The analysis started with an inception phase in which – in interaction with the stakeholders – a joint problem statement and the development objectives for the area were formulated. The problem statement and objectives formed the base on which the criteria/indicators were determined that the stakeholders want to use in the evaluation of alternative development strategies. The indicators have a direct link with the objectives and include, among others:
-
Reliability drinking of water supply (%)
-
Supply/demand ratio of agriculture (%)
-
Agricultural production (tons/year)
-
Hamoun ‘production’ (fish, birds, reeds, in tons/year)
-
Ecology of Hamouns
-
Health
-
Income stakeholders
As reference for the income of the stakeholders and the ecosystem condition the situation in the decade 1970–1980 has been selected as this period was considered to be good, even though also in this period dry years occurred. Nature and people have adapted to the variability in water supply and they can survive ‘normal’ dry years. The indicators that use this reference express how much will be deviated from this.
The next step was to develop scenarios and strategies. A clear distinction was made between ‘scenarios’ that represent external developments that cannot be influenced by the decision makers involved in the water resources in the Sistan area and ‘strategies’ that include the interventions that these people can actually decide upon. The main scenario elements were population growth in the area and upstream developments in Afghanistan, more or less determining the boundary conditions with respect to demand and supply respectively. Strategy elements included supply oriented measures (such as additional reservoir capacity and the operation of the reservoirs), demand oriented measures (in particular related to agriculture), ecology oriented measures (legislation and enforcement, landscaping the Hamouns and Chahnimeh reservoirs to make them more suitable for ecology, etc.) and the increase/decrease of the area of irrigated agriculture.
The actual analysis process is still going on and is carried out in close cooperation with the stakeholders. Reference is made to the full documentation of the project that will be prepared by WRI and SBWRA. Below only the specific issue of agricultural growth will be described. The base case was the present situation: 120,000 ha irrigated area with only 3 Chahnimeh reservoirs to be used for public water supply only. The following agriculture-related strategies were developed:
-
Strategy 1
the construction of Chahnimeh-4, to be used for public water supply only
-
Strategy 2
same as strategy 1 but with allowed use of Chahnimeh-4 for irrigation also
-
Strategy 3
an increase of the present irrigation area of 120,000 ha with an additional 125,000 ha, no use to be made of the Chahnimeh reservoirs for irrigation
-
Strategy 4
same as strategy 3 but will Chahnimeh-4 and allowed use for irrigation
-
Strategy 5
a decrease in irrigation area from the present 120,000 ha to 21.000 ha (in order to see the effects on the Hamouns)
All these strategies assume that the Hamouns are managed well and no over-exploitation of the natural resources takes place. As external scenario, the present situation in Afghanistan is assumed which includes the Kajaki and Arghandab reservoirs and about 240,000 ha irrigation. In this scenario, the average inflow from Afghanistan will be 5,795 MCM/year. To get some idea about the effects of upstream developments the base case is also evaluated for a scenario in which major upstream developments in Afghanistan will take place and the available water for Iran will reduce to about 3,257 MCM/year.
The impacts of these scenarios in terms of the defined indicators have been calculated by using the RIBASIM model as described above. A (partly reconstructed) time series of 55 years of inflows and climatological conditions (rainfall, evaporation) have been used to determine the average impacts. The average results are given in the score card of Table 2.
Table 2 Score card of alternative agricultural development strategies
The following preliminary conclusions can be drawn from this scorecard.
-
Base case (present situation). Note the rather low supply/demand ratio for irrigation (0.63) which means that in many years there will be insufficient water available to cultivate the full present irrigation area.
-
Strategy 1 (Chahnimeh 4 constructed). The storage of water for public water supply will, as expected, deteriorate the conditions for agriculture somewhat. The conditions for the Hamouns hardly change.
-
Strategy 2 (Chahnimeh reservoirs also used for irrigation). The agricultural sector clearly benefits from this strategy. At the other hand the reliability of the public water supply system decreased. Optimization of the operation rules of the reservoirs (applying hedging rules) should be able to improve this.
-
Strategy 3 (increase of irrigation area without reservoir use). The agricultural production will increase somewhat compared to strategy 2 but the reliability of the supply drops to a level (0.42) that will be unacceptable for farmers. The ecological conditions of the Hamouns deteriorate clearly. The return period of a dry Hamoun-e-Saberi increases with corresponding dangers for sand storms. Also the return period of flushing of the Hamouns increases (once in 17 years now) which will result in an increase of the salt concentration of the Hamouns.
-
Strategy 4 (as strategy 3 but now with allowed use of the Chahnimeh reservoirs for irrigation). This strategy improves the performance of the agricultural sector somewhat but the reliability of the supply remains too low (0.45). This is caused by the fact that the reservoir capacity is limited. The reliability of the public water supply decreases dramatically but this can be improved by applying different operation rules.
-
Strategy 5 (decrease in irrigation area to 21,000 ha). As expected the agricultural production will drop but the reliability of the supply increases substantially which will be good for the remaining farmers. The ecological conditions improve considerably.
Besides these five strategies also the impacts have been calculated of a strong decrease of available water from Afghanistan (scenario 2). This is only done for the base case (present situation). From Table 2 it becomes clear that such scenario will have disastrous effects for the agricultural activities in the Sistan delta and for the Hamouns.
It is noted, that the effects of an increase of the demand in Afghanistan is much more than a similar kind of increase in Iran. This is due to the fact that a development in Iran will mainly influence the Hamoun-e-Hirmand, leaving the two other larger Hamouns (Hamoun-e-Puzak and Hamoun-e-Saberi) intact. Developments in Afghanistan will influence all three Hamouns and will result in a nearly complete collapse of the ecology of the Hamouns.
The above results should be considered with great care, in particular the conclusions with respect to the Hamoun-related effects. At the other hand, the calculated impacts seem reasonable and can be used to support the decision making process. Basically the following overall conclusions can be drawn:
-
The use of water for irrigated agriculture is mainly restricted by the variability of the supply and not by the total supply.
-
This makes sustainable irrigation of the present 120,000 ha in the Sistan Delta only possible if use can be made of the storage capacity of the Chahnimeh reservoirs for irrigation water also. Only in that case can a sufficient and reliable supply be guaranteed, which is needed for economically sound agricultural practices.
-
Further increase of the irrigation area without the use of the Chahnimeh reservoirs does not make sense at all. Even if use can be made of the Chahnimeh reservoirs the reliability of the supply will be too low to sustain normal irrigated agriculture.
-
There is a direct relation between the use of water for irrigated agriculture and the environmental conditions in the area. Water consumed by agriculture will not be available anymore for the wetlands, resulting in a lower average water cover and corresponding impacts on ecology and health. Effluent water from the agricultural area poses a water quality related risk, but the discussion of this aspect is beyond the goals of this paper.
-
Developments in the upstream areas can have disastrous impacts for the downstream areas. The Chahnimeh reservoirs will take care that the public water supply will not be endangered but the availability of water for irrigation will substantially decrease and the average area of the Hamouns will be much smaller. The frequency of a complete drying out of the Hamouns as happened in the period 2000–2005 will increase with all related problems for ecology and health (sandstorms).
-
Developing the basin and the delta while at the same time protecting the Hamouns requires an intensive cooperation between Afghanistan and Iran.