Abbott, K., & Snidal, D. (2006). Nesting, overlap and parallelism: Governance schemes for international production standards. Memo for Alter-Meunier, Princeton Nesting Conference, February 2006. http://www.princeton.edu/~smeunier/Abbott%20Snidal%20memo.pdf. Accessed August 24, 2015.
Alter, K. J., & Meunier, S. (2009). The politics of international regime complexity. Perspectives on Politics,
7(1), 13–24.
Article
Google Scholar
Aye, E. K. (2016). Statement by Ms. Ei Ei Khin Aye, Ambassador/Deputy Permanent Representative of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar to the United Nations in New York at the Ministerial Meeting of the High-Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development.
Bastos Lima, M. G., Braña-Varela, J., Gupta, A., Visseren-Hamakers, I., Huynh, T. B., & Kleymann, H. et al. (2014). Promoting non-carbon benefits in REDD+ actions. WWF-WUR brief n.1.
Bastos Lima, M. G., Visseren-Hamakers, I. J., Braña-Varela, J., & Gupta, A. (2017). A reality check on the landscape approach to REDD+: Lessons from Latin America. Forest Policy and Economics,
78, 10–20.
Article
Google Scholar
Bernstein, S., Gupta, J., Andresen, S., Haas, P. M., Kanie, N., & Kok, M. (2014). Coherent Governance, the UN and the SDGs. Post-2015/UNU-IAS Policy Brief 4.
Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., Van Asselt, H., & Zelli, F. (2009). The fragmentation of global governance architectures: A framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics,
9(4), 14–40.
Article
Google Scholar
Brack, D. (2014). Sustainable Development Goals and forests: A summary of UN Open Working Group debates and country reflections. London: International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED).
Google Scholar
Brown Weiss, E. (1993). International environmental law: Contemporary issues and the emergence of a new world order. Georgetown Law Journal,
81(3), 675–710.
Google Scholar
Colombia. (2014). National development plan 2014-2018/Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2014–2018. Bogotá.
Den Besten, J. W., Arts, B., & Verkooijen, P. (2014). The evolution of REDD+: An analysis of discursive-institutional dynamics. Environmental Science and Policy,
35, 40–48.
Article
Google Scholar
Gehring, T., & Oberthür, S. (2009). The causal mechanisms of interaction between international institutions. European Journal of International Relations,
15(1), 125–156.
Article
Google Scholar
Griggs, D., Stafford Smith, M., Rockström, J., Ohman, M. C., Gaffney, O., Glaser, G., et al. (2014). An integrated framework for Sustainable Development Goals. Ecology and Society,
19(4), 49.
Article
Google Scholar
Gupta, J., Baud, I., Bekkers, R., Bernstein, S., Boas, I., & Cornelissen, V. et al. (2014). Sustainable Development Goals and inclusive development. Post-2015/UNU-IAS Policy Brief 5.
Gupta, A., Lövbrand, E., Turnhout, E., & Vijge, M. (2012). In pursuit of carbon accountability: the politics of REDD+ measuring, reporting and verification systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4(6), 726–731.
Article
Google Scholar
Gupta, A., Pistorius, T., & Vijge, M. (2015). Managing fragmentation in global environmental governance: The REDD+ partnership as bridge organization. International Environmental Agreements. doi:10.1007/s10784-015-9274-9.
Google Scholar
Hajer, M., Nilsson, M., Raworth, K., Bekker, P., Berkhout, F., de Boer, Y., et al. (2015). Beyond cockpitism: Four insights to enhance the transformative potential of the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability,
7, 1651–1660.
Article
Google Scholar
ICSU, ISSC. (2015). Review of the Sustainable Development Goals: The science perspective. Paris: International Council for Science (ICSU).
Google Scholar
Indonesia. (2015). Intended nationally determined contribution. Submitted to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. 24 September, 2015.
Indonesia. (2016). Technical guidelines for action plan for sustainable development: Zero draft. Ministry of National Development Planning (Bappenas).
Ivanova, M. (2013). The contested legacy of Rio+ 20. Global Environmental Politics,
13(4), 1–11.
Article
Google Scholar
Jagger, P., Brockhaus, M., Duchelle, A. E., Gebara, M. F., Lawlor, K., Resosudarmo, I. A. P., et al. (2014). Multi-level policy dialogues, processes, and actions: challenges and opportunities for national REDD+ safeguards measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV). Forests,
5, 2136–2162.
Article
Google Scholar
Kissinger, G., Herold, M., & De Sy, V. (2012). Drivers of deforestation and forest degradation: A synthesis report for REDD+ policymakers. Vancouver Canada: Lexeme Consulting.
Google Scholar
Krasner, S. D. (1982). Structural causes and regime consequences: Regimes as intervening variables. International Organization,
36(2), 185–205.
Article
Google Scholar
Kuik, O., Bastos Lima, M. G., & Gupta, J. (2011). Energy security in a developing world. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change,
2(4), 627–634.
Google Scholar
Lang, V. F., & Lingnau, H. (2015). Defining and measuring poverty and inequality post-2015. Journal of International Development,
27, 399–414.
Article
Google Scholar
Loewe, M. (2012). Post 2015: How to reconcile the millennium development goals (MDGs) and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)? German Development Institute (DIE) Briefing Paper 18/2012.
Lu, Y., Nakisenovic, N., Visbeck, M., & Stevance, A. S. (2015). Five priorities for the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Nature,
520, 432–433.
Article
Google Scholar
Oberthür, S. (2009). Interplay management: Enhancing environmental policy integration among international institutions. International Environmental Agreements,
9, 371–391.
Article
Google Scholar
Oberthür, S., & Gehring, T. (Eds.). (2006). Institutional interaction in global environmental governance: Synergy and conflict among international and EU Policies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Oberthür, S., & Gehring, T. (2011). Institutional interaction: Ten years of scholarly development. In S. Oberthür & O. S. Stokke (Eds.), Managing institutional complexity: Regime interplay and global environmental change (pp. 25–58). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Oberthür, O., & Stokke, O. S. (2011). Conclusions: Decentralized interplay management in an evolving interinstitutional order. In S. Oberthür & O. S. Stokke (Eds.), Managing institutional complexity: Regime interplay and global environmental change (pp. 313–342). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Poku, N. K., & Whitman, J. (2011). The millennium development goals and development after 2015. Third World Quarterly,
32(1), 181–198.
Article
Google Scholar
Raustiala, K., & Victor, D. G. (2004). The regime complex for plant genetic resources. International Organization,
58(2), 277–309.
Article
Google Scholar
Republic of the Union of Myanmar. (2015). Myanmar’s Intended Nationally Determined Contribution (INDC). 25 August 2015.
Royal Norwegian Embassy Jakarta. (2016). Bilateral REDD+ Cooperation. Embassy website, available at: http://www.norway.or.id/Norway_in_Indonesia/Environment/Bilateral-REDD-cooperation/.
Sachs, J. D. (2012). From millennium development goals to Sustainable Development Goals. Lancet,
379, 2206–2211.
Article
Google Scholar
Soria, E. M. (2014). Policy coherence for sustainable development in the post-2015 framework. Paris: OECD.
Google Scholar
Stead, D., & Meijers, E. (2009). Spatial planning and policy integration: Concepts, facilitators and inhibitors. Planning Theory and Practice,
10(3), 317–332.
Article
Google Scholar
UN General Assembly. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York: United Nations General Assembly.
Google Scholar
UN Environment. (2017a). Fiscal incentives for Indonesian Palm Oil Production: Pathways for alignment with green growth.
UN Environment. (2017b). Drivers of deforestation and forest degradation in Myanmar. Forthcoming. UN-REDD Programme and Myanmar Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Conservation.
Underdal, A. (2008). Determining the causal significance of institutions: Accomplishments and challenges. In O. R. Young, L. A. King, & H. Schroeder (Eds.), Institutions and environmental change: Principal findings, applications, and research frontiers (pp. 49–78). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chapter
Google Scholar
UKSSD and Bond. (2016). Progressing national SDGs implementation: Experiences and recommendations from 2016.
UNFCCC. (2010). Report of the conference of the parties on its sixteenth session, held in Cancun from 29 November to 10 December 2010. FCCC/CP/2010/7/Add.1.
UNFCCC. (2015). Draft decision-/CP.21, Methodological issues related to non-carbon benefits resulting from the implementation of the activities referred to in decision 1/CP.16, paragraph 70. FCCC/SBSTA/2015/L.5/Add.3.
UNFCCC. (2015). Report of the conference of the parties on its twenty first session, held in Paris from 30 November to 11 December 2015. FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1.
United Nations. (2016a). Report of the inter-agency and expert group on sustainable development goal indicators (E/CN.3/2016/2/Rev.1), Annex IV.
United Nations. (2016b). Proposal for voluntary common reporting guidelines for Voluntary National Reviews at the HLPF as presented in the annex of the Secretary-General’s report on critical milestones towards coherent, efficient and inclusive follow-up and review at the global level.
UNSD. (2016). Work plans for tier III indicators (as of 11 November 2016) Compiled by UNSD through an online questionnaire sent to international and regional entities responsible for global data compilation. Available at: http://unstats.un.org/sdgs/files/meetings/iaeg-sdgs-meeting-04/Tier%20III%20Work%20Plans%2011.11.2016.pdf.
Vandemoortele, J. (2009). The MDG conundrum: Meeting the targets without missing the point. Development Policy Review,
27(9), 355–371.
Article
Google Scholar
Vijge, M J., & Gupta, A (2014). Framing REDD+ in India: carbonizing and centralizing Indian forest governance? Environmental Science and Policy, 38, 17–27.
Article
Google Scholar
Visseren-Hamakers, I. J. (2013). Partnerships and sustainable development: The lessons learned from international biodiversity governance. Environmental Policy and Governance,
23, 145–160.
Article
Google Scholar
Visseren-Hamakers, I. J. (2015). Integrative environmental governance: Enhancing governance in the era of synergies. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability,
14, 136–143.
Article
Google Scholar
Visseren-Hamakers, I., Gupta, A., Herold, M., Pena Carlos, M., & Vijge, M. (2012b). Will REDD+ Work? The need for interdisciplinary research to address key challenges. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 46, 590–596.
Article
Google Scholar
Visseren-Hamakers, I. J., McDermott, C., Vijge, M., & Cashore, B. (2012a). Trade-offs, co-benefits and safeguards: Current debates on the breadth of REDD+. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability,
4(6), 646–653.
Article
Google Scholar
Weatherley-Singh, J., & Gupta, A. (2015). Drivers of deforestation and REDD+ benefit-sharing: A meta-analysis of the (missing) link. Environmental Science and Policy,
54, 97–105.
Article
Google Scholar
World Bank. (2015). Indonesia economic quarterly: Reforming amid uncertainty. December, 2015.
Young, O. R. (1996). Institutional linkages in international society: Polar perspectives. Global Governance,
2(1), 1–24.
Google Scholar
Young, O. R. (2002). The institutional dimensions of environmental change: Fit, interplay, and scale. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Young, O. R. (2008). Institutions and environmental research. The scientific legacy of a decade of IDGEC research. In O. R. Young, L. A. King, & H. Schroeder (Eds.), Institutions and environmental change: Principal findings, applications, and research frontiers (pp. 3–46). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Young, O. R., Underdal, A., Kanie, N., Andresen, S., Bernstein, S., & Biermann, F. et al. (2014). Earth system challenges and a multi-layered approach for the Sustainable Development Goals. Post-2015/UNU-IAS Policy Brief 1.
Zelli, F., Gupta, A., & Van Asselt, H. (2013). Institutional interactions at the cross-roads of trade and environment: The dominance of liberal environmentalism? Global Governance,
19(1), 105–118.
Google Scholar
Zelli, F., & Van Asselt, H. (2013). Introduction: The institutional fragmentation of global environmental governance: Causes, consequences, and responses. Global Environmental Politics,
13(3), 1–13.
Article
Google Scholar