hype. Information Systems Frontiers, pp. 1-21.
Borges, A. F. S., Laurindo, F. J. B., Spínola, M. M., Gonçalves, R. F., & Mattos, C. A. (2021). The strategic use of artificial intelligence in the digital era: Systematic literature review and future research directions. International Journal of Information Management., 57(September 2020), 102225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102225
Capper, P., & Williams, B. (2004). Cultural-historical activity theory: Enhancing evaluation using systems concepts. American Evaluation Association, pp. 1-12.
Castillo, D., Canhoto, A. I., & Said, E. (2020). The dark side of AI-powered service interactions: exploring the process of co-destruction from the customer perspective, The Service Industries Journal, pp. 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2020.1787993
Chen, R., Sharman, R., Rao, H. R., & Upadhyaya, S. J. (2013). Data model development for fire related extreme events: An activity theory approach. Mis Quarterly, pp. 125-147.
Chiu, Y.-T., Zhu, Y.-Q., & Corbett, J. (2021). In the hearts and minds of employees: A model of pre-adoptive appraisal toward artificial intelligence in organizations. International Journal of Information Management, 60, 102379.
Choudrie, J., Patil, S., Kotecha, K., Matta, N., & Pappas, I. (2021). Applying and understanding an advanced, novel deep learning approach: A Covid 19, text based, emotions analysis study. Information Systems Frontiers, 23(6), 1431–1465.
Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations, pp. 1-46.
Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32.
Davenport, T., Guha, A., Grewal, D., & Bressgott, T. (2020). How artificial intelligence will change the future of marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 24–42.
De Bruyn, A., Viswanathan, V., Beh, Y. S., Brock, J. K. U., & von Wangenheim, F. (2020). Artificial intelligence and marketing: pitfalls and opportunities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 51, 91–105.
Dennehy, D., Pappas, I. O., Wamba, S. F., & Michael, K. (2021). Socially responsible information systems development: the role of AI and business analytics. Information Technology & People, 34(6), 1541–1550.
Dennehy, D., & Conboy, K. (2019). Breaking the flow: a study of contradictions in information systems development (ISD). Information Technology & People, 33(2), 477–501. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-02-2018-0102
Dennehy, D., Conboy, K., Ferreira, J., & Babu, J. (2020). Sustaining Open Source Communities by Understanding the Influence of Discursive Manifestations on Sentiment. Information Systems Frontiers, pp.1-17.
Dennehy, D., & Conboy, K. (2017). Going with the flow: An activity theory analysis of flow techniques in software development. Journal of Systems and Software, 133, 160–173.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., Galanos, V., Ilavarasan, P. V., Janssen, M., Jones, P., Kar, A. K., Kizgin, H., Kronemann, B., Lal, B., Lucini, B., … Williams, M. D. (2021a). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, August, 101994.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Ismagilova, E., Rana, N. P., & Raman, R. (2021b). Social media adoption, usage and impact in business-to-business (B2B) context: A state-of-the-art literature review. Information Systems Frontiers, pp. 1-23.
Effah, J., & Adam, I. O. (2021). Examining Client-Vendor Relationship in the Outsourcing of a Work Environment Virtualisation: An Activity Theory Perspective. Information Systems Frontiers, pp. 1-15.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
Engeström, Y. (2000). Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics, 43(7), 960–974.
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14, 133–156.
Engeström, Y., & Kerosuo, H. (2007). From workplace learning to inter-organizational learning and back: the contribution of activity theory. Journal of Workplace Learning, 19(6), 336–342. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665620710777084
Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R.-L. (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge University Press.
Ferreira, J., Dennehy, D., Babu, J., & Conboy, K. (2019). ‘Winning of hearts and minds: Integrating sentiment analytics into the analysis of contradictions,’ The 18th International IFIP Conference on e-Business, e-Services and e-Society, September 2019, Norway.
Foot, K. A. (2001). Cultural-historical activity theory as practice theory: Illuminating the development of conflict-monitoring network. Communication Theory, 11(1), 56–83.
Han, R., Lam, H. K. S., Zhan, Y., Wang, Y., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Tan, K. H. (2021). Artificial intelligence in business-to-business marketing: a bibliometric analysis of current research status, development and future directions. Industrial Management & Data Systems, ahead-of-p(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-05-2021-0300
Hasan, H., & Banna, S. (2012). The unit of analysis in IS theory: The case for activity. Information Systems Foundations, 191, 3–33.
Hasan, H., Gould, E., & Hyland, P. (Eds.). (1998). Information systems and activity theory: tools in context. University of Wollongong Press.
Hasan, H., Kazluaskas, A., & Crawford, K. P. (2010). Blending complexity and activity frameworks for a broader and deeper understanding of IS. In Proceedings of the Thirty First International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), St. Louis, USA.
Hasan, H., Smith, S., & Finnegan, P. (2017). An activity theoretic analysis of the mediating role of information systems in tackling climate change adaptation. Information Systems Journal, 27(3), 271–308.
Helle, M. (2000). Disturbances and contradictions as tools for understanding work in the newsroom. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 12(1), 81–113.
Huang, M., & Rust, R. T. (2021). A strategic framework for artificial intelligence in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49(1), 30–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-020-00749-9
Irnazarow, A., Allen, D., & McKay, A. (2019). Investigating collaborative information behaviours in complex product development work. In 2019 SIG-USE Symposium Paper Presentations. SIG-USE.
Jaakkola, E., & Hakanen, T. (2013). Value co-creation in solution networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.11.005
Jones, O., & Holt, R. (2008). The creation and evolution of new business ventures: an activity theory perspective. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000810850847
Kaptelinin, V. (1996). Activity theory: Implications for human-computer interaction. Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction, 1, 103–116.
Karanasios, S. (2018). Toward a unified view of technology and activity: The contribution of activity theory to information systems research. Information Technology & People, 31(1), 134–155.
Karanasios, S., & Allen, D. (2014). Mobile technology in mobile work: contradictions and congruencies in activity systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 23, 529–542.
Kietzmann, J. (2008). Interactive innovation of technology for mobile work. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(3), 305–320.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2012). Marketing Management (14th ed.). Pearson.
Kuutti, K. (1995). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction, 1744.
Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Published in B. Nardi (ed.): Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human Computer Interaction, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1995, pp. 17-44.
Leone, D., Schiavone, F., Appio, F. P., & Chiao, B. (2020). How does artificial intelligence enable and enhance value co-creation in industrial markets? An exploratory case study in the healthcare ecosystem. Journal of Business Research, 129(May 2021), 849–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.008
Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Prentice-Hall.
Leontiev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the Development of Mind. Progress.
Liu, X. (2020). Analyzing the impact of user-generated content on B2B Firms’ stock performance: Big data analysis with machine learning methods. Industrial Marketing Management, 86(April), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.02.021
Malaurent, J., & Karanasios, S. (2020). Learning from workaround practices: The challenge of enterprise system implementations in multinational corporations. Information Systems Journal, 30(4), 639–663.
Martínez-López, F. J., & Casillas, J. (2013). Artificial intelligence-based systems applied in industrial marketing: An historical overview, current and future insights. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(4), 489–495.
Meadows, M., Merendino, A., Dibb, S., Garcia-Perez, A., Hinton, M., Papagiannidis, S., Pappas, I., & Wang, H. (2022). Tension in the data environment: How organisations can meet the challenge. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121315.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis. Sage.
Murphy, E., & Manzanares, M. A. R. (2008). Contradictions between the virtual and physical high school classroom: A third-generation Activity Theory perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 1061–1072.
Mursu, Á., Luukkonen, I., Toivanen, M., & Korpela, M. (2007). Activity Theory in Information Systems Research and Practice: Theoretical Underpinnings for an Information Systems Development Model. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 12(3).
Nardi, B. A. (1996). Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction, pp. 7-16.
Noy, C. (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 327–344.
Pappas, I. O., Mikalef, P., Giannakos, M. N., Krogstie, J., & Lekakos, G. (2018). Big data and business analytics ecosystems: paving the way towards digital transformation and sustainable societies. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 16(3), 479–491.
Paschen, J., Pitt, C., & Kietzmann, J. (2020a). Artificial intelligence: Building blocks and an innovation typology. Business Horizons, 63(2), 147–155.
Paschen, J., Wilson, M., & Ferreira, J. J. (2020b). Collaborative intelligence: How human and artificial intelligence create value along the B2B sales funnel. Business Horizons, 63(3), 403–414.
Ryu, C., Kim, Y. J., Chaudhury, A., & Rua, H.-R. (2005). Knowledge acquisition via three learning processes in enterprise information portals: Learning-by-investment, learning-by-doing, and learning-from-others. MIS Quarterly, 29, 245–278.
Schatzki, T. R. (1998). Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge University Press.
Schulz, T., Böhm, M., Gewald, H., Celik, Z., & Krcmar, H. (2020a). The negative effects of institutional logic multiplicity on service platforms in intermodal mobility ecosystems. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 62, 417–433.
Schulz, T., Gewald, H., Böhm, M., & Krcmar, H. (2020b). Smart mobility: Contradictions in value co-creation. Information Systems Frontiers, pp. 1-21. 10.1007/s10796-020-10055-y
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques. Sage publications.
Syam, N., & Sharma, A. (2018). Waiting for a sales renaissance in the fourth industrial revolution: Machine learning and artificial intelligence in sales research and practice. Industrial Marketing Management, 69, 135–146.
Upadhyay, N., Upadhyay, S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021). Theorizing artificial intelligence acceptance and digital entrepreneurship model. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, ahead-of-p(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-01-2021-0052.
Vargo, S. L., Lusch, R. F., Akaka, M. A., & He, Y. (2017). Service-dominant logic: A review and assessment. Review of Marketing Research, pp.125-167.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the development of children, 23, 34–41.
White, L., Burger, K., & Yearworth, M. (2016). Understanding behaviour in problem structuring methods interventions with activity theory. European Journal of Operational Research, 249, 983–1004.
Wiredu, G. O., & Sørensen, C. (2006). The dynamics of control and mobile computing in distributed activities. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(3), 307–319.
Zou, J., & Schiebinger, L. (2018). AI Can Be Sexist and Racist-It's Time to Make It Fair. Nature, 559(7714), 324–326.