Skip to main content

The Environmental State and Environmental Governance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Environment and Society

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Environmental Sociology and Policy ((PASTESP))

Abstract

Since the late nineteenth century, the nation-state has played a major role in protecting the natural environment. This resulted in the proliferation of specialized state environmental organizations, institutions and practices. For decades this state centrality in environmental protection was judged favourably. However, since the framing of ‘state failure’ in the 1980s and accelerated processes of globalization in the 1990s the environmental state is contested, resulting in the foregrounding of other actors, institutions and authorities in environmental protection. This contribution assesses these debates and developments with respect to the concept of environmental state in OECD countries. It concludes that within today’s polycentric landscape of environmental governance, it is still a useful concept but it has lost its monopoly position and conventional meaning that prevailed earlier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The development and form of the environmental state in OECD countries show a large degree of homogeneity, although also within this category differences exist. Some of the arguments and findings on the environmental state in OECD countries have wider relevance beyond the OECD region; but the literature on for instance Asian states (Gilley 2014) and African states (Death 2016) clearly mark particularities of (environmental) states in these geo-political regions that would need a more detailed and specific analysis.

  2. 2.

    I draw here on earlier work (Mol 2016).

  3. 3.

    http://epi.yale.edu/.

  4. 4.

    On environmental expertise , see Lidskog and Sundqvist this volume.

References

  • Ahuis, C. (2004). Die Umweltpolitik in Deutschland nach 1945. Norderstedt: GRIN Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfred, R. (2012). Governing Transport from Welfare State to Hollow State: The Case of Cycling in the UK. Transport Policy, 23, 95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2005). Power in the Global Age. A New Global Political Economy. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beisheim, M., & Liese, A. (2014). Transnational Partnerships. Effectively Providing for Sustainable Development? Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bijker, W. E., Bal, R., & Hendriks, R. (2009). The Paradox of Scientific Authority. The Role of Scientific Advice in Democracies. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, M. (2002). Umweltpolitischen Basisinnovationen im Industrieländervergleich. Ein grafisch-statistischer Überblick. FFU-Report 02-06. Berlin: Environmental Policy Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blowers, A. (1998). Power, Participation and Partnerships. In P. Glasbergen (Ed.), Co-Operative Environmental Govenance: Public-Private Agreements as Policy Strategy (pp. 229–249). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bridge, G., & Perreault, T. (2009). Environmental Governance. In N. Castree et al. (Eds.), A Companion to Environmental Geography (pp. 475–497). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Busch, P.-O., Jörgens, H., & Tews, K. (2005). The Global Diffusion of Regulatory Instruments: The Making of a New International Environmental Regime. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598, 146–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, S. R., Oosterveer, P., Bailey, M., & Mol, A. P. J. (2015). Sustainability Governance of Chains and Networks: A Review and Future Outlook. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 8–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2009). Communication Power. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castree, N. (2008). Neo-liberalising Nature 2: Processes, Outcomes and Effects. Environment and Planning A, 40, 153–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, U. (Ed.). (1997). Deregulation in the European Union. Environmental Perspectives. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Sustainable Development. (2006). Partnerships for Sustainable Development. Report to the Secretary-General. New York: UN Economic and Social Council (report E/CN.17/2006/6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Conca, K. (2005). Old States in New Bottles? The Hybridization of Authority in Global Environmental Governance. In J. Barry & R. Eckersley (Eds.), The State and the Global Ecological Crisis (pp. 181–205). Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, A. C. (1999). Locating ‘Authority’ in the Global Political Economy. International Studies Quarterly, 43, 59–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, A. C., Haufler, V., & Porter, T. (Eds.). (1999). Private Authority and International Affairs. New York: New York State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, A. R. (2002). Power, Politics and Networks: Shaping Partnerships for Sustainable Communities. Area, 34(2), 190–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Death, C. (2016). The Green State in Africa. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J. S. (1987). Rational Ecology: Environment and Political Economy. Oxford and New York: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duit, A. (2016). The Four Faces of the Environmental State: Environmental Governance Regimes in 28 Countries. Environmental Politics, 15(1), 69–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckersley, R. (2004). The Green State: Rethinking Democracy and Sovereignty. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilley, B. (2014). The Nature of Asian Politics. Cambridge: CUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glasbergen, P., Biermann, F., & Mol, A. P. J. (Eds.). (2007). Partnerships, Governance and Sustainable Development. Reflections on Theory and Practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guess, R. (2001). History and Illusion in Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. B., & Biersteker, T. J. (Eds.). (2002). The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, S. P. (1987). Beauty, Health, and Permanence: Environmental Politics in the United States, 1955–1985. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Helm, D. (2010). Government Failure, Rent-Seeking, and Capture: The Design of Climate Change Policy. Oxf Rev Econ Policy, 26(2), 182–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbst, S. (2003). Political Authority in a Mediated Age. Theory and Society, 32, 481–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillstrom, K., & Hillstrom, L. (2010). U.S. Environmental Policy and Politics: A Documentary History. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, K., & Volkery, A. (2006). Modelling Capacities for Environmental Policy-Making in Global Environmental Politics. In M. Jänicke & K. Jacob (Eds.), Environmental Governance in Global Perspective. New Approaches to Ecological and Political Modernisation (pp. 67–94). Berlin: Freie Universität (FFU report 01-2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jänicke, M. (1986). Staatsversagen. Die Ohnmacht der Politik in die Industriegesellschaft. Piper: München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jänicke, M. (1993). Über ökologische und politische Modernisierungen. Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik und Umweltrecht, 2, 159–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A., & Schout, A. (2006). The Coordination of the European Union: Exploring the Capacities of Networked Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A., Bauer, M. W., & Green-Pedersen, C. (2013). Policy Dismantling. Journal of European Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.771092

  • van Kersbergen, K., & van Waarden, F. (2004). Governance as a Bridge Between Disciplines: Cross-Disciplinary Inspiration Regarding Shifts in Governance and Problems of Governability, Accountability and Legitimacy. European Journal of Political Research, 43, 143–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knill, C., Tosun, J., & Bauer, M. W. (2009). Neglected Faces of Europeanization. Public Administration, 87(3), 519–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as Governance. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft, M. E., & Vig, N. J. (2010). Environmental Policy Over Four Decades. Achievements and New Directions. In N. J. Vig & M. E. Kraft (Eds.), Environmental Policy. New Directions for the Twenty-First Century (7th ed., pp. 1–26). Washington, DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, F., & Gereffi, G. (2010). Regulation and Economic Globalization: Prospects and Limits of Private Governance. Business and Politics, 12(3.): article 11). https://doi.org/10.2202/1469-3569.1325.

  • McCormick, J. (1991). British Politics and the Environment. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadowcroft, J. (2007). Democracy and Accountability: The Challenge for Cross-Sectoral Partnerships. In P. Glasbergen, F. Biermann, & A. P. J. Mol (Eds.), Partnerships, Governance and Sustainable Development. Reflections on Theory and Practice (pp. 194–213). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, D., Christensen, L., & Buxton, M. (2007). Squandering the Future—Climate Change, Policy Failure and the Water Crisis in Australia. Futures, 39(2–3), 272–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mert, A. (2012). Partnerships and the Privatisation of Environmental Governance: On Myths, Forces of Nature and Other Inevitabilities. Environmental Values, 21(4), 475–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. P. J. (2002). Political Modernisation and Environmental Governance: Between Delinking and Linking, Europæa. Journal of the Europeanists, 8(1–2), 169–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. P. J. (2007). Bringing the Environmental State Back In: Partnerships in Perspective. In P. Glasbergen, F. Biermann, & A. P. J. Mol (Eds.), Partnerships, Governance and Sustainable Development. Reflections on Theory and Practice (pp. 214–236). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. P. J. (2009). Environmental Deinstitutionalization in Russia. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 11(3), 223–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. P. J. (2016). The Environmental Nation-State in Decline. Environmental Politics, 25(1), 48–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. P. J., & Buttel, F. H. (Eds.). (2002). The Environmental State Under Pressure. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • NEWGOV. (2004). Integrated Project “New Modes of Governance”—Description of Work. Florence: European University Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2005). Governing Complex Societies: Trajectories and Scenarios. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Poncelet, E. C. (2001). “A Kiss Here and a Kiss There”: Conflict and Collaboration in Environmental Partnerships. Environmental Managament, 27(1), 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronit, K. (2001). Institutions of Private Authority in Global Governance. Linking Territorial Forms of Self Regulation. Administration & Society, 33(5), 555–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, W. A. (2000). Escaping the ‘Battered Agency Syndrome’: EPA’s Gamble with Regulatory Reinvention. In N. J. Vig & M. E. Kraft (Eds.), Environmental Policy (4th ed., pp. 165–189). Washington, DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. G. (1982). International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order. International Organization, 36(2), 379–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (2006). Territory-Authority-Rights. From Medieval to Global Assemblages. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, G. (2005). Stateless’ Regulation and Consumer Pressure: Historical Experiences of Transnational Corporate Monitoring. In F. H. Buttel & P. McMichael (Eds.), New Directions in the Sociology of Global Development (pp. 175–207). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerer, T., & Lim, S. (2016). The Environmental State as a Model for the World? An Analysis of Policy Repertoires in 37 Countries. Environmental Politics, 25(1), 92–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spaargaren, G., & Mol, A. P. J. (2008). Greening Global Consumption: Redefining Politics and Authority. Global Environmental Change, 18(3), 350–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spaargaren, G., Mol, A. P. J., & Buttel, F. H. (Eds.). (2006). Governing Environmental Flows. Global Challenges for Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, P. F., & VanDeveer, S. D. (Eds.). (2012). Comparative Environmental Politics. Theory, Practice, and Prospects. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streck, C. (2002). Global Public Policy Networks as Coalitions for Change. In D. Esty & M. Ivanova (Eds.), Global Environmental Governanc; Options and Opportunities. New Haven, CT: Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treib, O., Bähr, H., & Falkner, G. (2007). Modes of Governance: Towards a Conceptual Clarification. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP. (2012). Global Environmental Outlook 5. Nairobi: UNEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Tatenhove, J., Arts, B., & Leroy, P. (Eds.). (2000). Political Modernisation and the Environment. The Renewal of Environmental Policy Arrangements. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1947 [1915]). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Oxford University Press (Translated first part of Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidner, H., & Jänicke, M. (Eds.). (2002). Capacity Building in National Environmental Policy: A Comparative Study of 17 Countries. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, L., Mol, A. P. J., & Fu, T. (2008). Public-Private Partnerships in China’s Urban Water Sector. Environmental Management, 41, 863–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arthur P. J. Mol .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mol, A.P.J. (2018). The Environmental State and Environmental Governance. In: Boström, M., Davidson, D. (eds) Environment and Society. Palgrave Studies in Environmental Sociology and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76415-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76415-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76414-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76415-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics