Skip to main content
Log in

Drought and exceptional laws in Spain: the official water discourse

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Only recently securitization research is exploring which mechanisms are used to securitize the water discourse and how securitization affects decision-making processes. In this context, legal texts convey messages and shape public actions, but have been rarely considered in the analysis of water securitization. Moreover, security is usually meant as the absence of violent conflict, while discourse securitization can exist also where there are only vaguely defined threats to the society. This may be the case of water scarcity associated with drought. This paper undertakes a policy frame analysis of nine exceptional laws passed in Spain during the 2005–2008 drought, to address the following questions: To what extent and how can the water discourse in legal texts be securitized? and What are the consequences of that securitization? The analysis shows that securitization is achieved using both linguistic and institutional mechanisms. Dry spells are presented as exceptional situations and using alarmist terms, even if drought is inherent to Spain’s Mediterranean climate. The sense of urgency is used to fast-track the approval of measures that could be part of ordinary water planning. The securitization of the water discourse contributes to consolidate an existing water paradigm, which, in the case of Spain, is based on State-subsidized, technical and legal measures addressing water scarcity (real or exaggerated). It is an example of a “creeping” securitization of the water discourse, meant as the dramatization of otherwise natural circumstances to spur projects and investments conceived for other purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The donor and recipient areas of the transfer were of opposite political color, and the abrogation or continuation of the transfer was a political flag during the 2004 national elections campaign. The abrogation of the project was the second major act by the newly elected Government, after the withdrawal of Spanish troops from Iraq.

  2. The AGUA Program, approved in 2005, emphasized the construction of desalination plants along the Mediterranean coast to substitute the water that the Ebro transfer would have contributed. The planned desalination capacity amounted to over 700 Mm3/year Today, many of the planned plants are operational, and desalinated water is heavily subsidized to make it affordable to farmers. However, plants are dramatically underused (working only at 20 % capacity for the most part), and farmers still rely on groundwater resources, aggravating the situation of many intensively used aquifers along the coast.

  3. Meteorological drought is defined as precipitation below average for a period of time; hydrological drought refers to the effects of dry spells on surface or subsurface hydrology; agricultural drought refers to a period with declining soil moisture and consequent crop failure; socioeconomic drought is associated with failure of water systems to meet water demands (Wilhite and Glantz 1985; Mishra and Singh 2010).

  4. Surface water reserves are used as the main indicator for characterizing drought. However, reservoir reserves are largely a result of the Water Authorities’ management decisions. For instance, if they (imprudently) decide to release a large volume of water for a given use despite the fact that the dry spell is forecast to continue, their decision could provoke a worsening of the drought.

  5. Referring to the idea of “psychological drought,” Castro and Guijarro (2004) argue that most of the news about water in Spain are negative and alarming, for instance when media report that surface water reserves decrease during summer time. As the authors remark, “this is no news in itself, as in summer, with no rain and a sustained demand, the stored water volume has necessarily to decrease. The contrary would be a miracle and that would be a real news” (Castro and Guijarro 2004, translation from Spanish by the authors).

  6. Works for the cleaning up of the sediments started in 2013, 6 years after the approval of RD-Law 9/2007.

  7. The transfer of surface water was used to bring temporary relief to those wetlands suffering from intense groundwater exploitation in their recharge area.

Abbreviations

DEP:

Drought Emergency Plan for cities of over 20,000 inhabitants

DMP:

Drought Management Plan

EU:

European Union

WFD:

Water Framework Directive

NIP:

National Irrigation Plan

NGO:

Non-governmental Organization

NHP:

National Hydrological Plan

NWC:

New Water Culture

RBD:

River Basin District

RBMP:

River Basin Management Plan

RBOs:

River Basin Organizations

RD:

Royal Decree

RD-Law:

Royal Decree-Law

UGSP:

Upper Guadiana Special Plan

References

  • Adger, W. N., Benjaminsen, T. A., Brown, K., & Svarstad, H. (2001). Advancing a political ecology of global environmental discourses. Development and Change, 32(4), 681–715.

  • Albiac, J., Hanemann, M., Calatrava, J., & Uche, J. (2006). The rise and fall of the ebro water transfer. Natural Resources Journal, 46(3), 727–757.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrojo, P. (2003). Spanish National hydrological plan: Reasons for its failure and arguments for the future. Water International, 28(3), 295–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brufao Curiel, P. (2012). El régimen jurídico de las sequías: Crítica a la regulación extraordinaria y urgente de un fenómeno natural y cíclico propio del clima. Revista de Administración Pública, 187(1), 199–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B., Waever, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro, A., & Guijarro, L. (2004). La sequía en los medios de comunicación. La sequía en España. Directrices para minimizar su impacto. In Comité de Expertos en Sequías; Ministerio de Medio Ambiente (pp. 235–293) Madrid: MMA.

  • De Stefano, L., & Hernández-Mora, N. (2012). Water Planning and management after the EU water framework directive. In L. De Stefano & M. R. Llamas (Eds.). Water, agriculture and the environment in Spain: Can we square the circle? (pp. 35–44). RCR Press:Taylor and Francis.

  • Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the Community action in the field of water policy (EU Water Framework Directive), 2000 Official Journal (L 327) (EC).

  • Downward, S. R., & Taylor, R. (2007). An assessment of Spain’s Programa AGUA and its implications for sustainable water management in the province of Almería, Southeast Spain. Journal of Environmental Management, 82(2), 277–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drought Emergency Plans for cities of over 20,000 inhabitants (Article 27, section 3, Law 10/2001, of 5th July, of National Hydrological Plan).

  • Estrela, T., & Vargas, E. (2012). Drought management plans in the European Union. The case of Spain. Water Resources Management, 26(6), 1537–1553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feitelson, E., Tamimi, A., & Rosenthal, G. (2012). Climate change and security in the Israeli–Palestinian context. Journal of Peace Research, 49(1), 241–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischhendler, I. (2015). The securitization of water discourse: Theoretical foundations and research gaps. (in this volume). doi:10.1007/s10784-015-9277-6.

  • Fischhendler, I., Dinar, S., & Katz, D. (2011). The politics of unilateral environmentalism: Cooperation and conflict over water management along the Israeli–Palestinian Border. Global Environmental Politics, 11(1), 36–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischhendler, I., & Katz, D. (2012). The use of « security » jargon in sustainable development discourse: Evidence from UN Commission on Sustainable Development. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 13(3), 321–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrido, A., & Llamas, M.R (2009). Water Management in Spain: An example of changing paradigms. In Dinar & Albiac (Eds.). Policy and strategic behaviour in water resource management (pp. 125–144). London: Earthscan.

  • Garrido, A.,Rey, D., & Calatrava, J. (2012). Water trading in Spain. In De Stefano, L & Llamas, M.R (Eds.). Water, agriculture and the environment in Spain: Can we square the circle? (pp. 205–216) CRC Press:Taylor and Francis.

  • Goffmann, E. (1974). Frame analysis. An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA, US: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graeger, N. (1996). Environmental security? Journal of Peace Research, 33(1), 109–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Mora, N., del Moral, L., La Roca, F., La Calle, A., & Schmidt, G. (2014). Interbasin water transfers in Spain: Inter-regional Conflicts and Governance Responses. In G. Schneier-Madanes (Ed.), Globalized water. A question of governance (pp. 175–196). Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Instituto Nacional de Estadística -INE (2013). Cifras de Población y Censos Demográficos. http://www.ine.es/jaxi/menu.do?type=pcaxis&path=%2Ft20%2Fp321&file=inebase&L=0. Accessed 15 September 2013.

  • Katz, D. (2011). Hydro-political hyperbole: Examining incentives for overemphasizing the risks of water wars. Global Environmental Politics, 11(1), 12–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law 29/1985, of August 2nd, of Water (Water Act) (In force till July 25th 2001).

  • Law 10/2001, of July 5th, of National Hydrological Plan.

  • Law 11/2005, of June 22nd, for the modification of the Law 10/2001 of July 5th, of National Hydrological Plan.

  • Llamas, R. (1997). Consideraciones sobre la sequía de 1991 a 1995 en España. Ingeniería del Agua. 4(1), 39–50.

  • López-Gunn, E. (2009). Agua para todos: A new regionalist hydraulic paradigm in Spain. Water Alternatives, 2(3), 370–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Gunn, E., & De Stefano, L. (2014). Between a rock and a hard place: Re-defining water security, decentralisation and the elusive ‘Water Pact’ in Spain. In D. E. Garrick, G.R.M. Anderson, D. Connell, J. Pittock (Eds.). Federal Rivers. Managing Water in Multi-Layered Political Systems. (pp. 158–176). Northampton: Eduard Elgar.

  • Ludwig, R., Roson, R., Zografos, C., & Kallis, G. (2011). Towards an inter-disciplinary research agenda on climate change, water and security in Southern Europe and neighbouring countries. Environmental Science & Policy, 14(7), 794–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Santos, P., De Stefano, L., Llamas, M. R., & Martínez-Alfaro, P. E. (2008). Wetland Restoration in the Mancha Occidental aquifer, Spain: A critical perspective on water, agricultural, and environmental policies. Restoration Ecology, 16(3), 511–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Medio Rural y Marino-MMA (2008). Gestión de la sequía de los años 2004 a 2007. Estrela, T y Rodriguez Fontal, A (coord.). Madrid.

  • Mishra, A. K., & Singh, V. P. (2010). A review of drought concepts. Journal of Hydrology, 391(1–2), 202–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Order MAM/698/2007, of March 21st, for the approval of Special Drought Management Plans for the territory of the inter-regional river basins.

  • Risbey, J. S. (2008). The new climate discourse: Alarmist or alarming? Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 26–37.

  • Royal Decree 1265/2005, of October 21st, through which exceptional administrative measures are adopted for the management of hydraulic resources and to correct the effect of drought in the Jucar, Segura and Tagus river basins (Law II).

  • Royal Decree 1419/2005, of December 17th, through which exceptional administrative measures are adopted for the management of hydraulic resources management and for correcting the effects of drought in the Guadiana, Guadalquivir and Ebro river basins (Law IV).

  • Royal Decree 329/2002, of April 5th, for the approval of the National Irrigation Plan.

  • Royal Decree 287/2006, of March 10th, through which urgent works of improvement and consolidation of irrigation are regulated, in order to obtain an adequate water saving that palliates the damages provoked by drought (Law V).

  • Royal Decree 13/2008, of January 11th, for the approval of the Upper Guadiana Special Plan.

  • Royal Decree-Law 10/2005, of June 20th, through which urgent measures are adopted to palliate damages produced in the agricultural sector by drought and other climatic adversities (Law I).

  • Royal Decree-Law 15/2005, of December 16th, urgent measures for the regulation of transactions of water use rights (Law III).

  • Royal Decree-Law 9/2006, of September 15th, through which urgent measures are adopted to palliate the effects produced by drought in urban settlements and in irrigated farms in specific river basins (Law VI).

  • Royal Decree-Law 9/2007, of October 5th, through which urgent measures are adopted to palliate the effects produced by drought in specific river basins (Law VII).

  • Royal Decree-Law 8/2008, of October 24th, through which urgent measures are adopted to palliate the effects produced by drought in specific river basins (Law VIII).

  • Royal Decree-Law 14/2009, of December 4th, through which urgent measures are adopted to palliate the effects produced by drought in specific river basins (Law IX).

  • Saurí, D., & del Moral, L. (2001). Recent developments in Spanish water policy. Alternatives and conflicts at the end of the hydraulic age. Geoforum, 32(3), 351–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, C. (1985). Political theology: Four chapters on the concept of sovereignty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnett, J. (2010). Climates of risk: A field analysis of global climate change in US media discourse, 1997–2004. Public Understanding of Science, 19(6), 698–716.

  • Sonnett, J., Morehouse, B. J., Finger, T. D., Garfin, G., & Rattray, N. (2006). Drought and declining reservoirs: Comparing media discourse in Arizona and New Mexico, 2002–2004. Global Environmental Change, 16(1), 95–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soto, D. X., Roig, R., Gacia, E., & Catalan, J. (2011). Differential accumulation of mercury and other trace metals in the food web components of a reservoir impacted by a chlor-alkali plant (Flix, Ebro River, Spain): Implications for biomonitoring. Environmental Pollution, 159(6), 1481–1489.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stetter, S., Herschinger, E., Teichler, T., & Albert, M. (2011). Conflicts about water: Securitizations in a global context. Cooperation and Conflict, 46(4), 441–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. (1999). Modernity and hybridity: Nature, regeneracionismo, and the production of the Spanish waterscape. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 89(3), 443–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. (2007). Technonatural revolutions: The scalar politics of Franco’s hydro-social dream for Spain, 1939–1975. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(1), 9–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tàbara, J. D., & Ilhan, A. (2008). Culture as trigger for sustainability transition in the water domain: The case of the Spanish water policy and the Ebro river basin. Regional Environmental Change, 8(2), 59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verloo, M. (2005). Mainstreaming gender equality in Europe. A critical frame analysis. The greek review of social research, 117(B):11–34.

  • Vicente-Serrano, S. M., & Cuadrat, J. M. (2007). North Atlantic oscillation control of droughts in north-east Spain: Evaluation since 1600 a.d. Climatic change, 85(3–4), 357–379.

  • Warner, J. F., & Zeitoun, M. (2008). International relations theory and water do mix: A response to Furlong’s troubled waters, hydro-hegemony and international water relations. Political Geography, 27(7), 802–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhite, D. A., & Glantz, M. H. (1985). Understanding: The Drought Phenomenon—The role of definitions. Water International, 10(3), 111–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. C. (2003). Words, images, enemies: Securitization and international politics. International Studies Quarterly, 47(4), 511–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Maria Bustelo, Ana M. Pérez Camporeale, and Carolina Garcés for their methodological advice; Mario Ballesteros and Mario Valle for their help with the graphic material; Jill Simon for her linguistic edits; and Itziar González Tánago for her useful comments. The manuscript benefited from valuable comments of two anonymous reviewers and the journal editor. The study was undertaken in the framework of the EU-funded project “Fostering European Drought Research and Science-Policy Interfacing” (DROUGHT R&SPI).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucia De Stefano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Urquijo, J., De Stefano, L. & La Calle, A. Drought and exceptional laws in Spain: the official water discourse. Int Environ Agreements 15, 273–292 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-015-9275-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-015-9275-8

Keywords

Navigation