Abbott, K. W. (2012). The transnational regime complex for climate change. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(4), 571–590. https://doi.org/10.1068/c11127.
Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (2015). International organizations as orchestrators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
America’s Pledge. (2017). America’s pledge on climate change. Americas Pledge On Climate. https://www.americaspledgeonclimate.com/. Accessed January 19, 2018.
Andersen, S. O. (2015). Lessons from the stratospheric ozone layer protection for climate. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 5(2), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-014-0213-9.
Andersen, S. O., & Sarma, K. M. (2002). Protecting the ozone layer: The United Nations history. Sterling, VA: Earthscan Publications.
Arts, B. (2000). Regimes, non-state actors and the state system: A “structurational” regime model. European Journal of International Relations, 6(4), 513–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066100006004003.
Aykut, S. C., Foyer, J., & Morena, E. (Eds.). (2017). Globalising the climate: COP21 and the climatisation of global debates (1st ed.). London: Routledge.
Bäckstrand, K., Kuyper, J. W., Linnér, B.-O., & Lövbrand, E. (2017). Non-state actors in global climate governance: From Copenhagen to Paris and beyond. Environmental Politics, 26(4), 561–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1327485.
Betsill, M. M. (2015). Building productive links between the UNFCCC and the broader global climate governance landscape 1. Global Environmental Politics, 15(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00294.
Betsill, M. M. (2017). Trump’s Paris withdrawal and the reconfiguration of global climate change governance. Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment, 15(3), 189–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/10042857.2017.1343908.
Betsill, M. M., & Corell, E. (2008). NGO diplomacy: The influence of nongovernmental organizations in international environmental negotiations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., van Asselt, H., & Zelli, F. (2009). The fragmentation of global governance architectures: A framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics, 9, 14–40. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2009.9.4.14.
Bulkeley, H., Andonova, L., Betsill, M. M., Compagnon, D., Hale, T., Hoffmann, M. J., et al. (2014). Transnational climate change governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cao, X., & Ward, H. (2017). Transnational climate governance networks and domestic regulatory action. International Interactions, 43(1), 76–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2016.1220162.
Chan, S., Ellinger, P., & Widerberg, O. (2018). Exploring national and regional orchestration of non-state action for a < 1.5 °C world. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-018-9384-2.
Chan, S., & Pauw, P. (2014). A global framework for climate action—Orchestrating non-state and subnational initiatives for more effective global climate governance (Discussion Paper No. 34/2014). Bonn: Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik. http://www.die-gdi.de/uploads/media/DP_34.2014.pdf. Accessed April 7, 2018.
Climate Action Tracker. (2017). Assessment of the argentinian NDC. http://climateactiontracker.org/countries/argentina.html. Accessed January 22, 2018.
Climate Interactive. (2017). US subnational climate action. Climate Interactive. https://www.climateinteractive.org/programs/us-subnational-climate-action/. Accessed January 22, 2018.
Cornwall, W. (2017). Can U.S. states and cities overcome Paris exit? Science, 356(6342), 1000. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.356.6342.1000.
De Búrca, G., Keohane, R. O., & Sabel, C. (2014). Global experimentalist governance. British Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 477–486. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123414000076.
El Haite, H., & Tubiana, L. (2016). Marrakech partnership for global climate action. UNFCCC. https://unfccc.int/files/paris_agreement/application/pdf/marrakech_partnership_for_global_climate_action.pdf. Accessed April 7, 2018.
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2010). The dynamics of transitions: A socio-technical perspective. In J. Grin, J. Rotmans, & J. Schot (Eds.), Transitions to sustainable development—New directions in the study of long term transformative change (pp. 11–104). New York: Routledge.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gonzalez, M., Taddonio, K. N., & Sherman, N. J. (2015). The Montreal Protocol: How today’s successes offer a pathway to the future. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 5(2), 122–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-014-0208-6.
Graichen, P., Healy, S., Siemons, A., Höhne, N., Kuramochi, T., Gonzales-Zuniga, S., et al. (2016). International climate initiatives—A way forward to close the emissions gap? Initiatives’ potential and role under the Paris Agreement (Discussion Paper No. 31/2016). Dessau-Roßlau: Umweltbundesamt. http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/international-climate-initiatives-a-way-forward-to. Accessed January 10, 2017.
Grubb, M. (2010). Copenhagen: Back to the future. Climate Policy, 10(2), 127–130.
Gupta, J., & Sarkar, S. (2017). “Non-state actors are driving the bus”: The role of the US at COP23. https://www.thethirdpole.net/2017/11/15/non-state-actors-are-driving-the-bus-the-role-of-the-us-at-cop23/. Accessed April 7, 2018.
Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(01), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300001442.
Hale, T., & Roger, C. (2014). Orchestration and transnational climate governance. The Review of International Organizations, 9(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-013-9174-0.
Hermwille, L. (2016a). Climate change as a transformation challenge—A new climate policy paradigm? GAIA: Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25(1), 19–22. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.1.6.
Hermwille, L. (2016b). The role of narratives in socio-technical transitions—Fukushima and the energy regimes of Japan, Germany, and the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science, 11, 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.11.001.
Hermwille, L., Obergassel, W., Ott, H. E., & Beuermann, C. (2017). UNFCCC before and after Paris—What’s necessary for an effective climate regime? Climate Policy, 17(2), 150–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1115231.
Hoffmann, M. J. (2011). Climate governance at the crossroads: Experimenting with a global response after Kyoto. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Höhne, N., Braun, N., Ellermann, C., & Blok, K. (2014). Towards a policy menu to strengthen the ambition to mitigate greenhouse gases. Cologne: Ecofys. http://www.ecofys.com/files/files/ecofys-2014-towards-a-policy-menu-to-mitigate-ghg.pdf. Accessed April 7, 2018.
IISD Reporting Services. (2018). Earth negotiation bulletin—Coverage of climate and atmosphere meetings. http://enb.iisd.org/process/climate_atm.htm#climate. Accessed January 19, 2018.
IPCC. (2014). Chapter 13—International cooperation: Agreements and instruments. In Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 1001–1082). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jordan, A., & Huitema, D. (2014). Policy innovation in a changing climate: Sources, patterns and effects. Global Environmental Change, 29, 387–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.005.
Jordan, A., Huitema, D., Hildén, M., van Asselt, H., Rayner, T. J., Schoenefeld, J. J., et al. (2015). Emergence of polycentric climate governance and its future prospects. Nature Climate Change. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2725.
Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9(01), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592710004068.
Kuyper, J. W., Linnér, B.-O., & Schroeder, H. (2018). Non-state actors in hybrid global climate governance: Justice, legitimacy, and effectiveness in a post-Paris era. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.497.
McGinnis, M., & Ostrom, E. (1996). Design principles for local and global commons. In O. R. Young (Ed.), The international political economy and international institutions (Vol. 2, pp. 465–493). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Meadows, D. H. (1999). Leverage points—Places to intervene in a system. Hartland, VT: The Sustainability Institute. http://donellameadows.org/wp-content/userfiles/Leverage_Points.pdf. Accessed May 6, 2016.
Michaelowa, K., & Michaelowa, A. (2017). Transnational climate governance initiatives: Designed for effective climate change mitigation? International Interactions, 43(1), 129–155.
Milkoreit, M. (2017). Mindmade politics: The cognitive roots of international climate governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustenable de la República Argentina. (2017). Gabinete Nacional de Cambio Climático. Borrador Informe 2017. Buenos Aires: Dirección Nacional de Cambio Climático, Subsecretaría Cambio Climático y Desarrollo Sustenable.
Miskimmon, A., O’Loughlin, B., & Roselle, L. (2013). Strategic narratives: Communication power and the new world order. New York: Routledge.
Morseletto, P., Biermann, F., & Pattberg, P. (2016). Governing by targets: Reductio ad unum and evolution of the two-degree climate target. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-016-9336-7.
Nasiritousi, N., Hjerpe, M., & Linnér, B.-O. (2016). The roles of non-state actors in climate change governance: Understanding agency through governance profiles. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(1), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-014-9243-8.
Newell, P. (2000). Climate for change: Non-state actors and the global politics of the greenhouse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Newell, P., Pattberg, P., & Schroeder, H. (2012). Multiactor governance and the environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37(1), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-020911-094659.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge [etc.]: Cambridge University Press.
Obergassel, W., Arens, C., Hermwille, L., Kreibich, N., Mersmann, F., Ott, H. E., et al. (2015). Phoenix from the ashes: An analysis of the Paris Agreement to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change—Part I. Environmental Law and Management, 27, 243–262.
Obergassel, W., Arens, C., Hermwille, L., Kreibich, N., Mersmann, F., Ott, H. E., et al. (2016). Phoenix from the ashes: An analysis of the Paris Agreement to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change—Part II. Environmental Law and Management, 28, 3–12.
Oberthür, S. (2016). Reflections on global climate politics post Paris: Power, interests and polycentricity. The International Spectator, 51(4), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2016.1242256.
Oberthür, S., & Gehring, T. (Eds.). (2006). Institutional interaction in global environmental governance: Synergy and conflict among international and EU policies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Office of Governor of the State of California. (2017). Governor Brown Meets with President Xi of the People’s Republic of China, Signs Agreement with National Government to Boost Green Technology. http://gov.ca.gov/news.php?id=19832. Accessed January 22, 2018.
Okereke, C., Bulkeley, H., & Schroeder, H. (2009). Conceptualizing climate governance beyond the international regime. Global Environmental Politics, 9(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2009.9.1.58.
Ostrom, E. (2014). A polycentric approach for coping with climate change. Annals of Economics and Finance, 15(1), 97–134.
Ott, H. E., Hermwille, L., & Obergassel, W. (2017). International climate policy: Trumping trump (inbrief No. 3–2017). Wuppertal/Berlin: Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy. https://wupperinst.org/fa/redaktion/downloads/publications/In_Brief_2017-3_en.pdf. Accessed July 21, 2017.
Ott, H. E., Obergassel, W., Arens, C., Hermwille, L., Mersmann, F., & Wang-Helmreich, H. (2014). Climate policy: Road works and new horizons—An assessment of the UNFCCC process from Lima to Paris and beyond. Environmental Liability, 22(6), 223–238.
Overdevest, C., & Zeitlin, J. (2014). Assembling an experimentalist regime: Transnational governance interactions in the forest sector. Regulation & Governance, 8(1), 22–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01133.x.
Palacková, E. (2017). The race for climate leadership in the era of Trump and multilevel governance. European View, 16(2), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-017-0451-9.
Pattberg, P., & Widerberg, O. (2015). Theorising global environmental governance: Key findings and future questions. Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 43(2), 684–705. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829814561773.
Pattberg, P., & Widerberg, O. (2017). The climate change regime. In H. von Storch (ed.) Oxford research encyclopedia of climate science. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.46. Accessed January 2, 2018.
Pattberg, P., Widerberg, O., Isailovic, M., & Dias Guerra, F. (2014). Mapping and measuring fragmentation in global governance architectures: A framework for analysis (Working Paper No. R-14/34). Amsterdam: IVM Institute for Environmental Studies, VU Amsterdam. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2484513. Accessed February 23, 2016.
Republique Française. (2015). The commitments of the Lima–Paris Action Agenda and the actions announced by Ségolène Royal. Paris: Ministère de L’Ecologie du Développement Durable et de L’Énergie de la République Française. http://www.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/2015-12-11_DP_Agenda_Solutions_Engl.pdf. Accessed February 19, 2017.
Roelfsema, M., Harmsen, M., Olivier, J. J. G., Hof, A. F., & van Vuuren, D. P. (2018). Integrated assessment of international climate mitigation commitments outside the UNFCCC. Global Environmental Change, 48, 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.001.
Sabel, C. F., & Zeitlin, J. (2008). Learning from difference: The new architecture of experimentalist governance in the EU. European Law Journal, 14(3), 271–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2008.00415.x.
Sabel, C. F., & Zeitlin, J. (2012). Experimentalist governance. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of governance (pp. 169–186). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schroeder, H., & Lovell, H. (2012). The role of non-nation-state actors and side events in the international climate negotiations. Climate Policy, 12(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2011.579328.
Sewell, W. H. J. (2005). Logics of history: Social theory and social transformation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Smith, A. (2007). Translating sustainabilities between green niches and socio-technical regimes. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19(4), 427–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320701403334.
Smith, A., & Raven, R. (2012). What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Research Policy, 41(6), 1025–1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012.
Sterk, W., Arens, C., Hermwille, L., Kreibich, N., Mersmann, F., & Wehnert, T. (2013). Warsaw groundhog days. Wuppertal: Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy. http://wupperinst.org/a/wi/a/s/ad/2447/. Accessed April 7, 2018.
Stones, R. (2005). Structuration theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
UNDP. (2017). Argentina goes subnational. NDC Support Programme. http://www.undp.org/content/ndc-support-programme/en/home/presscenter/articles/2017/05/16/argentina-goes-subnational.html. Accessed November 22, 2017
UNFCCC. (2015). Decision 1/CP.20—Lima call for climate action (Document FCCC/CP/2014/10/Add.1). Lima: UNFCCC.
UNFCCC. (2016a). Paris agreement. Bonn: United Nations Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/paris_nov_2015/application/pdf/paris_agreement_english_.pdf. Accessed March 3, 2016
UNFCCC. (2016b). Report of the conference of the parties on its twenty-first session, held in Paris from 30 November to 13 December 2015 (No. FCCC/CP/2015/10/Add.1). Paris: United Nations Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/10a01.pdf. Accessed February 3, 2016.
UNFCCC. (2016c). Climateaction2020.unfccc.int. http://climateaction2020.unfccc.int/. Accessed December 5, 2016.
UNFCCC. (2016d). Aggregate effect of the intended nationally determined contributions: An update (Document FCCC/CP/2016/2). Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. http://unfccc.int/focus/indc_portal/items/9240.php. Accessed February 29, 2016.
UNFCCC. (2017). Assessment of the technical examination processes on mitigation and adaptation (Draft Decision No. FCCC/CP/2017/L.2). Bonn: UNFCCC. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2017/cop23/eng/l02.pdf. Accessed January 19, 2018.
UNFCCC. (2018). NAZCA platform. http://climateaction.unfccc.int/. Accessed January 16, 2018.
United Nations. (1989). Montreal protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer. https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%201522/volume-1522-I-26369-English.pdf. Accessed December 5, 2016.
Urpelainen, J., & Van de Graaf, T. (2017). United States non-cooperation and the Paris agreement. Climate Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1406843.
van Asselt, H. (2016). The role of non-state actors in reviewing ambition, implementation, and compliance under the Paris agreement. Climate Law, 6(1–2), 91–108.
Voß, J.-P., & Simons, A. (2014). Instrument constituencies and the supply side of policy innovation: The social life of emissions trading. Environmental Politics, 23(5), 735–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2014.923625.
Watts, M. (2017). Cities spearhead climate action. Nature Climate Change, 7(8), 537–538. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3358.
Wendt, A. (1987). The agent-structure problem in international relations theory. International Organization, 41(03), 335–370. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830002751X.
Wettestad, J. (1999). Designing effective environmental regimes: The key conditions. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
Widerberg, O., & Pattberg, P. (2015). International cooperative initiatives in global climate governance: Raising the ambition level or delegitimizing the UNFCCC? Global Policy, 6(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12184.
Widerberg, O., & Stripple, J. (2016). The expanding field of cooperative initiatives for decarbonization: A review of five databases: The expanding field of cooperative initiatives for decarbonization. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.396.
Young, O. R. (Ed.). (1997). Global governance: Drawing insights from the environmental experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Zelli, F. (2011). The fragmentation of the global climate governance architecture. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2(2), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.104.