Skip to main content
Log in

Full- versus partial-thickness sutures: experimental models of corneal injury repair

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the performance of full-thickness (FT) versus partial-thickness (PT) sutures in a full-thickness corneal wound in an animal model.

Methods

This is a prospective, experimental, comparative, longitudinal study. A 6-mm linear, full-thickness corneal incision was performed on the right eye of eight domestic pigs. Eyes were randomly assigned for repair with interrupted PT (80–90% depth) sutures or FT 10-0 nylon sutures. Anterior segment OCT, corneal pachymetry and clinical photographs were obtained 1, 4 and 8 weeks postoperatively. Corneal thickness, depth of suture placement, perilesional edema, coaptation of wound edges and complications were noted. Histopathologic examination was performed at 8 weeks.

Results

100% of the eyes with FT sutures developed a linear, less opaque scar. 100% of the eyes with PT developed a dense, opaque stromal scar (p = 0.02). Vascularization of the cornea was present in 75% of PT group and 25% in the FT group (p = 0.50). As the corneas healed, there was a marked trend toward thicker corneas in the PT group versus FT group with a median difference of − 63 µm at week 1 [median 788 µm vs. 725 µm, (p = 0.11)], − 38 µm at week 4, (724 µm vs. 686 µm, (p = 0.63)) and − 47 µm median difference at week 8 with (670 µm vs. 623 µm, (p = 0.06)). Histopathology showed disorganization of the collagen fibers and the formation of a retrocorneal fibrous membrane in the PT group.

Conclusions

The FT group presented less corneal edema at week 8 with a more linear and less opaque scar. Histopathology showed a better-organized scar and endothelialization without the formation of a fibrous membrane.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Oum BS, Lee JS, Han YS (2004) Clinical features of ocular trauma in emergency department. Korean J Ophthalmol 18(1):70–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Xie L, Zhai H, Dong X, Shi W (2008) Primary diseases of corneal perforation in Shandong Province, China: a 10-year retrospective study. Am J Ophthalmol 145(4):662–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuhn F (2013) Ocular traumatology: from military medicine to individual brilliance. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251(3):627–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lovald ST, Rau A, Nissman S et al (2017) Finite element analysis and experimental evaluation of penetrating injury through the cornea. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 66:104–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vora GK, Haddadin R, Chodosh J (2013) Management of corneal lacerations and perforations. Int Ophthalmol Clin 53(4):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hamill MB, Thompson WS (1990) The evaluation and management of corneal lacerations. Retina 10(Suppl 1):S1–S7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang T, Zhu L, Peng Y et al (2017) Photochemical cross-linking for penetrating corneal wound closure in enucleated porcine eyes. Curr Eye Res 42(11):1413–1419

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Myer CM 4th, Johnson CM, Postma GN, Weinberger PM (2015) Comparison of tensile strength of fibrin glue and suture in microflap closure. Laryngoscope 125(1):167–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hamill MB (2002) Corneal and scleral trauma. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 15(2):185–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuhn F (2007) Ocular traumatology. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fini ME, Stramer BM (2005) How the cornea heals: cornea-specific repair mechanisms affecting surgical outcomes. Cornea 24(8 Suppl):S2–S11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ljubimov AV, Saghizadeh M (2015) Progress in corneal wound healing. Prog Retin Eye Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.07.002

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kling S, Hafezi F (2017) Corneal biomechanics—a review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 37(3):240–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sanchez I, Martin R, Ussa F, Fernandez-Bueno I (2011) The parameters of the porcine eyeball. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249(4):475–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Faber C, Scherfig E, Prause JU, Sørensen KE (2008) Corneal thickness in pigs measured by ultrasound pachymetry in vivo. Scand J Lab Anim Sci 35(1):39–43

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Siatiri H, Moghimi S, Malihi M et al (2008) Use of sealant (HFG) in corneal perforations. Cornea 27(9):988–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Setlik DE, Seldomridge DL, Adelman RA et al (2005) The effectiveness of isobutyl cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive for the treatment of corneal perforations. Am J Ophthalmol 140(5):920–921

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Miki D, Dastgheib K, Kim T et al (2002) A photopolymerized sealant for corneal lacerations. Cornea 21(4):393–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zheng K, Huang H, Peng K et al (2016) Change of optical intensity during healing process of corneal wound on anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Sci Rep 6(32352):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  20. Massey JY, Hanna C (1974) Penetrating keratoplasty with use of through-and-through nylon sutures. Arch Ophthalmol 91(5):381–385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Berens C, King JH (1961) An atlas of ophthalmic surgery. JB Lippincott Co., Philadelphia, pp 258–259

    Google Scholar 

  22. Macsai MS (2000) The management of corneal trauma advances in the past twenty-five years. Cornea 19(5):617–624

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bobrova NF, Shevchyk VI, Kulbida MP (2011) A -term results of full-thickness suture method of primary surgical treatment of penetrating corneal wound. Oftalmol zh. 3:8–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Varley GA, Meisler DM (1991) Complications of penetrating keratoplasty: graft infections. Refract Corneal Surg 7(1):62–66

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rocher M, Robert PY, Desmoulière A (2020) The myofibroblasts, biological activities and roles in eye repair and fibrosis. A focus on healing mechanisms in avascular cornea. Eye 34(2):232–240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Matsuda A, Tagawa Y, Matsuda H et al (1997) Expression of macrophage migration inhibition factor in corneal wound healing in rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38(8):1555–1562

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This project was financed by a pilot-study fund from the Asociación para Evitar la Ceguera en México, Hospital “Dr. Luis Sánchez Bulnes”, Ciudad de México, México, and was approved by the Ethics Committee of this institution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Dalma-Weiszhausz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dalma-Weiszhausz, J., Galván-Chávez, M., Guinto-Arcos, E.B. et al. Full- versus partial-thickness sutures: experimental models of corneal injury repair. Int Ophthalmol 41, 325–334 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01585-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01585-0

Keywords

Navigation