Abstract
In the introductory article it was concluded that the effectiveness of the UN environmental institutions studied was quite low. Key actors, especially the US and the EU, play a considerable role in explaining the course of development in these institutions. However, this does not mean that these processes are mainly state-driven as a number of other factors matter. The potential for reform and increased effectiveness is limited as the main actors, the US the EU and G-77/China have very different interests and perceptions as to the future directions of these institutions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Interview with Gro Harlem Brundtland on Norwegian television, April 2007.
Chasek (this issue), includes a quote of Ambassador Sichan Siv from a 2005 speech before the 60th session of the UN General Assembly.
Abbreviations
- CSD:
-
Commission for sustainable development
- EMG:
-
Environmental management group
- GMEF:
-
Global ministerial environment forum
- JUSCANZ:
-
Japan, US, Canada, New Zealand (Other states have later become affiliated)
- MEAs:
-
Multilateral environmental agreements
- ODA:
-
Official development assistance
- SEPA:
-
State environmental protection administration
- UNCED:
-
United nations convention on environment and development
- UNFCC:
-
United nations framework commission on climate change
- UNEO:
-
United nations environmental organization
- UNEP:
-
United nations environment programme
- WCSD:
-
World commission on sustainable development
- WEO:
-
World environment organization
- WSSD:
-
World summit on sustainable development
References
Andresen, S., & Rosendal, K. (forthcoming). The role of the United Nations environmental programme in the co-ordination of multilateral environmental agreements. In F. Biermann, B. Siebenhuener, & A. Schreyogg (Eds.), International organisations in global environmental governance (pp. 119–136). Oxford: Routledge.
Brenton, T. (1994). The greening of Machiavelli: The evolution of international environmental politics. London: RIIA/Eartscan.
Chasek, P. (2007). US policy in the UN environmental arena: Powerful laggard or constructive leader? (This issue).
Earth Negotiations Bulletin (ENB) (2007). Summary of the 24th session of the UNEP Governing Council/Global Ministerial Forum. ENB 16(60), 12 February.
Earth Negotiation Bulletin (ENB) (2007). Fifteenth session of the commission on sustainable development––summary and analysis, ENB 5(254), 2.
Heggelund, G., & Bruzelius E. B. (2007). China and UN environmental policy: Institutional growth, learning and implementation. (This issue).
Heggelund, G., Andesen, S., & Ying, S. (2005). Performance of the Global Environmental Facility in China: Achievements and challenges as seen by the Chinese. Special issue on international agreements, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 5(3), 323–348.
Hovi, J., Skodvin, T., & Andresen, S. (2003). The persistence of the Kyoto Protocol: Why other Annex 1 countries move on without the United States. Global Environmental Politics, 3(4), 1–24.
Ivanova, M. (2007). Designing the United Nations Environment Program: A story of compromise and confrontation. (This issue).
Ivanova, M. (2005). Can the anchor hold? Rethinking the United Nations environment programme for the 21st century. New Haven, CT: Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies.
Kaasa, S. (2007). The UN Commission on Sustainable Development: Which mechanisms explain its accomplishments? Global Environmental Politics, 5(3) (forthcoming).
Lightfoot, S., & Burchell, J. (2004). Green hope or greenwash? The actions of the European Union at the world summit on sustainable development. Global Environmental Change, 14(4), 227–244.
Najam, A. (2005). Developing countries and global environmental governance: From contestation to participation to engagement. Special issue on international agreements, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 5(3), 303–321.
Najam, A., Papa, M., & Taiyab, N. (2006). Global environmental governance: A reform agenda. (IISD––International Institute for Sustainable Development).
Rosendal, K. (2007). Norway in UN environmental policies: Ambitions and influence. (This issue).
Skodvin T., & Andresen, S. (2006). Leadership revisited. Global Environmental Politics. Special Issue: The Negotiations and Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements, 6(3), 13–28.
Vogler, J., & Hannes, S. (2007). The European Union in global environmental governance: Leadership in the making? (This issue).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Andresen, S. Key actors in UN environmental governance: influence, reform and leadership. Int Environ Agreements 7, 457–468 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-007-9049-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-007-9049-z